`“x
`‘\\f
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/153,448
`
`01/13/2014
`
`Bodong Zhong
`
`CSPT-130US
`
`5089
`
`12/14/2016 —RATNERPRESTIA m
`7590
`52473
`2200 RENAIS SANCE BLVD
`KOSANOVIC’ HELENA
`S UITE 350
`KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`3749
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`12/14/2016
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`pcorrespondence @ratnerprestia.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/153,448 ZHONG ET AL.
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`AIA (First Inventorto File)
`Office Action Summary
`
`3749HELENA KOSANOVIC first“
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`-
`-
`
`Status
`
`1)IXI Responsive to communication(s) filed on
`[I A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)lX| This action is non-final.
`2a)I:| This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:I Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under EX parte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)|XI Claim(s) 1-6,9 and 10 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`6)|:l Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`7)IZ| Claim(s) 1-6, 9-10 is/are rejected.
`8)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`9)|:l Claim(s)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`
`
`
`://www.usoto. ov/ atents/init events"
`h/index.‘s orsend an inquiry to PF"I-Ifeedback{<‘buspto.qov.
`
`htt
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Z| The drawing(s) filed on _ is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)IXI objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`b)I:I Some” c)I:I None of the:
`a)I:I All
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PT0_413)
`1) D Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`—
`4) I:I Other'
`2) D Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date .
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20161208
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1. 1 14
`
`1.
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this
`
`application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action
`
`has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/5/16
`
`has been entered.
`
`Drawings
`
`2.
`
`Figures 1, 2A and 28 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art--
`
`because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected
`
`drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121 (d) are required in reply to the Office action
`
`to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled
`
`“Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct
`
`any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the
`
`applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office
`
`action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`3.
`
`The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show
`
`every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, a head (claim 1), as
`
`well as a flat portion of the shutter (claim 1) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled
`
`from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered.
`
`Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121 (d) are required in
`
`reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended
`
`replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate
`
`prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure
`
`number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure
`
`is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet,
`
`and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate
`
`changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for
`
`consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering
`
`of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an
`
`application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New
`
`Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner,
`
`the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next
`
`Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 12
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a):
`
`IN GENERAL—The specification shall contain a written description of the
`(a)
`invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise,
`and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it
`is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode
`contemplated by the inventor orjoint inventor of carrying out the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112:
`
`The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the
`manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to
`enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly
`connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the
`inventor of carrying out his invention.
`
`Claims 1-6 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-
`
`AIA), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The
`
`claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a
`
`way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint
`
`inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had
`
`possession of the claimed invention. The head of a shutter is not described in the
`
`specification. Also the flat portion of the shutter is not described in the specification.
`
`Even though figure 4 shows the rib 380 that appears to be flat, figure 3 shows that the
`
`flap is curved along axis or rib 231, and therefore it is not clear weather the flat portion
`
`is really flat as claimed.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis
`
`for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described
`as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to
`be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
`obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which
`said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1-2, 5-6 rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Applicant’s admitted prior art (figs 1, 2A and 2B) in view of Kahn
`
`3,312,242
`
`Applicant’s admitted prior art teaches:
`
`Regarding claim 1, an adapter structure of a ventilating fan (figs. 1, 2A, 28),
`
`comprising:
`
`an oval metal adapter 6 (fig. 2A, 2B) and an oval metal shutter 17 (fig. 2A, 28)
`
`provided in the metal adapter and being cooperated with a shape of the oval metal
`
`adapter (fig. 2A, 28), wherein
`
`a symmetry, axis of a longitudinal cross-section of the oval metal shutter in the
`
`horizontal direction 7 (fig. 2B) is a major axis, and a symmetry axis in the vertical
`
`direction 8 (fig. 2B) is a minor axis, the shutter is configured to be rotatable through a
`
`rotating shaft in the metal adapter (fig. 2A, 2B) ,
`
`Regarding claims 5-6, the rotating shaft 11 (fig. 2A) is formed on two inner sides
`
`of the metal adapter, (fig. 2A) and the shutter is formed by, two clamp parts
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`(unnumbered part between elements 9 and 11, fig. 2A) are provided for clamping the
`
`rotating shaft and erected from left and right edges of the plate body to an
`
`outside surface (fig. 2A).
`
`It is not clear regarding claim 5, 6 whether the rotating shaft is made integrally to
`
`the metal adapter or not, however the courts have held making the apparatus integral
`
`where the prior art teaches separate does not distinguish over prior art and further that
`
`the use of an one piece construction instead the structure disclosed in [the prior art]
`
`would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice” (MPEP 2144.04 V, B). In this
`
`case weather the shaft is integral to the adapter or made separate to said adapter it is a
`
`matter of the design choice. Therefore the instant claim does not define overt the
`
`Applicant's admitted prior art.
`
`Additionally, regarding claims, 5-6 it would have been obvious to one having
`
`ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use resin for the plate
`
`body, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select
`
`a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of
`
`obvious design choice. (.See In reLeshin, 125 USPQ 416. S_eee also Ballas Liquidating
`
`Co. v. Allied industries of Kansas, Inc. (DC Kans) 205 USPQ 331. Also MPEP 2144.07)
`
`Applicant’s admitted prior art does not teach about the curved shutter.
`
`Kahn teaches:
`
`Regarding claim 1, a curve point 11 (fig. 2) is provided between a projection
`
`point of a center line of the rotating shaft on the minor axis and a tail of the
`
`shutter (this limitation teaches the applicant’s admitted prior art), and a curve portion
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`(between elements 11 and 11D, fig. 2) of the shutter is formed by curving the shutter
`
`from the curve point to an inner surface side of the shutter (unnumbered inner surface
`
`of the upper surface 11) along the minor axis (and in combination with the Applicant’s
`
`admitted prior art) and a flat portion of the shitter (portion of a shutter between at
`
`least numeral 23 to the numeral 11, fig. 2) is formed from a head 23 (fig. 2) of the
`
`shutter to the curved portion .
`
`Wherein the shutter is formed smoothly from the curve point to the tail (fig. 2)
`
`Regarding claim 2, the curve point is located on an upstream side (fig. 2)
`
`Regarding limitation of claim 3 that a distance is one third from the rotate shaft to
`
`the tail, the courts have held that where general condition of claim is disposed in the
`
`prior art (see figure 2, where certain distance is provided between the rotate shaft to the
`
`tail 11c), it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable range (MPEP 2144.05
`
`lla)
`
`In this case the Kahn teaches curtain distance is provided between the rotate
`
`shaft to the tail 11D, and having a specific distance of one third is not inventive
`
`according to the courts. Varying the distance between the rotate shaft to the tail is
`
`recognized as a result-effective variable which is result of a routine experimentation. In
`
`this case varying the distance to start curving a plate at some particular distance from
`
`the shaft in order to achieve less turbulence through the duct in order to avoid noise is
`
`recognized in the art to be a result effective variable.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to have the Applicant’s admitted prior art modified with the Kahn curved
`
`shutter in order to control the turbulence through the shutter and thus prevent noise.
`
`2.
`
`Claims 3-4 rejected under pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Applicant’s admitted prior art (figs 1, 2A and 2B) in view of Kahn 3,312,242 and further
`
`in view of Sano 6,431,257.
`
`Applicant’s admitted prior art in view of Kahn teaches the invention as discussed
`
`above but is not specific about the ribs.
`
`Sano teaches:
`
`Regarding claims 3-4, a rib is formed on the minor axis of the shutter (several
`
`unnumbered parallel ribs on a shutter 221, fig. 18), and a rib also is formed on a
`
`projection of the center line of the rotate shaft on the shutter (unnumbered rib in the
`
`middle of the shutter arranged in longitudinal direction between two elements 230 of the
`
`shutter 221, and being perpendicular to the unnumbered vertical ribs).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to have the Applicant’s admitted prior art in view of Kahn invention modified
`
`with the Sano vertical and horizontal ribs in order to provide stuffiness to the shutter and
`
`thus provide the apparatus more sturdy and thus prevent malfunction.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 9-10 are rejected under pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentableover Applicant’s admitted prior art (figs 1, 2A and 2B) in view of Kahn
`
`3,312,242 and further in view of Official Notice taken.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 9
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`Applicant’s admitted prior art in view of Kahn and Ammons teaches the invention
`
`as discuss above, but is silent about reinforcement part.
`
`Claims 9-10 are rejected, because Official notice is taken that having a support
`
`part for the clamp plates is well known in the prior art.
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have
`
`support to the clamp plates in order to avoid malfunction of the apparatus and prolong
`
`its usage and thus make apparatus more affordable to the user.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 12/5/16 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive.
`
`The Kahn reference teaches the upper portion that is curved toward the inner
`
`portion which makes the upper portion of the shutter curved and the same shutter has a
`
`flat portion —rom the has portion to the curved portion as claimed. The rest of the
`
`arguments are irrelevant, because none of said arguments are claimed.
`
`Conclusion
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/153,448
`
`Page 10
`
`Art Unit: 3749
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to HELENA KOSANOVIC whose telephone number is
`
`(571)272-9059. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Steve McAllister can be reached on 571-272—6785. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272—1000.
`
`/HELENA KOSANOVIC/
`
`Primary Examiner,
`Art Unit 3749
`
`120816
`
`