throbber

`
` ., .
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
` Iii—33% s.m 'cn Hicmke and]. Réschkc
`
`
`_
`
`'
`am: 0
`By my. Unlversi ofMainz,
`g Ugtcrc Zalzlbachct Susan 8. 55131 M3132. Germany
`
`
` with flOO
`(Desni
`mg
`
`
` APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`182
`
` ., .
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`

`

`‘ -- A‘ m. 4“,“ n“... “a, -.
`
`..
`
` .
`
`\
`
`Table I Clomipramine (CL) and desmethylclomipramine (DCL) concentrationsin a
`patient treated with modafinil.
`
`DCL '
`
`Ratio
`Concentrations (rug/ml.)
`CL
`CUDCL
`03/01/96
`02/05/96
`
`_, 06/08/96
`
`2 1-: L...‘ 27/08/96
`
` ‘
`13/09/96
`
`
`*
`
`I :-
`
`’ "‘
`{)4}; A»
`
`I21
`
`C(
`
`:'
`
`’1 ‘.'
`It
`
`3
`:— 5? "I
`? f "
`
`t
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`
`
`x. w /
`
`'3‘) LL
`
`,,__
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`r
`
`I
`.
`m n,
`
`w
`
`_
`
`/
`
`,
`
`i: 9 , {M
`
`“
`
`w.
`
`-
`4
`3?" .‘J, I. if":
`1‘
`I"
`
`J
`
`,
`“.1 i
`V
`
`4
`
`-
`1'
`
`'.
`
`I
`’r'
`E/ !
`
`‘V
`
`f,
`'~
`
`f'?
`
`‘
`
`)
`
`4
`
`"
`
`‘
`
`”2:”.
`K
`
`\
`
`a
`
`’
`
`l
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`———-————l
`
`

`

`15. An Open, 3.x3 Latin Square, Randomized, Cross-over Study to Investigate the
`Pharmacoltmetics ofModafinil And Methylphenidate When Given Alone and in
`Combination in Healthy Male Volunteers (ClS38a/lO9/PK/UK)
`Objectives:
`To study the interaction ofModafinil and methylphenidate on their single dose
`pharmacokineu'cs.
`
`Introduction:
`
`approved drug for narcolepsy. Although it is unlikely that both methylphenidate and
`modafinil would be given at the same time, it is quite possible that patients on one
`treatment eculd be changed over to the other, which makes it necessary to study the
`interaction ofthese two agents.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`This was an open 3 x 3 Latin square. randomized. cross-over study involving 21 healthy male
`volunteers. performed in 3 groups of 7 volunteers. Only non-smokers and/or err-smokers for at
`least 6 months were screened; similarly. volunteers were only allowed to be moderate alcohol
`drinkers (Le. a maximum of 21 units per week). The three treatment schedules were:
`
`Treatment A:
`
`‘ Methylphenidate (‘unmediate release) 4 x 10 mg and modafinil 2 x 100 mg.
`Both given concomitantly as a single dose on Day 1.
`-
`
`Treatment 8:
`
`Modafinil 2 x 100 mg as a single dose on Day 1.
`
`Treatment C:
`
`Methylphenidate (immediate release) 4 x 10 mg as a single dose on Day 1.
`
`Volunteers were randomized to one of the following sequence order of treatment schedules:
`(,0 5+5: 4 4 -mj 094"” M pure . 61141414441 WW.
`
`Treatment A-fl‘reaunent Bahamnt C
`
`Treatment B-)Treatment C—)Treatment A
`
`Treatment C-eTteau-nent A—r‘l‘reaunent B
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`27
`
`

`

`W 3102,}: samples (10 1111.) we collected into lithium heparin
`3W ' monovette tubes pre~dose (0 hr) and at the followihg times
`post-dose: 0.5. l, 1.5, 2. 3. 4. 6, 8. 12, and 18 hem: for d- and
`l-threo-methylphenidate analysis; and 0.5. l. 2, 3, 4, 6. 8 12 24 36
`
`
`
`~~
`
` (HPLC)method’andd-andI-methyipherfidaxeia“Mate—methodwith
`
` .
`
` .
`
`
`
`of either agent. However, me
`thylphenidate caused a small increase in t,m for Modafinil
`(from 1.9 hr to 2.9 hr), whi
`ch indicated that coadmim‘stration ofmethylphenidate and
`modafinil may cause a del
`ay in the oral absorption of modafim'l.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`’28
`
`

`

`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`—-—9x:-="
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`

`

`
`
`.a ---~A.—. aa‘-u_.'..w__0 J; ;
`
`BEST POSSIBLE
`BEST POSSIBLE
`
`I '
`
`——n
`
`WE—Efiiflfi
`
`h“..-..,..,
`
`,.v.v~_.-————____.-
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`I APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`,
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`

`

`9 null 6
`
`12
`
`18
`
`*1,
`(SD)modaflnllplasmaconcentration
`Intwenty-onehealthymalevolunteersfollowinga‘slngleoraldoseof
`~.
`' J modafinll alone or
`lned with 4 mg methylphen date.
`A
`2L,
`(Protocol C15383/109lPK/U
`
`
`
`I E
`
`E
`
`flma (hour)
`
`Hymnal:$enubg§tnmnucplotofmean(SD)d-methylpfienldateplasr
`coneenh’atlonvs a
`mat
`. me In twenty-one he
`altny
`slngte oral dose of 40
`a volunteer: following
`mg methytphenldate alone or cornblned wtth 20
`mg modafinlt. (Protocol Cl538a/109/PK/UK)
`'
`'
`--o-- Methylphenldate + Modaflnll
`--- Methylphenldate
`
`v
`;.
`
`.
`
`1
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`

`

`( '
`,
`
`16. Evaluation ofa New ChemicalEntity,Modafinil as an InhibitorofHuman P450
`Enzymes (DM-96-051 (XT052396))
`V
`
`400 mg daily dose)
`3459-5112101: BMW W m “Wow
`CYP1A2
`a-Naphthotlavone
`1.0uM
`w VJ" ? W2 0““ s
`CYP2A6
`.
`Nicotine
`200 W Q Ma, W‘. w) “’4
`CYP286
`Orphenadn'ne
`500m .1 W“ t ,‘ W“
`CYPZCQ
`Sulfaphenazole
`10 u M
`a
`CYP2019
`Hexobatbital
`200 M Wadi} .
`CYPZDB
`Quinidine
`10 W ‘
`’
`CYP2E1
`4-Methylpyrazole
`1 uM
`CYP3A415
`Ketooonazole
`0.5 uM
`CYP4A9/11
`No competitive inhibitor is available forthis enzyme
`Results (Attachment l6) and Conclusions:
`
`‘
`
`.
`(_ .
`
`-
`
`
`
`in this regard. modalinil onid be expected to inhibit the metabolism of those drugs
`CYP2019.
`that are substrates for CYPZCtQ. which include omeprazole. lansoprazole. hexobarbital.
`mephobarbital. propranoloi. citalopram. diphenythydantoin (diiantin). imipramine. mebhenytoin.
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`

`

` .
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`30
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5 Pages RedactedTrade Secret/Confidential Commercial
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`

`

`Objectives:
`To investigate the effect ofmodafinil on major CYP enzymes in cultured human
`hepatocytes obtained from three donors.
`
`Methodology:
`Modafinil at concentrations of 10 uM, 100 uM and 1 mM were used in the
`incubation with human hepatocytes for 72 hours. Classic inducers of each examined
`CYP enzyme were used in the same batc
`h of cells as positive controls for modafinil. The
`rate ofmetabolism for each marker substrate ofthe enzyme was recorded to determine
`the enzyme activities.
`
`Results (Attachment l7) and Conclusions:
`The results showed that there were large variations ofCYP activity among three '
`liver microsomes, among the
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`31
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Hahn)
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`
`’
`
`S
`
`It},
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`I'i‘FMK 004:0
`
`Ethoxyresorufin
`(O-decthylation)"
`
`Phenacetin
`(deathylationf
`
`(O-dealkylation)”
`
`(hydroxylation)b
`
`Dextrome orphan
`(demethylationf
`
`p-nitrophcnol
`(hYdroxylation)°
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`Provigil° (modafinil)
`Human Phannacokinetics and Bioavuilubility~
`
`Table 6.2-92. Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Activities in Hep
`Prepared from the Human Livers
`
`
`M
`~
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY 0N ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`Ccphalon. Inc.
`as: 357
`CONFIDENTIAL
`O:\PGCEPHALON\NDA\HNAL\FH‘EM6\628~VIS.WP6: ll Nmbu’ I996 [0:32 [In
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`ITEM 6” mum
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`‘
`
`

`

`
`
` .
`
`““3
`
`2880
`
`V7641
`
`- 400 4
`
`_
`
`96 ofcontml
`50° 7
`.
`3
`30° 1
`:
`
`20°
`
`’~
`
`.
`3.:
`:3
`
`
`5 §;
`100
`.
`.5 ‘1',
`.3 gig-:15»
`o .
`V
`
`
`
`
`H94
`
`I
`
`w
`
`I Com: .
`I Modaina 10w
`I Modalniwom
`£3 Modumboow
`I 3-MC5w
`S PB3000:»!
`l Rrsow
`lemma.“
`
`.
`
`h *
`
`Humn donor
`
`J-MC .: Jflcthylctohnlhrme
`PB ‘
`: hcnobubiul
`RIP
`: :13um
`CLO :clofibn‘cmd
`
`8 4 ~ Exhoxyresomfin Odecthylaseaumty. supponed byCYP 1A, in humanhepatocytecultures
`thata 72 hour maximum period in the presume ofmodafini] (Modiodd®) and ofrcfumcc
`
`InduCCfS
`
`‘
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE copv ,
`
`
`

`

`
`
` .
`
`I Count
`
`I Modaini 10w
`
`I Modaina 100w
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`

`

`K .4.._m.-‘-...‘r. . N
`
` .
`
`$6 ofcontml
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`1‘"
`\
`
`60° 7
`5°° -’
`:
`400 ;
`3°° ‘
`M200 :7
`100
`
`
`
`.Comt
`IMoaamaiow
`.Modaini‘loow
`aModaInliooow
`I3-Mcsw
`Imp-sow
`lantoow
`
`"-‘uf..
`
`
`'umt.M
`aman,“
`
`H97
`
`Human donor
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`

`

`-r.....4 __ ....
`
`,
`
` .
`
`
`
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`BEST POSSIBLE COPY
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket