`Case: 23-15236, 08/21/2023, ID: 12777591, DktEntry: 74, Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`FILED
`
`
`AUG 21 2023
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
`
`No. 23-15236
`
`
`D.C. No. 4:21-cv-01721-YGR
`Northern District of California,
`Oakland
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff-Appellant,
`
`
`
`
`DEBORAH COONEY,
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of Court, United
`States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,
`Individually and in Her Official Capacity; et
`al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendants-Appellees.
`
`
`Before: SCHROEDER and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
`
`
`Appellant’s motion to strike (Docket Entry No. 71) is denied.
`
`Appellant’s amended motion for injunctive relief (Docket Entry Nos. 44 &
`
`54) is denied. See Feldman v. Ariz. Sec’y of State, 843 F.3d 366, 367 (9th Cir.
`
`2016) (“The standard for evaluating an injunction pending appeal is similar to that
`
`employed by district courts in deciding whether to grant a preliminary
`
`injunction.”); see also Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20
`
`(2008) (defining standard for preliminary injunction in district court).
`
`No motions for reconsideration of the denial of injunctive relief will be
`
`considered. Any further motions for injunctive relief are referred to the panel
`
`assigned to decide the merits of this appeal.
`
`OSA174
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-01721-YGR Document 331 Filed 08/21/23 Page 2 of 2
`Case: 23-15236, 08/21/2023, ID: 12777591, DktEntry: 74, Page 2 of 2
`
`Appellant’s motion to present oral argument (Docket Entry No. 68) is
`
`referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal.
`
`Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s orders setting the
`
`briefing schedule (Docket Entry No. 49) is denied. The existing briefing schedule
`
`remains in effect.
`
`
`
`OSA174
`
`2
`
`23-15236
`
`