`
`520.50520X00
`
`Applicants: HARAYAMA et al
`
`Serial No.:
`
`12/699,117
`
`Filed:
`
`February 3, 2010
`
`For:
`
`Liquid Crystal Display Device
`
`Art Unit:
`
`2692
`
`Examiner:
`
`P. McLoone
`
`Conf. No.:
`
`5302
`
`AMENDMENT AFTER FINAL REJECTION FOR CONSIDERATION
`UNDER THE AFTER FINAL PILOT PROGRAM 2.0
`
`Mail Stop: Amendment
`Commissioner For Patents
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria! VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`February 5, 2014
`
`The following amendments and remarks are respectfully submitted in
`
`connection with the above-identified application in accordance with AFCP 2.0, in
`
`response to the Office Action dated November 5, 2013. The amendments are as
`
`listed below.
`
`Amendments to the Claims; and
`
`Remarks are included following the amendments
`
`
`
`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application:
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`1. (currently amended) A liquid crystal display device comprising a liquid
`
`crystal display panel to which an image signal is input, and a backlight provided on
`
`one side of the liquid crystal display panel, using a light emitting diode as a light
`
`source of the backlight,
`
`wherein before the backlight and the liguid crystal display panel are
`
`assembled to form the liguid crystal display device, the backlight is assigned one
`
`rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white tolerance of
`
`the light source , and the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion of
`
`the backlight, and
`
`the liquid crystal display device further comprises an image quality processing
`
`circuit to which the assigned rank of the backlight can be input in order to correct
`
`gamma characteristics of the image signal according to the assigned rank.
`
`2. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the backlight includes at least a light guide panel provided to face the
`
`liquid crystal display panel, and a plurality of light emitting diodes arranged in parallel
`
`on a flexible circuit substrate so that the plurality of light emitting diodes face at least
`
`one side of a side wall surface of the light guide panel, and
`
`the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`
`
`3. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the light guide panel, the light emitting diodes, and the flexible circuit
`
`substrate are mounted in a frame,
`
`the frame includes a control circuit substrate for driving the light emitting
`
`diodes through the flexible circuit substrate, which is provided on a surface of the
`
`frame opposite to a surface on which the light guide panel, the light emitting diodes,
`
`and the flexible circuit substrate are mounted,
`
`an end of the flexible circuit substrate is electrically coupled to the control
`
`circuit substrate through a connector, and
`
`the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion adjacent to the
`
`connector of the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`4. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated by means of a dummy
`
`resistance attached to the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`5. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated by means of a bar
`
`code printed on the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`
`
`6. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the assigned rank of the backlight is displayed at least on one of a
`
`front surface and a back surface of the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`7. (currently amended) A liquid crystal display device comprising a liquid
`
`crystal display panel to which an image signal is input, and a backlight provided on
`
`one side of the liquid crystal display panel, using a light emitting diode as a light
`
`source of the backlight,
`
`wherein before the backlight and the liquid crystal display panel are
`
`assembled to form the liguid cgystal display device, the backlight is assigned one
`
`rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white tolerance of
`
`the light source, and the assigned rank of the backlight is stored in a memory device
`
`in a portion of the backlight, and
`
`the liquid crystal display device further comprises an image quality processing
`
`circuit to which the assigned rank of the backlight stored in the memory device can
`
`be input in order to correct gamma characteristics of the image signal according to
`
`the assigned rank.
`
`8. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 7,
`
`wherein the backlight includes at least a light guide panel provided to face the
`
`liquid crystal display panel, a plurality of light emitting diodes provided to face a side
`
`wall surface of the light guide panel, and a flexible circuit substrate on which the
`
`plurality of light emitting diodes are mounted, and
`
`the memory device is mounted on the flexible circuit substrate.
`
`
`
`9. (previously presented) The liquid crystal display device according to claim
`
`wherein the memory device is electrically coupled to the image quality
`
`processing circuit, so that the assigned rank of the backlight stored in the memory
`
`device can be output to the image quality processing circuit.
`
`10. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 1,
`
`wherein the backlight includes a plurality of light emitting diodes dispersed on
`
`a surface facing the liquid crystal display panel.
`
`11. (original) The liquid crystal display device according to claim 7,
`
`wherein the backlight includes a plurality of light emitting diodes dispersed on
`
`a surface facing the liquid crystal display panel.
`
`
`
`REMARKS
`
`By the above amendment under AFCP2.0, independent claims 1 and 7 have
`
`been amended to clarify the features of the present invention that the backlight is
`
`assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white
`
`tolerance of the light source "before the backlight and the liquid crystal display panel
`
`are assembled to form the liquid crystal display device". Thus, submitted with the
`
`amendment is the required certification under AFCP2.0 that at least one independent
`
`claim has been amended in a manner which does not broaden the scope of the
`
`claim. As to the basis for the amendment of independent claims 1 and 7, reference
`
`is made to the paragraph bridging pages 13 and 14 of the specification, which
`
`provides that "the occurrence of the white tolerance is inevitable in each mass—
`
`produced backlight BL before a liquid cmstal display panel is assembled into a
`
`module Mia. mass produced backlight BL, the rank of the white tolerance gm
`
`backlight BL is defined..." (emphasis added). Accordingly, applicants submit that the
`
`application papers, as originally filed, provides support for the now recited features of
`
`independent claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent claims.
`
`As to the rejection of claims 1, 7 and 9 - 11 under 35 USC 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of Morimoto et al (US
`
`2008/0245949 A1, hereafter Morimoto); the rejection of claims 2, 3, 6 and 8 under 35
`
`USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of
`
`Morimoto et al (US 2008/0245949 A1, hereinafter Morimoto) and further in view of
`
`Bulovic et al (US 2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic); the rejection of claim 4 under
`
`35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of
`
`Morimoto (US 2008/0245949 A1, hereafter "Morimoto") and further in view of Bulovic
`
`et al (US 2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic) and Liu et al (US 2010/0033109 A1,
`
`
`
`hereafter Liu); and the rejection of claim 5 under 35 USC 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Myers (US 2010/0073390 A1) in view of Morimoto et al (US
`
`2008/0245949 A1, hereafter Morimoto) and further in view of Bulovic et al (US
`
`2005/0088380 A1, hereafter Bulovic) and Tseng (US 2008/0307200 A1); such
`
`rejections are traversed insofar as they are applicable to the present claims, as
`
`amended, and reconsideration and withdrawal of the rejections are respectfully
`
`requested.
`
`Turning first to Myers, applicants submit that the Examiner has
`
`mischaracterized the disclosure of Myers in relation to the claimed invention, while
`
`recognizing at page 3 of the Office Action that "Myers does not teach the liquid
`
`crystal display device where a light emitting diode is used as a light source of the
`
`backlight and wherein information about the white tolerance of the light source using
`
`the Ii ht emittin diode is indicated in a portion of the backli ht" (emphasis added).
`
`
`
`As noted above, by the present amendment, independent claims 1 and 7 have been
`
`amended to recite the feature of "wherein before the backlight and the liguid crystal
`
`display panel are assembled to form the liquid crystal display device, the backlight is
`
`assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in accordance with information about white
`
`tolerance of the light source and the assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a
`
`portion of the backligh " (emphasis added), which is a critical feature of the present
`
`invention, as described. That is, while the Examiner refers to Fig. 2 and paragraph
`
`[0022] of Myers, it is apparent that the monitor 20 includes a display panel 24 with a
`
`backlight assembled therewith. That is, as described in paragraph [0018] of Myers,
`
`the method of Fig. 2 by which the panel data 28 is collected and stored in the
`
`monitor storage 30 is "performed at the factory before the monitor 20 is shipped to a
`
`customer or at other times" (emphasis added), wherein the monitor 20 includes the
`
`
`
`display panel 24 assembled with the backlight, as is apparent from TABLE 1 and
`
`paragraphs [0013], [0023], for example. While paragraph [0022] of Myers discloses
`
`how to calculate to generate the extended EDlD (Enhanced Display Information
`
`Data) corresponding to step 110 of Fig. 2, such data is panel data based upon an
`
`assembled display panel and backlight of the monitor 20, as described with the panel
`
`data being stored in a storage 30, which is not part of the backlight. Thus, applicants
`
`submit that Myers fails to disclose or teach the recited features of independent
`
`claims 1 and 7, as amended, and in fact, applicants submit that Myers teaches away
`
`from such recited features, such that claims 1 and 7 and the dependent claims,
`
`should be considered allowable thereover.
`
`The Examiner recognizing some deficiencies in Myers, although not the
`
`deficiencies as pointed out above, contends that Figs. 3 and 4 and paragraphs
`
`[0093] - [0095] of Morimoto disclose there are LEDs R, G and B and where there is a
`
`memory 51e on substrate on the backside of the substrate with the LEDs that
`
`possesses reference information for corrective values, and that it would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to adapt the
`
`backlight of Myers which already addresses separate R, G. B light sources (Myers
`
`[0019]) to use light emitting diodes as a standard choice as suggested by Morimoto.
`
`Additionally, the Examiner contends that the placement of storage of corrective
`
`information relating to the backlight on the structure integral to the backlight enables
`
`easy manufacture and factory calibration of backlight units, as well as future easy
`
`retrieval and updating of the factory default information.
`
`Irrespective of the contentions by the Examiner, applicants note that as
`
`illustrated in Fig. 9 of Morimoto, a color sensor 31a is mounted on the substrate of
`
`the backlight 3, and color sensor information is obtained when the backlight 3 is
`
`
`
`assembled with the display panel 2. More particularly, as described in paragraphs
`
`[0124] — [0125], according to the arrangement shown in Fig. 9, "the color sensor 31a
`
`include a light-shielding section 31i for preventing the light emitted from the LED 31b
`
`from being directly incident on the color sensor 31a.
`
`[0125] According to this
`
`arrangement, the light emitted from the LED 31b falls indirectly on the color sensor
`
`33 e.g., for example, by the liguid crystal unit 2, especially a diffusion plate 2a
`
`provided in the liquid crystal unit 2, falls on the color sensor 31a it becomes possible
`
`to detect light similar to light absorbed via the liguid crystal unit 2." (emphasis
`
`added). Thus, as described in Morimoto, while the color sensor 31a is mounted on
`
`the backlight substrate to detect respective light intensities of red, green and blue
`
`components of average light that illuminates the area, as described in the paragraph
`
`[0087], paragraph {0094] discloses that the reference light intensity data stored in the
`
`reference light intensity data memory 51e is data which indicates reference value for
`
`the respective light intensities of red, green, blue LED which indicates that the Egg
`
`intensity of LEDs are measured by the color sensor 31a after the backlight is
`
`assembled with the display panel, as illustrated in ELg__9_ for example. As such,
`
`applicants submit that Morimoto, like Myers, fails to provide a disclosure or teaching
`
`of " efore the backlight and the liguid crystal panel are assembled to form the liquid
`
`crystal display device, the backlight is assigned one rank of a plurality of ranks in
`
`accordance with information about white tolerance of the light source and me
`
`assigned rank of the backlight is indicated in a portion of the backlight" (emphasis
`
`added) as now recited in independent claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent
`
`claims.
`
`
`
`Thus, applicants submit that neither Myers nor Morimoto, taken alone, or in
`
`any combination, provide the recited features of independent claims 1 and 7 and the
`
`dependent claims, and all claims should be considered allowable thereover.
`
`As to the further combination of Myers and Morimoto with Bulovic, Liu and/or
`
`Tseng, irrespective of the disclosures of Bulovic, Liu and Tseng, such additionally
`
`cited references fail to overcome the deficiencies of the combination of Myers and
`
`Morimoto, as pointed out above. Thus, applicants submit that this additional cited art
`
`which is directed to features of the dependent claims, represent hindsight
`
`reconstruction attempts which fail to provide the recited features of independent
`
`claims 1 and 7 and therewith the dependent claims. Accordingly, applicants submit
`
`that all claims recite features which patentably distinguish over any of the above
`
`cited art, taken alone, or in any combination, and all claims should be considered
`
`allowable thereover.
`
`In view of the above amendments and remarks, applicants submit that all
`
`claims present in this application recite features which patentably distinguish over
`
`the cited art and all claims should be considered allowable thereover. Accordingly,
`
`issuance of an action of favorable nature is courteously solicited.
`
`To the extent necessary, applicants petition for an extension of time under 37
`
`CFR 1.136. Please charge any shortage in the fees due in connection with the filing
`
`10
`
`
`
`of this paper, including extension of time fees, to the deposit account of Antonelli,
`
`Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Deposit Account No. 01-2135 (Case: 520.50520XOO),
`
`and please credit any excess fees to such deposit account.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP
`
`IMelvin Kraus/ ME
`
`Melvin Kraus
`
`Registration No. 22,466
`
`MK/jla
`(703) 312—6600
`
`11
`
`