throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`202324Orig1s000
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Application No.-
`
`Submission Dates:
`
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW ADDENDUM
`
`Office of New Dru_s Qualitv Assessment
`NDA 202-324
`
`4/13/2011. 12/21/2012. 1/20/2012
`
`Reviewer: Kareen Riviere. Ph.D.
`
`Division of Oncology Products
`
`Secondary Signature: Sandra Suarez Sharp.
`Ph.D.
`
`Biopharmaceutics Lead: Angelica Dorantes.
`Ph.D.
`Date
`
`(”(4) will not likely affect the clinical performance of the drug product.
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Pfizer
`
`Trade Name:
`
`INLYTA®
`
`Generic Name:
`
`Axitinib
`
`Ass' ; ned:
`Date of
`Review:
`
`4/13/201 1
`
`1/25/2012
`
`Indication:
`
`Treatment of advanced renal cell
`carcinoma (RCC)
`
`Type 01' Submission: Original New Drug
`Application
`
`Formulation/strengths:
`
`Immediate Release (IR) Film-Coated
`Tablet/l m- and 5 m
`
`Route of
`Administration:
`
`SUMMARY:
`
`This addendum incorporates the agreements in terms of pending issues not resolved at the time the original
`Biopharmaceutics review was entered into DARRTS on December 12. 2011 by this reviewer.
`
`During the review cycle. the review team had concerns with the coating weight gain because there was no data (i.e..
`dissolution data) supporting the proposed specifications. The Applicant proposed a coating weight gain of (b) (4). The
`ONDQA review team connnunicated to the Applicant that the dissolution data do not support a film coating
`specification
`(5) (4) and recommended to adopt an upper limit for coating weight based on the provided
`dissolution data. In later communications. the Applicant provided dissolution data that support
`(5X4) coating
`weight gain for the 5 mg strength. Although the dissolution data provided do not directly support
`the same
`specification for the 1 mg strength. the review team considers that coating weight gain
`“(4) is acceptable for
`both strengths based on the following information:
`
`In vivo data showing that both strengths are bioequivalent: and
`1.
`2. Formulation characteristics and in vitro dissolution performance of the drug product.
`
`(5)“)
`Additionally. the review team had concerns that the proposed
`design space would provide adequate dissolution of axitinib and communicated this to the
`Applicant during the review cycle. The Applicant responded that
`(b) (4)
`
`(5) (4)
`However. the ONDQA review team later on commtmicated to the Applicant that their proposed design space
`was not acceptable and advised the Applicant to establish target values for the process parameters to
`ensure the formation of axitinib
`(war The Applicant revised their design space: however. there was a concern
`about the
`(”(4). as allowed by the specification. could have. Therefore. the
`Applicant was requested to provide data/justification that undetected
`0’ (4) drug substance polymorphs will not
`affect the bioavailability of the drug product. On a teleconference dated January 19. 2012. the Biopharmaceutics
`review team communicated to the Applicant that based on the information provided on December 21. 2011 and on an
`internal analysis of the exposure-response data for the drug product. the FDA considers that the presence of drug
`substance polymorphs
`
`Reference ID: 3076627
`
`

`

`
`RECOMMENDATION:
`
`
`1. The proposed film coat weight gain
` is acceptable for the 1 mg and 5 mg tablet.
`• This specification is supported by the information received on December 21, 2011 and on the
`bioequivalency between both strengths, the formulation characteristics, and the in vitro dissolution
`performance.
`
`
` Kareen Riviere, PhD Sandra Suarez Sharp, PhD
` Biopharmaceutics Reviewer Senior Biopharmaceutics Reviewer
` Office of New Drugs Quality Assessment Office of New Drugs Quality Assessment
`
` cc: Angelica Dorantes, Ph.D.
`
`Drug Product Film Coating Weight
`
` to control the weight of film coating applied to tablets.
`The Applicant proposed a film coat weight
`However, there no data was submitted supporting this proposed film coat specification.
`
`The following Biopharmaceutics comment related to film coating specification was made in the Information
`Request Letter dated September 26, 2011.
`
`
`FDA Query 36
`Indicate if
`available.
`
`Sponsor Response
`
` % of film coat has any impact on dissolution with supporting data, if
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3076627
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`4 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as B4 (CCI/
`TS) immediately following this
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`KAREEN RIVIERE
`01/25/2012
`
`SANDRA SUAREZ
`01/25/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3076627
`
`

`

`
`
`Clinical Pharmacology Review
`202324
`April 14, 2011
`Inlyta®
`Axitinib
`1 mg and 5 mg tablets
`Sarah Schrieber, PharmD
`Qi Liu, PhD
`Nitin Mehrotra, PhD
`Christine Garnett, PharmD
`Rosane Charlab Orbach, PhD
`Issam Zineh, PharmD
`Division of Clinical Pharmacology V
`Division of Drug Oncology Products
`Pfizer
`NME/0000/1
`Axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily without regards to
`food.
`Axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell
`carcinoma (RCC).
`
`
`
`NDA
`Submission Date:
`Brand Name:
`Generic Name:
`Formulation:
`OCP Reviewer:
`OCP Team Leader:
`Pharmacometrics Reviewer:
`Pharmacometrics Team Leader:
`Pharmacogenomics Reviewer:
`Pharmacogenomics Team Leader:
`OCP Division:
`
`ORM Division:
`Sponsor:
`Submission Type; Code:
`Dosing regimen:
`
`Indication:
`
`
`
`
`OCP Briefing was held on December 12, 2011.
`
`Table of Contents
`1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................4
`1.1
`Recommendations ...............................................................................................................5
`1.3
`Summary of Clinical Pharmacology Findings.....................................................................5
`2 Question Based Review ...................................................................................................................6
`2.1
`General Attributes ...............................................................................................................6
`2.2
`General Clinical Pharmacology...........................................................................................8
`2.3
`Intrinsic Factors.................................................................................................................24
`2.4
`Extrinsic Factors................................................................................................................30
`2.5
`General Biopharmaceutics ................................................................................................40
`2.6
`Analytical Section .............................................................................................................44
`3 Detailed Labeling Recommendations ............................................................................................50
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`4 Appendices.....................................................................................................................................63
`4.1
`PHARMACOMETRICS REVIEW...................................................................................63
`4. 2
`PHARMACOGEMOMICS Review..................................................................................79
`4.3
`NDA Filing and Review Form ..........................................................................................88
`
`
`Index of Tables
`Table 1. Progression free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced RCC (A4061032). ..............................8
`Table 2. Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Related Studies Submitted in NDA......................................9
`Table 3. Summary of Axitinib PK Parameters in Healthy Volunteers and Patients by Study and Treatment
`Group Following a Single 5 mg Oral Dose of Axitinib in the Fed State. ..........................................16
`Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Axitinib
` after Administration of
`single doses of 5 mg and multiple doses of 5 mg twice daily under Fed Conditions in Patients with
`Cancer. ...............................................................................................................................................17
`Table 5. Estimated Geometric Means and Ratios with Associated 90% CI for Pharmacokinetic Parameters
`of Axitinib (total and unbound) Comparing Healthy Volunteers with Mild or Moderate Hepatic
`Impairment to Volunteers without Hepatic Impairment in Study A4061036. ...................................28
`Table 6. Geometric mean (CV%) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Axitinib (total and unbound) after
`Administration of 5 mg in Healthy Volunteers with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment and
`Volunteers without Hepatic Impairment in Study A4061036............................................................29
`Table 7. Geometric mean (CV%) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Axitinib (unbound) after
`Administration of 5 mg in Healthy Volunteers with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment and
`Volunteers without Hepatic Impairment in Study A4061036............................................................29
`Table 8. Estimated Geometric Means and Ratios with Associated 90% CI for Pharmacokinetic Parameters
`of Axitinib (unbound) Comparing Healthy Volunteers with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment to
`Volunteers without Hepatic Impairment in Study A4061036............................................................29
`Table 9. Ki values (µM) for axitinib inhibition of CYP activities in human liver microsomes (study PDM-
`020). ...................................................................................................................................................32
`Table 10. Effect of increasing Axitinib (AG-013736) concentration on MDR1-MDCK permeability,
`efflux and inhibition...........................................................................................................................33
`Table 11. Digoxin Papp and net secretory flux values across Caco-2 cell monolayers in the presence of
`increasing concentrations of axitinib..................................................................................................34
`Table 12. Effect of increasing axitinib concentration on BCRP-MDCK permeability, efflux and
`inhibition. ...........................................................................................................................................35
`Table 13. Effect of increasing axitinib concentration on OATP efflux. .....................................................35
`Table 14. Geometric mean (95% CI) pharmacokinetic parameters of axitinib with and without multiple
`doses of ketoconazole.........................................................................................................................36
`Table 15. Effect of multiple doses of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of single dose of axitinib in
`Study A40601004. Test = AG-013736 (axitinib) 5 mg + ketoconazole 400 mg qd (N=28); Reference
`= axitinib 5 mg (AUC, N=31; Cmax: N=32). ....................................................................................36
`Table 16. Geometric mean (CV%) pharmacokinetic parameters of axitinib with and without multiple
`doses of rifampin................................................................................................................................37
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`2
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Table 17. Effect of multiple doses of rifampin (600 mg once daily) on the single-dose pharmacokinetic
`parameters of axitinib. Test = axitinib 5 mg + Rifampin 600 mg QD; Reference = axitinib 5 mg...38
`Table 18. Mean (CV%) every 3 week paclitaxel plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for Cohorts 1-3.
`Data from 2 subjects were excluded due to PK samples not being collected on Cycle 1 Day 1........39
`Table 19. Mean (CV%) weekly paclitaxel plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for Cohort 4. Data from 1
`subject excluded due to PK samples not being collected on Cycle 2 Day 1. .....................................39
`Table 20. Comparison of Plasma Pharmacokinetics of axitinib in the presence and absence of rabeprazole.
`............................................................................................................................................................40
`Table 21. Solubility of Axitinib in Aqueous Media as a Function of pH at 20°C for at least 24 Hours.....41
`Table 22. Solubility of Axitinib in Organic Solvents after Equilibration for at least 24 hours at 20°C. ....41
`Table 23. Composition of Axitinib Film-Coated Immediate Release 1 mg and 5 mg Tablets...................42
`Table 24. Descriptive Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Axitinib 5 mg Administration under
`Fasting Conditions, after administration with a Standardized Moderate-fat Meal, or a High-fat Meal
`in Study A4061053.............................................................................................................................43
`Table 25. Estimated Geometric Means and Ratios with Associated 90% CI for Pharmacokinetic
`Parameters of Axitinib Comparing Administration of 5 mg under Fasting Conditions Versus
`Administration with Standardized Moderate-fat or High-fat Meals in Study A4061053. .................43
`Table 26. Summary of Bioanalytical Methods Used in Clinical Studies for Pharmacokinetic
`Measurements of Axitinib..................................................................................................................46
`
`
`Index of Figures
`Figure 1. Structural Formula of axitinib. ......................................................................................................7
`Figure 2. Exposure dependent increase in hypertension (left) and proteinuria (right). Reduction of Dose
`from 5 to 3 mg bid will reduce the risk of hypertension and proteinuria...........................................13
`Figure 3. Occurrence of Diarrhea and Fatigue Increases with Axitinib Exposures....................................13
`Figure 4. Dose Titration Based on Tolerability Reduces Variability in Axitinib Exposures......................14
`Figure 5. No effect of healthy vs. patients on the clearance of axitinib......................................................18
`Figure 6. Median Cumulative Percent of Radioactive Dose Recovered in Urine and Feces at Specified
`Intervals after a Single 5 mg (100 µCi) Oral Dose of [14C]-axitinib to Healthy Male Subjects in
`Study A4061003 (N=6)......................................................................................................................20
`Figure 7. Proposed In Vivo Axitinib Metabolic Schema.............................................................................21
`Figure 8. Single dose Log AUCinf (ng*h/mL) vs. Log of Dose (mg) in the Dose Proportionality Studies
`(A4060010, A4061044, and A4061050) in the Dose Range of 2 to 30 mg. ......................................23
`Figure 9. Steady-state Log AUC0-24 (ng*h/mL) vs. Log of the Total Daily Dose (mg) in the Dose
`Proportionality Studies (A4060010 and A4061019) in the Dose Range of 1 to 20 mg Twice Daily.23
`Figure 10. No effect of gender on the clearance of axitinib........................................................................24
`Figure 11. Axitinib clearance in Japanese vs. non-Japanese patients from the popPK model. ..................25
`Figure 12. No effect of weight on the clearance of axitinib........................................................................25
`Figure 13. Axitinib clearance in <60 and >60 year subjects.......................................................................26
`Figure 14. No effect of UGT1A1*28 (left) and CYP2C19 (right) genotype on axitinib clearance............26
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Figure 15. No effect of CrCL in axitinib clearance (left) and individual observed and median with 25th -
`75th percentile range Axitinib Clearance (L/h) after Administration of 5 mg in Healthy Volunteers
`and/or Patients with Normal (N=381), Mild (N=139), Moderate (N=64), Severe (N=5), or End-stage
`(N=1) Renal Impairment (right).........................................................................................................27
`Figure 16. Individual and Geometric mean with 95% CI Axitinib (total and unbound) AUClast (ng*h/ml)
`after Administration of 5 mg in Healthy Volunteers with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment and
`Volunteers without Hepatic Impairment in Study A4061036............................................................28
`Figure 17. Axitinib clearance in non-smokers, active-smokers and ex-smokers........................................31
`Figure 18. The median time-concentration profiles of axitinib in healthy subjects on a semi-log scale,
`following a single 5 mg oral axitinib dose alone (N=31) or coadministered with 400 mg
`ketoconazole once daily (N=28) in a 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design. ..............37
`Figure 19. The median time-concentration profiles of axitinib in healthy subjects on a semi-log scale,
`following a single 5 mg oral axitinib dose alone (N=40) or coadministered with 600 mg rifampin
`once daily (N=39) in a 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design. ....................................38
`
`
`Axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -
`3. The current submission is the original NDA for axitinib for the treatment of advanced renal
`cell carcinoma (RCC).
`
`To support the efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma, the sponsor conducted one
`randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. Patients in the phase 3 trial were randomized to receive
`axitinib tablets 5 mg twice daily or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Progression free survival (PFS)
`was the primary endpoint. The median PFS for the axitinib treatment arm was 6.7 months
`compared to 4.7 months for patients receiving sorafenib.
`
`Exposure-safety analysis demonstrated that there was exposure dependent increase in
`hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, and diarrhea. The proposed dose reduction strategy (5 to 3 to 2
`mg bid) to manage hypertension and proteinuria is acceptable. Additionally, the dose titration
`scheme, which is the same as that used in the phase 3 trial (5 to 7 to 10 mg based on tolerability),
`is reasonable and can reduce variability in axitinib exposures based on observed pharmacokinetic
`data.
`
`The pharmacokinetics of axitinib has been evaluated in twenty studies in healthy volunteers and
`cancer patients. Following oral administration, the median axitinib plasma Tmax ranges between
`2.5 – 4.1 hours and the mean half-life ranges between 2.5 – 6.1 hours. The mean absolute
`bioavailability of axitinib after an oral 5 mg dose is 58%. A clinically significant effect of food
`was not observed; axitinib may be administered with or without food.
`
`The results of the hepatic impairment study support the labeling recommendations of reducing
`the axitinib dose by half for patients with moderate hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is
`warranted for patients with mild hepatic impairment. Patients with severe hepatic impairment
`have not been studied. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, no adjustment to the
`starting dose is needed for patients with pre-existing mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment.
`As only one subject was enrolled with end-stage renal impairment, a definitive conclusion
`
`
`
`Executive Summary
`
` 1
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`4
`
`
`
`

`

`Recommendations
`
`Phase IV Requirements
`
`regarding the effect of end-stage renal impairment on axitinib exposure cannot be made.
`
`In vitro data indicate that axitinib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4/5. In drug-drug
`interaction studies, ketoconazole (a strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitor) increased axitinib exposure by
`106%, while rifampin (a strong CYP3A4/5 inducer) decreased axitinib exposure by 80%.
`Therefore, concomitant use of strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4/5 should be avoided.
`However, if a strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitor must be co-administered, the axitinib dose should be
`reduced by half.
`
`1.1
`
`The Office of Clinical Pharmacology Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology 5, Pharmacometrics,
`and Pharmacogenomics have reviewed the information contained in NDA 202324. This NDA is
`considered acceptable from a clinical pharmacology perspective.
`
`Labeling Recommendations
`
`Please refer to Section 3 - Detailed Labeling Recommendations.
`
`1.2
`
`None.
`
`1.3
`
`Axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -
`3. Axitinib is being developed for oral use in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma
`(RCC).
`
`The applicant has conducted twenty studies in healthy volunteers, and patients with cancer to
`evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of axitinib. The Tmax of axitinib typically occurs 2.5-4.1
`hours following oral administration, and the concentrations of axitinib decreased over time with
`a half-life of approximately 2.5-6.1 hours after a single 5 mg axitinib oral dose in the fed state.
`No major deviation from dose proportionality was observed following multiple dosing in the
`dose range of 1 to 20 mg twice daily. There are no significant differences between the
`pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers and patients with cancer. A moderate-fat meal decreased
`the AUC of axitinib by 10%, while a high-fat increased the AUC of axitinib by 19%.
`
`After administration of radio-labeled axitinib in healthy subjects, approximately 41% of the
`radioactivity was recovered in feces and approximately 23% was recovered in urine. Unchanged
`axitinib was not detected in urine, but was the major component identified in feces (12% of the
`dose). In plasma, unchanged axitinib accounted for approximately 20% of the circulating
`radioactivity. Two metabolites of axitinib have been detected in human blood and these
`metabolites showed ≥400-times less activity than axitinib itself. A hepatic impairment study in
`subjects with moderate hepatic impairment showed that the average AUC was 2-fold higher that
`found in subjects with normal hepatic function. A dose reduction by 50% for patients with
`
`Summary of Clinical Pharmacology Findings
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`moderate hepatic impairment is recommended.
`
`Axitinib is a substrate of CYP3A4/5, P-glycoprotein, and UGT1A1. Drug-drug interaction
`studies indicate a 106% increase in axitinib exposure (AUC) when administered with
`ketoconazole and an 80% reduction in axitinib AUC when administered with rifampin. Axitinib
`inhibited CYP2C8 (I/Ki=0.15) and 1A2 (I/Ki=0.11) in vitro; however, in vivo, co-administration
`of axitinib did not increase paclitaxel plasma concentrations, indicating a lack of CYP2C8
`inhibition. Axitinib was not found to induce any cytochrome P-450 enzymes in vitro. The
`aqueous solubility of axitinib is pH dependent. Drug-drug interaction studies indicate a 15%
`decrease in axitinib AUC and 42% decrease in axitinib Cmax when administered rabeprazole.
`
`Exposure-safety analysis was conducted by pooling data from three phase 2 and one phase 3
`trial. There was exposure dependent increase in hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, and diarrhea.
`The proposed dose reduction strategy (5 to 3 to 2 mg bid) to manage hypertension and
`proteinuria is acceptable since these adverse events are exposure related. Additionally, the dose
`titration scheme proposed by the sponsor, which is the same as that used in the phase 3 trial (5 to
`7 to 10 mg based on tolerability), is reasonable and would reduce variability in axitinib
`exposures.
`
`Signatures:
` Team Leader: Qi Liu, PhD
`Reviewer: Sarah J. Schrieber, PharmD
`Division of Clinical Pharmacology 5
`Division of Clinical Pharmacology 5
` Team Leader: Christine Garnett, PharmD
`Reviewer: Nitin Mehrotra, PhD
`Division of Pharmacometrics
`Division of Pharmacometrics
` Team Leader: Issam Zineh, PharmD
`Reviewer: Rosane Charlab-Orbach, PhD
`Division of Pharmacogenomics
`Division of Pharmacogenomics
`Division Director, NAM Atiqur Rahman, PhD
`Division of Clinical Pharmacology 5
`Cc: DDOP: CSO - L Skarupa; MTL - J Johnson; MO - A McKee, Safety MO -
`
`DCP-
`Reviewers - S Schrieber (CP), N Mehrotra (PM) R Charlab-Orbach (GG)
`5:
`CP TL - Q Liu , PM TL - C Garnett GG TL - I Zineh
`DDD - B Booth DD - A Rahman
`
`QUESTION BASED REVIEW
`
`2.1 GENERAL ATTRIBUTES
`
`2.1.1 What are the highlights of the chemistry and physical-chemical properties of the
`drug substance and the formulation of the drug product as they relate to clinical
`pharmacology and biopharmaceutics review?
`
`Axitinib has been developed as 1 mg and 5 mg film-coated tablets for oral administration. The 1
`mg tablet is a red oval shaped tablet debossed with “Pfizer” on one side and “1 XNB” on the
`other. The 5 mg tablet is a red triangular shaped tablet debossed with “Pfizer” on one side and “5
`XNB” on the other.
`
`
` 2
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`6
`
`
`
`

`

`Physical-chemical properties
`1. Structural formula:
`
`
`Figure 1. Structural Formula of axitinib.
`
`
`2. Established names: Axitinib, AG-013736
`3. Molecular Weight: 386.5 Daltons
`4. Molecular Formula: C22H18N4OS
`5. Partition coefficient (log P): 3.5
`6. Dissociation Constant (pKa): 4.8
`7. Chemical Name: N-Methyl-2-[3-((E)-2-pyridin-2-yl-vinyl)-1H-indazol-6-ylsulfanyl]-
`benzamide
`8. Melting Point: 225°C
`9. Solubility: Axitinib solubility in aqueous media decreases with increasing pH. It is
`soluble in excess of 0.2 μg/mL in aqueous media over the range pH 1.1 to pH 7.8. See
`section 2.5.1.
`
`
`2.1.2 What are the proposed mechanisms of action and therapeutic indications?
`
`Axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -
`3. These receptors are implicated in pathologic angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastatic
`progression of cancer. Axitinib has been shown to potently inhibit VEGF-mediated endothelial
`cell proliferation and survival. Axitinib inhibited the phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 in xenograft
`tumor vasculature that expressed the target in vivo and produced tumor growth delay, regression,
`and inhibition of metastases in many experimental models of cancer.
`
`The proposed indication is for axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
`
`2.1.3 What are the proposed dosage(s) and route(s) of administration?
`
`The applicant proposes a dosing regimen of 5 mg of oral axitinib administered twice daily
`without regard to food. Patients who tolerate 5 mg twice daily may have the dose increased to 7
`mg bid, and further to a maximum of 10 mg twice daily if they meet the following criteria:
`• No Adverse drug reactions >Grade 2 for two consecutive weeks
`• Normotensive
`• Not receiving anti-hypertension medication
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review – Axitinib
`7
`
`
`
`

`

`2.2
`
`GENERAL CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`2.2.1 What are the design features of the clinical pharmacology and clinical studies used
`
`to support dosing or claims?
`
`A single pivotal trial in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted to
`support the efficacy claim.
`
`Pivotal Phase 3 Trial in Patients with advanced RCC (A4061032)
`The pivotal trial was a phase 3 multi-center, 2-arm, randomized, open-label study of axitinib (5
`mg twice daily with food) or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) in patients with advanced RCC
`whose disease had progressed on or after treatment with one prior systemic first—line therapy,
`including: sunitinib-, bevacizumab-, temsirolimus—, or cytokine-containing regimens. This study
`randomized 723 patients 1:1 to receive axitinib or sorafenib. During the study, the dose of
`axitinib was allowed to be escalated from 5 mg twice daily to 7 mg twice daily and 10 mg twice
`daily based on patient safety and tolerability.
`
`The primary efficacy endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) and Table 1 below shows a
`summary of the sponsors results based on this primary endpoint.
`
`Table 1. Pro ession free survival (PFS) in atients with advanced RCC (A4061032).
`—_-_-I
`Median PFS in Months
`
`W)
`
`W656,
`
`
`
`—m_
`Hazard Ratio 95% C
`CI, confidence interval
`
`< 0-0001
`0.67 0.54, 0.81
`
`The secondary efficacy endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and
`duration of response (DR).
`
`A total of 19 completed studies and l ongoing study were used to support
`Pharmacology and Biophannaceutics Section of the NDA (Table 2).
`
`the Clinical
`
`Healthy subject studies:
`0 Nine Phase 1 studies — Dose proportionality (A4061050), bioavailability. (A4061007),
`relative bioavailability / bioequivalence (A4061021, A4061033, A4061052, A4061063), food
`effect (A4061006, A4061053) and mass balance (A4061003)
`
`0 One organ impairment study - Hepatic (A4061036)
`0 Two drug interaction studies — CYP3A4/5 inhibitor (A4061004), 3A4/5 inducer (A4061026)
`o QT study — substudy of A4061004.
`
`Cancer patient studies:
`
`0 Three Phase 1 studies — Advanced solid tumor; Dose escalation (A4060010, A4060019,
`A406 1 044)
`
`0 Four Phase 2 studies - Advanced RCC (A4061046 [ongoing], A4061012, A4061023,
`A4061035)
`0 One Phase 3 study — Advanced RCC (A4061032)
`
`Reference ID: 3072768
`
`NDA 202324 Review — Axitinib
`8
`
`

`

`
`Clinical Pharmacology Reports of data from more than one study:
`The axitinib plasma concentration data from several studies were used to develop a population
`pharmacokinetic (popPK) model (reports PMAR-00075, PMAR-00079) to investigate the
`potential influence of covariates that contribute significantly to between-patient variability in
`pharmacokinetic parameters of axitinib. The model was also used to characterize the exposure-
`safety relationships for select adverse events (population PK/PD).
`
`Table 2. Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Related Studies Submitted in NDA.
`Study Description/Design
`Study
`Subjects Evaluated
`Treatment Regimen/
`Number
`Sex M/F
`Duration
`Start/End
`Age (yr): Mean (SD)
`Route of Administration
`Date
`Batch Number
`Race
`(W/B/His/As/Other)
`Bioavailability Studies
`Phase 1, randomized, open-label,
`A4061007
`single-dose, 3-treatment, 2-way
`02 Aug 2005/ 19
`crossover study designed to
`Aug 2005
`determine the absolute
`
`bioavailability of axitinib tablets
`vs. IV solution formulation in
`healthy subjects.
`
`Axitinib 5 mg po with a 7-day washout between
`each dosing period. Subjects were randomized to 1
`of 2 treatments sequences (ABC or BAC).
`Treatment Groups:
`A: 1 mg axitinib IV fasted
`B: 5 mg axitinib po fasted
`C: 5 mg axitinib po fed
`Formulation:
`IV administration
`
` solution for
`
`, fed
`
`, fed
`
`
`
` particle size,
`
` particle size,
`
` particle size,
`
`Subjects: 16
`Sex: 14 M / 2 F
`Age (yr): 37.4 (14.9)
`Race (W/B/Ot): 12/3/1
`
`Comparative Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies
`Subjects: 40
`Phase 1, open-label, randomized,
`A4061021
`Sex: 38 M / 2 F
`single-dose, 2-sequence, 3-period
`06 Jul 2006/ 15
`Age (yr): 33.4 (13.3)
`crossover trial designed to
`Aug 2006
`Race (W/B/As/Ot): 29/5/3/3
`determine the relative
`
`
`bioavailability of 5 mg
`
`fed healthy subjects.
`
`
`in
`
`A4061033
`02 Jan 2008/ 21
`Feb 2008
`
`
`Phase 1, open-label, single-dose,
`randomized, 4-sequence, 4-period,
`crossover study to determine the
`relative bioavailability of 5 mg
`
`Subjects: 56 M
`Age (yr): 34.6 (10.3)
`Race (W/B/As/Ot): 27/2/25/2
`
`
`
`in fed healthy
`
`male subjects.
`
`A4061052
`13 Jul 2009/ 02
`Sep 2009
`
`A4061053
`01 Jul 2009/ 18
`Jul 2009
`
`
`Phase 1, open-label, randomized,
`single-dose, 2-sequence, 4-period
`crossover to establish the
`bioequivalence of test 5 x1 mg
`axitinib tablet to reference 1 x 5
`mg axitinib tablet in fasted healthy
`male subjects.
`
`Phase 1, open-label, randomized,
`single-dose, 6-sequence, 3-period
`crossover to assess the effect of
`food vs. fasting on Form XLI
`axitinib pharmacokinetics in
`healthy male subjects.
`
`Subjects: 60 M
`Age (yr): 30.6 (7.0)
`Race (As): 60
`
`
`Subjects: 30 M
`Age (yr): 37.2 (9.5)
`Race (W/B): 29/1
`
`
`Axitinib 5 mg was administered under fed
`conditions according to the treatment sequence
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket