throbber
Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 2933 Filed 04/22/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Civil Minutes
`
`Date: April 21, 2022
`
`Judge: Hon. James Donato
`
`Time: 26 Minutes
`
`Case Nos.
`
`3:17-md-02801-JD In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No. III)
`3:14-cv-03264-JD In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation
`3:17-cv-03472-JD The AASI Beneficiaries Trust, by and through Kenneth
`A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee v. AVX Corporation et al
`3:17-cv-07046-JD Avnet Incorporated v. Hitachi Chemical Company
`Limited et al
`3:17-cv-07047-JD Benchmark Electronics Incorporated et al v. AVX
`Corporation et al
`3:18-cv-02657-JD Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. ELNA Co., Ltd. et al
`3:19-cv-01902-JD Jaco Electronics Incorporated et al v. Nippon Chemi-
`Con Corporation et al
`
`
`Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s):
`
`Charles Tompkins/Robert Turken/Stuart Singer/
`Scott Wagner
`Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Eric Enson/Phil Vanderweele/Jeffrey Bank/Chris Johnstone/
`Kristen Harris/Danyll Foix/Gaspare Bono/Joseph Bial/
`Leah Hibbler/Todd Stenerson/Robert Kidwell/Bonnie Lau
`
`FTR: 10:31:09 - 10:57:08
`
`Deputy Clerk: Lisa Clark
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Status Conference for DAP cases -- Held
`
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`NOTES AND ORDERS
`
`
`All pending summary judgment motions in the Direct Action Plaintiff cases are denied for the
`reasons stated on the record.
`
`For the AASI, Avnet, and Benchmark plaintiffs’ Daubert motions filed at MDL Dkt. Nos. 623,
`625, and 630, the Court agrees with the parties’ joint suggestion at the hearing that they raise
`issues more suitable for resolution in a motion in limine. The Daubert motions are terminated
`without prejudice on that basis.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 2933 Filed 04/22/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`Because this completes the coordinated pretrial proceedings in this multi-district litigation (MDL
`No. 2801), the Court will file with the JPML a suggestion of remand. The Court will
`recommend that Case Nos. 17-7046 (Avnet), 17-7047 (Benchmark), and 19-1902 (Jaco) be
`transferred back to the District of Arizona, and Case No. 18-2657 (Arrow) to the District of
`Colorado. Case Nos. 17-3472 (AASI) and 14-3264 (Flextronics) will remain in this District.
`
`For the AASI case, No. 17-3472, the parties are directed to jointly file by May 23, 2022, a
`proposed ADR mechanism and timeline for the case, as well as any other case management
`proposals to bring that case to resolution.
`
`For the Flextronics case, No. 14-3264, the parties are directed to jointly file by May 6, 2022, a
`proposed trial date that would provide for the completion of the trial by September 2, 2022. The
`Court anticipates a trial of 2.5-3 weeks, with a 9 am-4 pm trial day schedule. The joint statement
`should also identify (with docket numbers) any remaining motions that are in need of the Court’s
`resolution prior to trial.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket