`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMlVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/633,376
`
`02/27/2015
`
`Masaki IKEDA
`
`ONDAP0136US
`
`1045
`
`01/25/2018
`
`7590
`51921
`MARK D. SARALINO (PAN)
`RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
`1621 EUCLID AVENUE
`19TH FLOOR
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44115
`
`:
`
`EXAMINR
`
`
`THAPASA ESH
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`2859
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/25/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`ipdocket @rennerott0.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/633,376 IKEDA ET AL.
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Office Action Summary
`
`2859SAILESH THAPA $2213
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on amendment 12/08/2017.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|:l This action is non-final.
`2a)|Z| This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) 12 4 and 5-10 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`6)I:I Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`
`7)|Z| Claim(s) 1 2 4 and5- 10 is/are rejected.
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)I:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`htt
`:/'I’\WIIW.usnto. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`hI/index.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Xl The drawing(s) filed on 02/27/2015 is/are: a)IXI accepted or b)|:l objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20180116
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`This is in response to an application/remarks made in filed on 12/08/2017.
`
`Claims 1, 2 and 4-5 have been amended, claim 3 is cancelled and claims 6-10
`
`are newly added claims.
`
`In view of Applicant Argument/Remarks Made to an amended independent
`
`claims 1 and 5 have been fully considered. However, upon further consideration, a new
`
`ground(s) of rejection is made in light of applicant’s amendment.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claim 1, 5, 6-7 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Abe (US 2012/0019200 A1) in view of Furui (WO 2013/014914 A2).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Abe teaches a charger that charges a battery unit
`
`comprising; a charging unit (charger 200, fig.1) that supplies direct current power
`
`(AC/DC converter 202, fig.1) to at least one battery cell of the battery pack (battery
`
`pack 100, fig.1) for charging a rechargeable battery of a power tool (refer fig.1 that
`
`shows the charger 200 to charge the battery pack 100 when attached to the
`
`charger); a condition detection unit that detects condition information of the battery
`
`pack (voltage detector 303/105, current detector 302/104, communication unit
`
`304/106, fig.1, also refer para [0022-0024]); and an information processing unit that
`
`receives the condition information of the battery pack from the condition detection unit
`
`and outputs the received condition information of the battery pack to a communication
`
`unit (the communication unit 304 communicates with the communication unit 106
`
`in the battery pack 100 and receives the battery state information, refer fig.1, para
`
`[0025-0028]), further comprising a charger body (charger 200, fig.1) that
`
`accommodates the charging unit, the condition detection unit, and the information
`
`processing unit (refer fig.1 that discloses the charger 200 including AC/DC
`
`converter 202, the charging control IC 203, a current control device 204, a current
`
`detecting device 208, a display unit 206, and a charger microcomputer 301), the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`charger body (charger 200) includes: a plurality of terminals of the charger body that
`
`are respectively connectable to a plurality of electrodes of the battery pack (refer fig.1
`
`that shows + and — terminals of charger 200 and battery pack 100 that are
`
`respectively connectable), wherein the condition information includes information
`
`regarding whether or not the charging of the battery pack is completed (in step 8005, it
`
`is determined whether the charging of the battery pack 100 attached to the
`
`charger 200 is completed, fig.2, para [0028]).
`
`Abe fails to teach, configured to perform wireless communication with another
`
`device in accordance with a near field communication standard,
`
`Furui teaches, configured to perform wireless communication with another device
`
`in accordance with a near field communication standard (communicator 48, 18, 78 and
`
`108 transfers the battery cell 50 charge/discharge information according to the
`
`wireless communication protocol with an external device 100 refer, para [0193],
`
`also fig.2A).
`
`It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine the
`
`communicator that transfers the battery information according to the wireless
`
`communication protocol with an external device as taught by Furui within the charger of
`
`Abe such that to enable a wide variety of functions to be performed on the battery pack
`
`and/or power tool from a remote location and/or enables information concerning the
`
`battery pack and/or power to be displayed on the external device (para [0090]).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`Regarding claim 5, Abe teaches a charger that charges a battery unit
`
`comprising; a battery pack of a power tool (battery pack 100, fig.1); a power tool
`
`charger (charger 200) that charges a battery pack (100, fig.1) of a power tool (in view
`
`of broadest reasonable interpretation, charger 200 is interpreted as a power tool
`
`charger that is capable of charging the battery pack of the power tool), wherein the
`
`power tool charger (charger 200, fig.1) includes; a charging unit (charger 200, fig.1)
`
`that supplies direct current power (AC/DC converter 202, fig.1) to at least one battery
`
`cell of the battery pack (battery pack 100, fig.1) for charging a rechargeable battery of
`
`a power tool (refer fig.1 that shows the charger 200 to charge the battery pack 100
`
`when attached to the charger); a condition detection unit that detects condition
`
`information of the battery pack (voltage detector 303/105, current detector 302/104,
`
`communication unit 304/106, fig.1, also refer para [0022-0024]); and an information
`
`processing unit that receives the condition information of the battery pack from the
`
`condition detection unit (the communication unit 304 communicates with the
`
`communication unit 106 in the battery pack 100 and receives the battery state
`
`information, refer fig.1, para [0025-0028]), the power tool charger further including a
`
`charger body (charger 200, fig.1) that accommodates the charging unit, the condition
`
`detection unit, and the information processing unit (refer fig.1 that discloses the
`
`charger 200 including AC/DC converter 202, the charging control IC 203, a current
`
`control device 204, a current detecting device 208, a display unit 206, and a
`
`charger microcomputer 301), the charger body (charger 200) includes: a plurality of
`
`terminals of the charger body that are respectively connectable to a plurality of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`electrodes of the battery pack (refer fig.1 that shows + and — terminals of charger
`
`200 and battery pack 100 that are respectively connectable), wherein the condition
`
`information includes information regarding whether or not the charging of the battery
`
`pack is completed (in step 8005, it is determined whether the charging of the
`
`battery pack 100 attached to the charger 200 is completed, fig.2, para [0028]).
`
`Abe fails to teach, a communication unit that is configured to perform wireless
`
`communication with another device in accordance with a near field communication
`
`standard.
`
`Furui teaches, configured to perform wireless communication with another device
`
`in accordance with a near field communication standard (communicator 48, 18, 78 and
`
`108 transfers the battery cell 50 charge/discharge information according to the
`
`wireless communication protocol with an external device 100 refer, para [0193],
`
`also fig.2A).
`
`It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine the
`
`communicator that transfers the battery information according to the wireless
`
`communication protocol with an external device as taught by Furui within the charger of
`
`Abe such that to enable a wide variety of functions to be performed on the battery pack
`
`and/or power tool from a remote location and/or enables information concerning the
`
`battery pack and/or power to be displayed on the external device (para [0090]).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 1. Abe further teaches, wherein the battery pack remains external to
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`the charger when the battery pack is connected to the charger (refer fig.1 that clearly
`
`discloses the battery pack 100 is separate unit when connected to the charger
`
`200).
`
`Regarding claim 7, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 1. Abe further teaches, wherein the plurality of terminals of the
`
`charger body is at least partially arranged on an outer surface of the charger body (refer
`
`fig.1 that clearly discloses the we and —ve terminals on an outer surface of the
`
`charger 200).
`
`Regarding claim 9, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 5. Abe further teaches, wherein the battery pack remains external to
`
`the charger when the battery pack is connected to the charger (refer fig.1 that clearly
`
`discloses the battery pack 100 is separate unit when connected to the charger
`
`200).
`
`Regarding claim 10, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 9. Abe further teaches, wherein the plurality of terminals of the
`
`charger body is at least partially arranged on an outer surface of the charger body (refer
`
`fig.1 that clearly discloses the we and —ve terminals on an outer surface of the
`
`charger 200).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abe (US
`
`2012/0019200 A1) in view of Furui (WO 2013/014914 A2) with further view of Huang
`
`(US 2015/0171638 A1).
`
`Regarding claim 2, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 1. Abe teaches the condition detection unit detects the condition
`
`information of the rechargeable battery (voltage detector 303/105, current detector
`
`302/104, communication unit 304/106, fig.1, also refer para [0022-0024]), and the
`
`information processing unit outputs the condition information of the rechargeable battery
`
`detected by the condition detection unit to the communication unit (the communication
`
`unit 304 communicates with the communication unit 106 in the battery pack 100
`
`and receives the battery state information, refer fig.1, para [0025-0028]). Abe in
`
`view of Furui fails to teach, wherein the condition detection unit detects the condition
`
`information of the rechargeable battery regardless of whether or not the charging unit is
`
`charging the rechargeable battery.
`
`Huang teaches, wherein the condition detection unit detects the condition
`
`information of the rechargeable battery regardless of whether or not the charging unit is
`
`charging the rechargeable battery (continuously receiving the battery information
`
`from a battery management system in each rechargeable battery, also refer para
`
`[0031]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine the
`
`teachings of Huang into a system of Abe in view of Furui such that for charging the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 9
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`rechargeable battery having the minimal value of the battery information (abstract) and
`
`which can control every rechargeable battery to increase state of charge in a consistent
`
`path (para 0007).
`
`Claims 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abe (US
`
`2012/0019200 A1) in view of Furui (WO 2013/014914 A2) with further view of Jones
`
`(US 2011/0248576 A1).
`
`Regarding claim 4 and 8, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 1. Abe in view of Furui teaches all the claimed limitations except for,
`
`wherein when receiving a charging termination signal from another device via the
`
`communication unit, the information processing unit has the charging unit terminate
`
`charging of the rechargeable battery.
`
`Jones teaches, wherein when receiving a charging termination signal from
`
`another device via the communication unit, the information processing unit has the
`
`charging unit terminate charging of the rechargeable battery (the receiver may receive
`
`a control signal from a remote control device ......... the processor may identify a
`
`control signal to turn off the battery charger, para [0010], also refer claim 2).
`
`It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine a
`
`remote control device for turning off the battery charger as taught by Jones within a
`
`charging system of Abe in view of Furui which prevents battery chargers from
`
`consuming energy while not actually connected to a battery pack, but which also gives
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 10
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`users the convenience of leaving the battery chargers plugged into the same electrical
`
`outlet at all times (para 0006).
`
`Regarding claim 8, Abe in view of Furui teaches the power tool charger
`
`according to claim 5. Abe in view of Furui teaches all the claimed limitations except for,
`
`wherein when receiving a charging termination signal from another device via the
`
`communication unit, the information processing unit has the charging unit terminate
`
`charging of the rechargeable battery.
`
`Jones teaches, wherein when receiving a charging termination signal from
`
`another device via the communication unit, the information processing unit has the
`
`charging unit terminate charging of the rechargeable battery (the receiver may receive
`
`a control signal from a remote control device ......... the processor may identify a
`
`control signal to turn off the battery charger, para [0010]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine a
`
`remote control device for turning off the battery charger as taught by Jones within a
`
`charging system of Abe in view of Furui which prevents battery chargers from
`
`consuming energy while not actually connected to a battery pack, but which also gives
`
`users the convenience of leaving the battery chargers plugged into the same electrical
`
`outlet at all times (para 0006).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 11
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant’s amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded
`
`of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to SAILESH THAPA whose telephone number is (469)295-
`
`9108. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thurs 8:00-5:00 CST.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Dunn Drew can be reached on (571)272-2312. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-
`
`8300.lnformation regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published
`
`applications may be obtained from either Private PAlR or Public PAlR. Status
`
`information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAlR only. For
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/633,376
`
`Page 12
`
`Art Unit: 2859
`
`more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you
`
`have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business
`
`Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO
`
`Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call
`
`800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272—1 000.
`
`/S. T./
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 2859
`
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
`
`Drew A. Dunn
`
`/Drew A. Dunn/
`
`