throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/417,517
`
`05/20/2019
`
`Chong Soon LIM
`
`735256.410C1
`
`7557
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`PARIKH, DAKSHESH D
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2488
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/08/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1,7,13,19,25,31 and 43-62 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj] Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1,7,13,19,25,31 and 43-62 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 10/08/2020.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 5/19/2021,
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210603
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/417,517
`LIM etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`DAKSHESH D PARIKH
`2488
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 02/16/2021.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAIL
`
`Notice ofPre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`[1]
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, 1s being examined underthe first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Applicant(s) Response to OfficialAction
`
`[2]
`
`The responsefiled on 02/16/2021 has been entered and madeofrecord.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 and 35 USC § 103
`
`[3]
`
`Applicant’s presented arguments with regards to claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25 and 31, filed
`
`02/16/2021 have been fully considered but are held unpersuasive. Examiner's response to the
`
`presented arguments follows below.
`
`Summary of Arguments:
`
`[4]
`
`Regarding Claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25 and 31, argues that Chuang, does not appear to disclose
`
`splitting the block based on whetherfirst and second block-size conditionsare satisfied (in response
`
`to a size of a block of a picturesatisfying a first block-size condition satisfying a second block-size
`
`condition, the splitting along the single direction includes splitting the block along a shorter side of
`
`the block into an even number of sub blocks having a samesize) and writing partitioning- mode
`
`parameters into the bitstream based on whetherthefirst block-size condition 1s satisfied (in
`
`response to the size of the block notsatisfying the first block-size condition, writes a partitioning-
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 3
`
`mode parameter into the bitstream correspondingto splitting the block into four sub blocks along
`
`vertical and horizontal directions, each of the four sub blocks having a samesize) as recited by the
`
`independent claims as amended. /Page 15-16/
`
`Exxaminer’s Response:
`
`Examinerrespectfully disagrees.
`
`[5]
`
`Regarding Claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25 and 31, Examiner contends that
`
`1) The examinerts given the broadest reasonable interpretation when examining the
`
`claims.
`
`2) Chuang discloses
`
`a) quad-tree leaf nodesizeis not larger than a maximum allowed binary tree root
`
`node size (MaxBTSize), it can be further partitioned according to a binary tree
`
`structure. [Para 0085/, That is a first block-size condition, (1.e. Block-size =<
`
`MaxBTSize) 1s satisfied.
`
`b)
`
`1f the quad-tree leaf node size does not exceed the MaxBTSize of 64.times.64),
`
`the leaf quad-tree node may be further partitioned according to the binary tree
`
`structure. /Para 0087]
`
`c) video encoder 20 and video decoder 30 implement a horizontal version of the
`
`binary tree-based split, with respect to the leftmost sub-block of the top-right
`
`sub-block of block 90. The binary tree-based splitting 1s denoted 1n partitioning
`
`tree 92 using a dashed-line two-way split of the leftmost node that resulted from
`
`the split of the second-from-left branch. /Fig. 7A-B, Para 0095]; That 1s a second
`
`block-size condition,(1.e. width < height) 1s satisfied.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 4
`
`d)
`
`top-right sub-block of block 92 1s split according to the center-side triple tree
`
`partitioning structure, to form three rectangular sub-blocks.; Fig. 7A-B, Para
`
`0094, That is @vidth = height), therefore, width < height second block-size
`
`condition 1s notsatisfied)
`
`video encoder 20 may signal a one-bit flag, or an index, or multiple flags to
`
`enable video decoder 30 to decide or determine which of the above-mentioned
`
`splitting schemes should be implemented. [Para 0137]
`
`video encoder 20 maysignal for the various partitioning schemesthat are
`
`possible tn the PT-portion of a multi-type tree-partitioned block partitions and
`
`binary codeword "111" indicates vertical center-side triple tree-based
`
`partitioning, where Thefirst (leftmost) bin represents the value of a PT split flag
`
`(indicating whether the CU1s split or not), the second bin represents the PT split
`
`direction (e.g., horizontal or vertical), and the third bin represents the PT split
`
`mode(e.g., binary tree or center-side triple tree). Fig. 8, Para 0100]
`
`video encoder 20 maysignal three bits or bins for each PT nodeto indicate the
`
`partitioning information for the corresponding PT node. /Fug. 7A-B, 8, Para
`
`0101]
`
`a node in the quadtree may include a split flag, indicating whether the CU
`
`corresponding to the node1s split into sub-CUs.; [Para 0038]
`
`For the quad tree-based portion of the QTBTstructure, there is no need to
`
`signal an indication of the splitting type (1.e., horizontal or vertical), because the
`
`splitting nodes of the quad tree-based portion are always split horizontally and
`
`vertically into four (4) sub-blocks with equal sizes.; [Para 0088/
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 5
`
`Therefore, from aboveit 1s clear that Chuang discloses a first block size condition and
`
`second block size condition and based onsatisfying the first block condition and second
`
`block condition splitting the block in single direction and splitting along a shorter direction
`
`into an even numberof blocks having the same size and writing partitioning mode
`
`parameters (2.e. flags or an indexes) into the bitstream based on whetherthe first block-size
`
`condition1s satisfied (in response to the size of the block notsatisfying the first block-size
`
`condition, writes a partittoning-mode parameterinto the bitstream correspondingto splitting
`
`the block into four sub blocks along vertical and horizontal directions, each of the four sub
`
`blocks having a samesize.
`
`Therefore, regarding Claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25 and 31, Chuang, does appearto disclose splitting
`
`the block based on whetherfirst and second block-size conditionsare satisfied (in response
`
`to a size of a block of a picture satisfying a first block-size condition satisfying a second
`
`block-size condition, the splitting along the single direction includes splitting the block along
`
`a shorter side of the block into an even number of sub blocks having a samesize) and
`
`writing partitioning- mode parameters into the bitstream based on whetherthefirst block-
`
`size condition is satisfied (in response to the size of the block not satisfying the first block-
`
`size condition, writes a partitioning-mode parameterinto the bitstream corresponding to
`
`splitting the block into four sub blocks along vertical and horizontal directions, each of the
`
`four sub blocks having a samesize) as recited by the independent claims as amended.
`
`Accordingly, Examiner maintains the rejection.
`
`Claims Objected to, Minor Informalities
`
`[6]
`
`Claim 62 objected to because of the following informalities:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 6
`
`In claim 62, the claim limitations “... a binary-tree partitioning mode; a multiple-tree
`
`partitioning mode; a horizontal partitioning mode; a vertical partitioning mode; a symmetric
`
`partitioning mode; an asymmetric partitioning mode; a ratio of a block width to a block
`
`height of sub blocks; or combinations thereof.” appears to be a typo error, (1e. 1t is an extra
`
`text, which shall not be present) when looking at the similar claims 47, 52 and 57.
`
`Appropriate correction 1s required.
`
`Examiner’s Note regarding claim interpretation
`
`[7]
`
`Regarding claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 43-62,the claim limitations regarding “first block-size
`
`condition” and “second block-size condition” are not explicitly disclosed in the specifications as
`
`claimed, but they are implicitly disclosed in the Fig. 38-41 and 44-49 and associated text 1n the
`
`instant application.
`
`
`
`[8] The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based onajudicially created doctrine
`
`Double Patenting
`
`grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or
`
`improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible
`
`harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection 1s
`
`appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application
`
`claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is
`
`either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 7
`
`140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010
`
`(Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Long?, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686
`
`F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and
`
`In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be
`
`used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting
`
`ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with
`
`this application, or claims an invention madeasaresult of activities undertaken within the scope of a
`
`joint research agreement.
`
`Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal
`
`disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b).
`
`[9]
`
`Claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 43-62 are provisionally reyected on the ground of nonstatutory
`
`obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-38 of co-pending Application
`
`No 16/417514, in view of US Publication Chuanget al. (US20180070110A1) (hereinafter Chuang).
`
`Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other
`
`because it is merely 1n the terminology used in both sets of claims.
`
`The subject matter claimed tn the instant application 1s fully disclosed in the referenced
`
`patent and would be covered by any patent granted on that patents since the referenced patents and
`
`the instant application are claiming common subject matter, as follows:
`
`*Note: Bold indicates the common subject matter
`
`Instant Application: 16/417,517
`
`Co-pending Application: 16/417514
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`
`Page 8
`
`(Currently Amended) An image
`7.
`encoder comprising: a splitter which,
`in operation, receives and splits an
`original picture into blocks; a first
`adder which,
`in operation, receives
`the blocks from the splitter and
`predictions from a prediction
`controller, and subtracts each
`prediction from its corresponding
`block to output a residual; a
`transformer which,
`in operation,
`performs a transform on the residuals
`outputted from the adder to output
`transform coefficients; a quantizer
`which,
`in operation, quantizes the
`transform coefficients to generate
`quantized transform coefficients; an
`entropy encoder which,
`in operation,
`encodes the quantized transform
`coefficients to generate a bitstream;
`an inverse quantizer and transformer
`which,
`in operation,
`inverse
`quantizes the quantized transform
`coefficients to obtain the transform
`coefficients and inverse transforms
`the transform coefficients to obtain
`
`the residuals; a second adder which,
`in operation, adds the residuals
`outputted from the inverse quantizer
`and transformer and the predictions
`outputted from the prediction
`controller to reconstruct the blocks;
`and the prediction controller coupled
`to an inter predictor, an intra
`predictor, and a memory, wherein the
`inter predictor,
`in operation,
`generates a prediction of a current
`block based on a reference block in
`
`8. An image encoder comprising: a
`splitter which,
`in operation,
`receives and splits an original
`picture into blocks; a first adder
`which,
`in operation, receives the
`blocks from the splitter and
`predictions from a prediction
`controller, and subtracts each
`prediction from its corresponding
`block to output a residual; a
`transformer which,
`in operation,
`performs a transform on the residuals
`outputted from the adder to output
`transform coefficients; a quantizer
`which,
`in operation, quantizes the
`transform coefficients to generate
`quantized transform coefficients; an
`entropy encoder which,
`in operation,
`encodes the quantized transform
`coefficients to generate a bitstream;
`an inverse quantizer and transformer
`which,
`in operation,
`inverse
`quantizes the quantized transform
`coefficients to obtain the transform
`coefficients and inverse transforms
`the transform coefficients to obtain
`
`the residuals; a second adder which,
`in operation, adds the residuals
`outputted from the inverse quantizer
`and transformer and the predictions
`outputted from the prediction
`controller to reconstruct the blocks;
`and the prediction controller coupled
`to an inter predictor, an intra
`predictor, and a memory, wherein the
`inter predictor,
`in operation,
`generates a prediction of a current
`block based on a reference block in
`
`an encoded reference picture and the
`intra predictor,
`in operation,
`generates a prediction of a current
`block based on an encoded reference
`
`an encoded reference picture and the
`intra predictor,
`in operation,
`generates a prediction of a current
`block based on an encoded reference
`
`block in a current picture, wherein
`the prediction controller,
`in
`operation:
`
`block in a current picture, wherein
`the prediction controller,
`in
`operation:
`
`in response to a size of the current
`block of the picture satisfying a
`first block-size condition, splits
`the current block into sub blocks
`
`along a single direction, wherein,
`
`in response to splitting a block of a
`picture into sub blocks along a
`single direction, sets one or more
`parameters to a first set of values;
`
`
`
`in response to splitting the block
`into four sub blocks using a first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in response to the size of the
`current block satisfying a second
`block-size condition,
`the splitting
`along the single direction includes
`splitting the current block along a
`
`
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`
`Page 9
`
`shorter side of the current block
`into an even number of sub blocks
`
`having a same size; and
`
`in response to the size of the
`current block not satisfying the
`second block- size condition,
`the
`splitting along the single direction
`includes splitting the current block
`into sub blocks having different
`sizes;
`
`to the size of the
`the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partition, each of the sub blocks
`having a same size, sets the one or
`more parameters to a second set of
`values different from the first set
`
`
`
`
`
`of values,
`
`in response to splitting the block
`into three sub blocks using a second
`partition, ratios of sizes of the sub
`blocks being 1:2:1,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the second partition not including a
`partition splitting the block into
`four same-sized sub blocks, sets the
`one or more parameters to a third set
`of values different from the first
`and second sets of values; encodes
`the sub blocks of the block, and
`writes the one or more parameters
`into the bit stream.
`
`
`
`in response
`current block not satisfying
`first block-size condition, splits
`the block into four sub blocks along
`vertical and horizontal directions,
`the four sub blocks having a same
`Size; and encodes the sub blocks of
`the current block, wherein the
`prediction controller,
`in operation:
`in response to the size of the block
`satisfying the first block-size
`condition and not satisfying the
`second block-size condition, writes a
`partitioning-mode parameter into a
`bitstream corresponding to splitting
`the block into sub blocks including
`sub blocks having different sizes;
`and in response to the size of the
`block not satisfying the first block-
`size condition, writes a
`partitioning-mode parameter into the
`bitstream corresponding to splitting
`the block into four sub blocks along
`vertical and
`horizontal directions,
`each of the
`four sub blocks having a
`same size.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[10]
`
`Referring to claims 7, although conflicting application 16/417514 do not explicitly disclose
`
`what’s claimed in instant application 16/417517,“... in responseto a size of the current block of
`
`the picture satisfying a first block-size condition, splits the current block into sub blocks along a
`
`single direction, wherein, in response to the size of the current block satisfying a second block-size
`
`condition, the splitting along the single direction includes splitting the current block along a shorter
`
`side of the current block into an even numberof sub blocks having a samesize; and 1n response to
`
`the size of the current block not satisfying the second block- size condition, the splitting along the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 10
`
`single direction includes splitting the current block into sub blocks having different sizes; in
`
`response to the size of the current block notsatisfying the first block-size condition, splits the block
`
`into four sub blocks along vertical and horizontal directions, the four sub blocks having a samesize;
`
`and encodes the sub blocks of the current block, wherein the prediction controller, in operation: in
`
`response to the size of the block satisfying the first block-size condition and notsatisfying the
`
`second block-size condition, writes a partitioning-mode parameter into a bitstream corresponding to
`
`splitting the block into sub blocks including sub blocks having different sizes; and in response to the
`
`size of the block notsatisfying the first block-size condition, writes a partitioning-mode parameter
`
`into the bitstream corresponding to splitting the block into four sub blocks along vertical and
`
`horizontal directions, each of the four sub blocks having a samesize. ”
`
`However, in the same field of endeavor Chuangdiscloses “... in response to a size of the
`
`current block of the picture satisfying a first block-size condition,splits the current block into sub
`
`blocks along a single direction, wherein, in response to the size of the current block satisfying a
`
`second block-size condition, the splitting along the single direction includessplitting the current
`
`block along a shorter side of the current block into an even number of sub blocks having a same
`
`size; and in response to the size of the current block not satisfying the second block- size condition,
`
`the splitting along the single direction includes splitting the current block into sub blocks having
`
`different sizes; 1n response to the size of the current block notsatisfying the first block-size
`
`condition, splits the block into four sub blocks along vertical and horizontal directions, the four sub
`
`blocks having a same size; and encodes the sub blocks of the current block, wherein the prediction
`
`controller, in operation: in response to the size of the block satisfying the first block-size condition
`
`and notsatisfying the second block-size condition, writes a partitioning-mode parameter into a
`
`bitstream corresponding to splitting the block into sub blocks including sub blocks having different
`
`sizes; and in response to thesize of the block not satisfying the first block-size condition, writes a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 11
`
`partitioning-mode parameter into the bitstream corresponding to splitting the block into four sub
`
`blocks along vertical and horizontal directions, each of the four sub blocks having a samesize.”
`
`[Chuang: Fig. CA-B, 7A-B, 8, Para 0038, 0085-0088, 0093-0095, OO99, 0100, 101, 0137]
`
`Therefore, tt would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of
`
`the invention to modify the system disclosed by conflicting application 16/417,514 add the
`
`teachings of Chuang as above, in order to provide better coding efficiency. /Chuang: Para 0098]
`
`[11]
`
`Claim 1, 13, 19, 25 and 31 are analogues the device claim 7, therefore, at least for this reason
`
`claim 1, 13, 19, 25 and 31 are rejected similarly to claim 7.
`
`[12]
`
`Regarding dependent claims 43-62, Claims 43-62 correspond to claim 1-38 of conflicting
`
`Co-pending Application 16/417514 and obvious over Chuang.
`
`Notcere prior art available under both pre-AIA and AIA
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to ATA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) 1s incorrect, any correction of the
`
`statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new groundof rejection if the priorart
`
`relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same undereitherstatus.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following 1s a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 12
`
`A patent for a claimed mvention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed mvention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of thistitle, if the differences between the claimed invention
`and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the
`claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was
`made.
`
`Thefactual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966),
`that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C.
`103 are summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claimsat issue.
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinentart.
`4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or
`nonobviousness.
`
`This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims
`the examiner presumesthat the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned
`as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary.
`Applicantis advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and
`effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing
`date of the later invention 1n order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C.
`102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
`
`[13]
`
`Claim 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 43-62 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Chuang et al. (US20180070110A1) (hereinafter Chuang).
`
`Regarding Claim 7, Chuang meets the limitations as follows:
`
`An image encoder /Fig. 2, and associated text, Para 0052-0053, 0177, discloses an
`
`image encoder] comprising:
`
`a splitter which, tn operation, recetves and splits an original picture into
`
`blocks; /48 Fig. 2, and associated text, Para 0055, discloses splittingpicture in LOU]
`
`a first adder which, in operation, receives the blocks from the splitter and
`
`predictions from a prediction controller, and subtracts each prediction from its
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 13
`
`corresponding block to output a residual; [50 Pig. 2, and associated text, Para 0056,
`
`0059)
`
`a transformer which, in operation, performs a transform on the residuals
`
`outputted from the adder to output transform coefficients; 92 Fag. 2, and assocated
`
`text, Para 0053, 0065-0066]
`
`a quantizer which, in operation, quantizes the transform coefficients to
`
`generate quantized transform coefficients; [54 Fug. 2, and associated text, Para 0053,
`
`0066]
`
`an entropy encoder which, in operation, encodes the quantized transform
`
`coefficients to generate a bitstream; /56 Pig. 2, and associated text, Para 0053, 0056,
`
`0058, 0064, 0066-0067]
`
`an inverse quantizer and transformer which, in operation, inverse quantizes
`
`the quantized transform coefficients to obtain the transform coefficients and inverse
`
`transforms the transform coefficients to obtain the residuals; [58 Fig. 2, and associated
`
`text, Para 0053, 0068)
`
`a second adder which, in operation, adds the residuals outputted from the
`
`inverse quantizer and transformer and the predictions outputted from the prediction
`
`controller to reconstruct the blocks; /62 Fig. 2, and associated text, Para 053, 0056,
`
`0068) and
`
`the prediction controller coupled to an inter predictor, an intra predictor, and
`
`a memory, wherein the inter predictor, in operation, generates a prediction of a
`
`current block based on a reference block in an encoded reference picture and the
`
`intra predictor, in operation, generates a prediction of a current block based on an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 14
`
`encoded reference block in a current picture, /Fig. 2, and associated text, Para 0052-
`
`0058, 0068-0072] wherein the prediction controller, in operation:
`
`in response to a size of the current block of the picture satisfying a first
`
`block-size condition, (7.2. Block-size =< MaxBTSize, afirst block condition ts satisfied) [i.e.
`
`guad-tree leafnode size is not larger than a maximum allowed binary tree root node size
`
`(MaxBTSize), it can befurtherpartitioned according to a binary tree structure; Para 0085 andif
`
`the quad-tree leafnode size does not exceed the MaxBTSize of64.times.64), the leafquad-tree
`
`node may befurtherpartitioned according to the binary tree structure.; Para 0087] splits the
`
`current block into sub blocks along a single direction,/7.¢. ¢fthe guad-tree leafnode size
`
`does not exceed the MaxBTSize of64.times.64), the leafquad-tree node may befurtherpartitioned
`
`according to the binary tree structure.;[Para 0087] and In each splitting node (i.e., non-leafnode) of
`
`the binary tree portion ofFIG. 6B, video encoder 20 may signal oneflag to indicate which binary
`
`splitting type (i.e., horizontal or vertical) is used.;[Fig. CA-B, Fig, 7A-B, Para 0088] wherein,
`
`in response to the size of the current block satisfying a second block-size
`
`condition, (i.e. wzdth < height second block size condition is satisfied) the splitting along the
`
`single direction includes splitting the current block along a shorter side of the current
`
`block into an even number of sub blocks having a samesize; /.e. wdeo encoder 20 and
`
`udeo decoder 30 implement a horizontal version ofthe binary tree-based split, with respect to the
`
`leftmost sub-block ofthe top-right sub-block ofblock 90. The binary tree-based splitting is denoted
`
`in partitioning tree 92 using a dashed-hne two-way split ofthe leftmost node that resultedfrom the
`
`split ofthe second-from-left branch.; Fig. 7A-B, Para 0095] and
`
`in response to the size of the current block notsatisfying the second block-
`
`size condition, (2.2. wtdth = height, width < height second condition is not satisfied) the
`
`splitting along the single direction includessplitting the current block into sub blocks
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/417,517
`Art Unit: 2488
`
`Page 15
`
`having different sizes; /2.e. fop-right sub-block of block 92 is split according to the center-side
`
`triple treepartitioning structure, toform three rectangular sub-blocks.; Fig. 7A-B, Para 0094)
`
`in response to the size of the current block notsatisfying the first block-size
`
`condition,(i.e. Block-size > MaxBTSize, therefore, Block-size =< MaxBTSizeafirst block
`
`size condition is not satisfied) splits the block into four sub blocks along vertical and
`
`horizontal directions, the four sub blocks having a samesize; /7.e CTU size is set as
`
`128.times.128 and MaxBTSizeis set as 64.times.64, and quadtreepartitioning is applied to the
`
`CTUfirst, to generate quad-tree leafnodes, Para 0086, and block 90 isfirstpartitioned according
`
`to the quadtree structure, intofour square sub-blocks; Fig. 7A-B, Para 0093] and
`
`encodes the sub blocks of the current block, /2.e. wdeo encoder 20 may signal a
`
`one-litflag, or an index, or multipleflags to enable video decoder 30 to decide or determine which of
`
`the above-mentioned splitting schemes should be implemented. ; Para 0137] wherein the
`
`prediction controller, in operation:
`
`in response to the size of the block satisfying the first block-size condition
`
`and notsatisfying the second block-size condition, writes a partitioning-mode
`
`parameter into a bitstream correspondingto splitting the block into sub blocks
`
`including sub blocks having different sizes; /2.e. wideo encoder 20 may signalfor the various
`
`partitioning schemes that arepossible in the PT-portion ofa multi-type tree-partitioned block
`
`partitions and binary co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket