`
`usmo '
`RECEIPT-‘3 ACCC-UIlTlNG
`01mm
`
`u, H
`Application No.: 12/939,564
`Request dated:
`January 16, 2014 m" ‘H'
`
`,
`.
`'6 M 9' 05
`
`MAT-10414US
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`12/939,564 '
`Application No:
`Norimltsu SUGIYAMA et al.
`Applicants:
`November 4, 2010
`Filed:
`WIRELESS PROJ ECi'OR APPARATUS AND WIRELESS LAN ADAPTER
`Title:
`2878
`T.C./A.U.:
`William C. Dowling
`Examlner:
`Confirmation No.: 5644
`Docket No.:
`'
`MAT-10414US‘
`
`Refund Ref:
`
`W
`
`Mail Stop 16
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`I.
`
`REFUND REQUEST
`
`This is arequest for refund with respect to the credit card charge shown on the
`statement dated July 11, 2013, for the above-identified application.
`
`E
`
`Accompanying this request is a copy of the monthly statement on which the
`referred error is listed.
`
`iii‘liiifii‘a‘ liiEisBE’EBiiiiis iiiifil‘éi
`82 FC:1831
`Page 1 of34.25568
`
`UP
`
`ill Exp. .: XXXXXXXXXXXIBI?
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Application No.: 12/939,564
`Request dated:
`January 16, 2014
`
`MAT-10414US
`
`H.
`
`FEES CHARGED FOR WHICH REFUND IS REQUESTED
`
`Filing Fee
`
`Amount of
`Refund
`Requested
`
`mmzms
`
`On July 11, 2013 a Certification and Request for Consideration of an Information
`Disclosure Statement Filed After Payment of the Issue Fee Under the QPIDS Pilot
`Program was filed in the subject application, which Included a “Conditional" RCE and
`an Information Disclosure Statement. The RCE fee ($1,200) and the Petitions fee
`($140) were paid using a credit card on the same date.
`
`Surcharge for filing the basic filing fee on a date later than
`the filing date of the application (37 CFR 1.16(e))
`
`AND/OR
`
`Surcharge for filing the oath or declaration on a date later
`than the filing date of the application (37 CFR 1.16(e))
`
`Extension of time -
`
`months
`
`Petition Fee
`
`.
`
`Patent Maintenance Fee -
`
`year
`
`Patent Maintenance Fee Surcharge
`
`Other (please explain)
`RCE fee
`
`TOTAL REFUND REQUESTED
`
`III.
`
`EXPLANATION OF WHY. CONTESTED CHARGE IS IN ERROR
`
`On September 19, 2013, the Examiner considered the references that were filed on
`July 11, 2013, and he Issued 3 Supplemental Notice of All0wablllty. On December 17,
`2013, the allowed application issued as US. Patent No. 8,608,318.
`
`Since the Examiner considered the references and felt that the reopening of
`prosecution was not necessary, the RCE should not have been processed and the RCE
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Appllcatlon No.: 12/939,564
`Request dated:
`January 16, 2014
`
`MAT-1041f4US
`
`Please make refund by:
`
`lZl
`
`Cl
`
`credltlng Deposlt Account No. 18~0350.
`
`refundlng payment.
`
`.
`
`.44. . A»
`
`Lawrence E. Ashery, Reg. No. 34,5 :
`Attorney for Applicants
`
`LEA/sep
`
`E Attachment: Copy of the monthly statement on whlch the referred ~
`
`Dated:W
`
`PO. Box 980
`Valley Forge, PA 19482
`(610) 407-0700
`2179813J
`
`fee should have been returned. According to our records, the $1,200 RCE fee has not
`been refunded and refund of the RCE fee Is respectfully requested.
`1v.
`MANNER or REFUND
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`