throbber
PUBLIC VERSION
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, DC.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,
`
`INCLUDING MOBILE PHONES, TABLET
`COMPUTERS, AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1038
`
`ORDER NO. 26:
`
`INITIAL DETERMINATION GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO
`TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION BASED ON SETTLEMENT
`AGREEMENT
`
`(August 8, 2017)
`On June 7, 2017, Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy (“Nokia”) and Respondent-Apple
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Apple”) filed a joint motion (1038-023) to terminate the Investigation based on a
`
`settlement agreement and related agreements.1 On June 19, 2017, the Commission Investigative
`
`Staff (“Staff”) filed its response. Staff does not oppose the joint motion.
`
`The Commission’s Rules provide that ‘f[a]ny party may move at any time. for an order to
`
`terminate an investigation in whole or in part as to any or all respondents on the basis of
`
`settlement, a licensing or other agreement .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.”
`
`19 C.F.R. § 210.21(a)(2); see also Certain
`
`Organizer Racks and Prods. Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-466, Order No. 7 at 2 (Feb. 19,
`
`2001). In the instant proceeding, the motion to terminate is based upon a Settlement Agreement
`
`and related agreements, which appears to resolve the dispute between Nokia and Apple. Copies
`
`1 On June 13, 2017, Nokia and Apple were directed to provide a modified version of the public settlement agreement
`with fewer redactions. (See Order No. 23.) On July 7, 2017, pursuant to Order No. 23, they filed a modified public
`version of the settlement agreement. On July 19, 2017,
`the Commission determined to review the initial
`determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a Settlement Agreement and related
`agreements in Inv. No. 337-TA-1039, which included the same agreements at issue in this Investigation. Upon
`review, the Commission determined that the parties’ July 7th submission did not comply with Commission Rules
`210.21(b)(1) and 201.6 and remanded the investigation to ALJ McNamara to require the parties to file a revised
`public version of the agreements. On July 28, 2017, pursuant to Order No. 29 in Inv. No. 337-TA-1039, Nokia and
`Apple filed their joint supplemental submission. On August 1, 2017, they filed an updated joint supplemental
`submission in this Investigation, reflecting the updates submitted in the 1039 Investigation.
`
`

`

`of the agreements are attached hereto as Exhibits 1—4. Consistent with 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b)(1),
`
`Nokia and Apple state that “[t]he Settlement and Release Agreement .
`
`.
`
`. reflect the entire and
`
`only agreement between Nokia and Apple regarding the subject matter of this Investigation” and
`
`that “there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Nokia and -
`Apple regarding the subjeCt matter ofthis Investigation.” (Mot. at 1-2.)
`
`In any initial determination terminating an investigation by settlement agreement or
`
`consent order, the administrative law judge is directed to consider and make appropriate findings
`
`regarding the effect of the proposed settlement on the public health and welfare, competitive
`
`conditions in the United States economy, production of like or directly competitive articles in the
`
`United States, and United States consumers. l9 C...FR § 210.50(b)(2). Nokia, Apple, and Staff
`
`assert that it is in the interest of the public and administrative economy to grant this motion
`
`because “Commission policy and the public interest generally favor settlements.” (Mot. at 2;
`
`Staff Resp. at 3-4.) The undersigned agrees that termination ofthis Investigation does not impose
`
`any undue burdens on the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States
`
`economy, production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States
`
`consumers.
`
`Accordingly, it is the undersigned’s Initial Determination that the joint motion (103 8-
`
`021) to terminate this Investigation based on a settlement agreement and related agreements be
`
`granted. This Initial Determination, along with supporting documentation, is hereby certified to
`
`the Commission.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to 19 C.F.R.§ 210.42(h),
`
`this
`
`Initial Determination shall become the
`
`determination of the Commission unless a party files a petition for review of the Initial
`
`Determination pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.43(a), or the Commission, pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
`
`

`

`§210.44, orders, on its own motion, a review of the Initial Determination or certain issues
`
`herein.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`/
`
`Charles E. Bullock
`Chief Administrative Law Judge
`
`

`

`Exhibit 1
`
`'
`
`

`

`”Date: Mafia-2017'
`
`7(1) NOKIACORPORATI'ON :
`
`(2)- ArPLEINc.
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`SETTLEMENT‘3 AND REL'f1”? EAS1
`
`EAGREEMENT :
`
`_
`
`

`

`This SETI‘LEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT (this “Settlement Agreement”) is
`entered into and effective on the date of last signature of this Settlement Agreement (the.
`“Settlement Agreement Effective Date”)
`
`BETWEEN
`
`(I)
`
`(2)
`
`NOKIA CORPORATION a public corporation validly Organized and existing under
`the laWS of Finland, with corporate identifier 0112038—9, and having its principal
`offiCe at Karaportti 3, FL02610 Espoo, Finland (hereinafter referred to togetherwith
`its Affiliates as “Nokia”), and
`
`APPLE INC., a corporation Validly organized and existing under the laws of California,
`USA and having its principal office at 1 Infinite Loop, Copertino, California 95014
`USA (hereinafter referred to together with its Affiliates as “Apple7’),
`
`(each ofNokia and Apple a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”)'s.
`
`RECITAIS
`
`(A) WHEREAS, the Parties have been engaged inpatent licensing discussions and patent—
`related litigation and investigations worldwide,
`
`(B) WHEREAS, Apple and Nokia intend to enter'into a Global: Patent License Agreement
`(the “Global Patent License Agreement”) simultaneously herewith to acquire
`from one another certain patent rights, as set forth therein, and
`
`(C) WHEREAS the Parties now desire to settle all litigations and investigations under
`this Settlement Agreement, whereby the Parties are entering into a full, final,
`complete and gIobal settlement of the subject matter of such litigations and
`investigations, all on the terms and conditions set forth herein
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, in censideration of the above premises and in reCognition of all of the
`consideration described herein, including risk mitigatiOn, the Parties agree generally as,»
`follows and specifically as described in the Schedules Inferenced below:
`
`OPE-RATIVE PROVISIONS
`
`1,
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
`
`'“Afliliate” of a Party or a Person shall mean any other Person, which now or
`hereafter, directly or indirectlyIs controlled by, such first mentioned Party or Person,
`but any such other Person shall be deemed to he an Affiliate only as long as such
`Control oxists, and for the purposes of this definition, “control” shall mean direct or
`indirect ownership or control of more than fifty" percent (50%) of a Per-sen by any
`means, including voting power, capital (it other securities or ownership Interests or
`the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of
`the management and policies of a Person, whether through ownership of voting:
`securities, by contract or otherwise. Apple represents to Nokia and Nokia rep1esents
`to Apple that, as of the Settlement Agteement EffectiVe Date, they both. are the
`
`

`

`ultimate parent companies Within their respective consdlidated groups and thus not
`under the control of any other party.
`'
`
`
`“Apple Actions” means (i) the actions or investigations listed as such in Schedule 1
`(ii) any action, claim, counterclaim, complaint or investigation filed or requested by
`Apple before any judicial, administrative or other governmental authority anywhere
`in the world prior to the Settlement Agreement Effective Date against Nokia directly
`or indirectly, (iii) any other action, claim, counterclaim, complaint or investigation
`filed or requested by Apple before any sueh authority or body prior to the Settlement
`Agreement Effective Date against Nokia Covered Products, and (iv) any inter partes
`review, reexamination, invalidity, opposition, revocation or nullity request filed or
`requested by Apple prior to the Settlement Agreement Effective Date and relating to
`any Nokia OoVered Patents or— .
`
`
`ii) Lieensable by Apple.
`
`“Apple Covered Product(s)” means any and all past, present, and future:
`
`“Apple Licensed Patents” means all Patents of Apple that are Licensable by Apple
`and are either:
`
`

`

`
`
`“Business Day”means any day thatis nota Saturday, Sunday or a public liohday111
`either California or Finland;
`
`“CDMAStandard(s) means the: (1) code d1v1smn muluple access (CDMA) based
`CDMA Standards as promulgated during the Term (1.13., pubhshed and adopted) by -
`ETA, TIA, 3GPP2 and/or similar bodies and/or their respective success61(s) including
`‘IS-95, cdmaOne, CDMA'2'ooo and CDMAzooo' EVrDO;‘a11d= (ii)- denvanves, updates
`and” other evolutions thereof as promulgated dunng the Term (1.12%.,pubhshed and
`adopted) by EIA, TIA, 3GPP2 and/“or similar bodies and-[or their respective
`successor(s), rowded that such- derivatives, Updates or evolutions do not,
`fundamentally alterthe techmcal character ofthe standard111- question '
`
`_
`
`“Cellular Communication Standard(s)” means the GSM Standards, the CDMA :
`Standards the UMTS Standards and the LTE Standards ‘
`
`“Cellular EssentialPatent(s)” means Patents. that are Fssenhal to oneor more of
`the Cellular Communication Standards but excludmg such Patents as to which the '
`Party'in quesnon has expressly stated (‘11 expressly states during the T’err11,‘111 writing,
`and during the standardization process, as Well as in full comphance with any
`applicable rules of the standard- settingorgamzanon in question governing refusals to
`license, that it does not mtend to license such Patents to 1mplementers of such _
`Cellular Communication Standard(s) For clarity,Apple Cellular Essential; Patents and “
`Nokia Cellular Essential Patents willbe construed accordmgly
`
`“Claims” means» any and all causes of11131101), damages, costs,.liahility and other types
`"of claim$1in law or eqfityfimyjurisdiction throughout the world".
`'
`
`‘l'Dives’ted Patéxit('_s)" means: Patents that are:
`
`""_
`
`For: theavoidanceof doubt,1'Diiies’ted Patents:
`
`

`

`Notwithstanding the above,
`
`“ESSentia ” shall mean as applied to any Patent(s) that:
`
`(a) .it is not possible, on technical (but not commercial) grounds taking into account
`normal technical practice and the state of the art generally available at the time of
`promulgation (i.e., publication and adaption) of the Cellular Communication
`Standard(s) in question, to make, use, import, export, sell, offer for sale or
`otherwise dispose of equipment or methods, which comply with the Cellular
`Communicatiou Standard(s) in question, without infringing one or more of the
`claims of such Patent;
`
`(b) such Patent(s) has been declared by a Party or an applicable patentee as essential
`or potentially essential for the Cellular Communication Standard(s)'- in question;
`01'
`V
`.
`
`
`
`“Framework Agreement” means that certain Framework Agreement, being
`entered into by the Parties simultaneously herewith.
`
`“GPLA Effective Date” means—
`
`“GSM Standard(s)” means the: (i) time division multiple access (TDMA) based
`GSM standards as promulgated during the Term (i.e., published and adopted) by
`ETSI, 3GPP, and/or similar bodies and/or their respective successor(s) including
`GSM, HSCSD, GPRS and EDGE; and (ii) derivatives, updates and other evalutions
`thereof as promulgated by ETSI, 3GPP and/or similar bodies and/or their respective
`successor(s) during the Term, provided that such derivatives, updates or evolutions
`do not fundamentally alter the technical character of the standard in question.
`
`

`

`“Have Made” means
`
`“Licensable means that the Partyin question at any time during the Term has the
`tight to release or otherwise grant tights or immunities under a Patent (whether by
`virtue of ownership or otherwise) consistent with the scope of releases, rights or
`immunities granted by the Party in question under this Settlement Agreement
`I without a requirement to obtain- 'a- consent from or to pay or grant any additional
`rights, immunities or consideration to any ThirdParty thh joint or exclusive control
`oVer the Patent (unless such Third- Party consents or the other Party, at its sole
`discretion, elects to pay or otherWise giant the requisite rights,
`immunities or
`iconSideration) Ifa Party so has the right to grant a release or Other rights or
`immunities to the other Party under a Patent thatis more limited thanrequired by the
`release or other grants set forthin this Settlement Agreement, then such Patent will
`nonetheless be deemed Licensable to the maximum extent possible. Fer clarity,
`Licensable by Apple and: Licensable by Nokia will be construed accordingly Nelda
`represents and warrants to Apple and Apple represents and warrants to Nelda that
`any above mentioned requiteniei‘it‘s to obtain a consent from or to pay or grant any
`additional rights, immunities or considerationinvolving them respectively are not
`. specific to the ether Partyin question.-
`
`“Licensed Patents” means Nelda Heensed Patents and Apple Licensed. Patents.
`
`“LTE Standard(s)”means the: (i) orthogonal frequency divisioii multiplexmg based
`LTE standardsas promulgated during the Term (i-e.,published and adopted) by ETSI,
`igGPP, and/or similar bodies and/or their respective successors including, withOut'
`limitation, LTE LTE Advanced and SAE operating in any frequency band; and (ii)
`.iderivati‘ves, updates and other evolutions thereof as promulgated during the Term by
`ETSI, gGPP', and/or similar bedies and/Oi their respective successor(s), provided that
`such derivatives, updates or evolutidns’ do not fundamentally alter the technical
`character of the standardin question
`
`

`

`
`“Nokia Actions” means (i) the actions or investigation-s listed as such in Schedule 1
`(ii) any aetion, claim, counterclaim, complaint or'investigati'on filed or requested by
`Nokia before any judicial, administrative or'othe'r governmental authofity anywhere
`in the WOrld prior to the Settlement Agreement Effective Date against Apple directly
`or indirectly, (iii) any other action, claim, ecunterclairn, complaint or investigation
`filed'o-‘r "requested by Nokia before. any such authority or body prior to the Settlement
`Agreement Effective Date against Apple Covered Products, and (iv), any inter partes
`review, reexamination, invalidity, opposition, revocation or nullity request filed or
`requested by Nokia prior to the Settlement Agreement Effective Date and relating to
`any Apple Covered Patents or—
`
`“Nokia Covered Product(s)” means any and all past, present and future:
`
`(A)
`
`—
`
`(B)—
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`“Nokia Licensed Patents” means all Patents ofI Nokia that are licensable by Nokia
`and are either:
`
`p1.
`
`)—
`
`ii)—
`
`
`
`“Patent(s)” means any patent(s) and patent application(s) worldwide (and like
`statutory patent rights).
`
`“Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company,
`firm,
`joint venture,
`association,
`joint-stock campany,
`trust, unincorporated
`organization, governmental authority or other entity.
`
`the Global Patent
`“Related Agreements” means this Settlement Agreement,
`License Agreement and that certain Business Cooperation Agreement made by and
`between the Parties.
`
`“Related Party” means any direct and indirect customers, users, manufacturers
`(including original design manufacturers), suppliers, distributors, retailers, or
`resellers of, as applicable, Apple Covered Products or Nokia Covered Products.
`
`“Schedule” means a schedule to this Settlement Agreement.
`
`“501d” means directly or indirectly sold, distributed, leased or otherwise transferred
`by or for a Party.
`
`“Term” means the term of the Global Patent License Agreement-
`
`“Third Party” means any Person that is not a Party.
`
`(i) wideband code division multiple access
`“UMTS Standard(s)” means the:
`(WCDMA) based UMTS standards as promulgated during the Term by ETSI, 3GPP
`and/or similar bodies and/or their
`respective successor(s)
`including, without
`limitation FOMA, TD—SCDMA, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA and HSPA+; and (ii)
`
`

`

`derivatives, updates and other eVOlutions thereof as promulgated during the'I‘e‘rm by
`ETSI, sGPP and/or similar bodies and]or their respective successor(s) provided that
`such deriVatives, updates or evolutions do not fundamentally alter the technical
`character of the standard in question.
`
`2-.
`
`DISCONTINUANCE 0F ACTIONS
`
`Nolcia Corporation and Apple Inc. shall take, and shall cause their Affiliates to take, the
`following *steps to discontinue the Apple Actions and the Nokia Actions to the fullest extent
`permiSsible by applicable rules and prOcedures in the applicable jurisdictions:
`
`2.1 With the exception of the Nokia Actions and Apple Actions described in Clauses 2.2
`and 2.6, within ten (10) Business Days of the Settlement Agreement Effective Date:
`
`2.1.1
`
`“2.1.2
`
`Apple shall take steps sufficient to procure that the Apple Actions be
`withdrawn, discontinued or dismissed in their entirety against all parties
`thereto including by executing and filing at the court or administrative body
`the farms at Schedule 2 and any other filings as may be necessary. Apple’s
`withdrawal, discontinuance or dismissal of such Claims, complaints,
`requests or counterclaims shall be without prejudice.
`
`Nokia shall take steps sufficient to procure that the Nelda Actions be
`withdrawn, discontinued or dismissed in their entirety against Apple,
`including by executing and filing at the court or administrative body the
`forms at Schedule 2 and any other filings as may be necessary. Nokia’s
`withdrawal, discontinuance or dismissal of. such claims, complaints,
`requests or counterclaims shall be without prejudice.
`
`2.2
`
`In relation to the case of Apple Inc. v. Acacia Research Corp, 5:16~cv~o7266 (ND:
`Cal. filed December 20, 2016) [the "ND Cal Case"),xand the Parties and all of-the
`other
`parties
`thereto
`(including Acacia Research Corporation, Cellular
`Communications Equipment LLC, Saint Lawrence Communications LLC, Cellular
`Communications Equipment Gth, Saint Lawrence Communications Gth,
`Conversant IntellectualProperty Management Inc, Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l.,
`Core Wireless Licensing Ltd. (together, but exeluding Nokia, the “ND Cal CO-
`Defendants”)) and any other Claim based on Nokia’s licensing or in relation to:
`Nolcia’s divestment of Patents prior to the Settlement Agreement Effective Date
`brought by Apple against Nokia or any Third Party purchaser of Nokia Patents:
`
`2.2.1
`
`Apple and Nokia shall jointly file a motion to dismiss Nokia from the ND Cal
`Case, informing the Court that Apple has settled, waived and released any
`claim therein that Nolda violated the law by any alleged conSpi’racy,
`collusion, or anticompe‘titive arrangement with the ND Cal Co-Defendants to
`breach or circumvent its FRAND obligations, or any antitrust or competition
`law, based on Nolda's licensing or in relation to Nokia’s divestment of the
`Patents at issue in the ND Cal Case.
`
`2.2.2
`
`Apple shall not:
`
`

`

`_F I
`
`2.2.4
`
`n the event an inquiry is made bf Nokia or Appi'e regarding the‘ND Cal
`CaSe, then Apple and NOlda agree, not-withstanding the confidentiality
`provisions in this Settlement Agreement and the Related Agreements, that
`Ndkia or Apple may state publicall‘y that "Nokifi: and Apple have settled the
`claims that Applefiled against Nokia in the Northern District of Califbrn-ia
`case of Apple Inc. v. Acacia Research and have requested that the Court
`dismiss No‘kiafrom the acme."
`
`2.2.5
`
`
`
`

`

`I2.3—
`
`In rcI‘atiOn to proceedings in Germany, if any Party that is a defending party is invited
`by the court to comment on the value in dispute, they will respond that they do not
`intend to comment.
`
`In relation to the Turin Prooeedin‘gs with docket numbers 33485/‘2016 and
`33487/2016, Noltia shall terminate the proceedings by withdrawing all the claims it
`filedi without conditions. or limitations am} without prejuclice.
`
`2.4
`
`2.5
`
`2.6
`
`
`
`2.6.3
`
`1.0»
`
`

`

`
`
`2.7
`
`2.8
`
`249.
`
`42.10
`
`2.11
`
`2.1.3
`
`Each of Nolria Corporation and Apple Inc‘, on behalf of itSelf and its Affiliates, agrees,
`warrants and represents that it will give no further affirmative assistance to any
`regulatory 01 competition authorityin respect of actual or potential investigation
`against the other Party arising from such complaints, requests or informatiOn filed
`unless formally requested or campelléd to do so by such regulatory body or
`competition authority In the event that such regulatory body or competition
`authority compels a Party to provide information, the Party so requested shall
`premptly notify the other Party (to theextent permitted by applicable law, unless
`required by such regulatory body 0r competition authority not to do so), and before
`respondingshall share the request with the other Party (to the extent permitted by
`applicable law, unless required by such regulatorybody or cenipetition authority not
`to do so). It shall also, upon request, share any response with the other Party to the
`extent permitted «by applicable law, unless required by such regulatory body or
`Competition authority net to do so.
`
`Each Party shall without undue delay the any consent necessary'or requested by any"-
`Courtor administrative body to effect the withdrawal discontinuance or dismissal of
`the Apple Actions and Nol'cia Actions Without prejudice.
`
`Each Party shall without undue delay file any additional documents or take any other
`actions‘iu order to effectuate Clauses 2.1m 2.7
`
`Subject to Clauses 2.11 to; 213 below, each Patty shalt hear-halt its ”own costs and fees,
`and neither Party shall request reimbursement of itslegal. ”costs, court fees or expenses
`from the other,
`
`In the event that any Court or administrative body reimburses court feesin respect of
`the Nokia Actions, such reimbursements shallbe payable to Nokia. In the event that
`any Court or administrative body reimburses court fees in respect of the Apple
`Actions, such reimburSements shall be payable to Apple
`
`Any bonds or securities shall be promptly returned «to the Party providing them;
`
`In the event that any expertCS) or other persons appointed by a court or regulatory
`bodyin respect to any Noltia Actions may seek payment or reimbursement of fees,
`expenses 6r costs, these shall be paid by Nelda.
`In the event that any c‘xpert(s) or.
`othei persons appointed by a courtor regulatory bodyin respect to any Apple Actions
`may each payment or reimbursementof fees, expenses or costs, theseshall be paid by
`Apple.
`
`.
`
`‘PAST'RELEASES
`
`3.1
`
`Nokia Corporation, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, hereby unconditionally and
`irrevocably releases and foreverdischarges any and all Claims.
`
`11;
`
`

`

`3.1.1
`
`against Apple and its Related Parties—
`
`
`———solely to the extent such Claims arise out of
`
`
`prior to the GPLA Effective
`
`
`Date and such activities would have been licen‘Sed or subject
`to the
`covenants and standsfill’s under the Global Patent License Agreement, had
`they occurred during the Term thereof;
`
`3.1.2
`
`against Apple arising out of or in connection with negotiations—
`
`3.1.3
`
`against Apple arising out of or in connection with the MFi licensing
`program, including termination of the agreement dated July 1, 2016 entitled
`“MFi[Work_s With Apple Development License — Contra-ct #MFi-16-01147”
`(the “MFi License”)
`
`For the avoidance of dOuht, such release will apply irrespective of whether or not
`Nokia Was aware of such pOtential Claims at the Setil‘ement Agreement Effective Date
`and is subject
`to Clause 23 (with respect
`to Claims against Third Parties).
`Notwithstanding anything to the contiary in this Clause 3.1, no release or any other
`right or immunity is granted hereunder, whether expressl , imphedly, by estoppel or
`
`otherwise, under any i). Patents that are not
`
`or ii) Patents that are
`
`
`iii): Patents: to the extent that they are other‘wi‘Se not LicenSable during the Term.
`
`3.2
`
`Apple Inc., on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, hereby unconditionally and irrevocably
`releases and forever discharges any and 2111: Claims:
`
`3.2.1
`
`against Nokia and its Related Parties
`
`the extent such Claims arise out of prior to the GPL-A Effective Date and such activities: would
`
`solely to
`
`haVe been licensed or subjeét to the covenants and stand-stills under the
`Global Patent License Agreement, had they occurred during the Term
`thereof; and/or
`'
`'
`
`3.2.2
`
`against Nokia arising out of or in Connection with negotiations_
`
`For the avoidance of doubt, such release will apply irrespective of whether or not
`Apple Was aware of such potential Claims at the Settlement Agreement Effective Date
`and is subject
`to Clause 23 (with respect
`to Claims against Third Parties)
`Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Clause 3.2, no release or any other
`right or immunity is granted hereunder, whether expressly, impliedly, by estoppel or
`
`otherwise, under any Patents: i) that are not
`
`- ii)
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`3-3
`
`3.4
`
`—)m mm fheyarmm
`Licensable during the Term.
`
`
`
`

`

`_.
`
`‘-—
`
`_ Notwithstanding anything to: the contrary
`herein, the Parties will not be prevented from or limited in any manner in respect of:
`(i) responding to a subpoena or complying with other requirements of law;
`(ii):
`responding to written requests for information from any regulatory or competition
`authority; and (iii) Complying with their written contractual obligations to Third
`Parties in» existence on the Settlement Agreement Effective Date.
`
`3.6
`
`Each of Nokia Corporation and. Apple incn on behalf of itself and, its Affiliates, having
`specific intent to release all potential Claims described in this Clause 3, whether
`known or unknown, does hereby aclmowledge: and expressly waive the provisions of
`Article 1542 of the California Civil Code (and similar provisions in other jurisdictions,
`whether by statute or common law), which provides:
`
`A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TOCLAIMS‘ WHICH- THE CREDITOR
`DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME
`OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, MUST
`
`HAVE MATERIALL'' 7‘ lYAFFEC‘I‘ED HIS 0R HER SET“IL‘LEMEN' I'W II'H DEBTOR.
`
`
`In the event a release granted by'either Party to the other Party in thi‘sClause 3 at to
`any Claim is determined by a court, governmental authority or arbitration. tribunal to
`be defective and such granting Party brings such Claim against such other Party in
`any court, governmental authority or arbitration tribunal in contravention of such
`release, such other Party shall be entitled to bring any claim, counterclaim or defense
`against such granting Party in reSponse- to such Claim.
`
`N0 ADMISSIONS, REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
`
`No Party makes any admiSsion with regard to infringement, noneinfringement’,
`validity, inizalidity, damages, or any other issue regarding any Patents owned or
`controlled by the Parties, or with regard to any of the Parties’ products, services or
`technologies.
`
`Save as expressly set forth herein, this Settlement Agreement does not grant any
`releases, licenses or other rights to theWor_
`
`_or"to any other Patents owned or contro e" y ’eParties.
`
`3.7
`
`4.
`
`4.1
`
`4.2
`
`4.3
`
`Each Party represents and Warrants to the other Party that:
`
`14
`
`

`

`4.3.1 Schedule 1 is a full and complete listof all Nokia Actions and Apple Actions;
`
`4.3.2 the person(s) signing this Settlement Agreement on its behalf is/are fully
`authorised and legally competent to execute and deliver this Settlement
`Agreement on its behalf; and
`
`4.3.3 the performance of this Settlement Agreement has been fully authorised by all
`necessary corporate and other actions by each of its Affiliates that may be
`' parties to the Nokia Actions or Apple Actions.
`
`5.
`
`BINDING EFFECT '
`
`This Settlement Agreement is binding on all: Parties upon signature. This Settlement
`Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of whiCh shall be deemed an
`original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In making
`proof of this Settlement Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more
`than one such counterpart.
`'
`
`6.
`
`FURTHER ASSURANCES
`
`Each Party shall at its own cest and expense use all reasonable endeavours to ensure the
`carrying out of whatever further actions (including the execution of further documents) may
`be required to give effect to this Settlement Agreement.
`
`7.
`
`APPLICABLE LAW AND JURISDICTION
`
`7.: —
`
`
`
`7.1.2
`
`15
`
`

