throbber
Applicants:
`Serial No.:
`Filed:
`Page 3 of 5
`
`Shoji Miyazaki, et al.
`13/609,305
`September 11, 2012
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 34-35 and 37-42 were pending in the subject application.
`
`By this
`
`Amendment, Claims 35 and 37-42 have been canceled without prejudice or disclaimer,
`
`and Claim 34 has been amended. Support for the amendment can be found in at least
`
`paragraph [00129] of the specification. Applicants maintain that the amendments to the
`
`claims do not raise an issue of new matter. The amendments place the application in
`
`condition for allowance or in better form for appeal. Entry of the amendments is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. §1031a2
`
`Claims 34-35 are rejected as being unpatentable over White et al. (US 5,405,511).
`
`Claim 37-40 were rejected as being unpatentable over White et al.
`
`in view of
`
`Demmin et al. (US 5,554,273).
`
`Claims 41 and 42 were rejected as being unpatentable over White et al. in view of
`
`Demmin et al., and further in view of Wong et al. (US 6,123,827).
`
`The rejection of Claims 35 and 37-42 is rendered moot by the cancelation of those
`
`claims.
`
`Amended Claim 34 has features of
`
`“measuring the temperature at given intervals before the biosensor is inserted to
`
`the measuring device; and
`
`canceling a process of measuring the quantity of the substrate based on a
`
`magnitude of a change of the temperatures measured at the given intervals before the
`
`biosensor is inserted to the measuring device.”
`
`Applicants maintain that these features are not disclosed in any of the cited
`
`references.
`
`As
`
`the Examiner stated,
`
`the White reference “fails to teach measuring the
`
`563171.1
`
`

`

`Applicants:
`Serial No.:
`Filed:
`Page 4 of 5
`
`Shoji Miyazaki, et al.
`13/609,305
`September 11, 2012
`
`
`temperature at given intervals before the biosensor is inserted into the measuring device”
`
`(page 3 of Office Action, emphasis added). Further, the Examiner also stated that “[i]t
`
`would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`was made to modify the method of White to insert the biosensor after the meter has taken
`
`several readings in the off position because doing so would cause less waiting and
`
`inconvenience to the user” (pages 3-4 of OA, emphasis added).
`
`On the contrary, Claim 34 has been amended to require the features of “canceling
`
`a process of measuring the quantity of the substrate based on a magnitude of a change of
`
`the temperatures measured at the given intervals before the biosensor is inserted to the
`
`measuring device” (emphasis added).
`
`Applicants maintain that the feature of canceling the process based on a magnitude
`
`of a change of the temperatures before the biosensor is inserted to the device is not
`
`disclosed or suggested in the White reference.
`
`Accordingly, reconsideration and withdrawal of this rejection are respectfully
`
`requested.
`
`Request for Consideration under the After Final Consideration Pilot Program
`
`Applicants
`
`request consideration under
`
`the After Final Consideration Pilot
`
`Program. Form PTO/SB/434 is attached hereto.
`
`Status of Patent Family Members
`
`Applicants would like to advise the Examiner of the status of US. patent family
`
`members:
`
`1) US. Patent No. 7,232,510, issued June 19, 2007,
`
`2) US. Patent No. 7,850,839, issued December 14, 2010,
`
`3) US. Patent No. 8,097,147, issued January 17, 2012,
`
`563171.1
`
`

`

`Applicants:
`Serial No.:
`Filed:
`Page 5 of 5
`
`Shoji Miyazaki, et al.
`13/609,305
`September 11, 2012
`
`4) US. Patent No. 8,101,063, issued January 24, 2012,
`
`5) US. Patent No. 8,298,400, issued October 30, 2012,
`
`6) US. Patent Application No. 11/378,682, filed March 17, 2006, pending,
`
`7) US. Patent Application No. 11/800,273, filed May 3, 2007, abandoned,
`
`8) US. Patent Application No. 12/802,608, filed June 10, 2010, now allowed,
`
`9) US. Patent Application No. 13/317,662, filed October 25, 2011, pending.
`
`W
`
`In view of the amendments and remarks made herein,
`
`reconsideration and
`
`withdrawal of the rejections set forth in the September 25, 2013 Final Office Action are
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`If there is any minor matter preventing the allowance of the
`
`subject application, the Examiner is requested to telephone the undersigned attorney.
`
`No fee is deemed necessary in connection with the filing of this reply. However, if
`
`any fee is required with this reply or to preserve the pendency of the subject application,
`
`authorization is hereby given to charge the amount of any such fee to Deposit Account
`
`No. 01-1785. Please credit any overpayment to Deposit Account No. 01-1785.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP
`
`Attorneys for Applicants
`90 Park Avenue
`
`New York, New York 10016
`
`(212) 336—8000
`
`Dated: December 19, 2013
`New York, New York
`
`By [Alan D. Miller/
`Alan D. Miller, Reg. No. 42,889
`
`563171.1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket