throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/735,238
`
`01/06/2020
`
`Masakazu HOASHI
`
`20296.0133USW1
`
`1278
`
`HAY
`
`M
`
`TLERS
`
`HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON P.C.
`45 South Seventh Street
`Suite 2700
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683
`
`HAILE, BENYAM
`
`2688
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/16/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`PTOMail @hsml.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1,3 and 6 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1,3and6 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220511
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/735,238
`HOASHI etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`BENYAM HAILE
`2688
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 03/28/2022.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013,
`
`is being examined underthe
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`2.
`
`Claims 1, 3, 6 are pending.
`
`Status of Claims
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which formsthe basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent fora claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the
`prior art are such that theclaimed invention as a whole would have been obviousbefore the effective
`filing date of the claimed invention toa person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed
`invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`4,
`
`The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35
`
`U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims atissue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill
`
`in the pertinent art.
`
`4, Considering objective evidence presentin the application indicating obviousness or
`
`nonobviousness.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vahid [US
`
`20130275313]
`
`in view of Kuwanoet al. [Kuwano, US 8706303].
`
`Asto claim 1. Vahid discloses A methodfor dis playing a procedure of maintenance
`
`workfor a refrigerator ona display comprising:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 3
`
`identifying an error that occurred in the refrigerator, [0031] the device is a
`
`refrigeration unit, based on an instruction,[fig. 3 steps s32, s33, 0046, 0047] user selects
`
`possible issue from a list, input by a maintenance worker for the refrigerator, [0050] the user
`
`is amaintenance technician,_whois at the location of the refrigerator, [0052] the technician is
`
`at the location of the maintained device;
`
`causing the display to display a plurality of countermeasures which corres pond to
`
`the erroridentified in the identifying, [fig. 3 step s34, 0047];
`
`when one ofthe plurality of countermeasures is selected, [0047] user selects one of
`
`the remedy provided, causing the display to display the procedure whichindicates a
`
`plurality of processes corresponding to the selected countermeasure, [fig. 3 step s35, 0047] a
`
`step-through of how to repair the device is displayed, each of the plurality of processes being
`
`provided in advance with a work movie, [0047] the step-through is provided in a video format;
`
`wherein [0038, 0039] a remote server storing video guide for the specific device in a database on
`
`how to repair the device and send the guide when requested; and
`
`when an instruction to play a specific work movie, from among the work movies
`
`provided for the plurality of processes, [fig. 3, 0047, 0067] selected guide video is played,
`
`corresponding to a specific process included in the plurality of processes is received, [fig. 3
`
`step s35, 0047] a step-through of how to repair the device is displayed, causing the display to
`
`play the specific work movie on the display, [0047, 066, 0067] the video content is a remedy
`
`for the selected issue, by obtaining data for playing the specific work movie on the dis play
`
`from a serverwhichis configured to communicate, directly or indirectly, covers all the
`
`available scope, with the display, [0034], when the input of the instruction to play the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 4
`
`specific work movie is received via the display, [0034, 0047, 0066, 0067] the video shows the
`
`instruction on how to fix the selected issue,
`
`wherein the specific work movie is played on the display using the data received in
`
`the obtaining, [0034, 0047, 0066, 0067],
`
`the specific work movie includes only work explanation information of the specific
`
`process of the countermeasuresthat needs to be checked, [0047, 0066] “the video offers the
`
`user the ability to see a particular removal/replacement of the entire device or individual
`
`part/component while taking into account proper posture, position, and timing ofa live action
`
`example of said step/process”, and
`
`wherein when the specific process is selected, both (i) an explanation of the specific
`
`process, [0047], and (ii) an object for receiving the input of the instructions to play the
`
`specific work movie corresponding to the specific process are displayed, basic functionality
`
`of a video player, on the dis play, [0044, 0066, 0067].
`
`Vahid fails to explicitly disclose that the explanation of the specific process and the
`
`object for playing the movie are both displayed ona samescreen on the display; and when the
`
`selected countermeasure for the procedure has a plurality of sub-processes, a sub-process
`
`list screen showingalist of the plurality of sub-processes that corres pond to the selected
`
`countermeasure of work procedure is shown onthe display, a display area for a sub-
`
`process corresponding to the selected countermeasure of work procedureis enlarged, and
`
`an explanatory text and a video area of the work procedure of the sub-process are
`
`dis played.
`
`Kuwanoteaches an apparatus for displaying instructions in a manualthat contains a
`
`video [fig. 8A]; wherein the instruction manual displays instructions for a countermeasure for an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 5
`
`error wherein the same screen shows an object for playing a video for the same instruction
`
`manual, [fig. 8A, col. 7, lines 54-64]; wherein, [col 7, lines 37-53] when selecting a specific
`
`countermeasure, a more detailed explanation of the method which includes a video alongside an
`
`explanation text steps is displayed,
`
`[fig. 8A]; wherein the video includes an object for receiving
`
`input of the instructions to play the movie, A21d and the detailed explanation of the remedy
`
`provided in the video display region A21b.
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill
`
`in the art at the time ofthe filing of
`
`the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Vahid with that of Kuwanosothat the user
`
`can have the option of viewing the instructional video at the same time as reading the main steps
`
`in a text format alongside the video to allow the userillustrative instructions in the video ina
`
`greater detail and major steps of the instruction in the text format for easy following of the
`
`detailed steps provided in the video.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vahid in view
`
`of Kuwano as applied to claim 1 above, further in view of Mapes et al. [Mapes, US 5946921].
`
`Asto claim 3. Vahid fails to disclose The method according to claim 1, wherein the
`
`error includes an abnormality of an ice mechanism ofthe refrigerator, and the plurality of
`
`countermeasures include a removal of foreign substance stuck in the ice mechanism and a
`
`replacementof the ice mechanism.
`
`Mapes teaches a method for repairing a refrigerant system wherein the repair includes
`
`removing a blockage and replacing the mechanism thatis part of the ice making mechanism,
`
`[col. 7, lines 7-53].
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 6
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill
`
`in the art at the time of the filing of
`
`the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Vahid with that of Mapes for the method of
`
`Vahid to include commonrefrigerator problem diagnosis and repair instructions so as the method
`
`can be used for commonrefrigerator diagnostic steps.
`
`7.
`
`Claim 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vahid in view of
`
`Kuwanoasapplied to claim 1 above, further in view of Gillette et al. [US 20180031256a].
`
`Asto claim 6. Vahid discloses The method according to claim 1, wherein the error
`
`that occurred in the productis identified based on an error code, [0056] guide on how tofix
`
`the specific error is downloaded based on the error message.
`
`Vahid fails to disclose that the error code is input by the maintenance worker
`
`Gillette teaches a system and method for interactive maintenance interface comprising a
`
`remote maintenance service 210 [fig. 2A, 0026] including a troubleshooting and maintenance
`
`guide; wherein [0058] the technician canenter a maintenance identification number and obtain
`
`information from the maintenance service.
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill
`
`in the art at the time of the filing of
`
`the claimed invention to combine the teachings of the combination of Vahid and Kuwano with
`
`that of Gillette so that the technician can directly identify the error instead of gong through
`
`selection steps.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 7
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`8.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3, 6 have been considered but are moot
`
`because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection
`
`of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to BENYAM HAILEwhosetelephone numberis (571)272-2080.
`
`The examiner cannormally be reached 7:00 AM - 5:30 PM Mon.- Thur..
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using
`
`a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached on (571)270-1210. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available
`
`to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit:
`
`https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more
`
`information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about
`
`filing in DOCXformat. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/735,238
`Art Unit: 2688
`
`Page 8
`
`at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO CustomerService
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (INUSA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/Benyam Haile/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2688
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket