`
` ., .
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
` Iii—33% s.m 'cn Hicmke and]. Réschkc
`
`
`_
`
`'
`am: 0
`By my. Unlversi ofMainz,
`g Ugtcrc Zalzlbachct Susan 8. 55131 M3132. Germany
`
`
` with flOO
`(Desni
`mg
`
`
` APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`182
`
` ., .
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`‘ -- A‘ m. 4“,“ n“... “a, -.
`
`..
`
` .
`
`\
`
`Table I Clomipramine (CL) and desmethylclomipramine (DCL) concentrationsin a
`patient treated with modafinil.
`
`DCL '
`
`Ratio
`Concentrations (rug/ml.)
`CL
`CUDCL
`03/01/96
`02/05/96
`
`_, 06/08/96
`
`2 1-: L...‘ 27/08/96
`
` ‘
`13/09/96
`
`
`*
`
`I :-
`
`’ "‘
`{)4}; A»
`
`I21
`
`C(
`
`:'
`
`’1 ‘.'
`It
`
`3
`:— 5? "I
`? f "
`
`t
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`
`
`x. w /
`
`'3‘) LL
`
`,,__
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`r
`
`I
`.
`m n,
`
`w
`
`_
`
`/
`
`,
`
`i: 9 , {M
`
`“
`
`w.
`
`-
`4
`3?" .‘J, I. if":
`1‘
`I"
`
`J
`
`,
`“.1 i
`V
`
`4
`
`-
`1'
`
`'.
`
`I
`’r'
`E/ !
`
`‘V
`
`f,
`'~
`
`f'?
`
`‘
`
`)
`
`4
`
`"
`
`‘
`
`”2:”.
`K
`
`\
`
`a
`
`’
`
`l
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`———-————l
`
`
`
`15. An Open, 3.x3 Latin Square, Randomized, Cross-over Study to Investigate the
`Pharmacoltmetics ofModafinil And Methylphenidate When Given Alone and in
`Combination in Healthy Male Volunteers (ClS38a/lO9/PK/UK)
`Objectives:
`To study the interaction ofModafinil and methylphenidate on their single dose
`pharmacokineu'cs.
`
`Introduction:
`
`approved drug for narcolepsy. Although it is unlikely that both methylphenidate and
`modafinil would be given at the same time, it is quite possible that patients on one
`treatment eculd be changed over to the other, which makes it necessary to study the
`interaction ofthese two agents.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`This was an open 3 x 3 Latin square. randomized. cross-over study involving 21 healthy male
`volunteers. performed in 3 groups of 7 volunteers. Only non-smokers and/or err-smokers for at
`least 6 months were screened; similarly. volunteers were only allowed to be moderate alcohol
`drinkers (Le. a maximum of 21 units per week). The three treatment schedules were:
`
`Treatment A:
`
`‘ Methylphenidate (‘unmediate release) 4 x 10 mg and modafinil 2 x 100 mg.
`Both given concomitantly as a single dose on Day 1.
`-
`
`Treatment 8:
`
`Modafinil 2 x 100 mg as a single dose on Day 1.
`
`Treatment C:
`
`Methylphenidate (immediate release) 4 x 10 mg as a single dose on Day 1.
`
`Volunteers were randomized to one of the following sequence order of treatment schedules:
`(,0 5+5: 4 4 -mj 094"” M pure . 61141414441 WW.
`
`Treatment A-fl‘reaunent Bahamnt C
`
`Treatment B-)Treatment C—)Treatment A
`
`Treatment C-eTteau-nent A—r‘l‘reaunent B
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`W 3102,}: samples (10 1111.) we collected into lithium heparin
`3W ' monovette tubes pre~dose (0 hr) and at the followihg times
`post-dose: 0.5. l, 1.5, 2. 3. 4. 6, 8. 12, and 18 hem: for d- and
`l-threo-methylphenidate analysis; and 0.5. l. 2, 3, 4, 6. 8 12 24 36
`
`
`
`~~
`
` (HPLC)method’andd-andI-methyipherfidaxeia“Mate—methodwith
`
` .
`
` .
`
`
`
`of either agent. However, me
`thylphenidate caused a small increase in t,m for Modafinil
`(from 1.9 hr to 2.9 hr), whi
`ch indicated that coadmim‘stration ofmethylphenidate and
`modafinil may cause a del
`ay in the oral absorption of modafim'l.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`’28
`
`
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`—-—9x:-="
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`.a ---~A.—. aa‘-u_.'..w__0 J; ;
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`I '
`
`——n
`
`WE—Efiiflfi
`
`h“..-..,..,
`
`,.v.v~_.-————____.-
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`I APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`,
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9 null 6
`
`12
`
`18
`
`*1,
`(SD)modaflnllplasmaconcentration
`Intwenty-onehealthymalevolunteersfollowinga‘slngleoraldoseof
`~.
`' J modafinll alone or
`lned with 4 mg methylphen date.
`A
`2L,
`(Protocol C15383/109lPK/U
`
`
`
`I E
`
`E
`
`flma (hour)
`
`Hymnal:$enubg§tnmnucplotofmean(SD)d-methylpfienldateplasr
`coneenh’atlonvs a
`mat
`. me In twenty-one he
`altny
`slngte oral dose of 40
`a volunteer: following
`mg methytphenldate alone or cornblned wtth 20
`mg modafinlt. (Protocol Cl538a/109/PK/UK)
`'
`'
`--o-- Methylphenldate + Modaflnll
`--- Methylphenldate
`
`v
`;.
`
`.
`
`1
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`( '
`,
`
`16. Evaluation ofa New ChemicalEntity,Modafinil as an InhibitorofHuman P450
`Enzymes (DM-96-051 (XT052396))
`V
`
`400 mg daily dose)
`3459-5112101: BMW W m “Wow
`CYP1A2
`a-Naphthotlavone
`1.0uM
`w VJ" ? W2 0““ s
`CYP2A6
`.
`Nicotine
`200 W Q Ma, W‘. w) “’4
`CYP286
`Orphenadn'ne
`500m .1 W“ t ,‘ W“
`CYPZCQ
`Sulfaphenazole
`10 u M
`a
`CYP2019
`Hexobatbital
`200 M Wadi} .
`CYPZDB
`Quinidine
`10 W ‘
`’
`CYP2E1
`4-Methylpyrazole
`1 uM
`CYP3A415
`Ketooonazole
`0.5 uM
`CYP4A9/11
`No competitive inhibitor is available forthis enzyme
`Results (Attachment l6) and Conclusions:
`
`‘
`
`.
`(_ .
`
`-
`
`
`
`in this regard. modalinil onid be expected to inhibit the metabolism of those drugs
`CYP2019.
`that are substrates for CYPZCtQ. which include omeprazole. lansoprazole. hexobarbital.
`mephobarbital. propranoloi. citalopram. diphenythydantoin (diiantin). imipramine. mebhenytoin.
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
` .
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`30
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5 Pages RedactedTrade Secret/Confidential Commercial
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`Objectives:
`To investigate the effect ofmodafinil on major CYP enzymes in cultured human
`hepatocytes obtained from three donors.
`
`Methodology:
`Modafinil at concentrations of 10 uM, 100 uM and 1 mM were used in the
`incubation with human hepatocytes for 72 hours. Classic inducers of each examined
`CYP enzyme were used in the same batc
`h of cells as positive controls for modafinil. The
`rate ofmetabolism for each marker substrate ofthe enzyme was recorded to determine
`the enzyme activities.
`
`Results (Attachment l7) and Conclusions:
`The results showed that there were large variations ofCYP activity among three '
`liver microsomes, among the
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`31
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hahn)
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`
`’
`
`S
`
`It},
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`I'i‘FMK 004:0
`
`Ethoxyresorufin
`(O-decthylation)"
`
`Phenacetin
`(deathylationf
`
`(O-dealkylation)”
`
`(hydroxylation)b
`
`Dextrome orphan
`(demethylationf
`
`p-nitrophcnol
`(hYdroxylation)°
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`NDA 20-717
`Provigil° (modafinil)
`Human Phannacokinetics and Bioavuilubility~
`
`Table 6.2-92. Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Activities in Hep
`Prepared from the Human Livers
`
`
`M
`~
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`Ccphalon. Inc.
`as: 357
`CONFIDENTIAL
`O:\PGCEPHALON\NDA\HNAL\FH‘EM6\628~VIS.WP6: ll Nmbu’ I996 [0:32 [In
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`ITEM 6” mum
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
` .
`
`““3
`
`2880
`
`V7641
`
`- 400 4
`
`_
`
`96 ofcontml
`50° 7
`.
`3
`30° 1
`:
`
`20°
`
`’~
`
`.
`3.:
`:3
`
`
`5 §;
`100
`.
`.5 ‘1',
`.3 gig-:15»
`o .
`V
`
`
`
`
`H94
`
`I
`
`w
`
`I Com: .
`I Modaina 10w
`I Modalniwom
`£3 Modumboow
`I 3-MC5w
`S PB3000:»!
`l Rrsow
`lemma.“
`
`.
`
`h *
`
`Humn donor
`
`J-MC .: Jflcthylctohnlhrme
`PB ‘
`: hcnobubiul
`RIP
`: :13um
`CLO :clofibn‘cmd
`
`8 4 ~ Exhoxyresomfin Odecthylaseaumty. supponed byCYP 1A, in humanhepatocytecultures
`thata 72 hour maximum period in the presume ofmodafini] (Modiodd®) and ofrcfumcc
`
`InduCCfS
`
`‘
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE copv ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` .
`
`I Count
`
`I Modaini 10w
`
`I Modaina 100w
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`K .4.._m.-‘-...‘r. . N
`
` .
`
`$6 ofcontml
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`1‘"
`\
`
`60° 7
`5°° -’
`:
`400 ;
`3°° ‘
`M200 :7
`100
`
`
`
`.Comt
`IMoaamaiow
`.Modaini‘loow
`aModaInliooow
`I3-Mcsw
`Imp-sow
`lantoow
`
`"-‘uf..
`
`
`'umt.M
`aman,“
`
`H97
`
`Human donor
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`-r.....4 __ ....
`
`,
`
` .
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`