`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 152-1 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 947
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`FastVDO LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Civil Action No. 11-797 (RGA)
`
`Apple Inc., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`Plaintiff FastVDO LLC (“FastVDO”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) have announced to the Court that they have
`
`settled FastVDO’s claims for relief against Samsung and Samsung’s counterclaims for relief
`
`against FastVDO asserted in this case. FastVDO and Samsung have therefore requested that the
`
`Court dismiss FastVDO’s claims for relief against Samsung and Samsung’s counterclaims for
`
`relief against FastVDO, with prejudice and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed
`
`against the party incurring the same. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion
`
`that their request for dismissal should be granted.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that FastVDO’s claims for relief against Samsung and
`
`Samsung’s counterclaims for relief against FastVDO are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by
`
`each party incurring the same.
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
