UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`
`HEADPHONES
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337—TA-626
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Complainant Bose Corporation and Respondents Phitek Systems Limited (NZ), GN
`
`Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc., Logitech, Inc., Audio-Technica U.S., Inc., and Panasonic
`
`Corporation of North America (collectively, “Respondents”) hereby jointly submit this motion to
`
`amend the Court’s Protective Order (Order No. 1). The ITC Staff attomey has informed the
`
`parties that the Staff has no objection to the proposed amendment. Thus, the motion is
`
`unopposed.
`
`The parties have agreed upon the following provision governing the inadvertent
`
`disclosure of privileged material:
`
`The inadvertent production of any information protected from disclosure by the
`attorney—client privilege, the work product doctrine, the common interest doctrine,
`or other applicable immunities, shall not be deemed a waiver of any claim of
`privilege or protection from disclosure, provided that the producing party shall
`promptly notify the receiving party in writing when the inadvertent production is
`discovered, request that the documents or materials containing such information
`be returned, and attach a privilege log including an entry pertaining to all such
`documents or materials. Within five (5) business days of receiving written notice
`from the producing party, the receiving party shall return or destroy all such
`privileged or protected information and all copies thereof. The receiving party
`shall also retrieve and destroy all descriptions of the privileged or protected
`information. The receiving party may only challenge the designation of the
`inadvertently—produced information by moving for a court order compelling
`production of the material. If such a motion is filed, the producing party shall
`have the burden of proving that the documents and things in dispute are protected
`by the attomey-client privilege, work product immunity, or any other applicable
`
`

`
`privileges or immunities. Furthermore, unless and until such motion to compel is
`granted by the Court, the receiving party shall neither use nor refer to any
`privileged information contained within the document(s) at issue, except to the
`extent such information is reflected in an appropriate privilege log.
`
`Good cause exists for the proposed amendment because it is believed the amendment will
`
`facilitate the timely and efficient production of discovery in this investigation while not
`
`jeopardizing any party’s rights.
`
`The parties respectfully request that the Court modify its Protective Order (Order No. 1)
`
`to include the proposed amendment.
`
`Dated: March/1, 2008
`
`A
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`
`Andrew R. Kopsidas
`Jeffrey R. Whieldon
`Autumn J. Hwang
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`1425 K Street, N.W., 11th Floor
`
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`
`Attorneys for Complainant
`Bose Corporation
`
`JOINT MOTION To AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER—PAGE 2
`
`

`
`Dated: March ___, 2008
`
`Dated: March _, 2008
`
`William B. Nash
`
`Daniel D. Chapman
`Mark Fassold
`
`JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
`
`112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 2400
`
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counselfor Respondents Phitek
`Systems Limited, GN Netcom, Inc.,
`Creative Labs, Inc., and Logitech
`Inc.
`
`James P. White
`
`J. Aron Carnahan
`
`WELSH & KATZ, LTD.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd F1.
`
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counselfor Respondent Audio
`Technica U.S., Inc.
`
`Dated: March Q, 2008
`
`Joseph Casino
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`
`90 Park Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counselfor Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation ofNorth America
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER—PAGE 3
`
`

`
`Dated: Marchif, 2008
`
`Dated: March _, 2008
`
`Dated: March
`
`2008D!
`
`Qi /M:
`
`William B. Nash
`
`Daniel D. Chapman
`Mark Fassold
`
`JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
`
`112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 2400
`
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counselfor Respondents Phitek
`Systems Limited, GN Netcom, Ina,
`Creative Labs, Inc-., and Logitech
`Inc.
`
`James P. White
`
`J. Aron Carnahan
`
`WELSH & KATZ, LTD.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd F1.
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counselfor Respondent Audio
`Technica US, Inc.
`
`Daniel Ebenstein
`
`Abraham Kasdan
`
`Joseph Casino
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`
`90 Park Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counselfor Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation ofNorth America
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER—PAGE 3
`
`

`
`Dated: March
`
`, 2008
`
`Dated: March l_‘j_, 2008
`
`Dated: March _, 2008
`
`William B. Nash
`
`Daniel D. Chapman
`Mark Fassold
`
`JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
`
`112 E. Pecan Street., Suite 2400
`
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counselfor Respondents Phitek
`Systems Limited, GN Netcom, Inc.,
`Creative Labs, Inc., and Logitech
`Inc.
`
`
`
`J. Aron Carnahan
`
`WELSH & KATZ, LTD.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Fl.
`
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counselfor Respondent Audio
`Technica US, Inc.
`
`Daniel Ebenstein
`
`Abraham Kasdan
`
`Joseph Casino
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`
`90 Park Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counselfor Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation ofNorth America
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER-PAGE 3
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 14, 2008, a copy of
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
`__________________________________
`
`was served on the following as indicated:
`
`
`
`Marilyn R. Abbott
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 112-F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`The Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`T. Spence Chubb, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 404-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`William B. Nash, Esq.
`Daniel D. Chapman, Esq.
`Mark Fassold, Esq.
`Jackson Walker L.L.P.
`112 E. Pecan Street., Suite 2400
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`Alan Cope Johnston, Esq.
`G. Brian Busey, Esq.
`Cynthia Lopez Beverage, Esq.
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 5500
`Washington, DC 20006-1888
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`James P. White, Esq.
`J. Aron Carnahan, Esq.
`Welsh & Katz, Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`Arthur Wineburg, Esq.
`Daniel E. Yonan, Esq.
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
`1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`
`

`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Patrick Edelin, Jr.
`
`
`
`
`
`Daniel Ebenstein, Esq.
`Abraham Kasdan, Esq.
`Joseph Casino, Esq.
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America
`
`
`Tom M. Schaumberg, Esq.
`Jamie D. Underwood, Esq.
`Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP
`1200 Seventh Street, N.W., Fifth Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER NO.: _______
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Having considered the Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order by Complainant Bose
`
`
`
`
`
`Corporation and Respondents Phitek Systems Limited (NZ), GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs,
`
`Inc., Logitech, Inc., Audio-Technica U.S., Inc., and Panasonic Corporation of North America, it
`
`is determined that the motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
`
`
`
`So ORDERED this ______ day of March, 2008.
`
`
`
`
`__________________________________
`Hon. Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge