throbber
Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 103
`
`
`
`Ethan E. Litwin (admitted pro hac vice)
`Morgan J. Feder (admitted pro hac vice)
`Sigrid U. Jernudd (admitted pro hac vice)
`HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
`One Battery Park Plaza
`New York, New York 10004-1482
`Tel: (212) 837-6000
`Fax: (212) 422-4726
`Email: Ethan.Litwin@hugheshubbard.com
`Email: Morgan.Feder@hugheshubbard.com
`Email: Sigrid.Jernudd@hugheshubbard.com
`
`David H. Stern (CA Bar No. 196408)
`Carolin Sahimi (CA Bar No. 260312)
`HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3442
`Tel: (213) 613-2800
`Fax: (213) 613-2950
`Email: David.Stern@hugheshubbard.com
`Email: Carolin.Sahimi@hugheshubbard.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Soshin Electric Co., Ltd. and
`Soshin Electronics of America Inc.
`
`
`
`IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`
`DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION;
`
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA,
`INC.’S INDIVIDUAL ACTION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD
`
`DEFENDANTS SOSHIN ELECTRIC
`CO., LTD. AND SOSHIN
`ELECTRONICS OF AMERICA,
`INC.’S AMENDED ANSWER TO
`DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’
`CONSOLIDATED SECOND
`AMENDED CLASS ACTION
`COMPLAINT and COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL
`USA, INC.
`
`
`
`
`Defendants Soshin Electric Co., Ltd. (“Soshin Japan”) and Soshin Electronics of America
`
`Inc. (“Soshin America”; collectively, the “Soshin Defendants”), by and through counsel, hereby
`
`submit their Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ (“DPPs”)
`
`Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Complaint of Flextronics International
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`USA, Inc. filed July 22, 2015 (the “Complaint”). The Soshin Defendants deny all allegations set
`
`forth in the Complaint except to the extent such allegations are specifically admitted below.
`I.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. The Soshin
`
`Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint in their
`
`entirety, except that they admit that DPPs purport to bring this civil action on behalf of certain
`
`entities and assert various claims.
`
`AMENDED ANSWER: To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the
`
`Complaint relate to entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge
`
`or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. The
`
`Soshin Defendants do not make or sell aluminum or tantalum capacitors. Pursuant to the
`
`concessions made by Plaintiffs at the April 15, 2016 Case Management Conference, the Soshin
`
`Defendants will interpret the term “Capacitors” as used in the Complaint as referring solely to
`
`“single unit, unprocessed…free-standing capacitor[s] [that are not] put into anything else.”
`
`(Transcript of Apr. 15, 2016 Case Management Conference (“CMC Tr.”) at 15:23-25.). For the
`
`avoidance of doubt, the Soshin Defendants note that a “Capacitor” is able to perform on a standalone
`
`basis by itself, in contrast to other more complex components that require other devices to be
`
`combined with a Capacitor into a module in order for them to deliver the required performance. The
`
`Soshin Defendants’ responses herein to allegations regarding “Capacitors” use this amended
`
`definition. The Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the
`
`Complaint in their entirety, except that they admit that DPPs purport to bring this civil action on
`
`behalf of certain entities and assert various claims.
`
`-2-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`The Soshin Defendants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the
`
`Complaint in their entirety, except that they admit that electrical current flowing through a circuit,
`
`including a PCB, allows electrical devices to perform their functions.
`
`3.
`
`The Soshin Defendants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the
`
`Complaint in their entirety, except that they admit that the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of
`
`the Complaint provide a generally accurate description of electrical circuits.
`
`4.
`
`The Soshin Defendants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of the
`
`Complaint in their entirety, except that they admit that demand has risen for electrical components as
`
`dependence on consumer technology has grown.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit the allegations of Paragraph 5.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. The Soshin
`
`Defendants admit that film capacitors can cost as little as a fraction of a cent and that such capacitors
`
`represent a small fraction of the overall cost of the products containing them. The Soshin
`
`Defendants deny all remaining allegations of Paragraph 6.
`
`7.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint are
`
`conclusory and/or opinion-based, or constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not
`
`susceptible to admission or denial. The Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained
`
`in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint in their entirety.
`
`8.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`-3-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 4 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint in their
`
`entirety.
`
`9.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint in their
`
`entirety.
`
`AMENDED ANSWER: To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the
`
`Complaint relate to entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge
`
`or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the
`
`extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-
`
`based, or constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or
`
`denial. The Soshin Defendants aver that the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has
`
`informed Soshin that insofar as its investigation concerns the film capacitor industry, such
`
`investigation has been closed without any finding against any film Capacitor manufacturer. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint in their
`
`entirety.
`
`10.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`-4-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 5 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`11.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`12.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`13.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`-5-
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 6 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`14.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`15.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 15 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`16.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`17.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`-6-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 7 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`18.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 18 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`19.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 19 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 of the Complaint in
`
`their entirety.
`
`20.
`
`To the extent that the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 of the Complaint relate to
`
`entities other than the Soshin Defendants, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them. To the extent that the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 20 of the Complaint are conclusory and/or opinion-based, or
`
`constitute legal contentions and/or conclusions, they are not susceptible to admission or denial. The
`
`Soshin Defendants otherwise deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 of the Complaint in
`
`-7-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 8 of 103
`
`
`
`their entirety.
`
`
`
`II.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`21.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit that Plaintiffs purport to bring this civil action on
`
`behalf of certain entities and assert various claims in antitrust law. The Soshin Defendants otherwise
`
`deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 21 of the Complaint.
`
`22.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit that Flextronics purports to bring this action on behalf
`
`of itself and its related corporate entities and asserts various claims under federal and state law. The
`
`Soshin Defendants further admit that this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Flextronics’
`
`California state law claims. The Soshin Defendants deny the balance of the allegations of Paragraph
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit that this Court has jurisdiction over this action.
`
`AMENDED ANSWER: The Soshin Defendants admit that this Court has subject-matter
`
`jurisdiction over this action.
`
`24.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit that venue is proper in this judicial district. The Soshin
`
`Defendants deny the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 24.
`
`AMENDED ANSWER: Following Plaintiffs’ concessions at the April 15, 2016 Case
`
`Management Conference, which narrowed the scope of products relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims, the
`
`Soshin Defendants deny that this Court may exercise general or specific personal jurisdiction over
`
`the Soshin Defendants. The Soshin Defendants deny the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 24.
`
`25.
`
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 25, and therefore deny them, except
`
`that they admit that the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is conducting
`
`an investigation into the capacitors industry out of the United States Attorney’s Office for the
`
`District of Northern California.
`-8-
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 9 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDED ANSWER: The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient
`
`to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 25, and therefore
`
`deny them, except that they admit that the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice
`
`(“DOJ”) is conducting an investigation into the capacitors industry out of the United States
`
`Attorney’s Office for the District of Northern California. The Soshin Defendants aver that the DOJ
`
`has informed Soshin that insofar as its investigation concerns the film Capacitor industry, such
`
`investigation has been closed without any finding against any film Capacitor manufacturer.
`
`26.
`
`The Soshin Defendants admit that the assignment of this case to the San Francisco
`
`Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is proper. The
`
`Soshin Defendants deny the balance of the allegations of Paragraph 26.
`
`III.
`
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`27.
`
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 27, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`28.
`
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 28, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`29.
`
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 29, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`30.
`
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 30, and therefore deny them in their
`
`-9-
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 10 of 103
`
`
`
`entirety.
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Flextronics International U.S.A., Inc.
`31.
`The Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 31 and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`C.
`
`Defendants
`1. Panasonic/SANYO
`
`32.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 32 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 32 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`33.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 33 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 33 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`34.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 34 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 34 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`35.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 35 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`-10-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 11 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`Paragraph 35 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`36.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 36 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 36 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`2. NEC TOKIN
`
`37.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 37 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 37 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`38.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 38 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 38 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`39.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 39 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 39 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`-11-
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 12 of 103
`
`
`
`3. KEMET
`
`
`
`40.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 40 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 40 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`41.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 41 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 41 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`42.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 42 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 42 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`43.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 43 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 43 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`44.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 44 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 44 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`-12-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 13 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`4. Nippon Chemi-Con
`
`45.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 45 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 45 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`46.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 46 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 46 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`47.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 47 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 47 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`5. Hitachi
`
`48.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 48 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 48 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`-13-
`
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 14 of 103
`
`
`
`entirety.
`
`
`
`49.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 49 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 49 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`50.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 50 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 50 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`51.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 51 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 51 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`52.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 52 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 52 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth or falsity, and therefore deny them in their
`
`entirety.
`
`6. Fujitsu
`
`53.
`
`The allegations contained in Paragraph 53 of the Complaint are not addressed to the
`
`Soshin Defendants, and therefore no response is required. To the extent that the allegations in
`
`-14-
`SOSHIN DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ANSWER TO DPPS’ CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLAINT OF
`FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. 3:14-CV-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1197 Filed 04/26/16 Page 15 of 103
`
`
`
`
`
`Paragraph 53 are deemed to require a response, the Soshin Defendants lack knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to their

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket