throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/347,460
`
`06/14/2021
`
`SANSHIRO SHISHIDO
`
`083710-3421
`
`3485
`
`Rimon PC - Panasonic Corporation
`8300 Greensboro Dr.
`Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`
`SEVEN, EVREN
`
`2812
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`07/29/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOmail @rimonlaw.com
`
`eofficeaction @appcoll.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/347,460
`SHISHIDO etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`EVREN SEVEN
`2812
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 18 July 2024.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1,3,5-15 and 17-23 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Claim(s) 5-9,11-16 and 19-22 is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-3,10,17-18 and 23 is/are rejected.
`[) Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)() The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)C) accepted or b){) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12).) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`—_c)LJ None ofthe:
`b)LJ Some**
`a)D) All
`1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20240723
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/347,460
`Art Unit: 2812
`
`Page 2
`
`Detailed Action
`
`The presentapplication,filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventorto file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Kim explicitly
`
`teaches that the charge blocking layer is one of an electron blocking layer or a hole blocking layer.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a
`
`prior Office action.
`
`Claims 1-3, 10 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Pat.
`
`Pub. No. 20120313142 to Suzukiet al. (Suzuki) in view of U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 20080237481 to Zentaiet
`
`al. (Zentai).
`
`Regarding Claim 1, Suzuki teaches animaging device comprising:
`
`a first pixel 100; and
`
`a second pixel adjacent to the first pixel {adjacent 100), wherein:
`
`each of the first pixel and the second pixel includes:
`
`a first electrode 6;
`
`a second electrode 10 positioned on or abovethefirst electrode and facing the
`
`first electrode;
`
`a photoelectric conversion layer 9 positioned between the first electrode and
`
`the second electrode; and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/347,460
`Art Unit: 2812
`
`Page 3
`
`a first electron-blocking layer 7 [0038] positioned between thefirst electrode
`
`and the photoelectric conversion layer,
`
`an entirety of an upper surface of the first charge-blocking layer, which contacts the
`
`photoelectric conversion layer, is flat, and
`
`an area of the first charge-blocking layer of the first pixel is larger than an area of the
`
`first electrode of the first pixel in plan view (see Fig. 2).
`
`Suzuki does not explicitly teach that the first charge-blocking layer of the first pixel is separated
`
`from thefirst charge-blocking layer of the second pixel.
`
`However, in analogous art, Zentai teaches that a charge blocking layer 402 should be separated
`
`from those of adjacent pixels by regions 404.
`
`It would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill
`
`in the art before the time offiling to include the teaching of Zentaito prevent the barrier layer from
`
`shorting the pixels together, as taught by Zentai [0022].
`
`Regarding Claim 2, Suzuki teaches the imaging device according to claim 1, but does not
`
`explicitly teach that the first electrode of the first pixel is positioned inside the first charge-blocking layer
`
`of the first pixel in plan view. However, Zentaiteaches sucha configuration in Fig. 3 at least. It would
`
`have been obvious to the person of ordinaryskill in the art before the timeoffiling to include this
`
`further teaching of Zentaias combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield
`
`predictable results is within the purview of the person of ordinary skill (MPEP 2143A).
`
`Regarding Claim 3, Suzuki and Zentai teach the imaging device according to claim 1, wherein
`
`electrical conductivity of the first charge-blocking layer is higher than electrical conductivity of the
`
`photoelectric conversion layer in each of thefirst pixel and the second pixel (hole transport material vs.
`
`organic semiconductor, [0045-0046]).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/347,460
`Art Unit: 2812
`
`Page 4
`
`See the prior action forthe rejection of Claims 10 and 17.
`
`Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suzukiand Zentai as
`
`applied to claim 1 and furtherin view of U.S. pat. Pub. No. 20160211392to So etal. (So)
`
`Regarding Claim 18, Suzuki and Zentai teach the imaging device according to claim 1, but do not
`
`explicitly teach that the first charge-blocking layer contains a doped metal oxide or metal nitride.
`
`However, in analogous art, So teaches that a charge blocking layer in a photodetector may be
`
`doped nickel oxide [0032].
`
`It would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before
`
`the time offiling to include the teaching of So because NiO is highly light transmissive as taught by So in
`
`the quoted section.
`
`Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suzukiand Zentai as
`
`applied to claim 1 and furtherin view ofU.S. pat. Pub. No. 20110049665to Goto.
`
`Regarding Claim 23, Suzuki and Zentai teach the imaging device according to claim 1, but do not
`
`explicitly teach that the first charge-blocking layer contains one of chromium oxide, cobalt oxide or
`
`metal nitride.
`
`However, in analogous art, Gototeaches that a charge blocking layer may be made of Cobalt
`
`Oxide [0177].
`
`It would have been obvious to the person ofordinaryskill in the art before the time of
`
`filing to include the teaching of Goto since Suzuki is silent regarding the material of the electron
`
`blocking layer, thereby motivating those of ordinary skill to seek out such teachings.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`See prior actions for reasons for allowability of claims 5-9, 11-16 and 19-22.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/347,460
`Art Unit: 2812
`
`Page5S
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presentedin this Office
`
`action. Accordingly, THIS ACTIONIS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the
`
`extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from
`
`the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date
`
`of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH
`
`shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory
`
`action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing
`
`date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than
`
`SIX MONTHS from the date ofthis final action.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to EVREN SEVEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5666. The examiner can
`
`normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00- 5:00 Pacific.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reachthe examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Charles Garber can be reached on (571) 272-2194. The fax phone number for the organization where
`
`this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/347,460
`Art Unit: 2812
`
`Page 6
`
`/EVREN SEVEN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
`
`Information regarding the status of published or
`unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent
`Center. Unpublished application information in Patent
`Center is available to registered users. To file and manage
`patent submissions in Patent Center,visit:
`https://patentcenter.uspto.gov.Visit
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for
`more information about Patent Center and
`
`https ://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about
`filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the
`Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free).
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or
`571-272-1000.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket