throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
` Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-010
`
`
`
`
`
` SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`REMS MODIFICATION APPROVAL
`
`
`
`PF Prism C.V.
`
`
`c/o Pfizer Inc.
`
`500 Arcola Road
`
`Collegeville, PA 19426
`
`
`Attention: Alicia Holsey, MS, RAC
`
`
`Senior Manager, Worldwide Safety and Regulatory
`
`
`
`Dear Ms. Holsey:
`
`
`
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated December 19, 2014,
`
`received December 19, 2014, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
`
`
`
`Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for Xeljanz (tofacitinib) 5 mg Tablets.
`
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your amendments dated April 16, and 24, May 18, June 16, and 19,
`
`2015.
`
`
`
`
`This Prior Approval supplemental new drug application provides for revisions to the
`
`
`
`WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS, USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS, and CLINICAL
`
`
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGY, sections of the package insert as well as revisions to the Medication Guide
`
`
`
`
`to include information regarding the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients in Japan. This
`
`
`
`supplemental new drug application also provides for proposed modifications to the approved risk
`
`evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS).
`
`
`APPROVAL & LABELING
`
`We have completed our review of this supplemental application, as amended. It is approved,
`
`effective on the date of this letter, for use as recommended in the enclosed, agreed-upon labeling
`
`
`text.
`
`
`WAIVER OF HIGHLIGHTS SECTION
`
`
`Please note that we have previously granted a waiver of the requirements of 21 CFR
`
`
`
`201.57(d)(8) regarding the length of Highlights of prescribing information.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-010
`
` Page 2
`
`
` CONTENT OF LABELING
`
`
`
`As soon as possible, but no later than 14 days from the date of this letter, submit the content of
`
`
`
`
`
`labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format using the FDA
`
`automated drug registration and listing system (eLIST), as described at
`
`
`http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm. Content
`of labeling must be identical to the enclosed labeling (text for the package insert and the
`
`Medication Guide), with the addition of any labeling changes in pending “Changes Being
`Effected” (CBE) supplements, as well as annual reportable changes not included in the enclosed
`
`
`labeling.
`
`
`Information on submitting SPL files using eList may be found in the guidance for industry titled
`
`
`
`“SPL Standard for Content of Labeling Technical Qs and As at
`
`
`
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
`CM072392.pdf.
`
`
`
`
`The SPL will be accessible from publicly available labeling repositories.
`
`
`
`
`Also within 14 days, amend all pending supplemental applications that includes labeling changes
`
`
`for this NDA, including CBE supplements for which FDA has not yet issued an action letter,
`
`
`
`
`
`with the content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in MS Word format, that includes the
`changes approved in this supplemental application, as well as annual reportable changes and
`
`
`annotate each change. To facilitate review of your submission, provide a highlighted or marked-
`
`up copy that shows all changes, as well as a clean Microsoft Word version. The marked-up copy
`
`
`should provide appropriate annotations, including supplement number(s) and annual report
`
`date(s).
`
`
`
`We request that the labeling approved today be available on your website within 10 days of
`
`receipt of this letter.
`
`
`REQUIRED PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS
`
`Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new
`
`
`active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of
`
`
`
`administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the
`
`
`product for the claimed indication(s) in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived,
`
`
`deferred, or inapplicable.
`
`
`Because none of these criteria apply to your application, you are exempt from this requirement.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`The REMS for Xeljanz (tofacitinib) was originally approved on November 6, 2012, and the most
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recent modification was approved on February 11, 2015. The REMS consists of a
`
`
`
`
`communication plan and a timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS. Your
`
`
`proposed modifications to the REMS consists of revised communication plan materials to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-010
`
` Page 3
`
`
` include information regarding the increased risk of herpes zoster in Japanese patients treated
`
` with Xeljanz (tofacitinib).
`
`
`Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on June 19, 2015, and appended to this letter, is
`
`approved.
`
`
`
`
`
`The modified REMS consists of a communication plan and a timetable for submission of
`
`
`assessments of the REMS. The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS may
`
`
`remain the same as that approved on November 6, 2012.
`
`
`
`We remind you that in addition to the REMS assessments submitted according to the timetable in
`
`the approved REMS, you must include an adequate rationale to support a proposed REMS
`
`
`modification for the addition, modification, or removal of any of goal or element of the REMS,
`
`
`as described in section 505-1(g)(4) of the FDCA.
`
`
`
`We also remind you that you must submit a REMS assessment when you submit a supplemental
`
`application for a new indication for use as described in section 505-1(g)(2)(A). This assessment
`
`should include:
`
`
`
`
`a) An evaluation of how the benefit-risk profile will or will not change with the new
`
`
`indication;
`
`
`b) A determination of the implications of a change in the benefit-risk profile for the current
`
`
`REMS;
`c) If the new indication for use introduces unexpected risks: A description of those risks
`
`
`
`and an evaluation of whether those risks can be appropriately managed with the currently
`
`approved REMS.
`
`d) If a REMS assessment was submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`
`
`supplemental application for a new indication for use: A statement about whether the
`
`
`
`
`REMS was meeting its goals at the time of that the last assessment and if any
`
`modifications of the REMS have been proposed since that assessment.
`
`e) If a REMS assessment has not been submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`
`
`
`supplemental application for a new indication for use: Provision of as many of the
`
`
`currently listed assessment plan items as is feasible.
`f) If you propose a REMS modification based on a change in the benefit-risk profile or
`
`
`because of the new indication of use, submit an adequate rationale to support the
`modification, including: Provision of the reason(s) why the proposed REMS
`
`
`
`
`modification is necessary, the potential effect on the serious risk(s) for which the REMS
`
`
`was required, on patient access to the drug, and/or on the burden on the health care
`delivery system; and other appropriate evidence or data to support the proposed change.
`Additionally, include any changes to the assessment plan necessary to assess the
`proposed modified REMS. If you are not proposing REMS modifications, provide a
`
`
`
`
`rationale for why the REMS does not need to be modified.
`
`
`
`
`If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
`
`
`the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`
`instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-010
`
` Page 4
`
`
` specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
`
`
` assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`
` new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
` unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`
`
` REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`
` submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`
`
` in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`
`NDA 203214 REMS CORRESPONDENCE
`
`
`(insert concise description of content in bold capital letters, e.g.,
`
`
`UPDATE TO REMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - ASSESSMENT
`
`
`METHODOLOGY
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`Prominently identify any submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`
`
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`
`
`NDA203214 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203214/S-000 CHANGES BEING EFFECTED IN
`
`30 DAYS
`
`PROPOSED MINOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`
`Or
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203214/S-000 PRIOR APPROVAL
`
`
`SUPPLEMENT
`
`
`PROPOSED MAJOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`or
`
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203214/S-000 PRIOR APPROVA SUPPLEMENT
`
`
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATIONS DUE TO SAFETY LABEL CHANGES
`
`SUBMITTED IN SUPPLEMENT XXX
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE) FOR NDA 203214/S-000
`
`REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`
`
`
`
`Should you choose to submit a REMS revision, prominently identify the submission containing
`
`the REMS revisions with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the first page
`
`of the submission:
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` REMS REVISIONS FOR NDA203214
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-010
`
` Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To facilitate review of your submission, we request that you submit your proposed modified
`
`REMS and other REMS-related materials in Microsoft Word format. If certain documents, such
`
`
`as enrollment forms, are only in PDF format, they may be submitted as such, but the preference
`
`
`
`
`is to include as many as possible in Word format.
`
`
`
`If you do not submit electronically, please send 5 copies of REMS-related submissions
`
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
` We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`
`
`
` (21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
` If you have any questions, call Sadaf Nabavian, Senior Regulatory Project Manager, at (301)
`
`
` 796-2777.
`
`
`
` Sincerely,
`
` {See appended electronic signature page}
`
` Sally Seymour, MD
`
` Deputy Director for Safety
`
`
` Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Rheumatology
`
` Products
` Office of Drug Evaluation II
`
`
` Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURES:
`
`Content of Labeling
`
`
`REMS
`
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`SALLY M SEYMOUR
`06/19/2015
`
`Reference ID: 3782156
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket