throbber
Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 107 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 665
`Case 1:11—cv—00797—RGA Document 107
`Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 665
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`FastVDO LLC,
`
`v.
`
`Apple Inc., et al.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 11-797-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FASTVDO LLC'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANT
`
`TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff FastVDO LLC (“FastVDO”), by and through its undersigned attorneys, answers
`
`the counterclaims of Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (“Toshiba”) by corresponding
`
`paragraph number as follows:
`
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Parties
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Admitted.
`
`FastVDO admits that it is a Florida limited liability corporation with a principal
`
`place of business at 750 N. Atlantic Ave., Cocoa Beach, Florida 32391, and that it is the owner
`
`by assignment and merger of the ‘081 Patent.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`3.
`
`FastVDO admits that Toshiba purports to set forth counterclaims for declaratory
`
`judgment that it has not infringed the claims of the ‘081 patent and that the claims of the ‘O81
`
`patent are not Valid and/or enforceable. FastVDO denies the merits of Toshiba’s counterclaims
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 107 Filed 01/12/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 666
`Case 1:11—cv—00797—RGA Document 107
`Filed 01/12/12 Page 2 of 4 Page|D #: 666
`
`and that Toshiba is entitled to its requested relief.
`
`4.
`
`FastVDO admits that the counterclaims set forth by Toshiba arise under federal
`
`law and that this court has subject matter as alleged.
`
`5.
`
`FastVDO admits that it filed the First Amended Complaint on October 31, 2011,
`
`which alleged infringement of the ‘081 Patent against Toshiba America, Inc., that Toshiba
`
`America, Inc. was subsequently dismissed, and that Toshiba was added to the suit in its stead.
`
`FastVDO also admits that there is an actual and justiciable controversy between FastVDO and
`
`Toshiba regarding Toshiba’s infringement of the ‘081 Patent, as well as the validity and
`
`enforceability of the ‘081 Patent.
`
`6.
`
`Admitted.
`
`Declarato
`
`Jud ment — Noninfrin ement of the ‘081 atent
`
`First Counterclaim
`
`7.
`
`FastVDO incorporates by reference all of the allegations of its First Amended
`
`Complaint. FastVDO denies all of the allegations of Toshiba’s affirmative defenses. FastVDO
`
`incorporates its responses to paragraphs 1-6 of Toshiba’s counterclaims as though fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`10.
`
`Denied.
`
`Second Counterclaim
`
`Declarato
`
`Jud ment—Invalidi
`
`of the ‘081 atent
`
`ll.
`
`FastVDO incorporates by reference all of the allegations of its First Amended
`
`Complaint. FastVDO denies all of the allegations of Toshiba’s affirmative defenses. FastVDO
`
`incorporates its responses to paragraphs 1-10 of Toshiba’s counterclaims as though fully set forth
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 107 Filed 01/12/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 667
`Case 1:11—cv—00797—RGA Document 107
`Filed 01/12/12 Page 3 of 4 Page|D #: 667
`
`herein.
`
`12.
`
`Denied.
`
`13.
`
`Denied.
`
`Declarato
`
`Jud ment—Unenforceabili
`
`of the ‘081 atent
`
`Third Counterclaim
`
`14.
`
`FastVDO incorporates by reference all of the allegations of its First Amended
`
`Complaint. FastVDO denies all of the allegations of Toshiba’s affirmative defenses. FastVDO
`
`incorporates its responses to paragraphs 1-13 of Toshiba’s counterclaims as though fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`15.
`
`Denied.
`
`16.
`
`Denied.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, FastVDO prays for the following relief with regard to Toshiba’s
`
`counterclaims:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`A dismissal with prejudice of Toshiba’s counterclaims;
`
`An adjudication that Toshiba is not entitled to any relief on its counterclaims,
`
`including, without limitation, any fine or damages;
`
`C.
`
`Costs and such further relief to which FastVDO is entitled, and which the
`
`Court deems just and equitable.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`FastVDO demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 107 Filed 01/12/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 668
`Case 1:11—cv—00797-RGA Document 107
`Filed 01/12/12 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 668
`
`Date: January 12, 2012
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`
`Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. (Bar No. 100245)
`Brian E. Faman (Bar No. 4089)
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.corn
`
`Alexander C.D. Giza (admitted pro hac vice)
`Marc A. Fenster (admitted pro hac vice)
`Kevin P. Burke (admitted pro hac vice)
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025-1031
`(310) 826-7474
`agiza@raklaw.com
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`kburke@raklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaim‘zfi"FastVDO, LLC

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket