throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`520.50520X00
`
`Applicants: HARAYAMA et al
`
`Serial No.:
`
`12/699,117
`
`Filed:
`
`February 3, 2010
`
`For:
`
`Liquid Crystal Display Device
`
`Art Unit:
`
`2692
`
`Examiner:
`
`P. McLoone
`
`Conf. No.:
`
`5302
`
`AMENDMENT AFTER FINAL REJECTION FOR CONSIDERATION
`UNDER THE AFTER FINAL PILOT PROGRAM 2.0
`
`Mail Stop: Amendment
`Commissioner For Patents
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria! VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`February 5, 2014
`
`The following amendments and remarks are respectfully submitted in
`
`connection with the above-identified application in accordance with AFCP 2.0, in
`
`response to the Office Action dated November 5, 2013. The amendments are as
`
`listed below.
`
`Amendments to the Claims; and
`
`Remarks are included following the amendments
`
`

`

`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application:
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`1. (currently amended) A liquid crystal display device comprising a liquid
`
`crystal display panel to which an image signal is input, and a backlight provided on
`
`one side of the liquid crystal display panel, using a light emitting diode as a light
`
`source of the backlight,
`
`wherein before the backlight and the liguid crystal display panel are
`
`assembled to form the liguid crystal display device, the backlight is assigned one
`
`rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white tolerance of
`
`the light source , and the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion of
`
`the backlight, and
`
`the liquid crystal display device further comprises an image quality processing
`
`circuit to which the assigned rank of the backlight can be input in order to correct
`
`gamma characteristics of the image signal according to the assigned rank.
`
`2. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the backlight includes at least a light guide panel provided to face the
`
`liquid crystal display panel, and a plurality of light emitting diodes arranged in parallel
`
`on a flexible circuit substrate so that the plurality of light emitting diodes face at least
`
`one side of a side wall surface of the light guide panel, and
`
`the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`

`

`3. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the light guide panel, the light emitting diodes, and the flexible circuit
`
`substrate are mounted in a frame,
`
`the frame includes a control circuit substrate for driving the light emitting
`
`diodes through the flexible circuit substrate, which is provided on a surface of the
`
`frame opposite to a surface on which the light guide panel, the light emitting diodes,
`
`and the flexible circuit substrate are mounted,
`
`an end of the flexible circuit substrate is electrically coupled to the control
`
`circuit substrate through a connector, and
`
`the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion adjacent to the
`
`connector of the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`4. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated by means of a dummy
`
`resistance attached to the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`5. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated by means of a bar
`
`code printed on the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`

`

`6. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is displayed at least on one of a
`
`front surface and a back surface of the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`7. (currently amended) A liquid crystal display device comprising a liquid
`
`crystal display panel to which an image signal is input, and a backlight provided on
`
`one side of the liquid crystal display panel, using a light emitting diode as a light
`
`source of the backlight,
`
`wherein before the backlight and the liquid crystal display panel are
`
`assembled to form the liguid cgystal display device, the backlight is assigned one
`
`rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white tolerance of
`
`the light source, and the assigned rank of the backlight is stored in a memory device
`
`in a portion of the backlight, and
`
`the liquid crystal display device further comprises an image quality processing
`
`circuit to which the assigned rank of the backlight stored in the memory device can
`
`be input in order to correct gamma characteristics of the image signal according to
`
`the assigned rank.
`
`8. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 7,
`
`wherein the backlight includes at least a light guide panel provided to face the
`
`liquid crystal display panel, a plurality of light emitting diodes provided to face a side
`
`wall surface of the light guide panel, and a flexible circuit substrate on which the
`
`plurality of light emitting diodes are mounted, and
`
`the memory device is mounted on the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`

`

`9. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the memory device is electrically coupled to the image quality
`
`processing circuit, so that the assigned rank of the backlight stored in the memory
`
`device can be output to the image quality processing circuit.
`
`10. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 1,
`
`wherein the backlight includes a plurality of light emitting diodes dispersed on
`
`a surface facing the liquid crystal display panel.
`
`11. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 7,
`
`wherein the backlight includes a plurality of light emitting diodes dispersed on
`
`a surface facing the liquid crystal display panel.
`
`

`

`REMARKS
`
`By the above amendment under AFCP2.0, independent claims 1 and 7 have
`
`been amended to clarify the features of the present invention that the backlight is
`
`assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white
`
`tolerance of the light source "before the backlight and the liquid crystal display panel
`
`are assembled to form the liquid crystal display device". Thus, submitted with the
`
`amendment is the required certification under AFCP2.0 that at least one independent
`
`claim has been amended in a manner which does not broaden the scope of the
`
`claim. As to the basis for the amendment of independent claims 1 and 7, reference
`
`is made to the paragraph bridging pages 13 and 14 of the specification, which
`
`provides that "the occurrence of the white tolerance is inevitable in each mass—
`
`produced backlight BL before a liquid cmstal display panel is assembled into a
`
`module Mia. mass produced backlight BL, the rank of the white tolerance gm
`
`backlight BL is defined..." (emphasis added). Accordingly, applicants submit that the
`
`application papers, as originally filed, provides support for the now recited features of
`
`independent claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent claims.
`
`As to the rejection of claims 1, 7 and 9 - 11 under 35 USC 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of Morimoto et al (US
`
`2008/0245949 A1, hereafter Morimoto); the rejection of claims 2, 3, 6 and 8 under 35
`
`USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of
`
`Morimoto et al (US 2008/0245949 A1, hereinafter Morimoto) and further in view of
`
`Bulovic et al (US 2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic); the rejection of claim 4 under
`
`35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of
`
`Morimoto (US 2008/0245949 A1, hereafter "Morimoto") and further in view of Bulovic
`
`et al (US 2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic) and Liu et al (US 2010/0033109 A1,
`
`

`

`hereafter Liu); and the rejection of claim 5 under 35 USC 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of Morimoto et al (US
`
`2008/0245949 A1, hereafter Morimoto) and further in view of Bulovic et al (US
`
`2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic) and Tseng (US 2008/0307200 A1); such
`
`rejections are traversed insofar as they are applicable to the present claims, as
`
`amended, and reconsideration and withdrawal of the rejections are respectfully
`
`requested.
`
`Turning first to Myers, applicants submit that the Examiner has
`
`mischaracterized the disclosure of Myers in relation to the claimed invention, while
`
`recognizing at page 3 of the Office Action that "Myers does not teach the liquid
`
`crystal display device where a light emitting diode is used as a light source of the
`
`backlight and wherein information about the white tolerance of the light source using
`
`the Ii ht emittin diode is indicated in a portion of the backli ht" (emphasis added).
`
`
`
`As noted above, by the present amendment, independent claims 1 and 7 have been
`
`amended to recite the feature of "wherein before the backlight and the liguid crystal
`
`display panel are assembled to form the liquid crystal display device, the backlight is
`
`assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white
`
`tolerance of the light source and the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a
`
`portion of the backligh " (emphasis added), which is a critical feature of the present
`
`invention, as described. That is, while the Examiner refers to Fig. 2 and paragraph
`
`[0022] of Myers, it is apparent that the monitor 20 includes a display panel 24 with a
`
`backlight assembled therewith. That is, as described in paragraph [0018] of Myers,
`
`the method of Fig. 2 by which the panel data 28 is collected and stored in the
`
`monitor storage 30 is "performed at the factory before the monitor 20 is shipped to a
`
`customer or at other times" (emphasis added), wherein the monitor 20 includes the
`
`

`

`display panel 24 assembled with the backlight, as is apparent from TABLE 1 and
`
`paragraphs [0013], [0023], for example. While paragraph [0022] of Myers discloses
`
`how to calculate to generate the extended EDlD (Enhanced Display Information
`
`Data) corresponding to step 110 of Fig. 2, such data is panel data based upon an
`
`assembled display panel and backlight of the monitor 20, as described with the panel
`
`data being stored in a storage 30, which is not part of the backlight. Thus, applicants
`
`submit that Myers fails to disclose or teach the recited features of independent
`
`claims 1 and 7, as amended, and in fact, applicants submit that Myers teaches away
`
`from such recited features, such that claims 1 and 7 and the dependent claims,
`
`should be considered allowable thereover.
`
`The Examiner recognizing some deficiencies in Myers, although not the
`
`deficiencies as pointed out above, contends that Figs. 3 and 4 and paragraphs
`
`[0093] - [0095] of Morimoto disclose there are LEDs R, G and B and where there is a
`
`memory 51e on substrate on the backside of the substrate with the LEDs that
`
`possesses reference information for corrective values, and that it would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to adapt the
`
`backlight of Myers which already addresses separate R, G. B light sources (Myers
`
`[0019]) to use light emitting diodes as a standard choice as suggested by Morimoto.
`
`Additionally, the Examiner contends that the placement of storage of corrective
`
`information relating to the backlight on the structure integral to the backlight enables
`
`easy manufacture and factory calibration of backlight units, as well as future easy
`
`retrieval and updating of the factory default information.
`
`Irrespective of the contentions by the Examiner, applicants note that as
`
`illustrated in Fig. 9 of Morimoto, a color sensor 31a is mounted on the substrate of
`
`the backlight 3, and color sensor information is obtained when the backlight 3 is
`
`

`

`assembled with the display panel 2. More particularly, as described in paragraphs
`
`[0124] — [0125], according to the arrangement shown in Fig. 9, "the color sensor 31a
`
`include a light-shielding section 31i for preventing the light emitted from the LED 31b
`
`from being directly incident on the color sensor 31a.
`
`[0125] According to this
`
`arrangement, the light emitted from the LED 31b falls indirectly on the color sensor
`
`33 e.g., for example, by the liguid crystal unit 2, especially a diffusion plate 2a
`
`provided in the liquid crystal unit 2, falls on the color sensor 31a it becomes possible
`
`to detect light similar to light absorbed via the liguid crystal unit 2." (emphasis
`
`added). Thus, as described in Morimoto, while the color sensor 31a is mounted on
`
`the backlight substrate to detect respective light intensities of red, green and blue
`
`components of average light that illuminates the area, as described in the paragraph
`
`[0087], paragraph {0094] discloses that the reference light intensity data stored in the
`
`reference light intensity data memory 51e is data which indicates reference value for
`
`the respective light intensities of red, green, blue LED which indicates that the Egg
`
`intensity of LEDs are measured by the color sensor 31a after the backlight is
`
`assembled with the display panel, as illustrated in ELg__9_ for example. As such,
`
`applicants submit that Morimoto, like Myers, fails to provide a disclosure or teaching
`
`of " efore the backlight and the liguid crystal panel are assembled to form the liquid
`
`crystal display device, the backlight is assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in
`
`accordance with information about white tolerance of the light source and me
`
`assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion of the backlight" (emphasis
`
`added) as now recited in independent claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent
`
`claims.
`
`

`

`Thus, applicants submit that neither Myers nor Morimoto, taken alone, or in
`
`any combination, provide the recited features of independent claims 1 and 7 and the
`
`dependent claims, and all claims should be considered allowable thereover.
`
`As to the further combination of Myers and Morimoto with Bulovic, Liu and/or
`
`Tseng, irrespective of the disclosures of Bulovic, Liu and Tseng, such additionally
`
`cited references fail to overcome the deficiencies of the combination of Myers and
`
`Morimoto, as pointed out above. Thus, applicants submit that this additional cited art
`
`which is directed to features of the dependent claims, represent hindsight
`
`reconstruction attempts which fail to provide the recited features of independent
`
`claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent claims. Accordingly, applicants submit
`
`that all claims recite features which patentably distinguish over any of the above
`
`cited art, taken alone, or in any combination, and all claims should be considered
`
`allowable thereover.
`
`In view of the above amendments and remarks, applicants submit that all
`
`claims present in this application recite features which patentably distinguish over
`
`the cited art and all claims should be considered allowable thereover. Accordingly,
`
`issuance of an action of favorable nature is courteously solicited.
`
`To the extent necessary, applicants petition for an extension of time under 37
`
`CFR 1.136. Please charge any shortage in the fees due in connection with the filing
`
`10
`
`

`

`of this paper, including extension of time fees, to the deposit account of Antonelli,
`
`Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Deposit Account No. 01-2135 (Case: 520.50520XOO),
`
`and please credit any excess fees to such deposit account.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP
`
`IMelvin Kraus/ ME
`
`Melvin Kraus
`
`Registration No. 22,466
`
`MK/jla
`(703) 312—6600
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket