www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/853,030
`
`04/20/2020
`
`TETSUYA YAMAMOTO
`
`731456.422C3
`
`9973
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`MOORE JR, MICHAEL J
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2467
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/17/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/853,030
`YAMAMOTOetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`MICHAEL J MOORE JR
`2467
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 3/1/22.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-16 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C] Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected.
`(1 Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`C} Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)[M) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a) All
`1.{¥] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) ([] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220512
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`2.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103)is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A personshall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an
`application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the
`patent or application, as the case may be, namesanother inventor and waseffectively filed
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claim(s) 1, 5, 9, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being
`
`anticipated by Chen et al. (U.S. 2016/0337089) (hereinafter “Chen”). Chen teachesall
`
`of the limitations of the specified claims with the reasoning that follows.
`
`Regarding claim 1, “a terminal comprising: a receiver, which, in operation,
`
`receives repetitions of a control signal across a plurality of first subframes and a data
`
`signal allocated to a resource indicated by the control signal” is anticipated by the
`
`terminal shown in Figure 7 that includes a receiving module (receiver), where downlink
`
`allocation information (control signal) is repetitively transmitted through a PDCCH ina
`
`plurality of continuous downlink sub-frames to the terminal, and downlink service data
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 3
`
`(data signal) is repetitively transmitted through a PDSCH in a plurality of continuous
`
`downlink sub-frames to the terminal as spoken of on page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 18-
`
`25.
`
`Lastly, “a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits a response signal for the
`
`data signal with repetitions across a plurality of second subframes on resource blocks
`
`that are determined from one of indexesof the plurality of first subframes” is anticipated
`
`by the terminal shownin Figure 7 that includes a transmitting module (transmitter),
`
`where HARQ-ACK feedbackinformation (response signal) is repetitively transmitted
`
`through a PUCCH format 1a/1b channel in a plurality of continuous uplink sub-frames
`
`(second subframes) as spoken of on page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 22-25; where each
`
`sub-frame of the system reserves at least one PUCCH resource for PUCCH, each
`
`PUCCH resource occupying two resource blocks respectively located in two time slots
`
`of a sub-frame as spoken of on page 1, paragraphs [0005]-[0006]; where a PUCCH is
`
`determined by preset resources such as control channel elements occupied by the
`
`PDCCH asspoken of on page 3, paragraphs [0034]-[0036]; where a subframeutilized
`
`by a PDCCH includes a number of control channel elements (CCEs) as shownin Figure
`
`10 and spoken of on page 11, paragraph [0251]; and where the preset resources for the
`
`PUCCH are determined according to the index of the first CCE occupied by the
`
`
`
`PDCCH, the number of the CCEs and the number of the indexof the first subframe,
`
`
`
`
`subframes, etc. as spoken of on page 3, paragraphs [0037], [0039], and [0054].
`
`Regarding claim 5, “a base station, comprising: a transmitter, which, in
`
`operation, transmits repetitions of a control signal across a plurality of first subframes
`
`and a data signal allocated to a resource indicated by the control signal” is anticipated
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 4
`
`by the base station shownin Figure 7 that includes a transmitting module (transmitter),
`
`where downlink allocation information (control signal) is repetitively transmitted through
`
`a PDCCH in a plurality of continuous downlink sub-framesby the basestation, and
`
`downlink service data (data signal) is repetitively transmitted through a PDSCH ina
`
`plurality of continuous downlink sub-frames by the base station as spoken of on page 2,
`
`paragraph [001 1], lines 18-25.
`
`Lastly, “a receiver, which, in operation, receives a responsesignal for the data
`
`signal, which is transmitted with repetitions across a plurality of second subframes on
`
`resource blocks that are determined from one of indexes of the plurality offirst
`
`subframes’is anticipated by the base station shownin Figure 7 that includes a receiving
`
`module (receiver), where HARQ-ACK feedbackinformation (response signal) is
`
`repetitively transmitted through a PUCCH format 1a/1b channel in a plurality of
`
`continuous uplink sub-frames (second subframes) as spoken of on page 2, paragraph
`
`[0011], lines 22-25; where each sub-frame of the system reserves at least one PUCCH
`
`resource for PUCCH, each PUCCH resource occupying two resource blocks
`
`respectively located in two time slots of a sub-frame as spoken of on page 1,
`
`paragraphs [0005]-[0006]; where a PUCCH is determined by preset resources such as
`
`control channel elements occupied by the PDCCH as spoken of on page 3, paragraphs
`
`[0034]-[0036]; where a subframe utilized by a PDCCH includes a number of control
`
`channel elements (CCEs) as shownin Figure 10 and spoken of on page 11, paragraph
`
`[0251]; and where the preset resources for the PUCCH are determined according to the
`
`index of the first CCE occupied by the PDCCH, the index of the first subframe, the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 5
`
`number of the CCEs and the number of subframes, etc. as spoken of on page 3,
`
`paragraphs [0037], [0039], and [0054].
`
`Regarding claim 9, “receiving repetitions of a control signal across a plurality of
`
`first subframes and a data signal allocated to a resource indicated by the control signal”
`
`is anticipated by the terminal shown in Figure 7 that includes a receiving module
`
`(receiver), where downlink allocation information (control signal) is repetitively
`
`transmitted through a PDCCH in a plurality of continuous downlink sub-frames to the
`
`terminal, and downlink service data (data signal) is repetitively transmitted through a
`
`PDSCH in a plurality of continuous downlink sub-framesto the terminal as spoken of on
`
`page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 18-25.
`
`Lastly, “transmitting a response signal for the data signal with repetitions across
`
`a plurality of second subframes on resource blocks that are determined from one of
`
`indexesof the plurality of first subframes’” is anticipated by the terminal shownin Figure
`
`7 that includes a transmitting module (transmitter), where HARQ-ACK feedback
`
`information (responsesignal) is repetitively transmitted through a PUCCH format 1a/1b
`
`channel in a plurality of continuous uplink sub-frames (second subframes) as spoken of
`
`on page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 22-25; where each sub-frame of the system reserves
`
`at least one PUCCH resource for PUCCH, each PUCCH resource occupying two
`
`resource blocks respectively located in two time slots of a sub-frame as spoken of on
`
`page 1, paragraphs [0005]-[0006]; where a PUCCH is determined by preset resources
`
`such as control channel elements occupied by the PDCCH as spoken of on page 3,
`
`paragraphs [0034]-[0036]; where a subframe utilized by a PDCCH includes a number of
`
`control channel elements (CCEs) as shown in Figure 10 and spoken of on page 11,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 6
`
`paragraph [0251]; and wherethe preset resources for the PUCCH are determined
`
`according to the index of the first CCE occupied by the PDCCH, the indexof the first
`
`
`
`subframe, the number of the CCEs and the number of subframes, etc. as spoken of on
`
`page 3, paragraphs [0037], [0039], and [0054].
`
`Regarding claim 13, “transmitting repetitions of a control signal across a plurality
`
`of first subframes and a data signal allocated to a resource indicated by the control
`
`signal” is anticipated by the base station shown in Figure 7 that includes a transmitting
`
`module (transmitter), where downlink allocation information (control signal) is
`
`repetitively transmitted through a PDCCH in a plurality of continuous downlink sub-
`
`frames by the base station, and downlink service data (data signal) is repetitively
`
`transmitted through a PDSCH in a plurality of continuous downlink sub-frames by the
`
`base station as spoken of on page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 18-25.
`
`Lastly, “receiving a response signal for the data signal, which is transmitted with
`
`repetitions across a plurality of second subframes on resource blocks that are
`
`determined from associated one of indexes ofthe plurality of first subframes”is
`
`anticipated by the base station shownin Figure 7 that includes a receiving module
`
`(receiver), where HARQ-ACK feedbackinformation (responsesignal) is repetitively
`
`transmitted through a PUCCH format 1a/1b channel in a plurality of continuous uplink
`
`sub-frames (second subframes) as spoken of on page 2, paragraph [0011], lines 22-25;
`
`where each sub-frame of the system reserves at least one PUCCH resource for
`
`PUCCH, each PUCCH resource occupying two resource blocks respectively located in
`
`two time slots of a sub-frame as spoken of on page 1, paragraphs [0005]-[0006]; where
`
`a PUCCH is determined by preset resources such as control channel elements
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 7
`
`occupied by the PDCCH as spokenof on page 3, paragraphs [0034]-[0036]; where a
`
`subframe utilized by a PDCCH includes a number of control channel elements (CCEs)
`
`as shownin Figure 10 and spoken of on page 11, paragraph [0251]; and where the
`
`preset resourcesfor the PUCCH are determined according to the index of the first CCE
`
`occupied by the PDCCH, the index of the first subframe, the number of the CCEs and
`
`the number of subframes, etc. as spoken of on page 3, paragraphs [0037], [0039], and
`
`[0054].
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103)is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`6.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`7.
`
`This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the
`
`claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was
`
`commonly ownedasof the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any
`
`evidenceto the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to
`
`point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 8
`
`ownedas ofthe effectivefiling date of the later invention in order for the examiner to
`
`consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)
`
`prior art against the later invention.
`
`8.
`
`Claims 2-4, 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Chen in view of Earnshawetal. (U.S. 2013/0235768) (hereinafter
`
`“Earnshaw’).
`
`Regarding claims 2, 6, 10, and 14, Chen teachesclaims 1, 5, 9, and 13 as
`
`described above. While Chen also teaches where spacing between the last sub-frame
`
`occupied by the PDSCH andastarting sub-frame occupied by the PUCCH format 1a/1b
`
`channel is in total three subframes (indicates subframe period) as spoken of on page 2,
`
`paragraph [0011], lines 25-31, Chen doesnot explicitly teach “wherein a numberof the
`
`repetitions of the response signal is an integer multiple of a subframe period in which
`
`transmission of the response signal with repetitions is started”.
`
`However, Earnshaw teaches a system and methodfor handling scheduling
`
`requestcollisions with an ACK/NACK repetition signal where a value of a scheduling
`
`requestprohibit timer may be configured to represent a multiple of the scheduling
`
`request periodicity (subframe period), which may be equal to a scheduling request
`
`period multiplied by an integer (integer multiple) in the range from 0 to 7, inclusive, such
`
`that a collision with a ACK/NACK repetition sequence (response signal) may be avoided
`
`as spoken of on pages 5-6, paragraph [0038].
`
`Given the abovereferences, it would have been obvious to someoneof ordinary
`
`skill in the art, before the effectivefiling date of the invention, to apply the ACK/NACK
`
`repetition signal handling of Earnshaw to the system of Chenin order to improve the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 9
`
`reliability of the communication system by reducing the possibility of collisions between
`
`ACK/NACK responsesignaling and other control messaging as spoken of on pages 5-6,
`
`paragraph [0038] of Earnshaw.
`
`Regarding claims 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, and 16, Chen teachesclaims 1, 5, 9, and
`
`13 as described above. While Chen also teaches where each sub-frame of the system
`
`reserves at least one PUCCH resource for PUCCH, each PUCCH resource occupying
`
`two resource blocks respectively located in two time slots of a sub-frame (one-to-one
`
`association) as spoken of on page 1, paragraph [0005], as well as where a PUCCH is
`
`determined by preset resources such as control channel elements occupied by the
`
`PDCCH (one-to-one association) as spoken of on page 3, paragraphs [0034]-[0036],
`
`Chen does notexplicitly teach “wherein a number of the repetitions of the response
`
`signal is an integer multiple of a subframe period in which transmission of the response
`
`signal with repetitions is started, and the plurality of first subframes per the subframe
`
`period are associated one-to-one with the resource blocks’ or “wherein a number of the
`
`repetitions of the response signal is an integer multiple of a subframe period in which
`
`transmission of the responsesignal with repetitions is started, and the plurality of
`
`second subframes per the subframe period are associated one-to-one with the resource
`
`blocks”.
`
`However, Earnshaw teaches a system and method for handling scheduling
`
`requestcollisions with an ACK/NACK repetition signal where a value of a scheduling
`
`requestprohibit timer may be configured to represent a multiple of the scheduling
`
`request periodicity (subframe period), which may be equal to a scheduling request
`
`period multiplied by an integer (integer multiple) in the range from 0 to 7, inclusive, such
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 10
`
`that a collision with a ACK/NACK repetition sequence (response signal) may be avoided
`
`as spoken of on pages 5-6, paragraph [0038].
`
`Given the abovereferences, it would have been obvious to someoneof ordinary
`
`skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to apply the ACK/NACK
`
`repetition signal handling of Earnshaw to the system of Chen in order to improve the
`
`reliability of the communication system by reducing the possibility of collisions between
`
`ACK/NACK responsesignaling and other control messaging as spoken of on pages 5-6,
`
`paragraph [0038] of Earnshaw.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`9.
`
`Applicant's argumentsfiled 3/1/22 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive.
`
`Regarding amendedclaims 1, 5, 9, and 13, Applicant argues that Chen does not
`
`teach “a responsesignal for the data signal with repetitions across a plurality of second
`
`subframes on resource blocks that are determined from one of indexes of the plurality of
`
`first subframes”. Applicant also asserts that while one subframe includes a plurality of
`
`CCEs, and that eachof the plurality of CCEs is associated with a respective PUCCH
`
`resource, and that the respective PUCCH resource can be determined from each CCE
`
`
`(as taught in Chen), one PUCCH resource cannot be determined from each subframe
`
`because each subframe is associated with a plurality of PUCCH resources rather than
`
`one PUCCH resource.
`
`Examiner respectfully disagrees.
`
`As providedin the previous Office Action, since Chen teaches a PUCCH usedfor
`
`HARQ-ACK thatis determined from CCEs of the PDCCH usedfor control signaling, it
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 11
`
`follows that Chen also teaches that the PUCCH is determined from a subframe of the
`
`PDCCH since the CCEsare part of the subframe as shownin Figure 10 and spoken of
`
`on page 11, paragraph [0251] of Chen.
`
`In other words, it is Examiner’s understanding
`
`that the determination of the PUCCH from a CCE of a corresponding PDCCH would
`
`also be a determination of the PUCCH from a subframeincluding that particular CCE.
`
`As noted by Applicant, Chen describes where one subframe includesat least
`
`CCE #1 and CCE #2, where CCE #1 is associated with PUCCH #10, and CCE #2 is
`
`associated with PUCCH #20. Therefore, either or both of PUCCH #10 and PUCCH #20
`
`could be determined from the one subframe as the subframe includes both CCE #1 and
`
`CCE #2information that are associated with their corresponding PUCCH.
`
`Also, as described above, Chen further teaches where the preset resourcesfor
`
`the PUCCH are determined according to the index of the first CCE occupied by the
`
`PDCCH, the index of the first subframe, the number of the CCEs and the number of
`
`subframes, etc. as spoken of on page 3, paragraphs [0037], [0039], and [0054].
`
`Using a broadest reasonable interpretation of the current claim language, it is
`
`maintained that Chen teaches the abovelimitation in question.
`
`Conclusion
`
`10.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the eventa first reply is filed within
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 12
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date ofthis final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortenedstatutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`11.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J. MOORE, JR., whose telephone number is
`
`(571)272-3168. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9am-4pm).
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Awww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Hassan A. Phillips can be reached at (571)272-3940. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/853,030
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 13
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/MICHAEL J MOORE JR/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
`
`