throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
` Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-008
`
`
`SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`
` REMOVE REMS ELEMENT
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT PLAN REVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`PF PRISM C.V.
`
`
`c/o Pfizer, Inc.
`
`445 Eastern Road
`
`Groton, CT 06340
`
`
`
`Attention: James T. Mayne, PhD, DABT
`
`
`Senior Director, Worldwide Safety and Regulatory
`
`
`
`Dear Dr. Mayne:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated and received November
`
`
`
`
`
`7, 2014, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA)
`
`
`
`for Xeljanz (tofacitinib) 5 mg tablets.
`
`
`
`
`
`We also refer to our REMS Modification Notification letter, dated September 9, 2014, in which
`
`
`
`we notified you that the Medication Guide should be removed as an element of the REMS to
`
`
`decrease the burden on the healthcare delivery system of complying with the REMS. We also
`
`
`notified you that the REMS assessment plan should be revised.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This Prior Approval Supplemental New Drug Application proposes to eliminate the requirement
`
`
`
`for the approved Medication Guide as an element of the approved Xeljanz REMS.
`
`
`
`We have completed our review of this supplemental application. It is approved, effective on the
`
`date of this letter.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY REQUIREMENTS
`
`The REMS for Xeljanz (tofacitinib) was originally approved on November 6, 2012, and REMS
`
`
`
`
`modifications were approved on November 8, 2013 and March 26, 2014. The REMS consists of
`
`
`
`
`
`a Medication Guide, communication plan, and timetable for submission of assessment of the
`
`
`REMS.
`
`
`Your proposed modification to the REMS consists of eliminating the requirement for the
`
`
`
`Medication Guide as an element of the REMS.
`
`
`
`We have determined that maintaining the Medication Guide as part of the approved labeling is
`
`
`adequate to address the serious and significant public health concern and meets the standard in
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3700802
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` NDA 203214/S-008
`
` Page 2
`
`
` 21 CFR 208.1. Therefore, it is no longer necessary to include the Medication Guide as an
`
`
`
`
` element of the approved REMS to ensure that the benefits of Xeljanz (tofacitinib) outweigh the
`
` risks.
`
`
`
`Therefore, we agree with your proposal, and a Medication Guide is no longer required as part of
`
`the REMS for Xeljanz (tofacitinib).
`
`
`Your proposed modified REMS submitted on November 7, 2014 and appended to this letter is
`
`approved.
`
`
`
`
`The modified REMS consists of a communication plan and a timetable for submission of
`
`
`assessments for the REMS.
`
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that the Medication Guide will continue to be part of the approved labeling for
`
`Xeljanz (tofacitinib) in accordance with 21 CFR 208.
`
`The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS will remain the same as that approved
`
`
`on November 6, 2012.
`
`
`REMS ASSESSMENT PLAN
`
`
`Our March 26, 2014, Supplement Approval/REMS Modification Approval, letter described the
`
`
`REMS assessment plan. As described in our September 9, 2014, letter, the REMS assessment
`
`
`plan should be revised to remove the Survey of Patient Knowledge and Understanding since the
`
`
`
`REMS goals will be revised to only include healthcare providers.
`
`
`The revised REMS assessment plan should include, but is not limited to the following:
`
`
`
`
`i. A survey of physicians’ knowledge and understanding of the serious risks of tofacitinib
`
`
`will be made.
`
`
`
`ii. A survey of pharmacists’ knowledge and understanding of the serious risks of
`
`
`tofacitinib will be made.
`
`
`
`
`iii. An assessment and conclusions regarding the success of the REMS in meeting the
`
`stated goals will be made.
`
`
`
`
`iv. An assessment of the communication plan including:
`
`o The source(s) of the list of healthcare professionals to whom the Dear Healthcare Provider
`
`
`
`
`
` Letter, Dear Pharmacist Letter are distributed
`
`
`
` Journal information pieces published, including date and journal name, volume, and issue
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o
`
`o The date of launch of the communication plan (Dear Healthcare Provider Letter, Dear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pharmacist Letter, website, and journal information pieces)
`
`Reference ID: 3700802
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203214/S-008
`
` Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`o The number of recipients of the Dear Healthcare Provider and Dear Pharmacist Letters
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o Date(s) of distribution of the Dear Healthcare Provider and Dear Pharmacist Letters
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o The number of returned and refused letters
`
`
`
`
`
`
` The requirements for assessments of an approved REMS under section 505-1(g)(3) include with
`respect to each goal included in the strategy, an assessment of the extent to which the approved
`strategy, including each element of the strategy, is meeting the goal or whether 1 or more such
`
`
`
`
`
`goals or such elements should be modified.
`
`
`In addition to the assessments submitted according to the timetable included in the approved
`REMS, you must submit a REMS assessment and may propose a modification to the approved
`REMS when you submit a supplemental application for a new indication for use as described in
`section 505-1(g)(2)(A) of FDCA.
`
`
`If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
`
`
`the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`
`instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`
`
`specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
`
`
`
`assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`
`
`
`new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
`
`unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`
`
`
`REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`
`submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`
`
`in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`
`NDA 203214 REMS CORRESPONDENCE
`
`
`
`(insert concise description of content in bold capital letters, e.g.,
`
`
`UPDATE TO REMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - ASSESSMENT
`
`
`METHODOLOGY)
`
`
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`
`Prominently identify the submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`
`NDA 203214 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203214
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE)
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3700802
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203214/S-008
`
` Page 4
`
`
`
` FOR NDA 203214
`
`
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT
`
` PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If you do not submit electronically, please send 5 copies of REMS-related submissions.
`
`
`REQUIRED PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS
`
`
`
` Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new
` active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of
`
`
` administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the
`
`
` product for the claimed indication(s) in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived,
`
`
`
` deferred, or inapplicable.
`
`
`
`
`Because none of these criteria apply to your application, you are exempt from this requirement.
`
` REPORTING REQUIREMETNS
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21
`
`
`
`CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Carol F. Hill, Safety Regulatory Health Project Manager, at (301)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`796-1226.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`
`Sally Seymour, MD
`
`Deputy Director for Safety
`
`
`Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Rheumatology
`
`Products
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation II
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURES:
`
`REMS
`
`
`Reference ID: 3700802
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`CAROL F HILL
`02/11/2015
`
`SALLY M SEYMOUR
`02/11/2015
`
`Reference ID: 3700802
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket