throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`
`15/280,554
`
`09/29/2016
`
`Tetsuo FUKAMI
`
`20326.0086USOI
`
`7752
`
`53148
`
`759°
`
`03/19/2020
`
`HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON RC.
`45 South Seventh Street
`Suite 2700
`
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683
`
`MATTHEWS” ANDREL
`
`ART UNIT
`2621
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/19/2020
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`PTOMail@hsml.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`017/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/280,554
`Examiner
`ANDRE L MATTH EWS
`
`Applicant(s)
`FUKAMI et al.
`Art Unit
`2621
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/17/2019.
`CI A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) D This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4):] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expade Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s)
`
`1—6 and 13—14 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`[:1 Claim(ss)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(ss) 1 —6 and 13— 14 is/are rejected.
`
`D Claim(ss_) is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`S)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s
`* If any claims have been determined aflowable. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)|:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 9/29/2016 is/are: a). accepted or b)C] objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)C] Some**
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`SD Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) C] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/OBa and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) E] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20200304
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`1.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-4,6, and 14 have been considered
`
`but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used
`
`in the current rejection.
`
`2.
`
`The Examiner recognizes the cancellation of claims 5 and 13.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1-4 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Kawachi (US 2015/0029081) in view of Kim (US 2010/0321248).
`
`5.
`
`Regarding claim 1, Kawachi teaches A display device, comprising:
`
`a plurality of groups, each group having a plurality of data lines extending in a first
`
`direction (Fig. 2,11,19 data lines yn)and a plurality of gate lines extending in a
`
`second direction (Figs. 2, 11, 19 gate lies xn), wherein the plurality of gate lines for
`
`each group are adjacent in the first, direction (Fig. 4 [0072-0073] teach how scan lines
`
`x are grouped to selection lines 61); a plurality of blocks, each block including: a
`
`plurality of selector transistors and each of the plurality of selector transistors includes: a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 3
`
`first conductive electrode connected to an end of a corresponding gate line of the
`
`plurality of gate lines, a second conductive electrode, and a control electrode (Figs. 4,
`
`[0078] transistor 63 is connected to scan line 61x and selection lines 62), wherein
`
`each block among the plurality of blocks corresponds to a group among the plurality of
`
`the groups (Fig. 4 groups are defined by TFTs connected to the same scan line 61x
`
`or the same selection line 62); a plurality of selection signal supplying wirings each of
`
`which is connected to the control electrode of each of the plurality of selector
`
`transistors for a corresponding block of the plurality of blocks (Fig. 4 selection lines 62
`
`are connected to transistors 63); a plurality of gate voltage supplying wirings each of
`
`which is connected to the second conductive electrode of one of the plurality of selector
`
`transistors in each of the groups(Fig. 4 groups are defined by TFTs connected to the
`
`scan line 61x and selection line 62); and a gate driver that sequentially supplies a
`
`gate voltage to the plurality of gate voltage supplying wirings and supplies a control
`
`voltage to the plurality of selection signal supplying wirings to turn on or off one or more
`
`of the plurality of selector transistors([0082]). Although Kawachi teaches the limitations
`
`as discussed above, he fails to teach a dummy transistor having a control electrode and
`
`being disposed between two adjacent blocks among the plurality of blocks, wherein the
`
`plurality of blocks include a first block and a second block next to the first block, and the
`
`control electrode of each of the plurality of selector transistors included in the first block
`
`and the control electrode of the dummy transistor adjacent to the first block are
`
`integrally formed, and the control electrode of the dummy transistor adjacent to the first
`
`block is electrically isolated from and spaced apart from the control electrode of each of
`
`the plurality of selector transistors included in the second block.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 4
`
`However in the same field of manufacturing a display device, Kim teaches a
`
`dummy transistor having a control electrode and being disposed between two adjacent
`
`blocks among the plurality of blocks (Figs. 4-7 dummy circuits comprising dummy
`
`transistors 151 and 155), wherein the plurality of blocks include a first block and a
`
`second block next to the first block (blocks can be individual transistor of switching
`
`circuits 161 and 165) , and the control electrode of each of the plurality of selector
`
`transistors included in the first block and the control electrode of the dummy transistor
`
`adjacent to the first block are integrally formed (Figs. 4-7 show control electrodes of
`
`switching transistor blocks 161 and 165 integrally formed with control electrodes
`
`of dummy transistors 151 and 155), and the control electrode of the dummy transistor
`
`adjacent to the first block is electrically isolated from and spaced apart from the control
`
`electrode of each of the plurality of selector transistors included in the second block
`
`(Figs. 4-7 show block 151 isolated from block 155).
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`of the effective filing date to combine the display device as taught by Kawachi with the
`
`manufacturing method as taught by Kim. This combination would result in a system that
`
`provides a faster turn-on time for circuits in the display device as taught by Kim [0008].
`
`Regarding claim 2, Kawachi teaches wherein a first block and a second block among
`
`the plurality of blocks are sequentially arranged in a scanning direction(Fig. 4 groups
`
`are defined by TFTs connected to the same scan line 61x or the same selection
`
`line 62 and shows groups sequentially arranged), and the light shielding part is
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 5
`
`disposed between a selector transistor connected to a gate line scanned last in the first
`
`block and a selector transistor connected to a gate line scanned first in the second
`
`block([0094] teaches the scanning lines 61 can act as light-blocking to inhibit light
`
`transmission to the color filter substrate).
`
`Regarding claim 3, Kawachi teaches wherein the control electrodes for each of
`
`the plurality of selector transistors included in a block among the plurality of blocks are
`
`integrally formed (Fig. 4 groups are defined by TFT electrodes connected to the
`
`same scan line 61x or the same selection line 62 and shows groups sequentially
`
`arranged).
`
`Regarding claim 4, Kawachi teaches wherein the light shielding part is an
`
`extended part of the control electrode of a selector transistor among the plurality of
`
`selector transistors([0094] teaches the scanning lines 61 can act as light-blocking
`
`to inhibit light transmission to the color filter substrate. Scanning lines extended
`
`from electrodes).
`
`Regarding claim 13, Kawachi a light shielding part that is disposed between at
`
`least two adjacent blocks among the plurality of blocks ([0094] teaches the scanning
`
`lines 61 can act as light-blocking to inhibit light transmission to the color filter
`
`substrate).
`
`Regarding claim 14, Kawachi teaches wherein the plurality of selector transistors
`
`for each block are adjacent in the first direction(vertical) and at least partially overlap
`
`when viewed in the first direction (Fig. 4 shows selector transistors 63 adjacently
`
`disposed in a first direction and where groups of transistors partially overlapping
`
`transistors in the same group and adjacent groups).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 6
`
`4.
`
`Claims 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Kawachi (US 2015/0029081) in view of Kim (US 2010/0321248) Yuminami
`
`(2016/0070130).
`
`5.
`
`Regarding claim 6, Kawachi teaches the limitations as discussed above
`
`and also teaches a light blocking function of a scan line, but fails to teach wherein the
`
`dummy transistor includes a first conductive electrode and a second conductive
`
`electrode, wherein each of the plurality of selection signal supplying wirings is not
`
`connected to the first conductive electrode and the second conductive electrode of the
`
`dummy transistor, and wherein each of the plurality of gate voltage supplying wirings is
`
`not connected to the first conductive electrode and the second conductive electrode of
`
`the dummy transistor
`
`However in the same field of disposing light blocking elements in a display
`
`device, Yuminami teaches wherein the dummy transistor includes a first conductive
`
`electrode and a second conductive electrode (dummy TFT of dummy pixel 31),
`
`wherein each of the plurality of selection signal supplying wirings is not connected to the
`
`first conductive electrode and the second conductive electrode of the dummy transistor
`
`(dummy gate line 31a connected to dummy TFT. This well known the gate line is
`
`connected to gate electrode), and wherein each of the plurality of gate voltage
`
`supplying wirings (regular gate lines 19) is not connected to the first conductive
`
`electrode and the second conductive electrode of the dummy transistor (Fig. 7 and
`
`[0078] show dummy pixels 31 connected to dummy gate lines 31a and not pixel
`
`gate lines 19).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 7
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of the
`
`effective filing date to combine the light blocking method as taught by Kawachi with the
`
`display manufacturing method as taught by Kim and the light blocking method as
`
`taught by Yuminami. This combination would provide a display that reduce shadow and
`
`improve appearances of the panel as taught by Yuminami [0005].
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to ANDRE L MATTHEWS whose telephone number is
`
`(571)270-5806. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/280,554
`Art Unit: 2621
`
`Page 8
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached on 571 -272-7764. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-
`
`my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access
`
`to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-
`
`272-1000.
`
`/ANDRE L MATTHEWS/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 2621
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket