throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 21083/S061
`NDA 21110/S080
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`
`
`PF PRISM C.V.
`c/o Pfizer, Inc.
`Attention: Deneen Stewart, Ph.D.
` Director, Worldwide Safety and Regulatory
`500 Arcola Road
`Collegeville, PA 19426
`
`
`Dear Dr. Stewart:
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated and received November
`29, 2017, and your amendments, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
`Cosmetic Act (FDCA or the Act) for the following:
`
`
`
`Supplement #
`
`
`Product Description
`
`
`NDA #
`
`
`21083
`
`
`21110
`
`
`
`S-061
`
`
`S-080
`
`
`Rapamune® (sirolimus) Oral Solution 1mg/mL
`
`
`Rapamune® (sirolimus) Tablet, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg.
`
`
`
`These Prior Approval supplemental new drug applications provide for the following revisions to
`the package insert for these two products (additions are underlined text; deletions are in
`strikethrough text):
`
`
`
`
`1. In the 6.4 Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitors to Rapamune in Maintenance
`Renal Transplant Population, a new paragraph is added at the end of the subsection to
`read:
`
`In a second study evaluating the safety and efficacy of conversion from tacrolimus to
`Rapamune 3 to 5 months post kidney transplant, a higher rate of adverse events,
`discontinuations due to adverse events, acute rejection, and new onset diabetes mellitus
`was observed following conversion to Rapamune. There was also no benefit with respect
`
`Reference ID: 4267399
`
`

`

`NDA 21083/S061
`NDA 21110/S080
`Page 2
`
`
`
`to renal function and a greater incidence of proteinuria was observed after conversion to
`sirolimus [(see Clinical Studies (14.4)].
`
`
`2. In the 12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY/Drug-Drug Interactions/Verapamil, the
`second sentence is revised as follows:
`
`The simultaneous oral administration of 2 mg daily of sirolimus oral solution and 180 mg
`q 12h of verapamil at steady state to 26 25 healthy volunteers significantly affected the
`bioavailability of sirolimus and verapamil.
`
`
`3. In the 14 CLINICAL STUDIES/14.4 Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitors to
`Rapamune in maintenance Renal Transplant Patients, the following two paragraphs
`are added at the end of the subsection:
`
`In an open-label, randomized, comparative, multicenter study where kidney transplant
`patients were either converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus 3 to 5 months post-transplant
`(sirolimus group) or remained on tacrolimus, there was no significant difference in renal
`function at 2 years post-transplant. Overall, 44/131 (33.6%) discontinued treatment in the
`sirolimus group versus 12/123 (9.8%) in the tacrolimus group. More patients reported
`adverse events 130/131 (99.2%) versus 112/123 (91.1%) and more patients reported
`discontinuations from the treatment due to adverse events 28/131 (21.4%) versus 4/123
`(3.3%) in the sirolimus group compared to the tacrolimus group.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was higher for patients in the
`sirolimus group 11/131 (8.4%) compared to the tacrolimus group 2/123 (1.6%) through 2
`years post-transplant. The rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus post-randomization,
`defined as 30 days or longer of continuous or at least 25 days non-stop (without gap) use
`of any diabetic treatment after randomization, a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or a non-
`fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL, was higher in the sirolimus group 15/82 (18.3%) compared
`to the tacrolimus group 4/72 (5.6%). A greater incidence of proteinuria, was seen in the
`sirolimus group 19/131 (14.5%) versus 2/123 (1.6%) in the tacrolimus group.
`
`
`
`APPROVAL & LABELING
`
`We have completed our review of these supplemental applications, as amended. They are
`approved, effective on the date of this letter, for use as recommended in the enclosed, agreed-
`upon labeling text, which is identical to the package insert submitted on May 21, 2018.
`
`
`
`CONTENT OF LABELING
`
`As soon as possible, but no later than 14 days from the date of this letter, submit the content of
`labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format using the FDA
`
`Reference ID: 4267399
`
`

`

`NDA 21083/S061
`NDA 21110/S080
`Page 3
`
`
`automated drug registration and listing system (eLIST), as described at
`http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm. Content
`of labeling must be identical to the enclosed labeling text for the package insert, Medication
`Guide and Instructions for Use, with the addition of any labeling changes in pending “Changes
`Being Effected” (CBE) supplements, as well as annual reportable changes not included in the
`enclosed labeling.
`
`Information on submitting SPL files using eList may be found in the guidance for industry titled
`“SPL Standard for Content of Labeling Technical Qs and As” at
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
`CM072392.pdf.
`
`The SPL will be accessible from publicly available labeling repositories.
`
`Also within 14 days, amend all pending supplemental applications that include labeling changes
`for this NDA, including CBE supplements for which FDA has not yet issued an action letter,
`with the content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in MS Word format, that includes the
`changes approved in this supplemental application, as well as annual reportable changes and
`annotate each change. To facilitate review of your submission, provide a highlighted or marked-
`up copy that shows all changes, as well as a clean Microsoft Word version. The marked-up copy
`should provide appropriate annotations, including supplement number(s) and annual report
`date(s).
`
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`(21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Judit Milstein, Chief, Project Management Staff at 301-796-0763.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Renata Albrecht, MD
`Director
`Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`Office of Antimicrobial Products
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`ENCLOSURE(S): Content of Labeling
`
`Reference ID: 4267399
`
`

`

`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`RENATA ALBRECHT
`05/23/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4267399
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket