throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/384,845
`
`07/26/2021
`
`ENCHI KOGA
`
`083710-3465
`
`5189
`
`Rimon PC - Panasonic Corporation
`8300 Greensboro Dr.
`Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`
`AMPONSAH,OSEIK
`
`1729
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`08/26/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOmail @rimonlaw.com
`
`eofficeaction @appcoll.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/384,845
`KOGAetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`OSEI K AMPONSAH
`1729
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 7 May 2024.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-7 and 10-16 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C) Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-7 and 10-16 is/are rejected.
`(] Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)( objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)7) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20240820
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/384,845
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The presentapplication, filed on or after March 16, 2013,
`
`is being examined underthe
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Upon consideration, the previous rejection of record was withdrawn in light of new
`
`amendments. However new rejection is applied to the amended claims. All changes made in
`
`the rejectionare necessitated by the amendment.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-7 and 10-16 have been considered but
`
`are moot because the new ground ofrejection does notrely on any reference applied in the
`
`prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found
`
`in a prior Office action.
`
`Claim(s) 1-7 and 10-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`JP 2017-147397 A hereinafter Iwasaki [cited in IDS filed 05-27-2022] in view of JP 2019-
`
`021795 hereinafter Ban [cited in IDS filed 05-27-2022], U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/384,845
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 3
`
`2020/0106125 hereinafter Yano, and U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2016/0308244
`
`hereinafter Badding.
`
`Regarding Claims 1-2, lwasaki teaches a power storage device comprising: a solid
`
`electrolyte layer [31]; a coating (cover) layer [32] that coats a surface of the solid electrolyte
`
`layer; a first internal electrode [41] disposed inside the solid electrolyte layer; a first external
`
`electrode [51] disposed outside of the solid electrolyte layer and electrically connected to the
`
`first internal electrode; a second internal electrode[42] disposed inside the solid electrolyte
`
`layer; and a second external electrode [52] disposed outside of the solid electrolyte layer and
`
`electrically connected to the second internal electrode (paragraph 43, see figures 1-2).
`
`Iwasaki further teaches in paragraph 72 that the coating layer is made of a material
`
`having no lithium-ion conductivity but does not specify pyrochlore oxide in the coating layer.
`
`However, Badding teaches a solid electrolyte membrane that comprises trace amounts
`
`of asecond phase such as a pyrochlore phase (paragraph 20). Therefore, it would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form such solid electrolyte membrane having a
`
`pyrochlore phase before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention because Badding
`
`discloses that such modification can form a solid electrolyte for a power storage device
`
`(paragraph 143).
`
`With regards to the thicknessof the coating layer being greater than or equal to 1 um
`
`and less than or equal to 100 um, and the active material formed in the solid electrolyte layer.
`
`Ban teaches a powerstorage device that comprises a coating (covering) layer having a
`
`thickness of 50 - 200 um (paragraph 32).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/384,845
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 4
`
`Yano teachesa power storage device that comprises an active material layer disposed
`
`inside the solid electrolyte layer (see figure 1).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form such
`
`power storage device beforethe effectivefiling date of the claimed invention because Yano
`
`discloses that such modification can reducefailure rate of the power storage device (paragraph
`
`26).
`
`Regarding Claims 3-6, the combination teaches that the solid electrolyte layer is a garnet
`
`structure (i.e., sintered body with no sulfur, see combination of lwasaki, Ban and Yano above).
`
`Regarding Claims 7 and 10-12, the combination teaches the coating layer includes an
`
`oxide having a crystalline phase (see MPEP § 2143, E).
`
`Regarding Claims 13-16, the combination teaches a coating (covering) layer having a
`
`thickness of 50 - 200 um (paragraph 32 of Ban) and covering the entirety of the solid
`
`electrolyte, and further comprises a plating that coats a surface of the first external electrode
`
`and a surface of the second external electrode (see figure 1 of Yano).
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this
`
`Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is
`
`reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is setto expire THREE MONTHS
`
`from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the eventa first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of
`
`the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until afterthe end of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/384,845
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 5
`
`the THREE-MONTHshortened statutory period, thenthe shortened statutory period will expire
`
`on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a)
`
`will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however,will the
`
`statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the dateofthis final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to OSEI K AMPONSAH whosetelephone number is (571)270-3446.
`
`The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST.
`
`Examiner interviewsare available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing
`
`using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request(AIR) at
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Ula C Ruddock can be reached on (571)272-1481. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris available
`
`to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,visit:
`
`https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for
`
`more information about Patent Centerand https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for
`
`information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO
`
`Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (INUSA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/384,845
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 6
`
`/OSEI K AMPONSAH/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket