throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/572,378
`
`01/10/2022
`
`Ankit BHAMRI
`
`736456.535C1
`
`8085
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`NGUYEN,THAI
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2469
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/18/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`17/572,378
`Examiner
`THAI NGUYEN
`
`Applicant(s)
`BHAMRI etal.
`Art Unit
`2469
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 1/10/2022.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-14 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`CL] Claim(s)__is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1,4-6 and 10-14 is/are rejected.
`Claim(s) 2-3 and 7-9 is/are objected to.
`C) Claim(s
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)2) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)M The drawing(s) filed on 1/10/2022 is/are: a)) accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)(¥) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)() None ofthe:
`b)( Some**
`a) All
`1.@) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20240312
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`1.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out
`and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the
`invention.
`
`2.
`
`Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), second paragraph, as being
`
`indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor
`
`ora joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the
`
`invention.
`
`3.
`
`Claim 2 recites the limitation “...determines a number of regions according to maximum number
`
`of TCI states...to be indicated by one TCI in the DCI” which makes the claim indefinite.
`
`It’s unclear if
`
`Applicant intended to claim “...indicated by one TCI in the DCI” or not since the language “to be
`
`indicated” may be interpreted to mean “yet to be indicated”. Examiner will interpret as best
`
`understood.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`4.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AlA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Page 3
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same
`
`under either status.
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis
`
`for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application
`for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as
`the case may be, namesanother inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of
`the claimed invention.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 1, 4-6, 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Khoshnevisan et
`
`al (USPN 20200404667), with provisional application 62/865730filed 6/24/2019.
`
`Regarding claim 1, Khoshnevisan discloses
`
`a user equipment(UE), comprising: (UE, FIG. 2 #120, comprising [0043]
`
`a transceiver, which in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling; (combined
`
`transmit/receive circuitry for receiving DCI [0030, 0045-0049], FIGs. 9A, 10A, provisional application
`
`[0044-0045], FIG. 2
`
`a processor, which in operation: (processor, FIG. 2 #280, operable to perform [0049, 0087],
`
`provisional application [0008, 0009], FIG. 2
`
`obtains from the DCI signaling:a Transmission Configuration Indication (TCI) indicator specifying that two
`
`or more TCIstates are configured (first TCI state and second TCI state configured [0087, 0006, 0007, 0098-
`
`0099], provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`a frequency domain resource assignment indicating frequency domain resources allocated for the two or
`
`more TCI states (RB allocation/PRB bundling size indicator from DCI [0098], FIGs. 9A, 10A, provisional
`
`application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Page 4
`
`determinesfor each TCI state of the two or more TCI states one or more regionsin frequency domain, each
`
`region having an integer multiple of a precoding resource block group (PRG), said integer being equalto or larger
`
`than 1 (determines PRGs in frequency domain for each TCI state with region/block indexed with entire
`
`BWP [0099-0106], FIG. 9B, provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`wherein regionsof different TCI states do not overlap (region/block indexed are non-overlapping
`
`[0102], FIG. 9B, provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`wherein the transceiver, in operation, receives or transmits for each TCI state data on the frequency
`
`domain resources in the determined frequency domain region (combined transmit/receive circuitry for
`
`receiving data from each TRP with corresponding TCI state using determined PRG [0087, 0101], FIGs. 9A,
`
`9B, provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`7.
`
`Claim 14 is rejected based on similar ground(s) provided in rejection of claim 1.
`
`Regarding claim 13, Khoshnevisan discloses
`
`a scheduling node, comprising: (base station/TRP comprising [0004, 0033]
`
`a transceiver, which in operation, transmits downlink control information (DCI), signaling (combined
`
`transmit/receive circuitry for transmitting DCI [0030, 0033, 0044, 0047], provisional application [0042-
`
`0045], FIG. 2
`
`a processor, which in operation: (processor, FIG. 2 #240, [0047], provisional application [0046], FIG.
`
`provides within the DCI signaling: a transmission configuration indication (TCI) indicator specifying that
`
`two or more TCI states are configured (transmit TCI comprising first TCl state and second TCI state
`
`configured [0087, 0006, 0007, 0098-0099], provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Page 5
`
`a frequency domain resource assignment indicating frequency domain resources allocated for the two or
`
`more TCI states (RB allocation/PRB bundling size indicator from DCI [0098], FIGs. 9A, 10A, provisional
`
`application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`determinesfor each TCI state of the two or more TCI states one or more regionsin frequency domain, each
`
`region having an integer multiple of a precoding resource block group (PRG), said integer being equalto or larger
`
`than 1 (determines PRGs in frequency domain for each TCI state with region/block indexed with entire
`
`BWP [0099-0106], FIG. 9B, provisional application [(0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`wherein regionsof different TCI states do not overlap (region/block indexed are non-overlapping
`
`[0102], FIG. 9B, provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`wherein the transceiver, in operation, receives or transmits for each TCI state data on the frequency
`
`domain resources in the determined frequency domain region (combined transmit/receive circuitry for
`
`transmitting data to UE with corresponding TCI state using determined PRG [0087, 0101], FIGs. 9A, 9B,
`
`provisional application [0047, 0083, 0085-0091], FIGs. 7-10C
`
`Regarding claim 4, Khoshnevisan discloses “wherein the processor, in operation, assigns the regions to
`
`the respective integer multiples of PRGs in a semi-static manner, without considering dynamic resource allocation
`
`based on said DCI” PRGs being semi-statically indicated [0098, 0099], provisional application [0096, 0097]
`
`Regarding claim 5, Khoshnevisan discloses “assigns the regions to the respective integer multiples of
`
`PRGs in accordance with said frequency-domain resource assignment” UE assigns PRG based on bundlingsize
`
`P’ indicated by base station/TRP [0098, 0099], provisional application [0096, 0097]
`
`Regarding claim 6, Khoshnevisan discloses “associates the regions to the two or more TCI states
`
`according to a pre-configured pattern” PRGs can be divided between two TCI states using half/half split
`
`[0102], provisional application [00100]
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Page 6
`
`Regarding claim 10, Khoshnevisan discloses “wherein the processor, in operation, sequentially
`
`associates consecutive regions to each of the two or more TCI states” UE assigns half of number of PRGs tofirst
`
`TCI and the other half number of PRGs to second TCI [0102-0105], FIGs. 9A, 9B, provisional application
`
`[00100, 00105]
`
`Regarding claim 11, Khoshnevisan discloses “as a fixed size commonforall regions of all TCI states”
`
`DCI contains size indicator for both TCI states [0097-0101], FIG. 9B, provisional application [0091, 0095,
`
`0097]
`
`Regarding claim 12, Khoshnevisan discloses “obtaining from the DCI absolutesize in terms of said
`
`multiple of PRGs” DCI message contains parameter for PRG size [0006-0009, 0099], FIGs. 9A, 9B,
`
`provisional application [0091, 0095, 0097]
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`8.
`
`Claim 2 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or
`
`35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations
`
`of the base claim and any intervening claims.
`
`9.
`
`Claims 3, 7-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be
`
`allowable if rewritten in independent form includingall of the limitations of the base claim and any
`
`intervening claims.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`Conclusion
`
`disclosure.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/572,378
`Art Unit: 2469
`
`Bagheri et al (USPN 20200314881)
`
`FIG. 6
`
`Page 7
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to THA] NGUYEN whosetelephone number is (571)270-7632. The examiner can
`
`normally be reached M-F campus 10:30-5pm, telework 6pm-8pm| Telework count days.
`
`Examiner interviewsare available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, lan
`
`N Moore can be reached on (571)272-3085. The fax phone numberfor the organization wherethis
`
`application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from
`
`Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To
`
`file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For additional
`
`questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or
`
`571-272-1000.
`
`/THAI NGUYEN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket