throbber
Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 76 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 401
`Case 1:11—cv-00797-RGA Document 76
`Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 401
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`FastVDO LLC,
`
`V.
`
`Apple Inc., et al.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 11-797-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF FASTVDO LLC’S ANSWER TO DEFENDANT CASIO AMERICA
`INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Plaintiff FastVDO, LLC (“FastVDO”), by and through its undersigned attorneys,
`
`answers the counterclaims of Defendant Casio America, Inc. (“Casio”) by corresponding
`
`paragraph number as follows:
`
`COUNTERCLAIM
`
`1 .
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`“‘08l Patent”).
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Admitted.
`
`Admitted.
`
`FastVDO admits that it is the owner of U.S. Patent No. RE 40,081 (the
`
`Admitted.
`
`FastVDO admits that Venue is proper in this district.
`
`FastVDO admits that Casio purports to state a claim arising under the
`
`patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, and the Federal
`
`Declaratory Judgment Act, and that this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of
`
`this action. FastVDO denies the merits of Casio’s counterclaims and that Casio is
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 76 Filed 12/08/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 402
`Case 1:11—cv-00797-RGA Document 76
`Filed 12/08/11 Page 2 of 3 Page|D #: 402
`
`entitled to any of its requested relief. FastVDO denies the remaining allegations in this
`
`paragraph.
`
`7.
`
`FastVDO admits that there exists an actual and justiciable controversy
`
`between FastVDO and Casio regarding the validity of the ‘081 Patent and Casio’s
`
`infringement of the ‘O81 Patent. FastVDO denies the remaining allegations in this
`
`paragraph.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`10.
`
`Denied.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`FastVDO demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER F OR REl..lF.l<‘
`
`WHEREFORE, FastVDO prays for the following relief with regard to Casio’s
`
`counterclaims:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`A dismissal with prejudice of Casio’s counterclaims;
`
`An adjudication that Casio is not entitled to any relief on its counterclaims,
`
`including, without limitation, any fine or damages;
`
`C.
`
`Costs and further relief to which FastVDO is entitled, and which the Court
`
`deems just and equitable.
`
`

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00797-RGA Document 76 Filed 12/08/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 403
`Case 1:11—cv-00797-RGA Document 76
`Filed 12/08/11 Page 3 of 3 Page|D #: 403
`
`Date: December 8, 2011
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`
`Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. (Bar No. 100245)
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`» Alexander C.D. Giza (admitted pro hac vice)
`Marc A. Fenster (admitted pro hac vice)
`Kevin P. Burke (admitted pro hac vice)
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025-1031
`(310) 826-7474
`agiza@raklaw.com
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`kburke@raklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for PlairitiflFastVDO, LLC

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket