`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/565,379
`
`10/09/2017
`
`Osamu Kato
`
`731156.651USPC
`
`5724
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`HAQUE' ABUSAYEED M
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2466
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`11/15/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Off/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/565,379
`Examiner
`ABUSAYEED HAQUE
`
`Applicant(s)
`Kato, Osamu
`Art Unit
`2466
`
`AIA Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 10/09/2017.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 1 and 5 is/are rejected.
`
`Claim(s) 2i is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.'sp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10). The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 10/09/2017 is/are: a). accepted or b)C] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)|:] Some”
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1..
`
`Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`21:]
`
`Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail DateW.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20181108
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`This office action is a response to an application filed on
`
`10/09/2017, in which claims 1-5 are pending and ready for
`
`examination.
`
`Priority
`
`Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application
`
`under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or
`
`386(c) is acknowledged.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate
`
`paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the
`
`rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in
`public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of
`the claimed invention.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 3
`
`Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 102 (a) (1) as
`
`being anticipated by Xia et al. (hereinafter, “Xia”;
`
`20130129005)
`
`As to claim 1, Xia teaches a wireless communication apparatus
`
`which communicates with another wireless communication
`
`apparatus over a wireless backhaul line in which a plurality of
`
`wireless communication schemes are mixed and used,
`
`comprising: a processor that determines whether or not to
`
`add redundant data to data, in accordance with an allowable
`
`delay time of the data (paragraph 25, lines 1—18, transport data is
`
`equated to data, paragraph 26, lines 1—16, latency sensitive data and
`
`latency parameters are equated to allowable delay time of data,
`
`paragraph 28,|ines 1—14, determining remove or reduce the overhead
`
`for latency sensitive is taken as determines whether or not to add
`
`redundant data to data, error coding is equated to redundant data,
`
`adjusting modulation is taken as performing in accordance with an
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 4
`
`allowable delay time of the data, fig. 4, element 400, paragraph 37,lines
`
`1—13, using data processor is taken as the processer performs the claim
`
`functionality); and
`
`an antenna that transmits the data by adding or not adding
`
`the redundant data to the data, in accordance with a result of
`
`the determination (paragraph 28, lines 1—14, determining remove or
`
`reduce the overhead for latency sensitive is taken performing
`
`determination, adjusting modulation is taken as performing in
`
`accordance with in accordance with a result ofthe determination
`
`paragraph 37, lines 1—13 and paragraph 38, lines 1—12, teaches
`
`transmitting data, paragraph 40, lines 1—6, is read as using antenna for
`
`transmitting data).
`
`As to claim 5, Xia teaches a wireless communication method of a
`
`wireless communication apparatus which communicates with
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 5
`
`another wireless communication apparatus over a wireless
`
`backhaul line in which a plurality of wireless communication
`
`schemes are mixed and used, the method comprising
`
`determining whether or not to add redundant data to data, in
`
`accordance with an allowable delay time of the data
`
`(paragraph 25, lines 1—18, transport data is equated to data, paragraph
`
`26, lines 1—16, latency sensitive data and latency parameters are
`
`equated to allowable delay time of data, paragraph 28,lines 1—14,
`
`determining remove or reduce the overhead for latency sensitive is
`
`taken as determines whether or not to add redundant data to data,
`
`error coding is equated to redundant data, adjusting modulation is
`
`taken as performing in accordance with an allowable delay time of the
`
`data, fig. 4, element 400, paragraph 37,lines 1—13, using data processor
`
`is taken as the processer performs the claim functionality); and
`
`transmitting the data by adding or not adding the redundant
`
`data to the data, in accordance with a result of the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 6
`
`determination (paragraph 28, lines 1—14, determining remove or
`
`reduce the overhead for latency sensitive is taken performing
`
`determination, adjusting modulation is taken as performing in
`
`accordance within accordance with a result ofthe determination
`
`paragraph 37, lines 1—13 and paragraph 38, lines 1—12, teaches
`
`transmitting data, paragraph 40, lines 1—6, is read as using antenna for
`
`transmitting data).
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claim 2-4 are objected to as being dependent upon a
`
`rejected base claim, but would be allowable it rewritten in
`
`independent form including all of the limitations of the base
`
`claim and any intervening claims.
`
`The Closest reasonable prior art in the record for claim 2
`
`(20130129005; Xia) teaches in paragraphs 30-38 abound
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 7
`
`classifying data based on latencies, but fails to disclose using
`
`predetermined time (claim 2,line 5) for classifying data.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is
`
`considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry
`
`concerning this communication or earlier communications from
`
`the examiner should be directed to ABUSAYEED HAQUE whose
`
`telephone number is (571)270-7252. The examiner can normally
`
`be reached on 9 am -7:30 pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person,
`
`and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based
`
`collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/565,379
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 8
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are
`
`unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be
`
`reached on 571-272—7969. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is
`
`571 -273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be
`
`obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR)
`
`system. Status information for published applications may be
`
`obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status
`
`information for unpublished applications is available through
`
`Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system,
`
`see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on
`
`access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would
`
`like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative
`
`or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-
`
`9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272—1000.
`
`