`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`GENENTECH, INC., and CITY OF HOPE
`
`v.
`
`AMGEN INC.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 17-1407-CFC
`) (Consolidated)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`STIPULATION AND ~RDER
`MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`WHEREAS the ransomware attack on Epiq continues to limit Amgen' s access to
`
`documents produced in this case;
`
`WHEREAS the President has declared a national emergency with respect to the
`
`outbreak ofCOVID-19;
`
`WHEREAS the parties and their counsel have analyzed the extent of disruption
`
`caused by the national emergency and the need to work remotely;
`
`WHEREAS the parties have conferred extensively about the effect of these
`
`extraordinary circumstances upon the case's schedule; and
`
`WHEREAS the parties have reached agreement on the proposed extension of
`
`certain deadlines in this case that will not impact the filing of the pretrial order and preserve the
`
`scheduled dates for the pretrial conference or trial;
`
`WHEREAS the parties' proposed schedule modifies the summary judgment
`
`deadlines but maintains several months between the completion of any permitted briefing and the
`
`pretrial conference;
`
`MEI 32880788v.I
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-01407-CFC-SRF Document 656 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 45152
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval,
`
`that the following deadlines are extended pursuant to the table below:
`
`Event
`
`Current Deadline
`
`New Deadline
`
`Opening Expert Reports
`
`3/19/2020
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports
`
`5/12/2020
`
`Reply Expert Reports
`
`6/2/2020
`
`Close of Expert
`Discovery
`If Court allows SJ
`motions, Opening Briefs
`If Court allows SJ
`motions, Opposition
`Briefs
`If Court allows SJ
`motions, Reply Briefs
`Joint Proposed Pretrial
`Order
`Pretrial Conference
`
`7/10/2020
`
`7/17/2020
`
`7/31/2020
`
`8/7/2020
`
`9/29/2020
`
`4/9/2020
`
`6/2/2020
`
`6/23/2020
`
`8/7/2020
`
`8/14/2020
`
`8/28/2020
`
`9/4/2020
`
`( unchanged)
`
`11/19/2020
`
`(unchanged)
`
`Trial
`
`11/30/2020
`
`( unchanged)
`
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
`
`YOUNGCONAWAYSTARGATT&
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`Isl Daniel M Silver
`Michael P. Kelly (No. 2295)
`Daniel M. Silver (No. 4758)
`Alexandra M. Joyce (No. 6423)
`Renaissance Centre
`405 N. King Street, 8th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 984-6300
`mkelly@mccarter.com
`dsilver@mccarter.com
`ajoyce@mccarter.com
`
`Isl James L. Higgins
`Melanie K. Sharp (No. 2501)
`James L. Higgins (No. 5021)
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`msharp@ycst.com
`jhiggins@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Genentech, Inc. and City of
`Hope
`
`2
`
`MEI 32880788v.1
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-01407-CFC-SRF Document 656 Filed 03/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 45153
`
`Siegmund Y. Gutman
`AmirNaini
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010
`(310) 557-2900
`
`Steven M. Bauer
`Gourdin W. Sirles
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, MA 02110
`(617) 526-9600
`
`Attorneys for Amgen Inc.
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`Paul B. Gaffney
`David I. Berl
`Thomas S. Fletcher
`Kyle E. Thomason
`Teagan J. Gregory
`C. Luke McCloud
`Kathryn S. Kayali
`Jonathan S. Sidhu
`D. Shayon Ghosh
`Jinyuan Luo
`Sumeet P. Dang
`William F. Hawkins
`
`725 Twelfth St. NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 434-5000
`
`Attorneys for Genentech, Inc.
`
`DURIE TANGRI
`Daralyn J. Durie
`Adam R. Brausa
`David F. McGowan
`EnedaHoxha
`Eric C. Wiener
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`( 415) 362-6666
`
`Attorneys for Genentech, Inc. and City of
`Hope
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED, this f ~~ay of "4.t.rt,1,._ 2020.
`
`MEI 32880788v.1
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
