throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/920,691
`
`07/04/2020
`
`Daisuke ITO
`
`AOYA.25PUS01
`
`A714
`
`MARKD. SARALINO (PAN)
`RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
`1621 EUCLID AVENUE
`ISTH FLOOR
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44115
`
`SAHLE, MAHIDERE §
`
`2872
`
`04/25/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`ipdocket @rennerotto.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-7 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj] Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-3 and 6-7 is/are rejected.
`Claim(s) 4-5 is/are objectedto.
`£] Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)() The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)C) accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`cc) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)D) All
`1.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220419
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/920,691
`ITO, Daisuke
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`MAHIDERE S SAHLE
`2872
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 26 January 2022.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/920,691
`Art Unit: 2872
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined underthe
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103)is incorrect, any correction of the
`
`statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground ofrejection if the prior art
`
`relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same undereitherstatus.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 1, 2, 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Tetsuji (JP 2002244013A) in view of Fujinaka et al. (USPG Pub No. 2017/0139180), hereinafter
`
`“Fujinaka”.
`
`Regarding claim 1, Tetsuji discloses a lens barrel (19) having one end and another end
`
`(see Fig. 1), the lens barrel comprising: a first frame (69) that is movable in an optical axis
`
`direction of the lens barrel, and holds an optical member(L2) (Paragraph 22); a second frame
`
`(89) that is arranged to be relatively movable toward the other end with respectto the first frame
`
`(69), and holds an optical member(L4) (Paragraph 25); and a third frame (79) that is mounted
`
`on the first frame so as to be movable in the optical axis direction, and holds an optical member
`
`(L3) (Paragraph 23), and the second frame (89) includes a third stopper portion (89a) that has a
`
`contact surface located close to the one end with respectto, and that comesinto contactwith,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/920,691
`Art Unit: 2872
`
`Page 3
`
`when the second frame (89) is located within a range on the optical axis wherethe third frame
`
`(79) is movable, the third frame to limit movement toward the other end (see Fig. 1). Tetsuji
`
`discloses the claimed invention, but does not specify a third frame that is directly mounted on
`
`the first frame, wherein the first frame includesa first stopper portion thatis fixed on the first
`
`frame and that comesinto contact with the third frame to limit movement toward the one end,
`
`the first frame includes a second stopperportion that is fixed on the first frame and that comes
`
`into contact with, when the first frame is most distant from the second frame, the third frame to
`
`limit movement toward the other end, the second stopperportion. In the same field of endeavor,
`
`Fujinaka discloses a third frame (2040) that is directly mounted on the first frame (2030) (see
`
`Figs. 12A-C), wherein the first frame (2030) includesa first stopper portion (2033) that is fixed
`
`on the first frame (2030) and that comesinto contact with the third frame (2040)to limit
`
`movement toward the one end, the first frame (2030) includes a second stopper portion (2033)
`
`thatis fixed on the first frame (2030) and that comesinto contact with, whenthe first frame
`
`(2030) is most distant from the second frame (2090), the third frame (2040)to limit movement
`
`toward the other end, the second stopper portion (2033). It is inherent that the restriction
`
`grooves (2033) have a stopping point both in the front and rearof the first group unit (2030).
`
`This allows the third frame (2040) to move lengthwisein the optical axis direction without
`
`rotation (see Paragraph 53). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the
`
`art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the lens barrel of Tetsuji
`
`with a third frame that is directly mounted on the first frame, wherein the first frame includes a
`
`first stopper portion that is fixed on the first frame and that comesinto contact with the third
`
`frame to limit movement toward the one end, the first frame includes a second stopperportion
`
`that is fixed on the first frame and that comesinto contact with, whenthe first frame is most
`
`distant from the second frame, the third frame to limit movement toward the other end, the
`
`second stopper portion of Fujinaka for the purpose of preventing rotation of the frame while the
`
`frame is movable lengthwise in the optical axis direction (Paragraph 53).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/920,691
`Art Unit: 2872
`
`Page 4
`
`Regarding claim 2, Tetsuji further discloses further comprising a linear motor (25) thatis
`
`mounted on the first frame (69) to drive the third frame in the optical axis direction (Paragraph
`
`28).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Tetsuji further discloses wherein the second frame (89) is movable in
`
`the optical axis direction (Paragraph 23).
`
`Regarding claim 7, Tetsuji discloses a camera comprising the lens barrel according to
`
`claim 1 (Paragraph 2).
`
`Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tetsuji (JP
`
`2002244013A)in view of Fujinaka (USPG Pub No. 2017/0139180) as applied to claim 1 above,
`
`and further in view of Yasutomi et al. (USPG Pub No. 2008/0106788), hereinafter “Yasutomi”.
`
`Regarding claim 3, Tetsuji discloses wherein the optical member(L3) held by the third
`
`frame is a lens (Paragraph 23). Tetsuji and Fujinaka disclose the claimed invention, but do not
`
`specify held by the third frame is a focus lens. In the same field of endeavor, Yasutomi discloses
`
`held by the third frame is a focus lens (Paragraph 46). Therefore, it would have been obvious to
`
`one of ordinaryskill in the art before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention to provide
`
`the lens barrel of Tetsuji and Fujinaka with held by the third frame is a focus lens of Yasutomi
`
`for the purposeof providing a more compact system and smoothly driving said system
`
`(Paragraph 13) while suppressing blurring of the captured image (Paragraph 93). Furthermore,
`
`it is Knownin the art that a lens is moved for the purpose of performing a zooming or focusing
`
`action.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 4 and 5 are objected to as being dependent uponarejected base claim, but
`
`would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base
`
`claim and any intervening claims.
`
`The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter:
`
`none of the references, alone or in combination, disclose or teach the lens barrel according to
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/920,691
`Art Unit: 2872
`
`Page 5
`
`claim 1, specifically comprising a fourth frame that is mounted on the second frame so as to be
`
`movable in the optical axis direction, and holds an optical member, wherein the fourth frame is
`
`mounted on the second frame so asto stroke on the side of the other end with respect to the
`
`contact surface of the third stopper portion as is disclosed in claim 4.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-3, 6 and 7 have been considered but are
`
`moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior
`
`rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Fujinaka
`
`curesthe deficiencies of Tetsuji. For these reasons the claims remain rejected.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presentedin this
`
`Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant
`
`is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first replyis filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after
`
`the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event,
`
`however,will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this
`
`final action.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to MAHIDERE S SAHLE whose telephone numberis (571)270-3329. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
`
`Examinerinterviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing
`
`using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/920,691
`Art Unit: 2872
`
`Page 6
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO AutomatedInterview Request (AIR)at
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached on 571 272-2333. The fax phone numberfor the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris available
`
`to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,visit:
`
`https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit httos://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more
`
`information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about
`
`filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC)at
`
`866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/MAHIDERE S SAHLE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
`4/20/2022
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket