throbber

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`
`
`CERTAIN REUSABLE DIAPERS,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1077
`
`JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.15, Complainant Cotton Babies, Inc., and Respondents
`
`Alvababy.com (“Alvababy”), Shenzhen Adsel Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a Alva (“Adsel”), Huizhou
`
`Huapin Garment Co., Ltd. (“Huizhou”) (collectively, “Respondents”) jointly move for a stay of
`
`the Procedural Schedule (Order No. 4) as discussed further below.
`
`Ground Rule 3.2 Certification
`
`Complainant and Respondents discussed the subject of this motion with the Commission
`
`Investigative Attorney and he has indicated that the Office of Unfair Import Investigations does
`
`not oppose this motion. Staff Attorney has waived the two-day notice requirement of Ground Rule
`
`2.2 and consents to the timing of Complainant’s and Respondents’ filing of the motion.
`
`DISCUSSION AND ARGUMENT
`
`As background, the Commission instituted this investigation based on a Complaint filed
`
`by Complainant asserting infringement of claims 1, 13, 20 and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 8,518,007
`
`(“the ‘007 Patent”) and infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,120,270 (“the ‘270
`
`Trademark”). Complainant subsequently filed a motion for partial termination of the
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`investigation as to claims 20 and 21 of the ‘007 patent, which was granted by the ALJ and not
`
`reviewed by the Commission. See Order No. 6 and Commission’s March 12, 2018 Notice.
`
`Good cause exists for a stay of the Procedural Schedule. Complainant is concurrently
`
`filing with the instant Motion, a motion to terminate based on withdrawal of the Complaint
`
`against Respondents pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(a)(1). As such, Complainant and
`
`Respondents are jointly moving to stay the Procedural Schedule to conserve the resources of the
`
`Commission and the parties. Commission precedent supports a stay of the Procedural Schedule
`
`pending resolution of a motion to terminate to conserve resources. See, e.g., Certain Radio
`
`Frequency Integrated Circuits & Devices Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-848, Order No. 9
`
`(Oct. 15, 2012) (granting complainant’s motion to terminate investigation based on withdrawal
`
`of complaint and staying the investigation pending the Commission’s final determination on the
`
`motion); Certain Food Waste Disposers & Components & Packaging Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-
`
`838, Order No. 8 at 2 (Dec. 11, 2012) (terminating investigation based on withdrawal of the
`
`complaint the business day before the evidentiary hearing and suspending the procedural
`
`schedule). Thus, a stay of the Procedural Schedule is respectfully requested pending
`
`Complainant’s motion to terminate, which is being filed concurrently.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For all these reasons, Complainant and Respondents respectfully request that the
`
`Administrative Law Judge grant this Motion and stay the Procedural Schedule pending the
`
`outcome of Complainant’s motion to terminate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Dated: March 16, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Sudip Kundu
`Sudip K. Kundu
`Kundu PLLC
`1300 I Street, NW, Suite 400E
`Washington, DC 20005
`Sudip.Kundu@KunduPLLC.com
`
`Matthew L. Cutler
`Joel R. Samuels
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`7700 Bonhomme, Suite 400
`Clayton, MO 63105
`Telephone: (314) 726-7500
`Facsimile: (314) 726-7501
`mcutler@hdp.com
`jsamuels@hdp.com
`CBITC@hdp.com
`
`Glenn Forbis
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
`5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 400
`Troy, Michigan 48098
`Telephone: (248) 641-1600
`Facsimile: (248) 641-0270
`
`Counsel for Cotton Babies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ LyleVander Schaaf
`Lyle B. Vander Schaaf
`Fei Hu
`Evi Christou
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 296-8700
`Facsimile: (202) 296-8701
`lvanderschaaf@brinksgilson.com
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`
`Harold Johnson
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`NBC Tower – Suite 3600
`455 N. Cityfront Plaza Drive
`Chicago, IL 60611
`
`Counsel for Respondents Shenzhen Adsel
`Trading Co., Ltd., Alvababy.com and
`Huizhou Huapin Garment Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served to the parties in the manner
`
`indicated below, this 16th day of March 2018:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW Washington, DC 20436
`
`John Shin
`Investigative Attorney
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW Washington, DC 20436
`
`Alvababy.com
`
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 296-8700
`Fax: (202) 296-8701
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`Shenzhen Adsel Trading Co., Ltd.
`
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 296-8700
`Fax: (202) 296-8701
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`Huizhou Huapin Garment Co., Ltd.
`
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 296-8700
`Fax: (202) 296-8701
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`John.Shin@usitc.gov
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`AdselITC@brinksgilson.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Sudip Kundu
`Kundu PLLC
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket