`Case 1:11—cv—OO797—RGA Document 171 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 1057
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`FASTVDO LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`APPLE INC., er al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. ll-797-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`\&§/QR/\2\/\/\)
`
`STIPULATION FOR SUSPENSION OF DEADLINES
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff
`
`FastVDO LLC and Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America (“Panasonic”), subject to
`
`the approval of the Court, that, on account of the parties having reached a settlement in principle
`
`that the parties expect to finalize soon, (1) the deadlines for Panasonic to make its Rule 26(a)(1)
`
`and Paragraph 3 ESI disclosures and (2) the deadline for Panasonic to produce core technical
`
`documents pursuant to the May 15, 2012 Scheduling Order (D.I. 139) are suspended.
`
`August 6, 2012
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`
`By: /i]3£
`Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. (#100245)
`Brlan 13- Faman (#4089)
`919 North Market Street
`12th Floor
`Wlhnington, DE l980l
`Tel: (302) 777-0300
`farr1an@farnanlaw.com
`bfama-n@faman1aW-Com
`
`Attorneys for PlaintiffFast VDO LLC
`
`By: /s/ John G. Day
`John G_ Day (#2403)
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P_O_ BOX 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654_1888
`jday@ashby-geddes.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Panasonic
`Corporation ofNorth America
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this
`
`day of
`
`, 2012.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
