throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/969,699
`
`08/13/2020
`
`Jun MINOTANI
`
`733456.604USPC
`
`3957
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`NGO, CHUONG A
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2645
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`09/14/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-12 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 8/13/2020 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)¥) All
`1.4) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210909
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/969,699
`MINOTANI etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`CHUONG A NGO
`2645
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 8/13/2020.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined underthe
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AJA.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`2.
`
`This Office Action is in response to the Applicants’ communication filed on 8/13/2020.
`
`In virtue of this communication, claims 1-12 are currently presented in the instant application.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`3.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to ATA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the
`
`statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new groundofrejection if the prior art
`
`relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same undereither status.
`
`4,
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A personshall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or
`otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1-12 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) based upon a public use or sale or other
`
`public availability of the invention as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication
`
`20180227952 (hereinafter referred to as Kim).
`
`Consider claims 1, 12, Kim teaches a radio communication apparatus (see at least
`
`{ [027 1]-9 [0273], Fig. 10, “...the STA device (or STA) 1010 may include memory 1012,
`
`a processor 1011, and a radio frequency (RF) unit 1013 ...”), comprising:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 3
`
`control circuitry, which, in operation, determines a transmission resource for a
`
`Spatial Reuse (SR) signal based on radio quality information transmitted from another
`
`radio communication apparatus in a first Basic Service Set (BSS), the SR signal being
`
`transmitted by SR for a second BSS whichis a BSS otherthan the first BSS (see atleast {
`
`[0201], “...an AP 1 and an STA 1 maybelongto a first BSS, and an AP 2 and an STA 2
`
`may belong to a second BSS...” and seeat least {| [0203], “...an STA may perform
`
`spatial reuse (SR) (the improvementof efficiency on space) in which spatial resources are
`
`efficiently used by adjusting/setting a proper CCA level according to circumstances, ...
`
`its own signal is determinedto not have a great influence on another STA when
`
`executing SR, the STA adjusts a CCAlevel to be low (or reducing a criterion by which
`
`the idle state of a channel is determined), thereby enabling transmission resources to be
`
`used moreefficiently...” and further see at least {| [0265], “...the inter -BSS PPDU may
`
`refer to a PPDU thatis transmitted by an AP or STA associated with a second BSS
`
`different from a first BSS with whichthe first STA has been associated...”); and
`
`transmission circuitry, which, in operation, transmits the SR signal, using the
`
`transmission resource (seeat least { [0268], “...the information aboutthe first and the
`
`second CCAlevels indicate the first and the second CCA levels or information about a
`
`level difference betweenthe first or the second CCAlevel andthe first and the second
`
`CCAlevels...” and see at least { [0270], “...as a result of the execution of CCA, the
`
`channelis determined to beidle, the first STA maytransmit a signal/data/frame through
`
`the idle channel (S930). Thatis, the first STA may perform SR through the channel
`
`determined...”).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 4
`
`Consider claim 2 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches the control circuitry determines, based on the radio quality
`
`information, a band where the SR signal is sendable, and the transmission circuitry
`
`transmits the SR signal in the band where the SR signal is sendable, and the transmission
`
`circuitry does not transmit the SR signal in a band other than the band where the SR
`
`signal is sendable (see at least J [0268], “...the information aboutthe first and the second
`
`CCAlevels indicate the first and the second CCA levels or information about a level
`
`difference betweenthefirst or the second CCAlevel andthefirst and the second CCA
`
`levels...” and see at least § [0270], “...as a result of the execution of CCA, the channelis
`
`determinedto be idle, the first STA may transmit a signal/data/frame through the idle
`
`channel (S930). Thatis, the first STA may perform SR through the channel
`
`determined...”’).
`
`Consider claim 3 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teachesthe control circuitry determines the transmission resource when
`
`transmitting the SR signal in a period obtained based on a signal from the second BSS,
`
`and the control circuitry does not determine the transmission resource when not
`
`transmitting the SR signalin the period (see at least { [0202], “...in an environment in
`
`which the AP 1 and the STA1are sufficiently distant from the AP 2 or the STA 2 or
`
`interference from the signal transmitted by the AP 1 does not have a great influence on
`
`the STA 2...”).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 5
`
`Consider claim 4 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches the radio quality information indicates radio quality for each
`
`predetermined band(seeat least { [0268], “...the information aboutthe first and the
`
`second CCAlevels indicate the first and the second CCA levels or information about a
`
`level difference betweenthe first or the second CCAlevel andthe first and the second
`
`CCAlevels...”).
`
`Consider claim 5 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches the predetermined bandis a bandin units of resource units (RUs)
`
`(see at least { [0201], “...an efficient resource operation on the space may bedifficult
`
`because a CCAlevel, that is, a CCA threshold, is managedas a fixed value within a
`
`single BSS for each channel bandwidth ...” and also seeat least {[ [0250], “... AP/STA
`
`performs OFDMAtransmissionin a frame, the OBSS-DL-CCA-CS-threshold value and
`
`the OBSS-UL-CCA-CS-threshold value in the aforementioned embodiments may be
`
`subdivided in a resource unit (RU) unit and indicated/applied...”).
`
`Consider claim 6 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches the predetermined bandis a band in units of 20 MHz(seeatleast {
`
`[0250], “...a CCA operation is performed in a 20 MHz unit (or channel spacing or a
`
`channel width)...”).
`
`Consider claim 7 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 6
`
`Kim teaches whetheror not the SR signal is receivable in the other radio
`
`communication apparatus; whether or not an interference level in the other radio
`
`communication apparatus is lower than a threshold; the interference level in the other
`
`radio communication apparatus; and received quality when communication is performed
`
`from the radio communication apparatus to the other radio communication apparatus (see
`
`at least { [0208], “...the SR STA may set a new CCA-CS-threshold value (of a minimum
`
`receive sensitivity level (or minimum CCAsensitivity level) or higher) ...”).
`
`Consider claim 8 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches the radio quality information indicates radio quality of each of the
`
`BSSs (seeat least { [0011], “...the BSS although each BSS can transmit a signal
`
`according to a communication environment and/or channel quality ...”).
`
`Consider claim 9 (depends onat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teaches wherein the radio quality information indicates radio quality for a
`
`BSS that belongsto a first group including the first BSS, and radio quality for a BSS that
`
`belongs to a second group whichis different from the first group (see at least {| [0203],
`
`“ ..1ts own signal is determined to not have a great influence on another STA when
`
`executing SR, the STA adjusts a CCAlevel to be low (or reducing a criterion by which
`
`the idle state of a channel is determined), thereby enabling transmission resources to be
`
`used moreefficiently ...”).
`
`Consider claim 10 (dependsonat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 7
`
`Kim teachesthe radio quality information includes received quality when
`
`communication from the radio communication apparatus to the other radio
`
`communication apparatus is performed, and the control circuitry calculates, based on the
`
`received quality, a first transmission powersatisfying a predeterminederrorrate in the
`
`other radio communication apparatus, calculates a second transmission power based on a
`
`signal from the second BSS, and when the second transmission poweris greater than the
`
`first transmission power, the control circuitry determines transmission of the SR signal
`
`(see at least { [0196], “...an STA may determine a channelto be busy if a specific signal
`
`is detected with intensity (dBm) of a threshold value or more regardless of a signal
`
`defined in the 802.11 system.In this case, the threshold may be calculated as a value that
`
`is 20 dBm higherthan that of CCA-CS. For example, an STA may determine a channel to
`
`be busyif a threshold is -62 dBm or more in the case of 20 MHz channel spacing...”).
`
`Consider claim 11 (dependsonat least claim 1), Kim discloses the limitations of
`
`claim 1 as applied to claim rejection 1 above and further discloses:
`
`Kim teachesthe transmission powerfor the SR signal is greater than the first
`
`transmission powerandis less than the second transmission power(see at least { [0196],
`
`“’..an STA may determine a channel to be busyif a specific signal is detected with
`
`intensity (dBm) of a threshold value or more regardless of a signal defined in the 802.11
`
`system.In this case, the threshold may becalculated as a value that is 20 dBm higher
`
`than that of CCA-CS. For example, an STA may determine a channelto be busyif a
`
`threshold is -62 dBm or more in the case of 20 MHz channel spacing...” and seeat least {
`
`[0230], “...the received powerof the inter-BBS frame is found to be smaller than the
`
`threshold value, the SR STA may determinethat the transmission/reception channel of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 8
`
`the inter-BBS frameis idle and may transmit (i.e., perform SR) a signal/data through the
`
`corresponding channel...”).
`
`Conclusion
`
`6.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to CHUONG A NGO whosetelephone numberis (571)270-7264.
`
`The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 5:30AM-4:00PM.
`
`Examinerinterviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using
`
`a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicantis
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR)at
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examinerby telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached on (571) 272-7795. The fax phone numberfor the
`
`organization wherethis application or proceedingis assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`maybe obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to
`
`the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-
`
`free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to
`
`the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-
`
`1000.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/969,699
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 9
`
`/CHUONG A NGO/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket