Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 862
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 8 Page|D #: 862
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 11—cv-00797-RGA
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`This __ day of May, 2012, the Court having conducted an initial Rule 16(b) scheduling
`
`conference pursuant to Local Rule l6.l(b), and the parties having determined after discussion that
`
`the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation, or binding
`
`arbitration;
`
`IT IS ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Initial Discovery.
`
`a.
`
`On or before June 6, 2012, the plaintiff shall, for each defendant, specifically
`
`identify the accused productsl and the asserted patent(s) they allegedly infringe, and produce the file
`
`history for each asserted patent.
`
`b.
`
`On or before August 6, 2012, each defendant shall produce to the plaintiff
`
`defendant’s core technical documents related to defendant’s accused product(s), including but not
`
`limited to operation manuals, product literature, schematics, and specifications.
`
`c.
`
`On or before August 6, 2012, the parties shall make their initial disclosures
`
`pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and comply with the “Initial Disclosures”
`
`requirements in Paragraph 3 of the Delaware Default Standardfor Discovery, Including Discovery of
`
`Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) to the extent that a party has discoverable information in
`
`1 For ease of reference, the word “product” encompasses accused methods and systems as well.
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 863
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 8 Page|D #: 863
`
`its possession, custody control, except that the custodians and non-custodial data sources identified
`
`by the parties do not need to be listed in order from the most likely to the least likely.
`
`d.
`
`On or before September 5, 2012, [Plaintiff’s Proposal: plaintiff shall
`
`produce to each defendant an initial claim chart relating each accused product to the asserted
`
`claims each product allegedly infringes] [Defendants’ Proposal: plaintiff shall produce to each
`
`defendant an initial claim chart relating each accused product to the asserted claims each
`
`product allegedly infringes by identifying specifically where each element of each asserted
`
`claim is found within each accused product and, to the extent that any element is allegedly met
`
`by a component provided by a third party supplier to the defendant, identifying the component
`
`by manufacturer name and the model number if possible].
`
`e.
`
`On or before October 5, 2012, each defendant shall produce to the plaintiff its
`
`initial invalidity contentions for each asserted claim, as well as the related invalidating references
`
`(e.g., publications, manuals, and patents).
`
`2.
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join other
`
`parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on or before August 31, 2012.
`
`Defendants may move to amend the pleadings to allege inequitable conduct on or before April 1,
`
`2013.
`
`3.
`
`Discovery.
`
`a.
`
`Discovery Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be initiated so that it
`
`will be completed on or before June 30, 2013.
`
`b.
`
`Document Production. Document production shall be substantially complete
`
`by February 8, 2013.
`
`0.
`
`Requests for Admission. A maximum of 25 common requests for admission
`
`are permitted for each side. Each Defendant Group (a Defendant Group consists of one or more
`
`defendants that are related corporate entities) is permitted up to 25 individual requests for admission
`
`to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff is permitted up to 25 individual requests for admission to each Defendant
`
`Group. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is no limitation on the number of requests for
`
`admission that a document is authentic and/or a business record.
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 864
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 3 of 8 Page|D #: 864
`
`d.
`
`Interrogatories. Plaintiff may serve a total of 15 joint interrogatories on
`
`Defendants collectively. Plaintiff may serve a total of 10 Defendant specific interrogatories per
`
`Defendant Group. Defendants may collectively serve 15 joint interrogatories on Plaintiff. Each
`
`Defendant Group may individually serve 10 additional Defendant specific interrogatories.
`
`e.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Fact Deposition Discovegg. Plaintiff may take up to
`
`35 hours of fact depositions of each defendant or defendant group. Defendants may collectively
`
`take up to 70 hours of fact depositions of Plaintiff. Defendants may collectively depose an
`
`inventor for [Plaintiffs Proposal: 10 hours, but no single Defendant shall be permitted more
`
`than 7 hours of deposition time per inventor] [Defendants' Proposal: 14 hours]. Each side
`
`may collectively take up to 140 hours of third party depositions. The foregoing limitations do
`
`not apply to depositions of experts. The foregoing limitations are without prejudice to the right
`
`of Plaintiff or the Defendants to request additional hours from the Court for good cause shown.
`
`f.
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders. Should
`
`counsel find they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective order,
`
`the parties involved in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall contact the Court’s Case
`
`Manager to schedule an in-person conference/argument. Unless otherwise ordered, by no later than
`
`forty—eight hours prior to the conference/argument, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a
`
`letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no
`
`later than twenty-four hours prior to the conference/argument, any party opposing the application for
`
`relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining that party’s reasons for its opposition.
`
`Should any document(s) be filed under seal, a courtesy copy of the sealed document(s) must be
`
`provided to the Court within one hour of e-filing the document(s).
`
`If a discovery—related motion is filed without leave ofthe Court, it will be denied without
`
`prejudice to the moving party’s right to bring the dispute to the Court through the discovery matters
`
`procedures set forth in this Order.
`
`g.
`
`Absent a showing of good cause, discovery shall be limited to a term of 6
`
`years before the filing of the complaint, except that discovery related to asserted prior art, standards-
`
`setting activities, licensing activities, or the conception and reduction to practice of the inventions
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 865
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 4 of 8 Page|D #: 865
`
`claimed in any patent-in-suit shall not be so limited.
`
`4.
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be necessary to
`
`apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of
`
`confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed
`
`form of order and submit it to the Court within 30 days from the date of this order. Should counsel be
`
`unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, counsel must follow the provisions of
`
`Paragraph 3(g) above.
`
`Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the disclosure
`of information in this case, the Court does not intend to preclude
`another court from finding that information may be relevant and
`subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to
`this order who becomes subject to a motion to disclose another
`party’s information designated as confidential pursuant to this order
`shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may
`have an opportunity to appear and be heard on whether that
`information should be disclosed.
`
`5.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. When filing papers under seal, counsel shall deliver to the
`
`Clerk an original and one copy of the papers. A redacted version of any sealed document shall be
`
`filed electronically within seven days of the filing of the sealed document.
`
`6.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two courtesy copies of all
`
`briefs and one courtesy copy of any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e., appendices,
`
`exhibits, declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal.
`
`7.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On or before November 5, 2012, the parties
`
`shall exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and their
`
`proposed claim construction of those term(s)/phrase(s). This document will not be filed with the
`
`Court. Subsequent to exchanging that list, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart to be filed no later than November 19, 2012. The Joint Claim Construction
`
`Chart, in Word or WordPerfect format, shall be e-mailed simultaneously with filing to
`
`rga_civil@ded.uscourts.gov. The parties’ Joint Claim Construction Chart should identify for the
`
`Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of the claim(s) in issue, and should include each party’s proposed
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 866
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 5 of 8 Page|D #: 866
`
`construction of the disputed claim language with citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support
`
`of their respective proposed constructions. A copy of the patent(s) in issue as well as those portions
`
`of the intrinsic record relied upon shall be submitted with this Joint Claim Construction Chart. In
`
`this joint submission, the parties shall not provide argument.
`
`8.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. The plaintiff shall serve, but not file, its opening brief,
`
`not to exceed 20 pages, on December 17, 2013. The defendants shall serve, but not file, their
`
`answering brief, not to exceed 30 pages, on January 21, 2013. The plaintiff shall serve, but not file,
`
`its reply brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on February 4, 2013. The defendants shall serve, but not file,
`
`its sur-reply brief, not to exceed 10 pages, on February 18, 2013. No later than February 25, 2013,
`
`the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall copy and paste their unfiled
`
`briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term in sequential order, in substantially the
`
`form below.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`A.
`
`Agreed-upon Constructions
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`[TERM 1]
`
`l.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiffs Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiffs Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur—Reply Position
`
`B.
`
`[TERM 2]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiffs Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiffs Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur—Reply Position
`
`Etc. The parties need not include any general summaries of the law relating to claim construction. If
`
`there are any materials that would be submitted in an appendix, the parties shall submit them in a
`
`Joint Appendix.
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 867
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 6 of 8 Page|D #: 867
`
`9.
`
`Hearing on Claim Construction. Beginning at 9:30 a.m. on March 22, 2013, the Court
`
`will hear argument on claim construction. Absent prior approval of the Court (which, if it is sought,
`
`must be done so by joint letter submission no later than the date on which answering claim
`
`construction briefs are due), the parties shall not present testimony at the argument, and the argument
`
`shall not exceed a total of three hours.
`
`10.
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`a.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof on the subject
`
`matter, the initial Federal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before [Plaintiff’s
`
`Proposal: June'21] [Defendants’ Proposal: July 19], 2013. The supplemental disclosure to
`
`contradict or rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before
`
`[Plaintiff’s Proposal: July 19] [Defendants’ Proposal: August 19], 2013. Reply expert reports
`
`from the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before [Plaintiff’s Proposal: August 9]
`
`[Defendants’ Proposal: September 9], 2013. No other expert reports will be permitted without
`
`either the consent of all parties or leave of the Court. Along with the submissions of the expert
`
`reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times of their experts’ availability for deposition.
`
`Depositions of experts shall be completed on or before [Plaintiff’s Proposal: August 30]
`
`[Defendants’ Proposal: October 18], 2013.
`
`b. Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made
`
`pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993),
`
`as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made by motion no later than the
`
`deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
`
`11.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions, an opening brief, and
`
`affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before [Plaintiff’s
`
`Proposal: September 30] [Defendants’ Proposal: November 29], 2013. No case dispositive
`
`motion under Rule 56 may be filed more than ten days before the above date without leave of the
`
`Court.
`
`12.
`
`Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to the
`
`Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement required
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 868
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 7 of 8 Page|D #: 868
`
`by Local Rule 7.1.1.
`
`13.
`
`Pretrial Conference. On [Plaintiff’s Proposal: January 17] [Defendants’ Proposal:
`
`April 1], 2014, the Court will hold a Rule 16(e) final pretrial conference in Court with counsel
`
`beginning at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint proposed final pretrial order in compliance with
`
`Local Rule 16.3(c) no later than 5 p.m. on the third business day before the date of the final pretrial
`
`conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the timeframes set
`
`forth in Local Rule 16.3(d) for the preparation of the proposed joint final pretrial order.
`
`14.
`
`Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
`
`requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each party shall be
`
`limited to three in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine request
`
`and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be supported
`
`by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be opposed by a maximum of three pages of
`
`argument, and the party making the in limine request may add a maximum of one additional page in
`
`reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing an in limine request,
`
`such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three page submission (and, if the moving
`
`party, a single one page reply). No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless
`
`otherwise permitted by the Court.
`
`15.
`
`Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be tried to
`
`a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.l(a)(2) and 51.1, the parties should file (i) proposed voir dire,
`
`(ii) preliminary jury instructions, (iii) final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict forms no later
`
`than 5 p.m. on the third business day before the date of the final pretrial conference. The parties shall
`
`submit simultaneously with filing each of the foregoing four documents in Word or WordPerfect
`
`format to rga_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`16.
`
`I31. This matter is scheduled for a 7 day jury trial against each Defendant beginning
`
`at 9:30 a.m. on
`
`, 2014, with the subsequent trial days beginning at 9:30 a.m. Until the
`
`case is submitted to the jury for deliberations, the jury will be excused each day at 4:30 p.m. The
`
`trial will be timed, as counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their
`
`respective cases. The Court will determine before or at the Pretrial Conference the preferred order of
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 869
`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 135 Filed 05/03/12 Page 8 of 8 Page|D #: 869
`
`the trials.
`
`17.
`
`ADR Process. This matter is referred to a magistrate judge to explore the possibility
`
`of alternative dispute resolution.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE