`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/218,244
`
`12/12/2018
`
`Prateek Basu Mallick
`
`736456.434C2
`
`7249
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`ONAMUTL GBEMILEKE J
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2463
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/23/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`0,7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/218,244
`Examiner
`GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI
`
`Applicant(s)
`Basu Mallick et al.
`Art Unit
`AIA (FITF) Status
`2463
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 05/06/2019.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) C] This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—16 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are rejected.
`
`[:1 Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[j Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabie. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)[:] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11)[:] The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)D accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12):] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)D All
`
`b)I:J Some**
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.[:] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) C] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190520
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/218,244
`Art Unit: 2463
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`2.
`
`This communication is considered fully responsive to the response filed on the 6th
`
`Response to Remarks
`
`of May, 2019.
`
`(a).
`
`The rejection(s) of Claims 1-16 on the ground of nonstatutory double
`
`patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-16 of Patent No.: US 9,888,424
`
`B2 to Basu Mallick et al. and Claims 1-16 on the ground of nonstatutory double
`
`patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-12 of copending application No.:
`
`15/855,841 to Basu Mallick et al. is withdrawn because the terminal disclaimer
`
`filed on the 6th of May, 2019 is approved.
`
`(b).
`
`The rejection(s) of Claims 1-16 under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same
`
`invention as that of Claims 1-16 of prior Patent No.: US 9,888,424 B2 to Basu
`
`Mallick et al. is MAINTAINED because a statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double
`
`patenting reiection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that
`
`are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope.
`
`The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting
`
`rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/218,244
`Art Unit: 2463
`
`Page 3
`
`Double Parenting
`
`3.
`
`A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its
`
`support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or
`
`discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis
`
`added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to
`
`identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel,
`
`422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330
`
`(CCPA 1957).
`
`A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101 ) double patenting rejection can be overcome by
`
`canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no
`
`longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a
`
`double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as
`
`that of Claims 1-16 of prior Patent No.: US 9,888,424 B2 to Basu Mallick et al. This is a
`
`statutory double patenting rejection. See table below:
`
`Patent No.: US 9,888,424 B2
`
`Instant Application 16/218,244
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/218,244
`Art Unit: 2463
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Conclusion
`
`5.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/218,244
`Art Unit: 2463
`
`Page 5
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI whose telephone number is
`
`(571)270-5619. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, MARK RINEHART can be reached on 5712723632. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/GBEMILEKE J ONAMUTI/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
`
`