throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/490,587
`
`09/02/2019
`
`TETSUYA YAMAMOTO
`
`731456.537USPC
`
`3671
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`BUTT, WALLIZ
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2412
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/06/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/490,587
`Examiner
`WALLI Z BUTT
`
`Applicant(s)
`YAMAMOTOetal.
`Art Unit
`AIA (FITF) Status
`2412
`Yes
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 07/27/2021.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-11 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj] Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-3 and 7-9 is/are rejected.
`Claim(s) 4-6 and 10-11 is/are objected to.
`£] Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)() The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)C) accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`cc) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)D) All
`1.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210930
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 2
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Status of Case
`
`2.
`
`This communication is in response to Applicants 07/27/2021 amendment(s)
`
`/response(s) in the 16/490,587 by Li for “TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION
`
`METHOD FOR UPLINK CONTROL CHANNEL TRANSMISSION’, filed on 09/02/2019.
`
`The amendment/responseto the claims has been entered:
`

`
`Claims 1-11 are pending.
`
`This rejection is FINAL.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`3.
`
`Applicant's arguments, filed on 07/27/2021, hereinafter “Remarks”, have been
`
`fully considered and they are persuasive in part, as described below:
`
`a.
`
`Applicants have amendedthe title to be: “TERMINAL AND
`
`COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR UPLINK CONTROL CHANNEL
`
`TRANSMISSION”. Therefore, the objection to the title has been withdrawn.
`
`b.
`
`On page 7 of the Remarks, Applicants assert that the prior art reference of
`
`Wang does notdisclose or suggest “a case wherea difference between a power
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 3
`
`spectrum density (PSD) of the PUCCH and the PSD of the PUSCH is greater
`
`than a threshold value”. Examiner respectfully disagrees.
`
`L.
`
`In response, Examiner notes that Applicant’s claim language does
`
`not specifically define the term “greater than a threshold value”, nor does
`
`the claim language provide any further details regarding this term. Based
`
`on the broadest reasonable interpretation of the term “greater than a
`
`threshold value”, Examiner notes that this term can be construed as
`
`merely the difference between a PSD corresponding to a PUCCH and a
`
`PSD corresponding to a PUSCH asbeing greater than a preconfigured
`
`arbitrary value. Based on this interpretation, Examiner notes that the prior
`
`art reference of WANG, Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach determining the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH, determining the PSD of the PUCCH, and comparing
`
`a delta value which represents a difference between the channels to a
`
`maximum delta value which represents a maximum difference in the
`
`PSDs. Hence, WANG’s teachings encompassthe feature: “in a case
`
`wherea difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of the
`
`PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a threshold value,”
`
`based on the broadest reasonable interpretation of “greater than a
`
`threshold value”.
`
`C.
`
`On page 8 of the Remarks, Applicants assert that the prior art reference of
`
`Li, and the combination of Wang and LI, do not disclose or suggest dropping a
`
`symbol a symbol of the PUSCH in a transmission interval for the PUSCH
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 4
`
`overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH in a case where a
`
`difference between the PSD of the PUCCH and the PSD of the PUSCH is
`
`greater than a threshold value. Examiner respectfully disagrees.
`
`L.
`
`First, Examiner notes that the term “drop” can be construed as
`
`“does not transmit or punctures”. The LI reference teaches, at paragraph
`
`30, performing a combination of one or moreof: not scheduling data bits
`
`of a PUSCH in time-frequency resources of a PUCCH (i.e. the overlapping
`
`resources); puncturing the PUSCH in specified overlapping resourcesof
`
`the PUCCH and the PUSCH; first scheduling data bits and then
`
`puncturing specified data bits in overlapping resources of the PUSCH and
`
`the PUCCH. Therefore, LI teaches the feature for whichit is relied upon,
`
`i.e. “drops a symbol of the PUSCH in a transmission interval for the
`
`PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH;”.
`
`il.
`
`Second, in response to applicant's arguments against the
`
`references individually, one cannot show nonobviousnessby attacking
`
`references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of
`
`references. See /n re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981);
`
`In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). As
`
`described above, Wang teaches “a case wherea difference between a
`
`power spectrum density (PSD) of the PUCCH and the PSD of the PUSCH
`
`is greater than a threshold value”, and LI teaches “drops a symbol of the
`
`PUSCH in a transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a
`
`transmission interval for the PUCCH;”. Therefore, it would have been
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 5
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effectivefiling date of
`
`the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of LI with the teachings of
`
`WANGto drop a symbol of the PUSCH in a transmission interval for the
`
`PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH. The
`
`motivation would be to avoid an overlapping resource when PUCCH and
`
`PUSCH are multiplexed in the overlapping resources (LI, paragraph 30).
`
`d.
`
`With respect to claim 2, Applicants arguments on page 9 of the Remarks
`
`have been fully considered and respondedto above.
`
`e.
`
`On page 10 of the Remarks, with respect to claim 3, Applicants assert that
`
`“Wang does notdisclose that satisfying parameters relating to transmission
`
`format is tantamount to changing a transmission format of the PUCCH. Meeting
`
`parameters relating to transmission format or ensuring that the parameters are
`
`accommodated, conformedto or appropriate does not amount to changing a
`
`transmission format in a case where a condition is met.” Examiner respectfully
`
`disagrees.
`
`il.
`
`In response, Examiner notes that Wang, Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61,
`
`teach that the UE 120 mayincrease a quantity of data channel resource
`
`blocks from a candidate allocation and may decrease a quantity of control
`
`channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation to ensure that the
`
`delta value does not exceed the maximum delta value. Furthermore,
`
`paragraph 63 teaches the satisfying parameters relating to transmission
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 6
`
`format (e.g. QPSK, QAM) of the control channel or the data channel. This
`
`correspondsto changing a transmission format of the PUCCH because
`
`the UE 120 satisfies transmission format parameters of the PUCCH by
`
`prioritizing providing transmit power to specified channels basedatleastin
`
`part on another parameter such asa bias value relating to the
`
`transmission format.
`
`4.
`
`In view of the foregoing, Examiner respectfully disagrees that the prior art
`
`references of record do not teach the features of independent claim 1, as similarly
`
`recited in independent claims 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9. Based on all of the above remarks, and
`
`absent any changes to the claim language which would clearly distinguish over the prior
`
`art of record, Examiner maintains the rejection.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an
`application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the
`patent or application, as the case may be, namesanother inventor and waseffectively filed
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 3 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by
`
`WANGetal. (US20180206196A1), hereinafter WANG.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 7
`
`Regarding claim 3, WANGteachesA terminal comprising: circuitry, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 7, paragraphs 83-84, teach UE 602 comprising processor 706 (i.e. circuitry).)
`
`which, in operation, in a slot having allocated thereto both an uplink control
`
`channel (PUCCH) and an uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink data,
`
`(WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL PUCCH
`
`320 and PUSCH 330 that includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.) changesa transmission format of the PUCCH;
`
`(WANG,Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61, teach that the UE 120 mayincrease a quantity of
`
`data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and may decrease a quantity
`
`of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation to ensure that the delta
`
`value does not exceed the maximum delta value. Furthermore, paragraph 63 teaches
`
`the satisfying parameters relating to transmission format (e.g. QPSK, QAM) of the
`
`control channel or the data channel. This corresponds to changing a transmission
`
`format of the PUCCH because the UE 120satisfies transmission format parameters of
`
`the PUCCH.)
`
`and a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits the PUCCH obtained after
`
`the transmission format has been changed, and the PUSCH, in the slot. (WANG,
`
`Fig. 4, step 430, paragraph 66, teach transmitting at least the PUCCH in the slot.)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 8
`
`Regarding claim 9, WANG teaches A communication method including: ina
`
`slot having allocated thereto both an uplink control channel (PUCCH) and an
`
`uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink data, (WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-
`
`52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL PUCCH 320 and PUSCH 330 that
`
`includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.) changing a transmission format of the PUCCH;
`
`(WANG,Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61, teach that the UE 120 mayincrease a quantity of
`
`data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and may decrease a quantity
`
`of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation to ensure that the delta
`
`value does not exceed the maximum delta value. Furthermore, paragraph 63 teaches
`
`the satisfying parameters relating to transmission format (e.g. QPSK, QAM) of the
`
`control channel or the data channel. This corresponds to changing a transmission
`
`format of the PUCCH because the UE 120 satisfies transmission format parameters of
`
`the PUCCH.) and transmitting the PUCCH obtained after the transmission format
`
`has been changed, and the PUSCH, in the slot. (WANG,Fig. 4, step 430, paragraph
`
`66, teach transmitting at least the PUCCH in the slot.)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 9
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`7.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious beforethe effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`8.
`
`Claims 1-2 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`WANG et
`
`al.
`
`(US20180206196A1), hereinafter WANG,
`
`in view of
`
`Li
`
`et
`
`al.
`
`(US20180132229A1), hereinafter Li.
`
`Regarding claim 1, WANG teachesA terminal comprising: circuitry, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 7, paragraphs 83-84, teach UE 602 comprising processor 706(i.e. circuitry).)
`
`which, in operation, in a slot having allocated thereto both an uplink
`
`control channel (PUCCH) and an uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink
`
`data, (WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL
`
`PUCCH 320 and PUSCH 330that includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 10
`
`and a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits at least the PUCCHin the
`
`slot. (WANG,Fig. 4, step 430, paragraph 66, teach transmitting at least the PUCCH in
`
`the slot.)
`
`Although WANGteaches(Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61) that the UE 120 may
`
`increase a quantity of data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and
`
`may decrease a quantity of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation
`
`to ensure that the delta value does not exceed the maximum delta value, and
`
`furthermore, paragraph 64 teaches that the UE 120 may determine notto transmit one
`
`of the control channel or the data channel based on transmit power, associated PSD,
`
`and/or link budget WANG doesnot describe drops a symbol of the PUSCHina
`
`transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for
`
`the PUCCH;
`
`However L/in the same field of endeavor teaches drops a symbol of the
`
`PUSCHin a transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission
`
`interval for the PUCCH; (L/, paragraph 30 teaches the UE configured not schedule
`
`specified data bits of the PUSCH in the time-frequency region of the PUCCH.)
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before
`
`the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of L/ with the
`
`teachings of WANGto drop a symbol of the PUSCH in a transmission interval for the
`
`PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH. The motivation would
`
`be to avoid an overlapping resource when PUCCH and PUSCH are multiplexed in the
`
`overlapping resources (LI, paragraph 30).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 11
`
`Regarding claim 2, WANG teaches A terminal comprising: circuit, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 7, paragraphs 83-84, teach UE 602 comprising processor 706 (i.e. circuitry).)
`
`which, in operation, in a slot having allocated thereto both an uplink control
`
`channel (PUCCH) and an uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink data,
`
`(WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL PUCCH
`
`320 and PUSCH 330 that includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.)
`
`and a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits the PUCCH, and the
`
`PUSCHfor whichthe portion of a frequency band has been dropped, in theslot.
`
`(WANG,Fig. 4, step 430, paragraph 66, teach the PUCCH and the PUSCH in the
`
`specified resources.)
`
`Although WANGteaches(Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61) that the UE 120 may
`
`increase a quantity of data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and
`
`may decrease a quantity of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation
`
`to ensure that the delta value does not exceed the maximum delta value, and
`
`furthermore, paragraph 64 teaches that the UE 120 may determine notto transmit one
`
`of the control channel or the data channel based on transmit power, associated PSD,
`
`and/or link budget, WANG doesnot describe drops a portion of resources of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 12
`
`frequency resources to which the PUSCH isallocated in a transmission interval
`
`for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH;
`
`HoweverL/ in the same field of endeavor teaches drops a portion of resources
`
`of frequency resources to which the PUSCHis allocated in a transmission
`
`interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH;
`
`(LI, paragraph 30 teaches the UE configured not schedule specified data bits of the
`
`PUSCH in the time-frequency region of the PUCCH.)
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before
`
`the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of L/ with the
`
`teachings of WANGto drop a portion of resources of frequency resources to which the
`
`PUSCH is allocated in a transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a
`
`transmission interval for the PUCCH. The motivation would be to avoid an overlapping
`
`resource when PUCCH and PUSCH are multiplexed in the overlapping resources (LI,
`
`paragraph 30).
`
`Regarding claim 7, WANG teaches A communication methodincluding: in a
`
`slot having allocated thereto both an uplink control channel (PUCCH) and an
`
`uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink data, (WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-
`
`52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL PUCCH 320 and PUSCH 330that
`
`includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 13
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.)
`
`and transmitting at least the PUCCHin the slot. (WANG,Fig. 4, step 430,
`
`paragraph 66, teach transmitting at least the PUCCH in the slot.)
`
`Although WANGteaches(Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61) that the UE 120 may
`
`increase a quantity of data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and
`
`may decrease a quantity of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation
`
`to ensure that the delta value does not exceed the maximum delta value, and
`
`furthermore, paragraph 64 teaches that the UE 120 may determine notto transmit one
`
`of the control channel or the data channel based on transmit power, associated PSD,
`
`and/or link budget WANG doesnot describe dropping a symbol of the PUSCH ina
`
`transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for
`
`the PUCCH;
`
`However L/in the same field of endeavor teaches dropping a symbol of the
`
`PUSCHin a transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission
`
`interval for the PUCCH; (L/, paragraph 30 teaches the UE configured not schedule
`
`specified data bits of the PUSCH in the time-frequency region of the PUCCH.)
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before
`
`the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of LI with the
`
`teachings of WANG to drop a symbol of the PUSCH in a transmission interval for the
`
`PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH. The motivation would
`
`be to avoid an overlapping resource when PUCCH and PUSCH are multiplexed in the
`
`overlapping resources (LI, paragraph 30).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 14
`
`Regarding claim 8, WANG teaches A communication methodincluding: in a
`
`slot having allocated thereto both an uplink control channel (PUCCH) and an
`
`uplink channel (PUSCH)that includes uplink data, (WANG,Fig. 3, paragraphs 49-
`
`52, teach a slot 310 having allocated both UL PUCCH 320 and PUSCH 330 that
`
`includes UL data.)
`
`in a case where a difference between a power spectrum density (PSD) of
`
`the PUCCH andthe PSD of the PUSCHis greater than a threshold value, (WANG,
`
`Fig. 3, paragraphs 53-54, teach a difference between a PSD of the PUCCH and the
`
`PSD of the PUSCH is greater than a value (i.e. threshold value), as further described by
`
`Fig. 4, step 420, paragraph 60.)
`
`and transmitting the PUCCH, and the PUSCHfor which the portion of a
`
`frequency band has been dropped, in the slot. (WANG,Fig. 4, step 430, paragraph
`
`66, teach the PUCCH and the PUSCH in the specified resources.)
`
`Although WANGteaches(Fig. 4, paragraphs 60-61) that the UE 120 may
`
`increase a quantity of data channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation and
`
`may decrease a quantity of control channel resource blocks from a candidate allocation
`
`to ensure that the delta value does not exceed the maximum delta value, and
`
`furthermore, paragraph 64 teaches that the UE 120 may determine notto transmit one
`
`of the control channel or the data channel based on transmit power, associated PSD,
`
`and/or link budget, WANG doesnot describe drops a portion of resources of
`
`frequency resources to which the PUSCH isallocated in a transmission interval
`
`for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH;
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 15
`
`HoweverL/ in the same field of endeavor teaches drops a portion of resources
`
`of frequency resources to which the PUSCHis allocated in a transmission
`
`interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a transmission interval for the PUCCH;
`
`(LI, paragraph 30 teaches the UE configured not schedule specified data bits of the
`
`PUSCH in the time-frequency region of the PUCCH.)
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before
`
`the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of L/ with the
`
`teachings of WANGto drop a portion of resources of frequency resources to which the
`
`PUSCH is allocated in a transmission interval for the PUSCH overlapping with a
`
`transmission interval for the PUCCH. The motivation would be to avoid an overlapping
`
`resource when PUCCH and PUSCH are multiplexed in the overlapping resources (LI,
`
`paragraph 30).
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`9.
`
`Claims 4-6 and 10-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base
`
`claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the
`
`limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
`
`Conclusion
`
`10.
`
`‘The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 16
`
`Heo et al. (US20080153425A1) is directed to multiplexing an uplink packet data
`
`channel and a control channel, a transport format of the control channel for transmission
`
`of the control information is changed according to the transport format of the data
`
`channel (Abstract). More particularly, paragraph 52 teaches a number of symbols for a
`
`control channel, and as many symbols as those capable of satisfying the entire energy
`
`are required when a data transmission power is used in order to simultaneously transmit
`
`the control channel and the data channel.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst replyis filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date ofthis final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date ofthis final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to WALLI Z BUTT whose telephone number is (571)272-
`
`5822. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00 AM - 5.30 PM.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/490,587
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 17
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, CHARLES JIANG can be reached on 571-270-7191. The fax phone
`
`number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -
`
`273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-
`
`my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on accessto the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access
`
`to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-
`
`272-1000.
`
`IWALLI Z BUTT/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2412
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket