`
`objections and rejections set forth in the Office Action of November3, 2021 is respectfully
`
`REMARKS
`
`requested.
`
`The Examiner objected to the specification due to minor informalities. Thus, in order to
`
`overcomethe objection, a “Cross-Reference to Related Applications” has been addedtothefirst
`
`page of the specification. No new matter has been added. Thus, this objection has been
`
`overcome and should be withdrawn.
`
`In item 4 on page 4, the Examinerprovisionally rejected claim 1 underthe judicially
`
`created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of
`
`copending U.S. Application No. 16/951,346; and in item 5 on page 4, the Examinerrejected
`
`claim 1 underthe judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being
`
`unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 10,491,853.
`
`These rejections has been overcomebythefiling of a Terminal Disclaimer, together with
`
`the required USPTO fee. The Applicant submits the Terminal Disclaimerfor the sole purpose of
`
`expediting prosecution, and does not acquiesce to the rejections.
`
`
`
`In view of the above amendments and remarks, it is submitted that the present application
`
`is now in condition for allowance. However, if the Examiner should have any comments or
`
`suggestions to help speed the prosecution of this application, the Examineris requested to
`
`contact the Applicant's undersigned representative.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey R. Filipek/
`
`
`
`Jeffrey R. Filipek
`Registration No. 41,471
`Attorney for Applicant
`
`WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK,L.L.P.
`1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone (202) 721-8200
`Facsimile (202) 721-8250
`November16, 2021
`
`The Director is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required, or credit any overpayment
`to Deposit Account No. 23-0975.
`
`