throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`18/233,941
`
`08/15/2023
`
`Bryan LOCHMAN
`
`TER-118C2/110853-01-5118
`
`9955
`
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (BO)
`2222 MarketStreet
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`
`NIU, XINNING
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2828
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/13/2024
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`judith.troilo@ morganlewis.com
`phpatentcorrespondence @ morganlewis.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`162-187 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`CL] Claim(s)__is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 162-187is/are rejected.
`(] Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)( The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s)filed on 15 August 2023 is/are: a){¥] accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)£) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)Q) All
`1.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. |
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20240303
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`18/233,941
`LOCHMAN et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`XINNING(TOM) NIU
`2828
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 15 August 2023.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA orAIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The presentapplication,filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventorto file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Double Patenting
`
`2.
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded
`
`in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) soas to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise
`
`extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple
`
`assignees. Anonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not
`
`identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference
`
`claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious
`
`over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., Inre Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998): Inre
`
`Goodman,11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Inre Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1985); Inre Van Ornum,686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164
`
`USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`Atimely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to
`
`overcome an actualorprovisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the
`
`reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned withthe examined application,
`
`or claims an invention madeas a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research
`
`agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under thefirst inventor to file
`
`provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject
`
`to examination under thefirst inventor to file provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be
`
`signedin compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 3
`
`Thefiling of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double
`
`patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a
`
`reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional
`
`the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection !.B.1. Fora reply toa non-final Office action,
`
`see 37 CFR1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration
`
`while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may befiled after final for consideration. See MPEP §§
`
`706.07(e) and 714.13.
`
`The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit
`
`www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form isfiled
`
`determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A
`
`web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may befilled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal
`
`Disclaimer that meetsall requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission.
`
`For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-
`
`online/eterminal-disclaimer.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 162-169 and 174-181 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being
`
`unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,769,986 (hereinafter Lochman et al.).
`
`4.
`
`Regarding claim 162, Lochman etal. disclose: a laser system comprising a plurality of enclosed
`
`components, at least one of the components comprising one or more beam emitters therewithin,
`
`wherein (i) eachcomponent comprisesa gas inlet configured to permit ingress of gas into the
`
`component and a gas outlet configured to permit egress of gas out of the component, and (ii) the
`
`components are fluidly connected to eachother in series; a pump, different from the plurality of
`
`enclosed components, for supplying gas tothe gas inlet of a first one of the components, whereby the
`
`supplied gas flows sequentially into and out of each of the series -connected components; and a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 4
`
`siloxane-mitigation system, different from the plurality of enclosed components, configured to remove
`
`siloxanes from gas supplied by the pump (claim 3).
`
`5.
`
`Regarding claim 163, Lochman etal. disclose: further comprising an inlet manifold, different
`
`from the plurality of enclosed components,fluidly coupled to the gas inlet of the first one of the
`
`components, wherein the pump supplies gas tothe inlet manifold for supply to the gas inlet of the first
`
`one of the enclosed components(claim 3).
`
`6.
`
`Regarding claim 164, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein at least one of the enclosed components
`
`of the laser system (i) comprises therewithin one or more optical elements configured to focus and/or
`
`direct laser beams, and (ii) does not comprise a beam emitter therewithin (claim 9).
`
`7.
`
`Regarding claim 165, Lochman etal. disclose: further comprising an outlet manifold, different
`
`from the plurality of enclosed components,fluidly coupled to the gas outlet of a last one of the enclosed
`
`components (claim 4).
`
`8.
`
`Regarding claim 166, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein the pump is fluidly connected to the
`
`outlet manifold (claim 6).
`
`9.
`
`Regarding claim 167, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein the outlet manifold is configured to
`
`release gas intoa surrounding ambient(claim 7).
`
`10.
`
`Regarding claim 168, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein a gas outlet of a last one of the enclosed
`
`components is fluidly connected to the pump (claim 6).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page5S
`
`11.
`
`Regarding claim 169, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein a gas outlet of a last one of the enclosed
`
`components is configured to release gas intoa surrounding ambient (claim 8).
`
`12.
`
`Regarding claim 174, Lochman etal. disclose: further comprising one or more sensors
`
`configured to detect siloxanes within at least one enclosed component and/or within one or more
`
`conduits fluidly connected to at least one of the pump, at least one enclosed component, or the
`
`siloxane-mitigation system (claim 10).
`
`13.
`
`Regarding claim 175, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein one of the components comprises a laser
`
`resonatorhaving an enclosed laser cavity, the laser cavity comprising therewithin: a plurality of beam
`
`emitters each emitting a beam having a different wavelength; a dispersive element configured to
`
`receive beams emitted by the plurality of emitters and combine the beams into a multi-wavelength
`
`beam; and disposed optically downstream of the dispersive element,a partially reflective out put
`
`coupler configured to (i) receive the multi-wavelength beam,(ii) transmita first portion of the multi-
`
`wavelength beam as an output beam,and (iii) reflect a second portion of the multi-wavelength beam
`
`back toward the dispersive element (claim 17).
`
`14.
`
`Regarding claim 176, Lochman etal. disclose: the laser cavity comprises a platform having top
`
`and bottom opposedsides and defining an opening therethrough; the plurality of beam emittersis
`
`disposed over the topside of the platform, the beams emitted thereby being directed through the
`
`opening in the platform to the bottom side of the platform; and the dispersive elementis disposed over
`
`the bottom side of the platform and positioned to receive the beams directed through the opening
`
`(claim 18).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 6
`
`15.
`
`Regarding claim 177, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein the partially reflective output coupler is
`
`disposed over the bottom side of the platform (claim 19).
`
`16.
`
`Regarding claim 178, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein the laser cavity comprises therewithin: a
`
`plurality of slow-axis collimation lenses disposed optically downstream of the plurality of beam emitters,
`
`each slow-axis collimation lens configured to receive one or more beams from one of the beam
`
`emitters; anda plurality of folding mirrors disposed optically downstream of the slow-axis collimation
`
`lenses and optically upstream of the dispersive element (claim 20).
`
`17.
`
`Regarding claim 179, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein: the laser cavity comprises a platform
`
`having top and bottom opposedsides; the plurality of beam emitters is disposed over the top side of the
`
`platform; the plurality of slow-axis collimation lenses and the plurality of folding mirrors are disposed
`
`over the top side of the platform; the dispersive elementis disposed over the bottom side of the
`
`platform; the platform defines an opening therethrough, andthe beams emitted by the plurality of
`
`beam emitters are directed, from the top side of the platform to the bottom side of the platform, to the
`
`dispersive element through the opening; and the partially reflective output coupler is disposed over the
`
`bottom side of the platform (claim 21).
`
`18.
`
`Regarding claim 180, Lochman etal. disclose: wherein the plurality of enclosed components of
`
`the laser system comprisesa plurality of laser resonators, each laser resonator(i) being enclosed within
`
`a separate enclosurefluidly coupled to a different one of the gas inlets and (ii) comprising a plurality of
`
`beam emitters therewithin and being configured to combine beams emitted by the beam emitters into a
`
`combined beam (claim 22).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 7
`
`19.
`
`Regarding claim 181, Lochman etal. disclose: a beam-combining module, separate from the
`
`laser resonators, configured to receive the combined beams from the laser resonators and combine the
`
`combined beams into an output beam; andafiber optic module, separate from the laser resonators,
`
`configured to receive the output beam from the beam-combining module and supply the output beam
`
`to an optical fiber (claim 23).
`
`20.
`
`Claims 170-173, 182-184, 186 and 187 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting
`
`as being unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,769,986 (hereinafter Lochman etal.) in view
`
`of U.SPatent No. 11,424,592 (hereinafter Lochman ‘592).
`
`21.
`
`Regarding claim 170, Lochman etal. do not disclose: further comprising a desiccant positioned
`
`to remove moisture from gas supplied by the pump.
`
`22.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: further comprising a desiccant positioned to remove moisture from gas
`
`supplied by the pump (claim 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lochman by adding a desiccant to
`
`the device in order to remove moisture from the device.
`
`23.
`
`Regarding claim171, Lochman et al. do not disclose: wherein the siloxane-mitigation system
`
`comprises a siloxane-adsorbing material and/or a siloxane-absorbing material.
`
`24,
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the siloxane-mitigation system comprises a siloxane-adsorbing
`
`material and/or a siloxane-absorbing material (claim 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary
`
`skill in the art before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lochman
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 8
`
`by adding a siloxane adsorbing material and/or a siloxane-absorbing material in order to remove
`
`siloxane from the device.
`
`25.
`
`Regarding claim 172, Lochman et al. do not disclose: wherein the siloxane -mitigation system
`
`comprises a remediation system configured to remove siloxanes from thegas via at least one of
`
`condensation or reaction.
`
`26.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the siloxane-mitigation system comprises a remediation
`
`system configured to remove siloxanes from the gas via at least one of condensation or reaction (claim
`
`8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the
`
`claimed invention to modify the device of Lochman by adding a remediation system in order to remove
`
`siloxane from the device.
`
`27.
`
`Regarding claim 173, Lochman et al. do not disclose: wherein the siloxane -mitigation system
`
`comprises a liquid over and/or through which gas supplied by the pump is flowed.
`
`28.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the siloxane-mitigation system comprisesa liquid over and/or
`
`through which gas supplied by the pump is flowed (claim 9). It would have been obvious to one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of
`
`Lochman by flowing a liquid over or through the gas supplied by the pump in order to removesiloxane
`
`from the device.
`
`29.
`
`Regarding claim 182, Lochman etal. do not disclose: further comprising a computer-based
`
`controller configured to operate the pump.
`
`30.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: further comprising a computer-based controller configured to operate
`
`the pump (claim 11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 9
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lochman by using a computer-based
`
`controller to operate the pump in order to more accurately control the amount of gas in the device.
`
`31.
`
`Regarding claim 183, Lochman et al. do not disclose: further comprising one or more sensors
`
`configured to detect siloxanes within at least one enclosed component and/or within one or more
`
`conduits fluidly connected to at least one of the pump, at least one enclosed component, or the
`
`siloxane-mitigation system, wherein the controller is responsive to signals received from the one or
`
`more sensors.
`
`32.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: further comprising one or more sensors configured to detect siloxanes
`
`within at least one enclosed component and/or within one or more conduits fluidly connected to at
`
`least one of the pump, at least one enclosed component, or the siloxane-mitigation system, wherein the
`
`controller is responsive to signals received from the one or more sensors(claim 12). It would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to
`
`modify the device of Lochman as modified by adding one or more sensors tothe device and coupled to
`
`the controller in order to adjust the amountof gas in the device based onthe signals from the sensors.
`
`33.
`
`Regarding claim 184, Lochman et al. do not disclose: wherein the controller is configured to
`
`operate the pump only whenasiloxane concentration detected by at least one of the sensors exceeds a
`
`threshold.
`
`34.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the controller is configured to operate the pump only whena
`
`siloxane concentration detected by at least one of the sensors exceeds a threshold (claim 13). It would
`
`have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed
`
`invention to modify the device of Lochman as modified by adding one or more sensors to the device and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 10
`
`coupled to the controller in order to adjust the amount of gas in the device based on thesignals from
`
`the sensors.
`
`35.
`
`Regarding claim 186, Lochman etal. do not disclose: wherein the controller is configured to
`
`operate the pump continuously, at least during operation of the one or more beam emitters.
`
`36.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the controller is configured to operate the pump continuously,
`
`at least during operation of the one or more beam emitters (claim 14). It would have been obvious to
`
`one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the
`
`device of Lochman as modified by using a computer-based controller to operate the pump and to
`
`operate the pump continuously in order to supply more gas into the device.
`
`37.
`
`Regarding claim 187, Lochman et al. do not disclose: wherein the controller is configured to
`
`operate the pump at regular, predeterminedintervals, irrespective of a siloxane concentration within
`
`one or more of the components.
`
`38.
`
`Lochman ‘592 discloses: wherein the controller is configured to operate the pump at regular,
`
`predetermined intervals, irrespective of a siloxane concentration within one or more of the components
`
`(claim 15). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date
`
`of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lochman as modified by using a computer-based
`
`controller to operate the pump and to operate the pump at regular, predetermined intervals in order to
`
`simplify the pump control process in the device.
`
`39.
`
`Claim 185 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable
`
`over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,769,986 (hereinafter Lochman etal.) in view of U.S Patent No.
`
`11,424,592 (hereinafter Lochman ‘592) and Das et al. (5,646,954).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 11
`
`AO.
`
`Regarding claim185, Lochman as modified do not disclose: wherein the controller is configured
`
`to power down or power off the one or more beam emitters whena siloxane concentration detected by
`
`at least one of the sensors exceeds a threshold.
`
`41.
`
`Das et al. disclose: controller is configured to power down or power off the laser when laser
`
`energy deviates too far from a user-specified range(col. 1, lines 23-45). It would have been obvious to
`
`one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the
`
`device of Lochman as modified by powering off the one or more beam emitters when a siloxane
`
`concentration exceeds a threshold in order to protect the one or more emitters.
`
`Conclusion
`
`42.
`
`The prior art made of recordand notrelied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure. Weida etal. (US PG Pub 2015/0042820) disclose: A sensor system for sensing the presence of
`
`methane and sulfur hexafluoride in an area includes(i) a laser assembly including a quantum cascade
`
`gain medium that generates a MIR output beam that is directed at the area (Abstract). Ikdea et al. (US
`
`PG Pub 2010/0086459) disclose: An impurity removing apparatusis simple in structure for removing
`
`impurities from a rare gas and enable to make the rare gas reusable. The impurity removing apparatus
`
`includes a first treatment device 21 for removing fluorine and fluorine compound which are mixed with
`
`a rare gas discharged from an excimer laser oscillation apparatus 10, asecond treatment device 23 for
`
`removing oxygen generated bythe first treatment device, and a circulation device 25 for circulating the
`
`rare gas discharged from the excimer laser oscillation apparatus 10 and returning the rare gas tothe
`
`excimer laser oscillation apparatus 10 (Abstract).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 18/233,941
`Art Unit: 2828
`
`Page 12
`
`A3.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to XINNING(TOM) NIU whose telephone number is (571)270-1437. The examiner can
`
`normally be reached M-F: 9:30am-6:00pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reachthe examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Minsun Harvey can be reached on 571-272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this
`
`application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from
`
`Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To
`
`file and managepatent submissions in Patent Center,visit: https://patentcenter.us pto. gov.Visit
`
`https ://www.us pto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https ://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For additional
`
`questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or
`
`571-272-1000.
`
`/XINNING(Tom) NIU/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2828
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket