`“x
`‘\\f
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/640,479
`
`03/06/2015
`
`Mitsunori MATSUBARA
`
`CS PT— 137US
`
`3171
`
`7590
`52473
`2200 RENAIS SANCE BLVD
`S UITE 350
`
`”“20” —
`RUBY, TRAVIS C
`
`3744
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/11/2017
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`pcorrespondence @ratnerprestia.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/640,479 MATSUBARA ET AL.
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`TRAVIS RUBY $2213 3744
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 3/6/2015.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|ZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)|:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) L6is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)|:I Claim(s)
`7)|Z| Claim(s)_1-6is/are rejected.
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)|:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`hit z/thvvvtlsnto. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`iindex.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)IZI The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)IXI The drawing(s) filed on 3/6/2015 is/are: a)lX| accepted or b)|:l objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20170106
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/640,479
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 3744
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Status of Claims
`
`2.
`
`The status of the claims as filed in the reply dated 3/6/2015 are as follows:
`
`Claims 1—6 are pending and being examined.
`
`Specification
`
`3.
`
`The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly
`
`indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed.
`
`The following title is suggested: “Air Conditioning System with Room to Room Air
`
`Ventilator”.
`
`Claim Objections
`
`4.
`
`Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2 line 2 recites
`
`“The” which should be ——the——. Appropriate correction is required.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 USC. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless ,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/640,479
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 3744
`
`(a)(l) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or
`otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 1-4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by
`
`Lestage (US8118236B2).
`
`Re Claim 1. Lestage teaches an air conditioning system (Figure 2) comprising:
`
`a main room (16) having an air conditioner and an air ventilating device (50) mounted
`
`therein (Figure 1; Column 1 lines 20—21 and Column 2 lines 10—15 teaches the main household
`
`area 16 is air conditioned); and
`
`at least one sub—room (10) each communicating with the main room through the air
`
`ventilating device mounted in the main room, the air ventilating device (50) distributes the air in
`
`the main room to the respective sub—rooms communicating with the main room (Figure 2;
`
`Column 4 line 59 to Column 5 line 4).
`
`Re Claim 2. Lestage teaches the air ventilating device corresponds to one or more sub—
`
`rooms (10) (Figure 2).
`
`Re Claim 3. Lestage teaches wherein the air ventilating device is a ceiling—embedded air
`
`ventilating fan (56) (Figure 2, the ventilator 50 is mounted to 14 which is the ceiling of the
`
`basement 10; Column 4 line 60);
`
`each sub—room is provided with an air exiting part (58) (Figure 2; Column 4 line 59 to
`
`Column 5 line 4); and
`
`the ceiling—embedded air ventilating fan is connected with the air eXiting part in the sub—
`
`room Via a duct (54) (Figure 2; Column 4 line 59 to Column 5 line 4).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/640,479
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 3744
`
`Re Claim 4. Lestage teaches wherein the air ventilating device is provided with a control
`
`part (36), and the main room or the sub—room is provided with a remote controller connected
`
`with the control part (Figure 2; Column 5 lines 6—37, the humidistat, humidity sensor, or
`
`temperature sensor will all remotely control the controller 36).
`
`Re Claim 6. Lestage teaches each sub—room is provided with an air exiting part (58), the
`
`air ventilating device (50) is connected with the air eXiting part, and the air exiting part and the
`
`air ventilating device are disposed at a lower portion of a side wall of the sub—room (Figure 2,
`
`wall 14 is a side of the room 10).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`7.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 USC. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the
`prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective
`filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed
`invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`8.
`
`The factua1 inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere C0., 383 US. 1, 148 USPQ 459
`
`(1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35
`
`USC. 103 are summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or
`
`nonobviousness.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/640,479
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 3744
`
`9.
`
`This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the
`
`claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly
`
`owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the
`
`contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and
`
`effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date
`
`of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C.
`
`102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
`
`10.
`
`Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lestage
`
`(US8118236B2) in View of Aronstam (US7347774B2).
`
`Re Claim 5. Lestage teaches the sub—room (Figure 2), but fails to specifically teach the
`
`sub—room is provided with a temperature sensor communicating with the control part.
`
`However, Aronstam teaches a sub—room (122) is provided with a temperature sensor (8b)
`
`communicating with the control part (40b) (Figures 2—3; Column 6 lines 18—67).
`
`Therefore, in view of Aronstam's teaching it would have been obvious to one of ordinary
`
`skill in the art at the time of filing to add a temperature sensor to the sub—room of Lestage in
`
`order to better regulate the airflow from the main room to the sub—room to achieve a desired sub—
`
`room temperature efficiently.
`
`Conclusion
`
`11.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure. See attached PTO—892 for other relevant prior art.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/640,479
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 3744
`
`12.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to TRAVIS RUBY Whose telephone number is (571)270—5760. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday—Friday 9:30—5:00.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Allana Lewin can be reached on 571—272—5560. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization Where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571—273—8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair—direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR
`
`system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866—217—9197 (toll—free). If you would
`
`like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated
`
`information system, call 800—786—9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571—272—1000.
`
`f1"RAVIS RUBY/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3744
`
`