throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER: 020717
`
`
`
`
`
`FINAL PRINTED LABELING
`
`

`

`
`
`
` NDA 20-717 1
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`PROVIGIL® (modafinil) TABLETS
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`PROVIGIL (modafinil) is a wakefulness-promoting agent for oral administration. Modafinil
`
`is
`
`a
`
`racemic
`
`compound.
`
`The
`
`chemical
`
`name
`
`for
`
`modafinil
`
`is
`
`2-[(diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl]acetamide. The molecular formula is C15H15N028 and the
`
`molecular weight is 273.36.
`
`The chemical structure is:
`
`©iili
`CW
`
`CH—S-CHg—C—NHZ
`
`Modafinil is a white to off-white, crystalline powder that is practically insoluble in water and
`
`cyclohexane.
`
`It is sparingly to slightly soluble in methanol and acetone. PROVIGIL tablets
`
`contain 100 mg or 200 mg of modafinil and the following inactive ingredients: lactose, corn
`
`starch, magnesium silicate, croscarmellose sodium, povidone, magnesium stearate, and
`
`talc.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Mechanism of Action and Pharmacology
`
`The precise mechanism(s) through which modafinil promotes wakefulness is unknown.
`
`Modafinil has wake-promoting actions
`
`like
`
`sympathomimetic
`
`agents including
`
`amphetamine and methylphenidate, although the phar'rnacologic profile is not identical to
`
`that of sympathomimetic amines.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-717
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`At pharmacologically relevant concentrations, modafinil does not bind to most potentially
`
`relevant receptors for sleep/wake regulation, including those for norepinephrine, serotonin,
`
`dopamine, GABA, adenosine, histamine-3, melatonin, or benzodiazepines. Modafinil also
`
`does not inhibit the activities of MAO-B or phosphodiesterases ll-V.
`
`Modafinil is not a direct- or indirect-acting dopamine receptor agonist and is inactive in
`
`several in vivo preclinical models capable of detecting enhanced dopaminergic activity.
`
`In vitro, modafinil binds to the dopamine reuptake site and causes an increase in
`
`extracellular dopamine, but no increase in dopamine release.
`
`In a preclinical model, the
`
`wakefulness induced by amphetamine, but not modafinil, is antagonized by the dopamine
`
`receptor antagonist haloperidol.
`
`Modafinil does not appear to be a direct or indirect 0(1-adrenergic agonist. Although
`
`modafinil-induced wakefulness can be attenuated by the (nu-adrenergic receptor
`
`antagonist, prazosin, in assay systems known to be responsive to a-adrenergic agonists,
`
`modafinil has no activity. Modafinil does not display sympathomimetic activity in the rat
`
`vas deferens preparations (agonist-stimulated or electrically stimulated) nor does it
`
`increase the formation of
`
`the adrenergic receptor-mediated second messenger
`
`phosphatidyl inositol in in vitro models. Unlike sympathomimetic agents, modafinil does
`
`not reduce cataplexy in narcoleptic canines and has minimal effects on cardiovascular and
`
`hemodynamic parameters.
`
`In the cat, equal wakefulness-promoting doses of methylphenidate and amphetamine
`
`increased neuronal activation throughout
`
`the brain. Modafinil at an equivalent
`
`wakefulness—promoting dose selectively and prominently increased neuronal activation in
`
`more discrete regions of the brain.The relationship of this finding in cats to the effects of
`
`modafinil in humans is unknown.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`NDA 20-717
`Provigil® (modafinil) - FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`In addition to its wakefulness-promoting effects and increased locomotor activity in
`
`animals, in humans, PROVIGIL produces psychoactive and euphoric effects, alterations
`
`in mood, perception, and thinking, and feelings typical of other CNS stimulants. Modafinil
`
`is reinforcing, as evidenced by its self-administration in monkeys previously trained to self
`
`administer cocaine; modafinil was also partially discriminated as stimulant-like.
`
`The optical enantiomers of modafinil have similar pharmacological actions in animals. The
`enantiomers have not been individually studied in humans. Two major metabolites of
`
`modafinil, modafinil acid and modafinil sulfone, do not appear to contribute to the CNS-
`
`activating properties of modafinil.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Modafinil is a racemic compound, whose enantiomers have different pharrnacokinetics
`
`(e.g., the half-life of the /-isomer is approximately three times that of the d-isomer in
`
`humans). The enantiomers do not interconvert. At steady state, total exposure to the [-
`
`isomer is approximately three times that for the d-isomer. The trough concentration
`
`(Cminsslgiiof circulating modafinil after once daily dosing consists of 90% of the l-isomer and
`10% of the d-isomer. The effective elimination half-life of modafinil after multiple doses is
`
`about 15 hours. The enantiomers of modafinil exhibit linear kinetics upon multiple dosing
`
`of 200-600 mg/day once daily in healthy volunteers. Apparent steady states of total
`
`modafinil and I-(-)-modafinil are reached after 2-4 days of dosing.
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Absorption and Distribution
`
`Absorption of PROVIGIL tablets is rapid, with peak plasma concentrations occurring at
`
`2-4 hours. The bioavailability of PROVIGIL tablets is approximately equal to that of an
`
`aqueous suspension. The absolute oral bioavailability was not determined due to the
`
`aqueous insolubility (<1 mg/ml) of modafinil, which precluded intravenous administration.
`
`Food has no effect on overall PROVlGlL bioavailability; however, its absorption (tmax) may
`
`be delayed by approximately one hour if taken with food.
`
`Modafinil is well distributed in body tissue with an apparent volume of distribution (~09
`
`L/kg) larger than the volume of total body water (0.6 L/kg).
`
`In human plasma, in vitro,
`
`modafinil is moderately bound to plasma protein (~60°/o, mainly to albumin). At serum
`
`concentrations obtained at steady state after doses of 200 mg/day, modafinil exhibits no
`
`displacement of protein binding of warfarin, diazepam, or propranolol. Even at much larger
`
`concentrations (1000pM; >25 times the Cmax of 40uM at steady state at 400 mg/day),
`
`modafinil has no effect on warfarin binding. Modafinil acid at concentrations >500pM
`
`decreases the extent of warfarin binding, but these concentrations are > 35 times those
`
`achieved therapeutically.
`
`Metabolism and Elimination
`
`The major route of elimination (~90°/o)
`
`is metabolism, primarily by the liver, with
`
`subsequent renal elimination of the metabolites. Un'ne alkalinization has no effect on the
`
`elimination of modafinil.
`
`Metabolism occurs
`
`through hydrolytic deamidation,
`
`S—oxidation,
`
`aromatic
`
`ring
`
`hydroxylation, and glucuronide conjugation. Less than 10% of an administered dose is
`
`excreted as the parent compound.
`
`In a clinical study using radiolabeled modafinil, a total
`
`of 81% of
`
`the administered radioactivity was recovered in 11 days post-dose,
`
`predominantly in the urine (80% vs. 1.0% in the feces). The largest fraction of the drug
`
`in urine was modafinil acid, but at least six other metabolites were present in lower
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`concentrations. Only two metabolites reach appreciable concentrations in plasma, i.e.,
`
`modafinil acid and modafinil sulfone.
`
`In preclinical models, modafinil acid, modafinil
`
`sulfone, 2-[(diphenylmethyl)sulfonyl]acetic acid and 4-hydroxy modafinil, were inactive or
`
`did not appear to mediate the arousal effects of modafinil.
`
`In humans, modafinil shows a possible induction effect on its own metabolism after chronic
`
`administration of doses 2 400 mg/day.
`
`Induction of hepatic metabolizing enzymes, most
`
`importantly cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, has also been observed in vitro after incubation
`
`of primary cultures of human hepatocytes with modafinil.
`
`(For further discussion of the
`
`effects of modafinil on CYP enzyme activities see PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions).
`
`Drug-Drug Interactions: Because modafinil
`
`is a reversible inhibitor of the drug-
`
`metabolizing enzyme CYPZC19, co-administration of modafinil with drugs such as
`
`diazepam, phenytoin, and propranolol, which are largely eliminated via that pathway, may
`
`increase the circulating levels of those compounds.
`
`In addition, in individuals deficient in
`
`the enzyme CYP2D6 (i.e., 7-10% of the Caucasian population; similar or lower in other
`
`populations), the levels of CYP2D6 substrates such as tricyclic antidepressants and
`
`selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which have ancillary routes of elimination through
`
`CYPZC19, may be increased by co-administration of modafinil. Dose adjustments may be
`
`necessary for patients being treated with these and similar medications
`
`(see
`
`PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions).
`
`Chronic administration of modafinil may also cause modest induction of the metabolizing
`
`enzyme CYP3A4, thus reducing the levels of co-administered substrates for that enzyme
`
`system, such as steroidal contraceptives, cyclospon‘ne and to a lesser degree,
`
`theophylline. Dose_adjustments may be necessary for patients being treated with these
`
`and similar medications (see PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions).
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`An apparent concentration-related suppression of CYPZCQ activity was observed in
`
`human hepatocytes after exposure to modafinil in vitro. Although no other indication of
`CYP2C9 suppression has been observed, the in vitro results suggest that there is potential
`for metabolic interaction between PROVIGIL and CYP2C9 substrates, such as warfan'n or
`
`phenytoin (see PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions).
`
`Special Populations
`
`Gender Effect: The pharmacokinetics of modafinil are not affected by gender.
`
`Age Effect: A slight decrease (~20%) in oral clearance (CL/F) of modafinil was observed
`
`in a single dose study at 200 mg in 12 subjects with a mean age of 63 years (range 53-72
`
`years), but the change was considered unlikely to be clinically significant.
`
`In a multiple
`
`dose study (300 mg/day) in 12 patients with a mean age of 82 years (range 67-87 years),
`
`the mean levels of modafinil in plasma were approximately two times those historically
`
`obtained in matched younger subjects. Due to potential effects from the multiple
`
`concomitant medications with which most of the patients were being treated, the apparent
`
`difference in modafinil pharmacokinetics may not be attributable solely to the effects of
`
`aging. However, the results suggest that the clearance of modafinil may be reduced in the
`
`elderly. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`
`Race Effect: The influence of race on the pharmacokinetics of modafinil has not been
`
`studied.
`
`Renal Impairment:
`
`In a single dose 200 mg modafinil study, severe chronic renal failure
`
`(creatinine clearance 5 20 ml/min) did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of
`
`modafinil, but exposure to modafinil acid (an inactive metabolite) was increased 9 fold
`
`(see PRECAUTIONS).
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Hepatic Impairment: Pharmacokinetics and metabolism were examined in patients with
`
`cirrhosis of the liver (6 M and 3 F). Three patients had stage B or B+ cirrhosis (per the
`
`Child criteria) and 6 patients had stage C or C+ cirrhosis. Clinically 8 of 9 patients were
`
`icteric and all had ascites. In these patients, the oral clearance of modafinil was decreased
`
`by about 60% and the steady state concentration was doubled compared to normal
`
`patients. The dose of PROVIGIL should be reduced in patients with severe hepatic
`
`impalrrnent (see PRECAUTIONS and DOSAGE and ADMINISTRATION).
`
`CLINICAL TRIALS
`
`The effectiveness of PROVIGIL in reducing the excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)
`
`associated with narcolepsy was established in
`
`two US 9-week, multicenter,
`
`placebo-controlled,
`
`two-dose (200 mg per day and 400 mg per day) parallel-group,
`
`double-blind studies of outpatients who met the lCD-9 and American Sleep Disorders
`
`Association criteria for narcolepsy (which are also consistent with the American Psychiatric
`
`Association DSM-IV criteria). These criteria include either 1) recurrent daytime naps or
`
`lapses into sleep that occur almost daily for at least three months, plus sudden bilateral
`
`loss of postural muscle tone in association with intense emotion (cataplexy) or 2) a
`
`complaint of excessive sleepiness or sudden muscle weakness with associated features:
`
`sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucinations, automatic behaviors, disrupted major sleep
`
`episode; and polysomnography demonstrating one of the following: sleep latency less
`
`than 10 minutes or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency less than 20 minutes.
`
`In
`
`addition, for entry into these studies, all patients were required to have objectively
`
`documented excessive daytime sleepiness, a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) with two
`
`or more sleep onset REM periods, and the absence of any other clinically significant active
`
`medical or psychiatric disorder. The MSLT, an objective daytime polysomnographic
`
`assessment of the patients ability to fall asleep in an unstimulating environment, measures
`
`
`
`

`

` NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labe|ing 12/98
`
`latency (in minutes) to sleep onset averaged over 4 test sessions at 2-hour intervals
`
`following nocturnal polysomnography. For each test session, the subject was told to lie
`
`quietly and attempt to sleep. Each test session was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep
`
`occurred or 15 minutes after sleep onset.
`
`In both studies, the primary measures of effectiveness were 1) sleep latency, as assessed
`
`by the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and 2) the change in the patient’s overall
`
`disease status, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGl-C). For
`
`a successful trial, both measures had to show significant improvement.
`
`The MWT measures latency (in minutes) to sleep onset averaged over 4 test sessions at
`
`2 hour intervals following noctumal polysomnography. For each test session, the subject
`
`was asked to attempt to remain awake without using extraordinary measures. Each test
`
`session was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred or 10 minutes after sleep
`
`onset. The CGl-C is a 7-point scale, centered at No Change, and ranging from Very Much
`
`Worse to Very Much Improved. Patients were rated by evaluators who had no access to
`
`any data about the patients other than a measure of their baseline severity. Evaluators
`
`were not given any specific guidance about the criteria they were to apply when rating
`
`patients.
`
`Other assessments of effect included the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), Epworth
`
`Sleepiness Scale (ESS; a series of questions designed to assess the degree of sleepiness
`
`in everyday situations) the Steer Clear Performance Test (SCPT; a computer-based
`
`evaluation of a patient’s ability to avoid hitting obstacles in a simulated driving situation),
`
`standard nocturnal polysomnography, and patients daily sleep log. Patients were also
`
`assessed with the Quality of Life in Narcolepsy (QOLIN) scale, which contains the
`
`validated SF-36 health questionnaire.
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`
`
`
`Both studies demonstrated improvement in objective and subjective measures of excess
`daytime sleepiness for both the 200 mg and 400 mg doses compared to placebo. §§§§Patients
`
`treated with either dose of PROVIGIL showed a statistically significantly enhanced ability
`
`to remain awake on the MWT (all p values_<0.001), at weeks 3,6,9, and endpoint
`
`compared to placebo and a statistically significantly greater global improvement, as rated
`
`on the CGl-C scale (all p values <0.05).
`
`The average sleep latencies (in minutes) on the MWT at endpoint in the 2 controlled trials
`
`are shown in the table below:
`
`Table 1. MWT Averaoe Slee Latenc at End oint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROVlGlL
`
`Placebo
`
`200 mg*
`
`400 mg*
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ significantly different from placebo for both trials (p<0.001)
`
`The percentages of patients who showed any degree of improvement on the CGl-C in the
`
`two clinical trials are shown in the table below:
`
`Table 2. Clinical Global lm-ression of Cha oe CGl-C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Placebo
`
`PROVIGIL
`200 mg*
`400 mg*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`‘
`
`
`
`" significantly different from placebo for both trials (Trial 1: p<0.001;na| 2: p0.01)
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Similar statistically significant treatment-related improvements were seen on other
`
`measures of impairment in narcolepsy, including a decrease in the propensity to fall asleep
`
`on the MSLT (p<0.001 for each dose in comparison to placebo) and a statistically
`
`significant lessening of patient-assessed level of daytime sleepiness on the E88 (P<0.001
`
`for each dose in comparison to placebo),
`
`Although PROVIGIL tended to be numerically superior to placebo on several of the other
`
`outcome measures, there were no consistent statistically significant differences between
`
`drug and placebo on these measures.
`
`Nighttime sleep measured with nocturnal polysomnography was not affected by the use
`
`of PROVIGIL.
`
`The effectiveness of modafinil in long-term use (greater than 9 weeks) has not been
`
`systematically evaluated in placebo-controlled trials. The physician who elects to prescribe
`
`PROVIGIL tablets for an extended time should periodically re-evaluate long-tenn
`
`usefulness for the individual patient.
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`
`PROVIGIL is indicated to improve wakefulness in patients with excessive daytime
`
`sleepiness associated with narcolepsy.
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`PROVIGIL is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to modafinil.
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`General
`
`Although modafinil has not been shown to produce functional
`
`impairment, any drug
`
`affecting the CNS may alter judgment,
`
`thinking or motor skills. Patients should be
`
`cautioned about operating an automobile or other hazardous machinery until they are
`
`reasonably certain that PROVIGIL therapy will not adversely affect their ability to engage
`
`in such activities.
`
`Cardiovascular System
`
`In clinical studies of PROVIGIL, signs and symptoms including chest pain, palpitations,
`
`dyspnea and transient ischemic T-wave changes on ECG were observed in three subjects
`
`in association with mitral valve prolapse or left ventricular hypertrophy. It is recommended
`
`that PROVIGIL tablets not be used in patients with a history of left ventricular hypertrophy
`
`or
`
`ischemic ECG changes, chest pain, arrhythmia or other clinically significant
`
`manifestations of mitral valve prolapse in association with CNS stimulant use.
`
`Modafinil has not been evaluated or used to any appreciable extent in patients with a
`
`recent history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina, and such patients should be
`
`treated with caution.
`
`Modafinil has not been systematically evaluated in patients with hypertension. Periodic
`
`monitoring of hypertensive patients may be appropriate.
`
`Central Nervous System
`
`One healthy male volunteer developed ideas of reference, paranoid delusions, and
`
`auditory hallucinations in association with multiple daily 600 mg doses of PROVIGIL and
`
`sleep deprivation. There was no evidence of psychosis 36 hours after drug
`
`discontinuation. Caution should be exercised when PROVIGIL is given to patients with a
`
`history of psychosis.
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Patients with Severe Renal Impairment
`
`In patients with severe renal impairment (mean creatinine clearance = 16.6 mLJmin), a
`
`200 mg single dose of modafinil did not lead to increased exposure to modafinil but
`
`resulted in much higher exposure to the inactive metabolite, modafinil acid, than is seen
`
`in subjects with normal renal function. There is little information available about the safety
`
`of such levels of this metabolite (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY).
`
`Patients with Severe Hepatic Impairment
`
`In patients with severe hepatic impairment, with or without cirrhosis (see CLINICAL
`
`PHARMACOLOGY), PROVIGIL should be administered at a reduced dose as the
`
`clearance of modafinil was decreased compared to that in normal subjects (see DOSAGE
`
`and ADMINISTRATION).
`
`Elderly Patients
`
`To the extent that elderly patients may have diminished renal and/or hepatic function,
`
`dosage reductions should be considered (see DOSAGE and ADMINISTRA110N).
`
`Patients Using Contraceptives
`
`The effectiveness of steroidal contraceptives may be reduced when used with PROVIGIL
`
`tablets and for one month after discontinuation of therapy (See Potential Interactions with
`
`Drugs That Inhibit or are Metabolized by Cytochrome P-450 lsoenzymes and Other Hepatic
`
`Enzymes). Alternative or concomitant methods of contraception are recommended for
`
`patients treated with PROVIGIL tablets, and for one month after discontinuation of
`
`PROVIGIL.
`
`Information for Patients
`
`Physicians are advised to discuss the following issues with patients for whom they
`
`prescribe PROVIGIL tablets.
`
`12
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigi|® (modafinil) - FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Pregnancy
`
`Animal studies to assess the effects of modafinil on reproduction and the developing fetus
`
`were not conducted at adequately high doses or according to guidelines which would
`
`ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the potential of modafinil to adversely affect fertility,
`
`or cause embryolethality or teratogenicity (see Impairment of Fertility and Pregnancy).
`
`Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they become pregnant or intend to
`
`become pregnant during therapy. Patients should be cautioned regarding the potential
`
`increased risk of pregnancy when using steroidal contraceptives (including depot or
`
`implantable contraceptives) with PROVIGIL tablets and for one month after discontinuation
`
`of therapy.
`
`Nursing
`
`Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they are breast feeding an infant.
`
`Concomitant Medication
`
`Patients should be advised to inform their physician if they are taking, or plan to take, any
`
`prescription or over-the-counter drugs, because of the potential for interactions between
`
`PROVIGIL tablets and other drugs.
`
`Alcohol
`
`Patients should be advised that the use of PROVIGlL in combination with alcohol has not
`
`been studied. Patients should be advised that it is prudent to avoid alcohol while taking
`
`PROVIGIL tablets.
`
`Allergic Reactions
`
`Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they develop a rash, hives, or a
`
`related allergic phenomenon.
`
`13
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Drug Interactions
`
`CNS Active Drugs
`
`Methylphenidate -
`
`In a single-dose study in healthy volunteers, coadministration of
`
`modafinil (200 mg) with methylphenidate (40 mg) did not cause any significant alterations
`
`in the pharmacokinetics of either drug. However, the absorption of PROVIGIL may be
`
`delayed by approximately one hour when coadministered with methylphenidate.
`
`Clomipramine — The coadministration of a single dose of clomipramine (50 mg) on the first
`
`of three days of treatment with modafinil (200 mg/day) in healthy volunteers did not show
`
`an effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug. However, one incident of increased
`
`levels of Clomipramine and its active metabolite desmethylclomipramine has been reported
`
`in a patient with narcolepsy during treatment with modafinil (See Potential Interactions with
`
`Drugs That Inhibit or are Metabolized by Cytochrome P—450 Isoenzymes and Other
`
`Hepatic Enzymes).
`
`Tn'azolam - In a single-dose pharrnacodynamic study with PROVIGIL in healthy volunteers
`
`(50, 100 or 200 mg) and triazolam (0.25 mg), no clinically important alterations in the
`
`safety profile of modafinil or triazolam were noted.
`
`Mo‘noamine Oxidase (MAO) Inhibitors - Interaction studies with monoamine oxidase
`
`inhibitors have not been performed.
`
`Therefore, caution should be used when
`
`concomitantly administering MAO inhibitors and modafinil.
`
`Potential Interactions with Drugs That Inhibit, Induce, or are Metabolized by Cytochrome
`
`P-450 Isoenzymes and Other Hepatic Enzymes
`
`in a controlled study in patients with narcolepsy, chronic dosing of PROVIGIL at 400
`
`mg/day once daily resulted in a ~20% mean decrease in modafinil plasma trough
`
`concentrations by week 9,
`
`relative to those at wee suggesting that chronic
`
`administration of PROVIGIL might have caused induction of its metabolism.
`
`In addition,
`
`14
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`coadministration of potent inducers of CYP3A4 (e.g., carbamazepine, phenobarbital,
`
`n'fampin) orinhibitors of CYP3A4 (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole) could alter the levels
`
`of modafinil due to the partial involvement of that enzyme in the metabolic elimination of
`
`the compound.
`
`In in vitro studies using primary human hepatocyte cultures, modafinil was shown to slightly
`
`induce CYP1A2, CYPZBS and CYP3A4 in a concentration-dependent manner. Although
`
`induction results based on in vitro experiments are not necessarily predictive of response
`
`in vivo, caution needs to be exercised when PROVIGIL is coadministered with drugs that
`
`depend on these three enzymes for their clearance. Specifically, lower blood levels of
`
`such drugs could result.
`
`In the case of CYP1A2 and CYPZBS, no other evidence of
`
`enzyme induction has been observed. A modest induction of CYP3A4 by modafinil has
`
`been indicated by other results, hence the clearance of CYP3A4 substrates such as
`
`cyclosporine or steroidal contraceptives and to a lesser degree, theophylline may be
`
`increased. One case of an interaction between modafinil and cyclospon‘ne has been
`
`reported in a 41 year old woman who had_undergone an organ transplant. After one month
`
`of administration of 200 mg/day of modafinil, cyclosporine blood levels were decreased by
`
`50%. The interaction was postulated to be due to the increased metabolism of
`
`cyclosporine, since no other factor expected to affect the disposition of the drug had
`
`changed.
`
`The exposure of human hepatocytes to modafinil
`
`in vitro produced an apparent
`
`concentration—related suppression of expression of CYP2C9 activity. The clinical
`
`relevance of this finding is unclear, since no other indication of CYP2C9 suppression has
`
`been observed. However, monitoring of prothrombin times is suggested as a precaution
`
`for the first several months of coadministration of PROVIGIL and warfan'n, a CYP2C9
`
`substrate, and thereafter whenever PROVIGIL dosing is changed.
`
`In addition, patients
`
`receiving PROVIGIL and phenytoin, a CYP2C9 substrate, concomitantly should be
`
`monitored for signs of phenytoin toxicity.
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`In vitro studies using human liver microsomes showed that modafinil has little or no
`
`capacity to inhibit the major CYP enzymes except for CYP2C19, which is reversibly
`
`inhibited at pharrnacologically relevant concentrations of modafinil. Drugs that are largely
`
`eliminated via CYPZC19 metabolism, such as diazepam, propranolol, phenytoin or S-
`
`mephenytoin may have prolonged elimination upon coadministration with PROVIGIL and
`
`may require dosage reduction.
`
`In addition, CYP2C19 provides an ancillary pathway for the metabolism of certain tricyclic
`
`antidepressants (e.g., clomipramine and desipramine) that are primarily metabolized by
`
`CYP2D6.
`
`ln tricyclic-treated patients deficient in CYP2D6 (i.e., those who are poor
`
`metabolizers of debrisoquine; 7-10% of the Caucasian population; similar or lower in other
`
`populations), the amount of metabolism by CYPZC19 may be substantially increased.
`
`PROVIGIL may cause elevation of the levels of the tricyclics in this subset of patients.
`
`Physicians should be aware that a reduction in the dose of tricyclic agents might be
`
`needed in these patients.
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`Carcinogenesis
`
`Carcinogenicity studies were conducted in which modafinil was administered in the diet
`
`to mice for 78 weeks and to rats for 104 weeks at doses of 6, 30 and 60 mg/kg/day. The
`
`highest dose studied represents 1.5 times (mouse) or 3 times (rat) greater than the
`
`maximum recommended human daily dose of 200 mg on a mg/m2 basis. There was no
`
`evidence of tumorigenesis associated with modafinil administration in these studies, but
`
`because the mouse study used an inadequate high dose that was not representative of a
`
`maximum tolerated dose, the carcinogenic potential of modafinil has not been fully
`
`evaluated.
`
`Mutagenesis
`
`There was no evidence of mutagenic or clastogenic potential of modafinil in a series of
`
`assays.
`
`It was not mutagenic in the in vitro Ames bacten'al reverse mutation test, the in
`
`16
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`vitro mouse lymphoma/TK locus assay in the presence or absence of metabolic activation;
`
`and it was not clastogenic in the in vitro human lymphocyte chromosomal aberration assay
`
`in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, or in two in vivo mouse bone marrow
`
`micronucleus assays. Modafinil did not increase unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat
`
`hepatocytes.
`
`In a cell transformation assay in BALE/3T3 mouse embryo cells, modafinil
`
`did not cause an increase in the frequency of transformed foci in the presence or absence
`
`of metabolic activation.
`
`Impairment of Fertility
`
`When modafinil was administered orally to male and female rats prior to and throughout
`
`mating and gestation at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day (4.8 times the maximum recommended
`
`daily dose of 200 mg on a mg/m2 basis) no effects on fertility were seen. The study to
`
`evaluate these effects, however, did not use sufficiently high doses or large enough
`
`sample size to adequately assess effects on fertility.
`
`Pregnancy
`
`Pregnancy Category C: Embryotoxicity was observed in the absence of maternal toxicity
`
`when rats received oral modafinil throughout the period of organogenesis. At a dose of
`
`200 mg/kg/day (10 times the maximum recommended daily human dose of 200 mg on a
`
`mglm2 basis) there was an increase in resorption, hydronephrosis, and skeletal variations.
`
`The no-effect dose for these effects was 100 mg/kg/day (5 times the maximum
`
`recommended daily human dose on a mg/m2 basis). When rabbits received oral modafinil
`
`throughout organogenesis at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day (10 times the maximum
`
`recommended daily human dose on a mg/m2 basis), no embryotoxicity was seen. Neither
`
`of these studies, however, used optimal doses for the evaluation of embryotoxicity.
`
`Although a threshold dose for embryotoxicity has been identified, the full spectrum of
`
`potential toxic effects on the fetus has not been characterized. When rats were dosed
`
`throughout gestation and lactation at doses up to 200 mg/kg/day, no developmental toxicity
`
`was noted post=natally in the offspring. There are no adequate and well-controlled trials
`
`17
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`with modafinil in pregnant women and this drug should be used during pregnancy only if
`
`the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`NDA 20-717
`
`Provigil® (modafinil) — FDA Approved Draft Labeling 12/98
`
`Labor and Delivery
`
`The effect of modafinil on labor and delivery in humans has not been systematically
`
`investigated. Seven normal births occurred in patients who had received modafinil during
`
`pregnancy. One patient gave birth 3 weeks earlier than the expected range of delivery
`
`dates (estimated using ultrasound) to a healthy male infant. One woman with a history of
`
`spontaneous abortions suffered a spontaneous abortion while being treated with modafinil.
`
`Nursing Mothers
`
`It is not known whether modafinil or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. Because
`
`many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when PROVlGlL
`
`tablets are administered to a nursing woman.
`
`PEDIATRIC USE
`
`Safety and effectiveness in individuals below 16 years of age have not been established.
`
`GERIATRIC USE
`
`Safety and effectiveness in individuals above 65 years of age have not been established.
`
`Experience in a limited number of patients (15) who were greater than 65 years of age in
`
`US clinical trials showed an incidence of adverse experiences similar to other age groups.
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`
`Modafinil has been evaluated for safety in over 2200 subjects, of whom more than 900
`
`subjects with narcolepsy or narcolepsy/hypersomnia were given at least one dose of
`
`modafinil. Modafinil has been found to be generally well-tolerated.
`
`In controlled clinical
`
`trials, most adverse experiences were mild to moderate.
`
`The most commonly observed adverse events (25%) associated with the use of modafinil
`
`more

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket