throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`202570Orig1s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

` 09//2009
`(submitted)
` 12/2013
` 06//2014
`
`
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`Final Report Submission:
`Other:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR Description:
`1789-1
`
`Clinical trial report and datasets from A8081007: Phase 3, Randomized,
`Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of PF-02341066 vs. Standard of
`Care (Pemetrexed or Docetaxel) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell
`Lung Cancer Harboring a Translocation or Inversion Event Involving the
`Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Locus
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`
`
`This randomized trial will provide additional information on the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in
`a comparative setting.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`Crizotinib was approved on the basis of single arm studies in a population with non-small cell lung
`cancer. To fully determine the safety profile of this drug in a population with substantial pre-
`existing disease, it will be necessary to compare the adverse event profile of crizotinib to that of
`other drugs. Further, the efficacy of crizotinib in comparison to other drugs is an important safety
`concern since this will impact the patient’s ultimate outcome.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 1 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`This is an ongoing randomized clinical trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have
`received one prior therapy.
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 2 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`To ensure that the results of this study will be submitted regardless of the results of the primary
`analysis.
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug
`quality.
`
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 3 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

` 06/2010
`(submitted)
` 12/2015
` 06/2016
`
`
`
`Trial Completion:
`Final Report Submission:
`Other:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR Description:
`1789-2
`
`Clinical trial report and datasets from A8081014: Phase 3, Randomized,
`Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Crizotinib vs.
`Pemetrexed/Cisplatin or Pemetrexed/Carboplatin in Previously Untreated
`Patients with Non-Squamous Carcinoma of the Lung Harboring a
`Translocation or Inversion Event Involving the Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
`Gene Locus
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`
`
`This study will provide comparative information on the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in patients
`with non-small cell lung cancer who have received no prior treatment. Since this population has less
`comorbid disease, the adverse event profile of crizotinib, seen in this comparative setting, will be
`more clearly delineated.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`Crizotinib was approved on the basis of a surrogate endpoint in two small, single-arm trials. This
`study will provide additional safety data as well as information of the efficacy of crizotinib in this
`setting. Information on the efficacy of crizotinib is ultimately a safety concern since it may impact
`overall survival.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 4 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`An ongoing clinical trial in patients with untreated non-small cell lung cancer
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 5 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`Overall survival data from an ongoing clinical trial
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug
`quality.
`
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 6 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`Attachment B: Sample PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR Description:
`1789-3
`
`Submit the final report on the ongoing in vitro evaluations of induction
`potential of crizotinib on CYP2B and CYP2C enzymes.
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones:
`
`Final Protocol Submission: 12/2011
`Study Completion:
`
`12/2011
`Final Report Submission:
`12/2011
` Other:
`MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`As crizotinib induces CYP3A mRNA up to 23 fold, crizotinib may also induce CYP2B or
`CYP2C eneymes, which may subsequently decrease the drug concentrations of the substrates of
`these enzymes. The ongoing in vitro evaluations induction potential of crizotinib on CYP2B and
`CYP2C enzymes is therefore should be submitted for FDA’s review.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`
`
`As crizotinib induces CYP3A mRNA up to 23 fold, crizotinib may also induce CYP2B or
`CYP2C eneymes, which may subsequently decrease the drug concentrations of the substrates of
`these enzymes. The ongoing in vitro evaluations induction potential of crizotinib on CYP2B and
`CYP2C enzymes may answer whether dose adjustments are needed for coadministration with
`CYP2B or CYP2C substrates with crizotinib.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 7 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`The study is in vitro screening study using biomaterials such as hepatocytes.
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 8 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 9 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`NDA 202570 (Crizotinib)
`PMR/PMC Ophthalmology
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR Description:
`1789-4
`
`Clinical trial (existing trial or new clinical trial) in which at least 30
`patients are studied. The following examinations should be performed
`in these patients at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after drug administration
`and 2-8 weeks after discontinuation of the therapy (single visit post
`therapy).
`
`
`1. Best corrected distance visual acuity
`2. Refractive error associated with best corrected distance visual
`acuity
`3. Pupil size under standardized lighting conditions
`4. Slit lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior segment
`5. Intraocular pressure
`6. Ocular coherence tomography of the macula
`7. Dilated fundus photography of the retina
`
`
`
` 10/2011
` 12/2013
` 06/2014
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
`X Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`Additional ophthalmology examinations and tests will further clarify the significance and long term
`effects of these visual symptoms.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 10 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`Visual disturbances associated with the use of crizotinib occurred in the majority of patients taking
`the drug product. These events have not been well characterized and included diplopia,
`photopsia, photophobia, vision blurred, visual field defect, visual impairment, vitreous
`floaters, visual brightness, and visual acuity reduced.
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
`X FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`X Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`X Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` X
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`Clinical trial (existing trial or new clinical trial) in which at least 30 patients are studied.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 11 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`X Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`X Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`X Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug
`quality.
`
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 12 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`Attachment B: Sample PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`
`PMR Description:
`1789-5
`
`Complete the ECG sub-study in trial A8081007 and submit the final study
`report, along with a thorough review of cardiac safety data to address any
`potential impact of crizotinib on QTc interval prolongation in patients.
`
`
`
`Final Protocol Submission
`Trial Completion Date:
`Final Report Submission Date:
`Other:
`
`
`09/2009 (submitted)
`12/2013
`06/2014
`MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones:
`
`
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`Crizotinib appears to prolong the QTC interval. However, the QTc evalaution of crizotinib
`in trials A8081001 and A8081005 is inconclusive, due to ECG acquisition and
`interpretation issues. Large increases in QT interval (i.e., ~20 ms) can not be reliably
`excluded. The IRT-QTc review team recommends this PMR, based on previous agreement
`with the sponsor, to complete and submit a ongoing dedicated QTc assessment at 250 mg
`BID in the ECG sub-study in trial A8081007 to gain reliable estimation of QT effect size,
`especially if indications other than NSCLC with different benefit-risk balances are being
`pursued.
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 13 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`
`
`Based on the QTc evalaution of crizotinib in trials A8081001 and A8081005, crizotinib
`appears to be associated with concentration-dependent QT interval prolongation (P <
`0.001).
`The QT-IRT recommends a PMR to complete and submit an ongoing dedicated QTc
`assessment at 250 mg BID in the ECG-substudy in trial A8081007 to gain reliable
`estimation of QT effect size.
`
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 8/24/2011
`
`Page 14 of 43
`
`Reference ID: 3005826
`
`

`

`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`Time-matched PK/ECGs samples will be collected in 40 patients in the treatment Arm A (250 mg
`crizotinib BID) of Phase 3 trial 1007. In this ECG sub-study, all post-screening ECGs will be read
`in a blinded fashion by a central reader. The ECG recordings will be transferred digitally to a
`central reader where they will be stripped of any information which could permit identification of
`the patient, site, date or time. The ECGs will be evaluated for interval assessments including PR,
`QT, RR and QRS.
`Based upon the standard deviation of change from baseline of QTc of 16 ms (Study A8081001), a
`total sample size of 40 patients from both Studies A8081007 (Arm A) and A8081005 should be
`sufficient for greater than 90% probability that all five boundaries of upper one-sided 95%
`confidence intervals for the change from baseline of QTc at all five QTc sampling time points on
`Cycle 2 Day 1 are under 20 ms, assuming the true change from baseline in QTc is 10 ms.
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`QT prolongation assessment using open-label, non-thorough QT study design.
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket