throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`
`
`
`NDA 18-936/S-071/S-073
`NDA 20-101/S-032
`NDA 20-974/S-005
`NDA 21-235/S-003
`
`
`Eli Lilly and Company
`Attention: Gregory T. Brophy, Ph.D.
`Director, U.S. Regulatory Affairs
`Lilly Corporate Center
`Indianapolis, IN 46285-2643
`
`
`Dear Dr. Brophy:
`
`Please refer to your supplemental new drug applications dated September 2, 2004, and December 14,
`2004, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Prozac and
`Sarafem (fluoxetine hydrochloride) pulvules (NDA 18-936), Prozac solution (NDA 20-101), Prozac
`tablets (NDA 20-974), and Prozac Delayed-Release Capsules (NDA 21-235).
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submission dated May 31, 2005.
`
`Your submission of May 31, 2005 constituted a complete response to our May 12, 2005 action letter.
`
`Reference is also made to an e-mail from CAPT Paul A. David of this Agency to Dr. Barbara Arning,
`of Eli Lilly, dated August 31, 2005, requesting that you agree to revise the labeling.
`
`We additionally refer to Dr. Arning’s e-mail dated November 3, 2005, accepting the agreed upon
`labeling (as noted below).
`
`These supplements, submitted as “Changes Being Effected” applications, provide for revisions to the
`labeling
`to
`incorporate
`the results of your
`juvenile animal
`toxicology studies under
`the
`CARCINOGENESIS, MUTAGENESIS,
`IMPAIRMENT
`of FERTILITY, ANIMAL
`TOXICOLOGY, and Pediatric Use sections as well as minor editorial changes.
`
`We completed our review of these application, as amended. These applications are approved, effective
`on the date of this letter, for use as recommended in the agreed-upon labeling text.
`
`
`

`

`NDAs 18-936/S-071/S-073, 20-101/S-032, 20-974/S-005, & 21-235/S-003
`Page 2
`
`We note your agreement to add the following language at the end of the PRECAUTIONS-Pediatric
`Use section as follows:
`
`
`PRECAUTIONS-Pediatric Use
`Significant toxicity, including myotoxicity, long-term neurobehavioral and reproductive toxicity,
`and impaired bone development, has been observed following exposure of juvenile animals to
`fluoxetine. Some of these effects occurred at clinically relevant exposures.
`
`In a study in which fluoxetine (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg) was orally administered to young rats from
`weaning (Postnatal Day 21) through adulthood (Day 90), male and female sexual development
`was delayed at all doses, and growth (body weight gain, femur length) was decreased during the
`dosing period in animals receiving the highest dose. At the end of the treatment period, serum
`levels of creatine kinase (marker of muscle damage) were increased at the intermediate and high
`doses, and abnormal muscle and reproductive organ histopathology (skeletal muscle degeneration
`and necrosis, testicular degeneration and necrosis, epididymal vacuolation and hypospermia) was
`observed at the high dose. When animals were evaluated after a recovery period (up to 11 weeks
`after cessation of dosing), neurobehavioral abnormalities (decreased reactivity at all doses and
`learning deficit at the high dose) and reproductive functional impairment (decreased mating at all
`doses and impaired fertility at the high dose) were seen; in addition, testicular and epididymal
`microscopic lesions and decreased sperm concentrations were found in the high dose group,
`indicating that the reproductive organ effects seen at the end of treatment were irreversible. The
`reversibility of fluoxetine-induced muscle damage was not assessed. Adverse effects similar to
`those observed in rats treated with fluoxetine during the juvenile period have not been reported
`after administration of fluoxetine to adult animals. Plasma exposures (AUC) to fluoxetine in
`juvenile rats receiving the low, intermediate, and high dose in this study were approximately 0.1 -
`0.2, 1 - 2, and 5 - 10 times, respectively, the average exposure in pediatric patients receiving the
`maximum recommended dose (MRD) of 20 mg/day. Rat exposures to the major metabolite,
`norfluoxetine, were approximately 0.3 - 0.8, 1 - 8, and 3 - 20 times, respectively, pediatric
`exposure at the MRD.
`
`A specific effect of fluoxetine on bone development has been reported in mice treated with
`fluoxetine during the juvenile period. When mice were treated with fluoxetine (5 or 20 mg/kg,
`intraperitoneal) for 4 weeks starting at 4 weeks of age, bone formation was reduced resulting in
`decreased bone mineral content and density. These doses did not affect overall growth (body
`weight gain or femoral length). The doses administered to juvenile mice in this study are
`approximately 0.5 and 2 times the MRD for pediatric patients on a body surface area (mg/m2)
`basis.
`
`In another mouse study, administration of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg intraperitoneal) during early
`postnatal development (Postnatal Days 4 to 21) produced abnormal emotional behaviors
`(decreased exploratory behavior in elevated plus-maze, increased shock avoidance latency) in
`adulthood (12 weeks of age). The dose used in this study is approximately equal to the pediatric
`MRD on a mg/m2 basis. Because of the early dosing period in this study, the significance of these
`findings to the approved pediatric use in humans is uncertain.
`
`Additionally, and as communicated in our May 12, 2005 letter, we concur with your proposed
`revisions to the CARCINOGENESIS, MUTAGENESIS, IMPAIRMENT of FERTILITY section.
`
`
`

`

`NDAs 18-936/S-071/S-073, 20-101/S-032, 20-974/S-005, & 21-235/S-003
`Page 3
`
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the labeling above.
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the guidance for industry titled Providing
`Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format - NDA. Alternatively, you may submit 20 paper copies
`of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it is printed. Individually mount 15
`of the copies on heavy-weight paper or similar material. For administrative purposes, designate these
`submissions "FPL for approved supplements 18-936/S-071/S-073, 20-101/S-032, 20-974/S-005, & 21-
`235/S-003”. Approval of these submissions by FDA is not required before the labeling is used.
`
`If you issue a letter communicating important information about this drug product (i.e., a “Dear Health
`Care Professional” letter), we request that you submit a copy of the letter to this NDA and a copy to
`the following address:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81).
`
`If you have any questions, call Paul David, R.Ph., Chief Project Management Staff, at (301) 796-1058.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MEDWATCH, HFD-410
`FDA
`5600 Fishers Lane
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Thomas Laughren, M.D.
`Director
`Division of Psychiatry Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
` /s/
`---------------------
`Thomas Laughren
`12/1/2005 03:34:44 PM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket