throbber

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`[Counsel listed on signature pages]
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`
`ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS
`
`Case No. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISMISSING
`PLAINTIFFS’ SHERMAN ACT CLAIMS
`FOR FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS [ECF
`No. 915]
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 10
`
`
`
`The Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) and undersigned Defendants hereby stipulate as
`
`follows:
`
`WHEREAS, on September 30, 2016, the Court issued its Order re Phase I of Summary
`
`Judgment on Foreign Transactions (the “Phase I Order”) resolving certain of the “parties’
`
`disagreements about the scope of the import exclusion and proximate cause for the domestic
`
`effects exception to the FTAIA,” see Phase I Order at 3, which were briefed by the parties in
`
`connection with Defendants’ Joint Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiffs’
`
`Sherman Act Claims For Foreign Transactions. See ECF No. 915 (Defendants’ “Motion of
`
`Summary Judgment”).
`
`WHEREAS, the Phase I Order resolved certain disputes between Defendants and DPPs
`
`with respect to three categories of transactions in particular: (1) “Capacitors Billed To Entities In
`
`The U.S.”; (2) “Capacitors Billed To Foreign Entities But Shipped To The U.S.”; and (3)
`
`“Capacitors Billed And Shipped To A Foreign Entity.” See Phase I Order at 5-11.
`
`WHEREAS, with respect to the category of “Capacitors Billed And Shipped To A
`
`Foreign Entity,” the Court held that “the Sherman Act claims of foreign purchasers who were
`
`invoiced and received their capacitors abroad are not barred as a matter of law, but they may not
`
`allege a claim on the basis of a global pricing theory.” See Phase I Order at 8-11. The Court
`
`further ordered a second phase of summary judgment briefing with respect to this category of
`
`transactions, after which the Court would “apply these legal determinations to the record and end
`
`in a final order on defendants’ requests for summary judgment under the FTAIA.” Id. at 3.
`
`WHEREAS, the DPPs disagree with the Court’s Order as to the category of “Capacitors
`
`Billed And Shipped To A Foreign Entity,” and expressly reserve their rights to appeal the Court’s
`
`Order at a later date; and
`
`WHEREAS, the DPPs intend to seek certification of damage claims only on behalf of the
`
`class as defined by the Court’s Phase I Order: a class limited to purchases of capacitors that are
`
`billed to entities in the U.S., as well as purchases of capacitors billed to foreign entities but
`
`shipped to the U.S.;
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 3 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 3 of 10
`
`
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the DPPs and
`the undersigned Defendants, subject to the concurrence of the Court, that:
`1.
`Upon the Court’s endorsement of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, the
`Court’s Phase I Order shall constitute a final order with respect to Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment with respect to DPPs’ claims of foreign purchasers who were invoiced and
`received their capacitors outside the United States. Such an order does not affect or limit DPPs’
`rights or timing to seek appellate review or Defendants’ rights to oppose any such appellate
`proceeding.
`2.
`The Phase II FTAIA briefing schedule for the DPP action, and related hearing date
`scheduled for March 23, 2017, are hereby vacated with respect to the undersigned Defendants.
`See Amended Scheduling Order, ECF No. 1405.
`The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this
`stipulation as an order.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Honorable James Donato
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`January 11, 2017
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 4 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 4 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeffrey L. Kessler
`
`
`Jeffrey L. Kessler
`A. Paul Victor
`Molly M. Donovan
`Mollie C. Richardson
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10166
`Telephone: (212) 294-4698
`Facsimile: (212) 294-4700
`jkessler@winston.com
`pvictor@winston.com
`mmdonovan@winston.com
`mrichardson@winston.com
`
`Ian L. Papendick
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: (415) 591-6905
`Fax: (415) 591-1400
`ipapendick@winston.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, SANYO
`Electric Co., Ltd., and SANYO North America
`Corporation
`
`/s/ Bruce D. Sokler
`
`
`Bruce D. Sokler
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO PC
`701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20004
`T: 202-434-7303
`F: 202-434-7400
`bdsokler@mintz.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant AVX Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 5 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 5 of 10
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Heather S. Tewksbury
`
`
`Heather S. Tewksbury
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
`AND DORR, LLP
`950 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: 650-858-6134
`F: 650-858-6100
`heather.tewksbury@wilmerhale.com
`
`Attorney for Defendants Elna Co. Ltd. and Elna
`America Inc.
`
`
`
`/s/ Chul Pak
`
`
`Chul Pak (admitted pro hac vice)
`Jeffrey C. Bank (admitted pro hac vice)
`Justin A. Cohen (admitted pro hac vice)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`T: 212-497-7726
`F: 212-999-5899
`cpak@wsgr.com
`jbank@wsgr.com
`jcohen@wsgr.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants, Hitachi Chemical Co.,
`Ltd., Hitachi Chemical Co. America, Ltd., and
`Hitachi AIC Inc.
`
`/s/ Eric P. Enson
`
`
`Jeffrey A. LeVee
`Eric P. Enson
`Rachel H. Zernik
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071.2300
`T: 213-489-3939
`F: 213-243-2539
`jlevee@JonesDay.com
`epenson@JonesDay.com
`rzernik@JonesDay.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Holy Stone Enterprise
`Co., Ltd. Holystone International, and Vishay
`Polytech Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 6 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 6 of 10
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Michael E. Martinez
`
`Scott M. Mendel
`Steven M. Kowal
`Michael E. Martinez
`Lauren N. Norris
`Brian J. Smith
`K&L GATES LLP
`70 West Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Telephone: (312) 372-1121
`Facsimile: (312) 827-8000
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Nichicon Corporation
`Nichicon (America) Corporation
`
`
`
`5
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Roxane A. Polidora
`
`
`Roxane A. Polidora
`Jacob R. Sorensen
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
`PITTMAN LLP
`Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 983-1000
`Email: roxane.polidora@pillsburylaw.com
`jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants KEMET Corporation
`and KEMET Electronics Corporation
`
`/s/ Bonnie Lau
`
`
`Bonnie Lau
`DENTONS US LLP
`525 Market Street, 26th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`T: 415-882-5000
`F: 415- 882-0300
`bonnie.lau@dentons.com
`
`Attorney for Defendant Matsuo Electric Co.,
`Ltd.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 7 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 7 of 10
`
`
`
` /s/ Jarod M. Bona
`Jarod M. Bona
`Aaron R. Gott
`BONA LAW PC
`4275 Executive Square, #200
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`T: 858-964-4589
`F: 858-964-2301
`jarod.bona@bonalawpc.com
`aaron.gott@bonalawpc.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Taitsu Corporation
`and Taitsu America, Inc. 
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Djordje Petkoski
`
`
`Djordje Petkoski
`HUNTON AND WILLIAMS LLP
`2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20037
`T: 202-955-1500
`dpetkoski@hunton.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Rubycon Corporation
`and Rubycon America Inc.
`
`/s/ Joseph J. Bial
`
`
`Joseph J. Bial
`Eric R. Sega
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON, LLP
`2001 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1047
`jbial@paulweiss.com
`esega@paulweiss.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants United Chemi-Con,
`Inc. and Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation
`
`
`
`6
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 8 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 8 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Gaspare J. Bono
`
`
`Gaspare J. Bono
`Stephen M. Chippendale
`Claire M. Maddox
`Eric Y. Wu
`DENTONS US LLP
`1900 K St., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`T: 202-496-7500
`F: 202-496-7756
`gap.bono@dentons.com
`steve.chippendale@dentons.com
`claire.maddox@dentons.com
`eric.wu@dentons.com
`
`Andrew S. Azarmi
`DENTONS US LLP
`Spear Tower, One Market Plaza, 24th Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`T: 415-267-4000
`F: 415-356-3873
`andrew.azarmi@dentons.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Shinyei Kaisha,
`Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd., Shinyei Capacitor
`Co., Ltd., and Shinyei Corporation of America,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`7
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 9 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 9 of 10
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Darrell Prescott
`
`
`Darrell Prescott (admitted pro hac vice)
`Catherine Stillman (SBN 252440)
`452 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 626-4476
`Fax: (212) 310-1637
`Email: Darrell.Prescott@bakermckenzie.com
`Email: Catherine.Stillman@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Meghan E. Hausler(admitted pro hac vice)
`2300 Trammell Crow Center
`2001 Ross Avenue
`Dallas, TX 75201
`(214) 965-7219
`Fax: (214) 978-3099
`Email: Meghan.Hausler@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Colin H. Murray (SBN 159142)
`Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 591-3244
`Fax: (415) 576-3099
`Email: Colin.Murray@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Okaya Electric Industries Co., Ltd. and
`Okaya Electric America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2017
`
`/s/ Joseph R. Saveri
`
`Joseph R. Saveri
`Andrew M. Purdy
`Matthew S. Weiler
`James G. Dallal
`Ryan J. McEwan
`555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1210
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 500-6800
`Facsimile: (415) 395-9940
`jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com
`apurdy@saverilawfirm.com
`mweiler@saverilawfirm.com
`jdallal@saverilawfirm.com
`rmcewan@saverilawfirm.com
`
`Interim Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser
`Plaintiffs
`8
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1421 Filed 01/06/17 Page 10 of 10Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1426 Filed 01/11/17 Page 10 of 10
`
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing
`of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
`
`
`9
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PHASE II OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT – CASE NO. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket