throbber
Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 937 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION.
`
`Case No. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`ORDER RE TOSHIN KOGYO CO.,
`LTD.
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 895
`
`
`
`
`
`In this consolidated antitrust action, defendant Toshin Kogyo Co., Ltd. has repeatedly
`
`failed to comply with the Northern District of California’s Civil Local Rules and this Court’s
`
`specific orders in this case, by filing virtually identical motions to dismiss no fewer than four
`
`times through a person who is not a member of the bar of this Court in violation of Civil Local
`
`Rule 3-9(b). Dkt. Nos. 430, 600, 816, 894. As a result, on September 28, 2015, the Court issued
`
`an order directing Toshin Kogyo to show cause, in writing and no later than October 13, 2015,
`
`why the Court should not impose upon Toshin Kogyo sanctions in the form of a pre-filing order
`
`restricting its ability to further file papers through Mr. Kasahara or any other person who is not a
`
`member of the bar of this Court. Dkt. No. 895.
`
`The Court has received no response. Consequently, the Court hereby orders that the
`
`Clerk’s Office must reject and return to the sender any papers that may be presented on behalf of
`
`Toshin Kogyo Co., Ltd., if they are submitted by Kenji Kasahara or any other person who is not a
`
`member of the bar of this Court.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: October 23, 2015
`
`________________________
`JAMES DONATO
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 937 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 14-cv-03264-JD
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`CHIP-TECH, LTD., et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
`
`District Court, Northern District of California.
`
`
`
`That on October 26, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
`
`placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
`
`depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
`
`receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
`
`
`
`Kenji Kasahara
`Representative Director of Toshin Kogyo Co., LTD
`Tsukas Bldg. 2-15-4, Uchikanda
`Chiyoda-Ku
`Tokyo, Japan,
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 26, 2015
`
`
`Susan Y. Soong
`Clerk, United States District Court
`
`
`
`By:________________________
`LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
`Honorable JAMES DONATO
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket