`
`Application
`No.
`15/476,363
`
`Examiner
`SHAN |_|U
`
`Yes
`
`Applicant(s)
`SATOU, Takeki
`
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`1. SHAN LlU (Primary Examiner); Telephonic
`
`2. Anthony Marshik (Reg. No. 73969); Telephonic
`
`Date of Interview: 29 August 2019
`
`Claims Discussed: 12,13
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`Proposed Amendments:
`Claims 12—13 were missed in the claim amendment submitted 6/3/2019 under 312, which was entered 6/26/2019.
`Examiner suggested to add the claims 12—13 through the examiner amendment and the corrected notice of
`allowability.
`
`Authorization for this examiner’s amendment was given in a telephone interview with the applicant's representative,
`Mr. Anthony Marshik (Reg. No. 73969) on 8/29/2019.
`The application has been amended as follows:
`12. (New) The electronic display device of claim 1, wherein
`both of the first and second panel devices are liquid crystal display type panel devices.
`13. (New) The electronic display device of claim 1, wherein
`one of the first and second panel devices is a touch sensitive input panel device.
`
`
`
`ISHAN LlU/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2871
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview was initiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner has indicated that a written summary will be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Please further see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`37 CFR § 1.2 Business to be transacted in writing
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. 01/01/2015)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20190829
`
`Applicant recordation instructions:lt is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`