`

`7.1.4_ .
`
`——
`
`_
`
`7.3 . The. validity, perfonnance, construction and interpretation of this Settlement
`Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New Yark, without regara- te’
`its conflict of law provisions.
`
`7.4
`
`Any Party seeking interim or injunctive relief in relation to an alleged breaeh'of this
`Settlement Agreement may do so in any‘jurisdiction where relief may be available._
`
`7-5 then the Parties agree that: '(i) Nokia shall be
`
`16
`
`

`

`entitled to seek interim relief in any jurisdiction pursuant to Clause 7.4', including to
`intervene for this limited purpose in any such court (or other tribunal) in which Apple
`has brought such Claim;
`(ii). any breach of ClauSes 2.2 and/or 3.3 will cause
`irreparable damage to Nelda and that Nokia will not have an adequate remedy at law
`in connection therewith; and (iii): Clauses 2.2 and/or 3.3 will be enforceable by a
`decree of "specific performance issued by any ecur‘t or arbitration tribunal of
`competent jurisdiction, and appropriate injunctive relief should be granted pending
`the resolution of such Dispute under the dispute reSOIution provisions set forth in
`Clause 7.
`
`All of the above remedies in this Clause 7.5 shall be cumulative and not exclusive, and
`shall be in addition to any other remedies which Nokia may have under this
`Settlement Agreement or otherwise.
`
`8.
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY AND PUBLICITY
`
`The Parties will hold this Settlement Agreement, its Schedules and its terms and cond’itiOns,
`but not
`the existence hereof, along with all correspondence and information. shared
`hereunder or relating to this Settlement Agreement, that is not or has not become public, as
`strictly confidential and agree to refrain'from disclosing them now or hereafter to any Third
`Party, unless such disclosure is:
`
`
`
`I—
`
`I-
`
`17
`
`

`

`I —
`
`
`
`9.
`
`9.1
`
`9.2
`
`9.3
`
`9.4
`
`9.5
`
`9.6
`
`MISCELLANEOUS
`
`No variation of this Settlement Agreement shall be efiective unless madein writing
`and: signed by Nokia Corporation and Apple Inc. ThisClause 9.1 can only be varied1n
`Writing and by signature of these Parties.
`
`If at any time, any provision hereofis or becomes illegal, invalid or unenforceablein
`any respect under the law of any jurisdictmn neither the legality, validity or
`enterceability of the remaining previsions hereof 1101:
`the legality, Validity or
`enforceability or such provision under the law of any other jurisdiction shallin any
`waybe affected or impaired there11y The invalld provision shall be replaced by a valid.
`One, “hich achieves to the fullest extent possible the original purpose and commercial
`goal ofthe invalid provision.
`
`This Settlement Agreement is conditional upon the execution by the Parties of the
`Global Patent License Agreement, the Framework Agreement and the other Related
`Agreements
`
`This Settlement Agreement may not be terminated other than pursuant to mutual
`written agreement between Nelda Corporation and Apple Inc.
`In the event of any
`alleged material breach by a Party, the other Party shall provide written notice thereof
`to the Party alleged to have committed such material breach and the Party alleged to
`have committed suchbreach shall take prompt, reasonable efforts to cure.
`Neither this Settlement Agreement nor any provision hereof may be waived without
`the prior written consent of the Party against whern such WaiVer is asserted. No delay
`01' omission byeither Party to exercise any right or poWer shall'impair any such right
`or poWer or be censtrued to be a waiverthereof. Consent by either Party to, or waiver
`of, a breach by the ether Party shall not constitute consent to,Waiver of, or excnSc for
`any other different or subsequent breach.
`Notices shall he madein writing andm the English language and shall he sent by
`overnight delivery to the following addresses (or such other address as may be
`notified'in writing from time to time by eitherParty) and deemed received on the
`third (3rd) Business Day following the sending thereof.
`
`-18
`
`

`

`Additionally, any netice given by one Party to the other shall be deemed properly
`given, if the reception thereof13 specifically acknowledged by the receiving Party in
`writing or when demonstrably delivered to the recipient by hand or prepaid,
`internationally—recognized, ovemight courier to the following addresses (or such
`other address as may be notifi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket