throbber

`
`1
`
`PV 5200 AMP
`
`ALIMTA®
`pemetrexed
`for injection
`DESCRIPTION
`ALIMTA®, pemetrexed for injection, is an antifolate antineoplastic agent that exerts its action
`by disrupting folate-dependent metabolic processes essential for cell replication. Pemetrexed
`disodium heptahydrate has the chemical name L-Glutamic acid, N-[4-[2-(2-amino-4,7-dihydro-4-
`oxo-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl]benzoyl]-, disodium salt, heptahydrate. It is a white
`to almost-white solid with a molecular formula of C20H19N5Na2O6•7H2O and a molecular weight
`of 597.49. The structural formula is as follows:
`
`- Na+
`CO2
`
`·7H2O
`
`-
`
`CO2
`
`Na+
`
`NH
`
`O
`
`NH
`
`O
`
`HN
`
`H2N
`
`N
`
`ALIMTA is supplied as a sterile lyophilized powder for intravenous infusion available in
`single-dose vials. The product is a white to either light yellow or green-yellow lyophilized solid.
`Each 500-mg vial of ALIMTA contains pemetrexed disodium equivalent to 500 mg pemetrexed
`and 500 mg of mannitol. Hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide may have been added to
`adjust pH.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Pemetrexed is an antifolate containing the pyrrolopyrimidine-based nucleus that exerts its
`antineoplastic activity by disrupting folate-dependent metabolic processes essential for cell
`replication. In vitro studies have shown that pemetrexed inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS),
`dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT),
`all folate-dependent enzymes involved in the de novo biosynthesis of thymidine and purine
`nucleotides. Pemetrexed is transported into cells by both the reduced folate carrier and
`membrane folate binding protein transport systems. Once in the cell, pemetrexed is converted to
`polyglutamate forms by the enzyme folylpolyglutamate synthetase. The polyglutamate forms are
`retained in cells and are inhibitors of TS and GARFT. Polyglutamation is a time- and
`concentration-dependent process that occurs in tumor cells and, to a lesser extent, in normal
`tissues. Polyglutamated metabolites have an increased intracellular half-life resulting in
`prolonged drug action in malignant cells.
`Preclinical studies have shown that pemetrexed inhibits the in vitro growth of mesothelioma
`cell lines (MSTO-211H, NCI-H2052). Studies with the MSTO-211H mesothelioma cell line
`showed synergistic effects when pemetrexed was combined concurrently with cisplatin.
`Absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) following single-agent administration of pemetrexed to
`patients not receiving folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation were characterized using
`population pharmacodynamic analyses. Severity of hematologic toxicity, as measured by the
`depth of the ANC nadir, correlates with the systemic exposure of pemetrexed. It was also
`observed that lower ANC nadirs occurred in patients with elevated baseline cystathionine or
`homocysteine concentrations. The levels of these substances can be reduced by folic acid and
`vitamin B12 supplementation. There is no cumulative effect of pemetrexed exposure on ANC
`nadir over multiple treatment cycles.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`
`

`

`
`
`2
`
`42
`43
`44
`45
`46
`47
`48
`49
`50
`51
`52
`53
`54
`55
`56
`57
`58
`59
`60
`61
`62
`63
`64
`65
`66
`67
`68
`69
`70
`71
`72
`73
`74
`75
`76
`77
`78
`79
`80
`81
`82
`83
`84
`85
`86
`87
`
`Time to ANC nadir with pemetrexed systemic exposure (AUC), varied between 8 to 9.6 days
`over a range of exposures from 38.3 to 316.8 µg•hr/mL. Return to baseline ANC occurred 4.2 to
`7.5 days after the nadir over the same range of exposures.
`Pharmacokinetics
`The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed administered as a single agent in doses ranging from
`0.2 to 838 mg/m2 infused over a 10-minute period have been evaluated in 426 cancer patients
`with a variety of solid tumors. Pemetrexed is not metabolized to an appreciable extent and is
`primarily eliminated in the urine, with 70% to 90% of the dose recovered unchanged within the
`first 24 hours following administration. The total systemic clearance of pemetrexed is
`91.8 mL/min and the elimination half-life of pemetrexed is 3.5 hours in patients with normal
`renal function (creatinine clearance of 90 mL/min). The clearance decreases, and
`exposure (AUC) increases, as renal function decreases. Pemetrexed total systemic
`exposure (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) increase proportionally with dose.
`The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed do not change over multiple treatment cycles. Pemetrexed
`has a steady-state volume of distribution of 16.1 liters. In vitro studies indicate that pemetrexed
`is approximately 81% bound to plasma proteins. Binding is not affected by degree of renal
`impairment.
`Drug Interactions
`Chemotherapeutic Agents — Cisplatin does not affect the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed and
`the pharmacokinetics of total platinum are unaltered by pemetrexed.
`Vitamins — Coadministration of oral folic acid or intramuscular vitamin B12 does not affect the
`pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed.
`Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes — Results from in vitro studies with human
`liver microsomes predict that pemetrexed would not cause clinically significant inhibition of
`metabolic clearance of drugs metabolized by CYP3A, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP1A2. No
`studies were conducted to determine the cytochrome P450 isozyme induction potential of
`pemetrexed, because ALIMTA used as recommended (once every 21 days) would not be
`expected to cause any significant enzyme induction.
`Aspirin — Aspirin, administered in low to moderate doses (325 mg every 6 hours), does not
`affect the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed. The effect of greater doses of aspirin on pemetrexed
`pharmacokinetics is unknown.
`Ibuprofen — Daily ibuprofen doses of 400 mg qid reduce pemetrexed’s clearance by about
`20% (and increase AUC by 20%) in patients with normal renal function. The effect of greater
`doses of ibuprofen on pemetrexed pharmacokinetics is unknown (see Drug Interactions under
`PRECAUTIONS).
`Special Populations
`The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed in special populations were examined in about
`400 patients in controlled and single arm studies.
`Geriatric — No effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed was observed over a
`range of 26 to 80 years.
`Pediatric — Pediatric patients were not included in clinical trials.
`Gender — The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed were not different in male and female
`patients.
`Race — The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed were similar in Caucasians and patients of
`African descent. Insufficient data are available to compare pharmacokinetics for other ethnic
`groups.
`
`

`

`
`
`3
`
`88
`89
`90
`91
`92
`93
`94
`95
`96
`97
`98
`99
`100
`101
`102
`103
`104
`105
`106
`107
`108
`109
`110
`111
`112
`113
`114
`115
`
`Hepatic Insufficiency — There was no effect of elevated AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), or total
`bilirubin on the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed. However, studies of hepatically impaired
`patients have not been conducted (see PRECAUTIONS).
`Renal Insufficiency — Pharmacokinetic analyses of pemetrexed included 127 patients with
`reduced renal function. Plasma clearance of pemetrexed decreases as renal function decreases,
`with a resultant increase in systemic exposure. Patients with creatinine clearances of 45, 50, and
`80 mL/min had 65%, 54%, and 13% increases, respectively in pemetrexed total systemic
`exposure (AUC) compared to patients with creatinine clearance of 100 mL/min (see
`WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma — The safety and efficacy of ALIMTA have been evaluated
`in chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with
`cisplatin.
`Randomized Trial: A multi-center, randomized, single-blind study in 448 chemonaive patients
`with MPM compared survival in patients treated with ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin to
`survival in patients receiving cisplatin alone. ALIMTA was administered intravenously over
`2 and cisplatin was administered intravenously over 2 hours at
`10 minutes at a dose of 500 mg/m
`a dose of 75 mg/m2 beginning approximately 30 minutes after the end of administration of
`ALIMTA. Both drugs were given on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. After 117 patients were
`treated, white cell and GI toxicity led to a change in protocol whereby all patients were given
`folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation.
`The primary analysis of this study was performed on the population of all patients randomly
`assigned to treatment who received study drug (randomized and treated). An analysis was also
`performed on patients who received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation during the entire
`course of study therapy (fully supplemented), as supplementation is recommended (see
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Results in all patients and those fully supplemented
`were similar. Patient demographics are shown in Table 1.
`
`
`Table 1: Summary of Patient Characteristics in MPM Study
`Randomized and Treated
`Fully Supplemented
`Patients
`Patients
`ALIMTA/cis
`Cisplatin
`ALIMTA/cis
`Cisplatin
`(N=226)
`(N=222)
`(N=168)
`(N=163)
`
`
`
`
`Patient characteristic
`Age (yrs)
` Median (range)
`Gender (%)
` Male
` Female
`Origin (%)
` Caucasian
` Hispanic
` Asian
` African descent
`Stage at Entry (%)
` I
` II
` III
`
`61 (29-85)
`
`60 (19-84)
`
`60 (29-85)
`
`60 (19-82)
`
`184 (81.4)
`42 (18.6)
`
`204 (90.3)
`11 (4.9)
`10 (4.4)
`1 (0.4)
`
`16 (7.1)
`35 (15.6)
`73 (32.4)
`
`181 (81.5)
`41 (18.5)
`
`206 (92.8)
`12 (5.4)
`4 (1.9)
`0
`
`14 (6.3)
`33 (15.0)
`68 (30.6)
`
`136 (81.0)
`32 (19.0)
`
`150 (89.3)
`10 (6.0)
`7 (4.2)
`1 (0.6)
`
`15 (8.9)
`27 (16.2)
`51 (30.5)
`
`134 (82.2)
`29 (17.8)
`
`153 (93.9)
`7 (4.3)
`3 (1.8)
`0
`
`12 (7.4)
`27 (16.8)
`49 (30.4)
`
`

`

`
`
`4
`
`101 (44.9)
`1 (0.4)
`
`154 (68.1)
`37 (16.4)
`18 (8.0)
`17 (7.5)
`
`105 (47.2)
`2 (0.9)
`
`152 (68.5)
`36 (16.2)
`25 (11.3)
`9 (4.1)
`
`74 (44.3)
`1 (0.6)
`
`117 (69.6)
`25 (14.9)
`14 (8.3)
`12 (7.1)
`
`73 (45.3)
`2 (1.2)
`
`113 (69.3)
`25 (15.3)
`17 (10.4)
`8 (4.9)
`
` IV
` Unspecified
`Diagnosis/Histologya (%)
` Epithelial
` Mixed
` Sarcomatoid
` Other
`Baseline KPSb (%)
`69 (42.3)
`83 (49.4)
`97 (43.7)
`109 (48.2)
` 70-80
`94 (57.7)
`85 (50.6)
`125 (56.3)
`117 (51.8)
` 90-100
`a Only 67% of the patients had the histologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma confirmed by independent
`review.
`b Karnofsky Performance Scale.
`
`Table 2 summarizes the survival results for all randomized and treated patients regardless of
`vitamin supplementation status and those patients receiving vitamin supplementation from the
`time of enrollment in the trial.
`
`
`116
`117
`118
`119
`120
`121
`122
`123
`
`124
`125
`126
`127
`128
`129
`130
`131
`132
`
`Table 2: Efficacy of ALIMTA plus Cisplatin vs. Cisplatin in Malignant Pleural
`Mesothelioma
`Randomized and Treated
`Patients
`ALIMTA/cis
`Cisplatin
`(N=226)
`(N=222)
`12.1 mos
`9.3 mos
`(10.0-14.4)
`(7.8-10.7)
`0.77
`0.020
`
`Fully Supplemented
`Patients
`ALIMTA/cis
`Cisplatin
`(N=168)
`(N=163)
`13.3 mos
`10.0 mos
`(11.4-14.9)
`(8.4-11.9)
`0.75
`0.051
`
`
`
`
`Efficacy Parameter
`Median overall survival
`(95% CI)
`Hazard ratio
`Log rank p-value*
`* p-value refers to comparison between arms.
`
`Similar results were seen in the analysis of patients (N=303) with confirmed histologic
`diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Exploratory demographic analyses showed no
`apparent differences in patients over or under 65. There were too few non-white patients to
`assess possible ethnic differences. The effect in women (median survival 15.7 months with the
`combination vs. 7.5 months on cisplatin alone), however, was larger than the effect in males
`(median survival 11 vs. 9.4 respectively). As with any exploratory analysis, it is not clear
`whether this difference is real or is a chance finding.
`
`

`

`5
`
`Median Survival = 12.1 mos
`
`Hazard ratio
`Log rank p-value
`Percent censored
`
`Median Survival
`= 9.3 mos
`
` 0.77
`0.020
` 32
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`Survival Time (Months)
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`133
`
`
`
`1.00
`
`0.75
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.00
`
`Survival Distribution Function
`
`ALIMTA + Cisplatin (n=226)
`Cisplatin (n=222)
`Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Survival Time for ALIMTA plus Cisplatin and
`Cisplatin Alone in all Randomized and Treated Patients.
`
`
`Objective tumor response for malignant pleural mesothelioma is difficult to measure and
`response criteria are not universally agreed upon. However, based upon prospectively defined
`criteria, the objective tumor response rate for ALIMTA plus cisplatin was greater than the
`objective tumor response rate for cisplatin alone. There was also improvement in lung function
`(forced vital capacity) in the ALIMTA plus cisplatin arm compared to the control arm.
`Patients who received full supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12 during study
`therapy received a median of 6 and 4 cycles in the ALIMTA/cisplatin (N=168) and
`cisplatin (N=163) arms, respectively. Patients who never received folic acid and vitamin B12
`during study therapy received a median of 2 cycles in both treatment arms (N=32 and N=38 for
`the ALIMTA/cisplatin and cisplatin arm, respectively). Patients receiving ALIMTA in the fully
`supplemented group received a relative dose intensity of 93% of the protocol specified ALIMTA
`dose intensity; patients treated with cisplatin in the same group received 94% of the projected
`dose intensity. Patients treated with cisplatin alone had a dose intensity of 96%.
`Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) — The safety and efficacy of ALIMTA as a
`single-agent have been evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic (Stage III or IV)
`non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy.
`Randomized Trial: A multi-center, randomized, open label Phase 3 study was conducted to
`compare the overall survival following treatment with ALIMTA versus docetaxel. ALIMTA was
`2 and docetaxel was
`administered intravenously over 10 minutes at a dose of 500 mg/m
`administered at 75 mg/m2 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion. Both drugs were given on Day 1 of
`each 21-day cycle. All patients treated with ALIMTA received vitamin supplementation with
`folic acid and vitamin B12. The study was intended to show either an overall survival superiority
`or non-inferiority of ALIMTA to docetaxel. Patient demographics of the intent to treat (ITT)
`population are shown in Table 3.
`
`
`134
`135
`136
`137
`138
`139
`140
`141
`142
`143
`144
`145
`146
`147
`148
`149
`150
`151
`152
`153
`154
`155
`156
`157
`158
`159
`
`

`

`
`
`6
`
`Table 3: Summary of Patient Characteristics in NSCLC Study
`ALIMTA
`Docetaxel
`(N=283)
`(N=288)
`
`59 (22-81)
`
`68.6/31.4
`
`25.1/74.9
`
`154 (54.4)
`78 (27.6)
`4 (1.4)
`51 (18.1)
`
`234 (88.6)
`30 (11.4)
`
`57 (28-87)
`
`75.3/24.7
`
`25.3/74.7
`
`142 (49.3)
`93 (32.3)
`1 (0.3)
`53 (18.5)
`
`240 (87.6)
`34 (12.4)
`
`
`Patient characteristic
`Age (yrs)
` Median (range)
`Gender (%)
` Male/Female
`Stage at Entry (%)
` III/IV
`Diagnosis/Histology (%)
` Adenocarcinoma
` Squamous
` Bronchoalveolar
` Other
`Performance Status (%)
` 0-1
` 2
`
`The primary endpoint in this study was overall survival. The median survival time was
`8.3 months in the ALIMTA treatment arm and 7.9 months in the docetaxel arm, with a hazard
`ratio of 0.99 (see Table 4). The study did not show an overall survival superiority of ALIMTA.
`Non-inferiority of ALIMTA to docetaxel could not be demonstrated, because a reliable and
`consistent survival effect of docetaxel required for a non-inferiority analysis could not be
`estimated from historical trials. In addition, significant treatment crossover at the time of disease
`progression may have confounded the survival interpretation. The demonstrated surrogate
`endpoint, response rate allowed the conclusion that an effect of ALIMTA on survival is
`reasonably likely.
`Exploratory demographic analyses on survival showed no significant differences between
`ALIMTA and docetaxel in patients over or under 65 years of age. There were too few non-white
`patients to assess possible ethnic differences. Regarding gender, females lived longer than males
`in both treatment groups. There was no difference in survival between ALIMTA and docetaxel
`with respect to gender after adjusting for prognostic factors.
`Secondary endpoints evaluated in the trial include objective response rate, progression free
`survival (PFS) and time to progressive disease (TTPD). There was no statistically significant
`difference between ALIMTA and docetaxel with respect to objective response rate, progression
`free survival (PFS) and time to progressive disease (TTPD).
`
`
`Table 4: Efficacy of ALIMTA vs. Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer – ITT
`Population
`
`
`
`Median overall survival (95% CI)
` Hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI)
` Log rank p-value
` 1-year survival (95% CI)
`Median progression free survival
` Hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI)
`
`Docetaxel
`ALIMTA
`(N=288)
`(N=283)
`7.9 mos (6.3-9.2)
`8.3 mos (7.0-9.4)
`0.99a (0.82-1.20)
`0.93
`29.7% (23.7-35.6)
`29.7% (23.9-35.5)
`2.9 mos
`2.9 mos
`0.97a (0.82-1.16)
`
`160
`161
`162
`163
`164
`165
`166
`167
`168
`169
`170
`171
`172
`173
`174
`175
`176
`177
`178
`179
`180
`181
`
`

`

`
`
`7
`
`Time to Progressive Disease
` Hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI)
`Overall response ratea,b (95% CI)
`a Not statistically significant.
`b Number of qualified patients on the ALIMTA arm (N=264) and docetaxel arm (N=274).
`
`
`3.5 mos
`3.4 mos
`0.97a (0.80-1.17)
`9.1% (5.9-13.2)
`8.8% (5.7-12.8)
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`Mesothelioma: ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin is indicated for the treatment of
`patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma whose disease is unresectable or who are
`otherwise not candidates for curative surgery.
`Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: ALIMTA as a single-agent is indicated for the treatment of
`patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy.
`The effectiveness of ALIMTA in second-line NSCLC was based on the surrogate endpoint,
`response rate. There are no controlled trials demonstrating a clinical benefit, such as a favorable
`survival effect or improvement of disease-related symptoms.
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`ALIMTA is contraindicated in patients who have a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction
`to pemetrexed or to any other ingredient used in the formulation.
`WARNINGS
`
`Decreased Renal Function
`ALIMTA is primarily eliminated unchanged by renal excretion. No dosage adjustment is
`needed in patients with creatinine clearance ≥45 mL/min. Insufficient numbers of patients have
`been studied with creatinine clearance <45 mL/min to give a dose recommendation. Therefore,
`ALIMTA should not be administered to patients whose creatinine clearance is <45 mL/min (see
`Dose Reduction Recommendations under DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`One patient with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 19 mL/min) who did not
`receive folic acid and vitamin B12 died of drug-related toxicity following administration of
`ALIMTA alone.
`Bone Marrow Suppression
`ALIMTA can suppress bone marrow function, as manifested by neutropenia,
`thrombocytopenia, and anemia (or pancytopenia) (see ADVERSE REACTIONS);
`myelosuppression is usually the dose-limiting toxicity. Dose reductions for subsequent cycles are
`based on nadir ANC, platelet count, and maximum nonhematologic toxicity seen in the previous
`cycle (see Dose Reduction Recommendations under DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`Need for Folate and Vitamin B12 Supplementation
`Patients treated with ALIMTA must be instructed to take folic acid and vitamin B12 as a
`prophylactic measure to reduce treatment-related hematologic and GI toxicity (see DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION). In clinical studies, less overall toxicity and reductions in
`Grade 3/4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities such as neutropenia, febrile neutropenia,
`and infection with Grade 3/4 neutropenia were reported when pretreatment with folic acid and
`vitamin B12 was administered.
`Pregnancy Category D
`ALIMTA may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Pemetrexed was
`fetotoxic and teratogenic in mice at i.p. doses of 0.2 mg/kg (0.6 mg/m2) or 5 mg/kg (15 mg/m2)
`when given on gestation days 6 through 15. Pemetrexed caused fetal malformations (incomplete
`ossification of talus and skull bone) at 0.2 mg/kg (about 1/833 the recommended i.v. human dose
`
`182
`183
`184
`185
`186
`187
`188
`189
`190
`191
`192
`193
`194
`195
`196
`197
`198
`199
`200
`201
`202
`203
`204
`205
`206
`207
`208
`209
`210
`211
`212
`213
`214
`215
`216
`217
`218
`219
`220
`221
`222
`223
`224
`
`

`

`
`
`8
`
`on a mg/m2 basis), and cleft palate at 5 mg/kg (about 1/33 the recommended i.v. human dose on
`
`a mg/m2 basis). Embryotoxicity was characterized by increased embryo-fetal deaths and reduced
`litter sizes. There are no studies of ALIMTA in pregnant women. Patients should be advised to
`avoid becoming pregnant. If ALIMTA is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes
`pregnant while taking ALIMTA, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the
`fetus.
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`General
`ALIMTA should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in
`the use of antineoplastic agents. Appropriate management of complications is possible only
`when adequate diagnostic and treatment facilities are readily available. Treatment-related
`adverse events of ALIMTA seen in clinical trials have been reversible. Skin rash has been
`reported more frequently in patients not pretreated with a corticosteroid in clinical trials.
`Pretreatment with dexamethasone (or equivalent) reduces the incidence and severity of
`cutaneous reaction (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`The effect of third space fluid, such as pleural effusion and ascites, on ALIMTA is unknown.
`In patients with clinically significant third space fluid, consideration should be given to draining
`the effusion prior to ALIMTA administration.
`Laboratory Tests
`Complete blood cell counts, including platelet counts and periodic chemistry tests, should be
`performed on all patients receiving ALIMTA. Patients should be monitored for nadir and
`recovery, which were tested in the clinical study before each dose and on days 8 and 15 of each
`cycle. Patients should not begin a new cycle of treatment unless the ANC is ≥1500 cells/mm3,
`the platelet count is ≥100,000 cells/mm3, and creatinine clearance is ≥45 mL/min.
`Drug Interactions
`ALIMTA is primarily eliminated unchanged renally as a result of glomerular filtration and
`tubular secretion. Concomitant administration of nephrotoxic drugs could result in delayed
`clearance of ALIMTA. Concomitant administration of substances that are also tubularly secreted
`(e.g., probenecid) could potentially result in delayed clearance of ALIMTA.
`Although ibuprofen (400 mg qid) can be administered with ALIMTA in patients with normal
`renal function (creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min), caution should be used when administering
`ibuprofen concurrently with ALIMTA to patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency
`(creatinine clearance from 45 to 79 mL/min). Patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency
`should avoid taking NSAIDs with short elimination half-lives for a period of 2 days before, the
`day of, and 2 days following administration of ALIMTA.
`In the absence of data regarding potential interaction between ALIMTA and NSAIDs with
`longer half-lives, all patients taking these NSAIDs should interrupt dosing for at least 5 days
`before, the day of, and 2 days following ALIMTA administration. If concomitant administration
`of an NSAID is necessary, patients should be monitored closely for toxicity, especially
`myelosuppression, renal, and gastrointestinal toxicity.
`Drug/Laboratory Test Interactions
`None known.
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`No carcinogenicity studies have been conducted with pemetrexed. Pemetrexed was clastogenic
`in the in vivo micronucleus assay in mouse bone marrow but was not mutagenic in multiple
`in vitro tests (Ames assay, CHO cell assay). Pemetrexed administered at i.v. doses of
`
`225
`226
`227
`228
`229
`230
`231
`232
`233
`234
`235
`236
`237
`238
`239
`240
`241
`242
`243
`244
`245
`246
`247
`248
`249
`250
`251
`252
`253
`254
`255
`256
`257
`258
`259
`260
`261
`262
`263
`264
`265
`266
`267
`268
`269
`270
`
`

`

`271
`272
`273
`274
`275
`276
`277
`278
`279
`280
`281
`282
`283
`284
`285
`286
`287
`288
`289
`290
`291
`292
`293
`294
`295
`296
`297
`298
`299
`300
`301
`302
`303
`304
`305
`306
`307
`308
`309
`310
`311
`
`
`
`9
`
`0.1 mg/kg/day or greater to male mice (about 1/1666 the recommended human dose on a mg/m2
`basis) resulted in reduced fertility, hypospermia, and testicular atrophy.
`Pregnancy
`Pregnancy Category D (see WARNINGS).
`Nursing Mothers
`It is not known whether ALIMTA or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. Because
`many drugs are excreted in human milk, and because of the potential for serious adverse
`reactions in nursing infants from ALIMTA, it is recommended that nursing be discontinued if the
`mother is treated with ALIMTA.
`Pediatric Use
`The safety and effectiveness of ALIMTA in pediatric patients have not been established.
`Geriatric Use
`Dose adjustments based on age other than those recommended for all patients have not been
`necessary (see Special Populations under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION).
`Gender
`Dose adjustments based on gender other than those recommended for all patients have not been
`necessary (see Special Populations under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION).
`Patients with Hepatic Impairment
`Patients with bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal were excluded from clinical trials
`of ALIMTA. Patients with transaminase >3.0 times the upper limit of normal were routinely
`excluded from clinical trials if they had no evidence of hepatic metastases. Patients with
`transaminase from 3 to 5 times the upper limit of normal were included in the clinical trial of
`ALIMTA if they had hepatic metastases.
`Dose adjustments based on hepatic impairment experienced during treatment with ALIMTA
`are provided in Table 9 (see Special Populations under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`Patients with Renal Impairment
`ALIMTA is known to be primarily excreted by the kidney. Decreased renal function will result
`in reduced clearance and greater exposure (AUC) to ALIMTA compared with patients with
`normal renal function. Cisplatin coadministration with ALIMTA has not been studied in patients
`with moderate renal impairment (see Special Populations under CLINICAL
`PHARMACOLOGY).
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma — In Table 5 adverse events occurring in at least 5% of
`patients are shown along with important effects (renal failure, infection) occurring at lower rates.
`Adverse events equally or more common in the cisplatin group are not included. The adverse
`effects more common in the ALIMTA group were primarily hematologic effects, fever and
`infection, stomatitis/pharyngitis, and rash/desquamation.
`
`
`Table 5: Adverse Events* in Fully Supplemented Patients Receiving ALIMTA plus
`Cisplatin in MPM
`CTC Grades (% incidence)
`All Reported Adverse Events Regardless of Causality
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Laboratory
` Hematologic
` Neutropenia
` Leukopenia
` Anemia
` Thrombocytopenia
` Renal
` Creatinine elevation
` Renal failure
`Clinical
` Constitutional Symptoms
` Fatigue
` Fever
` Other constitutional
`symptoms
` Cardiovascular General
` Thrombosis/embolism
` Gastrointestinal
` Nausea
` Vomiting
` Constipation
` Anorexia
` Stomatitis/pharyngitis
` Diarrhea without
`colostomy
` Dehydration
` Dysphagia/esophagitis/
`odynophagia
` Pulmonary
` Dyspnea
` Pain
` Chest pain
` Neurology
` Neuropathy/sensory
` Mood
`alteration/depression
` Infection/Febrile
`Neutropenia
` Infection without
`neutropenia
` Infection with Grade 3 or
`Grade 4 neutropenia
`
`All
`Grades
`
`
`58
`55
`33
`27
`
`16
`2
`
`
`80
`17
`11
`
`
`7
`
`84
`58
`44
`35
`28
`26
`
`7
`6
`
`
`66
`
`40
`
`17
`14
`
`
`
`11
`
`6
`
`ALIMTA/cis
`(N=168)
`Grade 3
`
`Grade 4
`
`
`
`19
`14
`5
`4
`
`1
`0
`
`
`17
`0
`2
`
`
`4
`
`11
`10
`2
`2
`2
`4
`
`3
`1
`
`
`10
`
`8
`
`0
`1
`
`
`
`1
`
`1
`
`
`
`5
`2
`1
`1
`
`0
`1
`
`
`0
`0
`1
`
`
`2
`
`1
`1
`1
`0
`1
`0
`
`1
`0
`
`
`1
`
`1
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`1
`
`0
`
`10
`
`Cisplatin
`(N=163)
`Grade 3 Grade 4
`
`
`
`3
`1
`0
`0
`
`1
`0
`
`
`12
`0
`1
`
`
`3
`
`6
`4
`1
`1
`0
`1
`
`1
`0
`
`
`5
`
`5
`
`1
`1
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`
`
`1
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`
`1
`0
`1
`
`
`1
`
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`All
`Grades
`
`
`16
`20
`14
`10
`
`12
`1
`
`
`74
`9
`8
`
`
`4
`
`79
`52
`39
`25
`9
`16
`
`1
`6
`
`
`62
`
`30
`
`15
`9
`
`
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`11
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`22
`
`1
`
`1
`
`0
`
`
`1
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
`2
`
`1
`
`1
`
`
`9
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
` Infection/febrile
`neutropenia-other
` Febrile neutropenia
` Immune
` Allergic reaction/
`hypersensitivity
` Dermatology/Skin
` Rash/desquamation
`* Refer to NCI CTC Version 2.0.
`
`Table 6 compares the incidence (percentage of patients) of CTC Grade 3/4 toxicities in patients
`who received vitamin supplementation with daily folic acid and vitamin B12 from the time of
`enrollment in the study (fully supplemented) with the incidence in patients who never received
`vitamin supplementation (never supplemented) during the study in the ALIMTA plus
`cisplatin arm.
`
`Table 6: Selected Grade 3/4 Adverse Events Comparing Fully Supplemented versus Never
`Supplemented Patients in the ALIMTA plus Cisplatin arm in MPM (% incidence)
`Fully Supplemented
`Never Supplemented
`
`Patients
`Patients
`Adverse Event Regardless of
`Causalitya (%)
`(N=168)
`(N=32)
`24
`38
`Neutropenia
`5
`9
`Thrombocytopenia
`12
`31
`Nausea
`11
`34
`Vomiting
`2
`9
`Anorexia
`4
`9
`Diarrhea without colostomy
`4
`9
`Dehydration
`0
`6
`Fever
`1
`9
`Febrile neutropenia
`1
`6
`Infection with Grade 3/4 neutropenia
`17
`25
`Fatigue
`a Refer to NCI CTC criteria for lab and non-laboratory values for each grade of toxicity (Version 2.0).
`
`The following adverse events were greater in the fully supplemented group compared to the
`never supplemented group: hypertension (11%, 3%), chest pain (8%, 6%), and
`thrombosis/embolism (6%, 3%).
`For fully supplemented patients treated with ALIMTA plus cisplatin, the incidence of CTC
`Grade 3/4 fatigue, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were greater in patients
`65 years or older as compared to patients younger than 65. No relevant effect for ALIMTA
`safety due to gender or race was identified, except an increased incidence of rash in men (24%)
`compared to women (16%).
`Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) — Table 7 provides the clinically relevant undesirable
`effects that have been reported in 265 patients randomly assigned to receive single-agent
`ALIMTA with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation and 276 patients randomly assigned to
`receive single-agent docetaxel. All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic
`NSCLC and had received prior chemotherapy.
`
`312
`313
`314
`315
`316
`317
`318
`319
`
`320
`321
`322
`323
`324
`325
`326
`327
`328
`329
`330
`331
`332
`333
`334
`
`

`

`Table 7: Adverse Events* in Patients Receiving ALIMTA vs. Docetaxel in NSCLC
`CTC Grades (% incidence)
`All Reported Adverse Events Regardless of Causality
`ALIMTA
`Docetaxel
`(N=265)
`(N=276)
`Grade 3 Grade 4
`Grade 3 Grade 4
`
`335
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Laboratory
` Hematologic
` Anemia
` Leukopenia
` Neutropenia
` Thrombocytopenia
` Hepatic/Renal
` ALT elevation
` AST elevation
` Decreased creatinine
`clearance
` Creatinine elevation
` Renal failure
`Clinical
` Constitutional Symptoms
` Fatigue
` Fever
` Edema
` Myalgia
` Alopecia
` Arthralgia
` Other constitutional
`symptoms
` Cardiovascular General
` Thrombosis/embolism
` Cardiac ischemia
` Gastrointestinal
` Anorexia
` Nausea
` Constipation
` Vomiting
` Diarrhea without
`colostomy
` Stomatitis/pharyngitis
` Dysphagia/esophagitis/
`odynophagia
` Dehydration
`
`All
`Grades
`
`
`33
`13
`11
`9
`
`10
`8
`5
`
`3
`<1
`
`
`87
`26
`19
`13
`11
`8
`8
`
`
`4
`3
`
`62
`39
`30
`25
`21
`
`20
`5
`
`3
`
`12
`
`
`
`6
`17
`8
`1
`
`<1
`<1
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`
`16
`<1
`<1
`3
`NA
`3
`1
`
`
`2
`<1
`
`7
`3
`1
`1
`4
`
`1
`1
`
`1
`
`
`
`<1
`11
`32
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`
`1
`0
`0
`0
`NA
`0
`<1
`
`
`1
`0
`
`<1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`
`
`6
`4
`3
`2
`
`2
`<1
`1
`
`0
`0
`
`
`14
`1
`<1
`2
`NA
`<1
`1
`
`
`2
`2
`
`4
`4
`0
`2
`<1
`
`1
`1
`
`1
`
`
`
`2
`<1
`2
`0
`
`1
`1
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`
`2
`<1
`0
`0
`NA
`0
`1
`
`
`1
`1
`
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`<

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket