throbber
Exhibit 2
`
`
`
`In Support of Audio-Technica’s Motion for Summary Determination
`
`
`
`

`
`(12) United States Patent
`Sapiejewski et al.
`
`(10) Patent NO.: US 6,597,792 ~1
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jul. 22,2003
`
`(54) HEADSET NOISE REDUCING
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Roman Sapiejewski, Boston, MA (US);
`Michael J. Monahan, Franklin, MA
`(us]
`
`(73) Assignee: Bose Corporation, Framingham, MA
`( u s )
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`Patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 091353,425
`Jul. 15, 1999
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Int. CL7 ......................... GlOK 11/16; H04R 25100
`(51)
`(52) U.S. C1. ........................ 381171.6; 381174; 3811371;
`3811372; 381171.1
`(58) Field of Search ......................... 381174, 71.6, 312,
`3811371, 372; 1811129
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,644,581 A * 211987 Sapiejewski ................. 381174
`
`5,182,774 A * 111993 Bourk ....................... 381171.6
`511993 Sapiejewski ................ 3811183
`5,208,868 A
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0582404 A
`EP
`0688143 A
`EP
`0873040 A
`EP
`* cited by examiner
`
`211994
`1211995
`1011998
`
`W,
`~
`~
`~
`primary ~
`Assistant Examiner4lizabeth McChesney
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or F i r m q i s h & Richardson P.C.
`ABSTRACT
`
`i
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`q
`
`(57)
`A headset has an earcup with front opening adjacent to an
`annular cushion formed with a plurality of openings facing
`the inside of the earcup that acoustically couples the earcup
`volume to the cushion volume. A driver is seated inside the
`earcup with a microphone adjacent to the driver. Active
`noise reducing circuitry intercouples the driver and micro-
`phone. An acoustic load that may comprise a wire mesh
`resistive cover andlor air mass adjacent the microphone is
`constructed and arranged to reduce the effect of resonances
`in the earcup volume.
`
`6 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`/
`
`EAR
`CUSHION
`
`MICROPHONE
`
`...
`
`WIRE MESH-
`RESISTIVE
`COVER
`
`PLATE
`
`I l E
`
`' DRIVER
`
`EAR CUP
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`J U ~ . 22,2003
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`J U ~ . 22,2003
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`US 6,597,792 BI
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`J U ~ . 22,2003
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`DRIVER PLATE
`MNT. BOSSES
`
`CABLE ENTRY
`
`FIG. 3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22,2003
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`MASS PORT
`01.8 x 8.0 mm
`
`80 x 700 WIRE MESH
`
`FIG. 5
`
`35
`
`

`
`1
`HEADSET NOISE REDUCING
`
`US 6,597,792 B1
`
`The present invention relates in general to headset noise
`reducing and more particularly concerns novel apparatus
`and techniques for actively andlor passively reducing the 5
`noise perceived by the user of a headset.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`A
`
`For background reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos.
`5,305,387, 5,208,868, 5,181,252, 4,989,271, 4,922,542,
`4,644,581 and 4,455,675. Reference is also made to the Bose
`active noise-reducing headsets that are or were commer-
`cially available from Bose Corporation that are incorporated
`by reference herein.
`It is an important object of the invention to provide
`improved noise-reducing for headsets.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`a
`
`J
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL
`VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
`
`~
`
`~
`
`
`
`the
`
`an
`
`the 5s
`
`2
`tronic circuitry intercouples the microphone and driver 12 to
`provide active noise reduction and exchange audio signals
`through cable 14 for transduction by driver 12 into desired
`sound signal for the wearing user and by the microphone
`into a noise-reducing audio signal.
`Referring also to FIG. lB, cushion 1 5 covers the exposed
`front opening adjacent to the ear of the wearing user and is
`formed with an ear opening 15A for accommodating the ear
`-
`-
`of the wearing user and an annular ridge 16 surrounding ear
`opening 15A that is formed with a plurality of openings,
`such as 16A, through which an annular ring of foam is
`visible that rests against driver 12 when assembled.
`Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a diagrammatic
`sectional view through an assembled earcup. Driver 12 is
`seated in earcup 11 with driver plate 12Aextending rearward
`from a lip 11Aof earcup 11 to a ridge 11B with microphone
`1 7 closelv adiacent to driver 12 and covered bv wire mesh
`resistive cover 13. Cushion 15 covers the front opening of
`earcup 11 and includes foam 15B.
`According to the invention, there is an earcup closed at 20
`Referring to FIG. 3, there is shown a pictorial perspective
`the back away from the ear of a user and open at the front
`view into earcup 11 with cushion 15, microphone 1 7 and
`adjacent to the ear of the user. There is a driver inside the
`resistive cover 13 removed to illustrate certain
`wire
`earcup. The earcup has a cushion that is seated in the front
`structural details. Earcup 11 is formed with a cable entry 11C
`opening and formed with an ear opening for accommodating
`for accommodating cable 14 for receiving audio signals for
`the ear of the user and an annular ridge surrounding the ear 25 transduction by driver 12 and intercoupling external elec-
`opening formed with a plurality of openings with adjacent
`tronic circuitry with the drive and microphone. Driver plate
`openings typically spaced from each other by of the order of
`12A carries resistive cover holders 21A and 21B for sup-
`the width of an opening measured along the circumference
`porting the wire mesh resistive cover 13. Microphone holder
`22 extends from the rear wall of earcup 11 for supporting
`of the ear opening with each opening having a radial width
`generally perpendicular to the circumference of the ear 30 microphone 17 and encloses air that comprises acoustical
`opening slightly less than the radial width of the annular
`loading. Driver plate mounting bosses 12B and 12C furnish
`ridge. For active noise reduction, there is a microphone
`a means for attaching driver plate 12A to earcup 11. Driver
`12 divides earcup 11 into a front volume typically about 50
`adjacent to the driver coupled to the driver by electronic
`circuitry that furnishes active noise reduction and an acous-
`CC adjacent to the front opening and a rear volume typically
`tical load around the microphone and driver. The acoustic 35 about 15 CC enclosed by the closed end of earcup 11.
`
`load may comprise a resistive mesh screen andlor air in a
`~
`
`~to FIG, 4, there is shown a rear view of earcup f ~ ~ ~ i
`
`
`
`
`tube. other features, objects and advantages will become
`11 showing mass port 11C and resistive port 11D covered by
`apparent from the following detailed description when read
`a ,ire mesh,
`in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
`40 With reference now to the drawing and more particularly
`FIG. 5 thereof, there is shown a block diagram illustrating
`the logical arrangement of a system incorporating the inven-
`tion corresponding substantially to FIG. 1 of the aforesaid
`'581 patent. A signal combiner 30 algebraically combines
`FIG. 1 A is a perspective view of a headset earcup assem-
`bly embodying the invention with the cushion shown in FIG. 45 the signal desired to be reproduced by the earphone on input
`terminal 24 with a feedback signal provided by microphone
`1B according to the invention removed;
`preamplifier 35. Signal combiner 30 provides the combined
`FIG, 2 is a sectional view of an earcup assembly accord-
`signal to compressor 31 which limits the level of the high
`ing to the invention;
`FIG, 3 is a pictorial perspective view into the earcup
`31 is
`level
`The Output of
`to
`31A.
`31Ainc1udes
`assembly with the microphone and resistive cover plate 50
`circuits to insure that the open loop gain meets the Nyquist
`removed;
`stability criteria, so that the system will not oscillate when
`the loop is closed, The system shown is duplicated once each
`for the left and right ears.
`Power amplifier 31 amplifies the signal from compensator
`31A and energizes earphone driver 2 to provide an acoustical
`that is combined with an outside
`signal in thefront ca;ity
`noise signal that enters the front cavity from a region
`represented as acoustical input terminal 25 to produce a
`With reference now to the drawings and, more
`particularly, FIGS. 1 A and 1B thereof, there is shown a 60 combined acoustic pressure signal in the front cavity repre-
`perspective view of an earcup assembly according to the
`sented as a circle 36 to provide a combined acoustic pressure
`signal applied to and transduced by microphone 7. Micro-
`invention with the perforated cushion of FIG. 1B removed.
`phone amplifier 35 amplifies the transduced signal and
`Earcup 11 is closed at the rear away from the ear of a user
`delivers it to signal combiner 30.
`and supports driver 12 and a closely adjacent microphone
`(not seen in FIG. 1A) that is covered by resistive mesh 65 Having described the structural arrangement of an
`screen 13 typically formed with an opening 13A exposing
`embodiment of the invention, principles of operation will be
`the microphone and comprising an acoustical load. Elec-
`described. A problem in active noise-reducing circumaural
`
`is a perspective view
`earcup; and
`is a
`
`diagram of a 'ystem
`
`invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`

`
`US 6,597,792 B1
`
`4
`
`and further
`
`What is claimed is:
`1. A headset comprising,
`
`3
`headphones arises from earcup resonances causing a rough
`acoustic response that is a function of the head of the user,
`making electronic compensation difficult.
`an earcup having a front opening adapted to be adjacent
`One approach for smoothing the acoustic response is to
`to the ear of the user,
`place damping material, typically highly absorptive foam, 5
`around the walls of the earcup. This approach typically
`a driver inside said earcup,
`requires a significant thickness of foam to provide sufficient
`a cushion around the periphery of said front 'pening
`damping and requires earcups of relatively large volume to
`formed with an ear opening constructed and arranged to
`accommodate the thick foam. Furthermore, the damping of
`accommodate the ear of a user and formed with a
`the highly absorptive foam is a sensitive function of the lo
`physical dimensions of the foam and atmospheric
`plurality of openings around said opening constructed
`conditions, causing inconsistent acoustical response.
`and arranged to acoustically add the volume of said
`Resonance in the earcup may produce instability by
`cushion to the volume of said earcup and enhance
`causing oscillation at certain frequencies that typically limits
`passive attenuation.
`the amount of feedback for active noise reduction. By
`acoustically loading the microphone and driver with the wire l5 2. A headset in accordance with 'laim
`comprising,
`mesh resistive cover 13 andlor the enclosed air, resonances
`are significantly reduced, allowing increased gain in the
`a microphone inside said earcup adjacent to said driver,
`feedback loop and significantly improved active noise
`and
`reduction in an earcup of relatively small volume.
`active noise reducing circuitry intercoupling said micro-
`By forming openings in annular ridge 16 of cushion 15 to 20
`phone and said driver constructed and arranged to
`expose foam material 15B, the effective volume of the
`provide active noise reduction,
`earcup is significantly increased to embrace the volume
`whereby said cushion with said plurality of openings is
`occupied by cushion 15 and thereby increase passive attenu-
`further constructed and arranged to furnish addi-
`ation and provides additional damping to help smooth the
`tional damping to help smooth the audio response at
`audio response at the ear and control stability with the 25
`headset off the head.
`the ear of a user and control stability with the headset
`The invention has a number of advantages. Cup size is
`off the head.
`relatively small, yet there is considerable effective volume
`3. A headset in accordance with claim 2 and further
`with the additional effective volume afforded by cushion 15
`comprising,
`accessed through openings such as 16A. The effect of 30
`an acoustic load in close proximity to said microphone
`resonances inside earcup 11 is significantly reduced with
`constructed and arranged to reduce the effects of reso-
`wire mesh resistive cover 13 andlor the enclosed air, thereby
`nances in said earcup.
`allowing a significant increase in loop gain of the active
`4. A headset in accordance with claim 3 wherein said
`noise reducing system.
`It is evident that those skilled in the art may now make 35 acoustic load comprises a wire mesh resistive cover.
`5. A headset in accordance with claim 4 wherein said wire
`numerous uses and modifications of and departures from the
`mesh resistive cover is formed with an opening near said
`specific apparatus and techniques herein disclosed without
`microphone.
`departing from the inventive concepts. Consequently, the
`6. A headset in accordance with claim 4 wherein said wire
`invention is to be construed as embracing each and every
`novel feature and novel combination of features present in or 40 mesh resistive cover coacts with said driver to substantially
`enclose said microphone.
`possessed by the apparatus and techniques herein disclosed
`and limited solely by the spirit and scope of the appended
`claims.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`
`
`In Support of Audio-Technica’s Motion for Summary Determination
`
`
`
`

`
` UNITED‘ STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Oflice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box I450
`Alexandria, Virginia 223 I 3-I450
`www.uSpl0,gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`I0/754,094
`
`OI/08/2004
`
`Roman Sapiejewski
`
`’
`
`012103-353002
`
`7613
`
`'
`75”
`W
`'FISH&RICHARDSONPC
`P.O. BOX 1022
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022
`
`°’”°”°°"
`
`.
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2615
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`02/29/2008
`
`LEE, PING
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`10/754,094
`
`Examne,
`
`Ping Lee
`
`SAPIEJEWSKI ET AL.
`
`A,., Unit
`
`2615
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE Q MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`- Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)lZ] Responsive to communication(s) filed on 07 December 2007.
`
`2b)XI This action is non-final.
`2a)l:I This action is FINAL.
`3)l:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`4)E| C|aim(s)L is/are pending in the application.
`
`4a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`Application Papers
`
`9)EI The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`10)I] The drawing(s) filed on ___is/ are: a)I:] accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CF R 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CF R 1.121(d).
`
`11)I:] The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:l Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`a)l:l All b)lj Some * c)Ij None of:
`
`Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. __
`
`Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2( )).
`
`‘
`
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`4) CI Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mall Date. __.
`2) El Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948)
`5) I:I N°1i°e Of '"f°""a' Palem Application
`3) I] lnforrnation Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/O8)
`6) C] Other: ___.
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`.
`
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06)
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20080219
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`1.
`
`_ The information disclosure statement filed on 12/7/07 fails to comply with 37 CFR
`
`1.98(a)(1), which requires the following: (1) a list of all patents, publications,
`
`applications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office; (2) U.S.
`
`patents and U.S. patent application publications listed in a section separately from
`
`citations of other documents; (3) the application number of the application in which the
`
`information disclosure statement is being submitted on each page of the list; (4) a
`
`column that provides a blank space next to each document to be considered, for the
`
`examiner’s initials; and (5) a heading that clearly indicates that the list is an information
`
`disclosure statement. The submitted document with pictures of Beyerdynamic cushion
`
`and headphones is not being properly identified. The information disclosure statement
`
`has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not
`
`been considered.
`
`Claim Objections
`Claim 9 is objected tounder 37 CFR 1I75(c), as being of improper dependent
`
`2.
`
`form for failing to further limit the subject matter of a previous claim. Applicant is
`
`required to cancel the c|aim(s), or amend the c|aim(s) to place the c|aim(s) in proper
`
`dependent form, or rewrite the c|aim(s) in independent form. The limitation as specified
`
`in claim 9 is being wholly incorporated into claim 7.
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`Page 3
`-
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`3.
`
`The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S.- Code not included in this action can
`
`be found in a prior Office action.
`
`4.
`
`Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Gorike et al
`
`(hereafter Gorike) (US 4,005,267).
`
`3
`
`Regarding claim 1, Gorike discloses headset comprising, an earcup having a
`
`front opening adapted to be adjacent to the ear of the user (see Fig. 3), a driver inside
`
`said earcup (col. 7, line 1+), a cushion (14) around the periphery of said front opening
`
`formed with an ear opening constructed and arranged to accommodate the ear of a
`
`user and formed with a plurality of openings ("open pores"; col. 7, line 37) around said
`
`opening constructed (although not explicitly shown, the open pores are inherently
`
`located evenly on the cushion; therefore, some of them arenaround the opening; as
`
`shown in Fig. 3, some holes are located facing the passageway between the cushion)
`
`and arranged to acoustically add the volume of said cushion (although not explicitly
`
`A shown, the open pores are in contact with the coupling volume; therefore, the open
`
`pores would inherently add the volume of the cushion to the coupling volume) to the
`
`volume of said earcup and enhance passive attenuation ("a more or less intense
`
`communication between the coupling volume and the outside air"; col. 7, lines 37-39).
`
`In another embodiment, Fig. 11 illustrates a cushion. As" disclosed in col. 9, lines
`28-33, the cushion is made of sound transmitting material, so it would acoustically add
`
`the volume of the cushion to the volume of the earcup and enhance passive
`
`afienuafion.
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`.
`
`Page 4
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 7-11 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Jones (US007103188B1) in view of Olsson (US005913178A).
`
`Regarding claims 7-9, 11 and 15-17, Jones shows a headset comprising, an
`
`earcup having ‘a front opening (see Fig. 2A) adapted to be adjacent to the ear of the
`
`user (See Fig. 1), a driver (22) inside said earcup, a microphone (28) inside said earcup
`
`_ adjacent to said driver (see Fig. 2A), active noise reducing circuitry (abstract)
`
`intercoupling said microphone (28) and said driver (22) constructed and arranged to
`
`provide active noise reduction, a resistive wire cover (26) positioned over the driver (22)
`
`and the microphone (28; col. 8, lines 55-56) coacting with the driver (22) to substantially
`enclose the microphone (28), the resistive cover (26) and the driver (16) defining a
`
`volume with enclosed air and the microphone (18) therebetween, the enclosed air and
`
`the resistive cover forming an acoustic load (although not_exp|icit|y discussed, the
`
`acoustic load is inherently there caused by the grille and the air).
`
`Jones fails to explicitly discuss that the load reduces the effects of resonances in
`
`the earcup. However, Jones clearly teaches that the resistive cover imparts certain
`
`acoustic properties to the sound system to achieve the desired acoustic response.
`
`Jones further teaches that his/her design would greatly improve the stability of the
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`Page 5
`
`system.
`
`It was well known to those in the art that the resonance(s) caused instability.
`
`Olsson teaches that a resistive fine-meshed grille of cross—laid thin wires could be used
`
`for reducing resonance (col. 5, lines 20-26). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art to modify Jones in view of Olsson by selecting the proper grille in
`
`order to reduce the resonance and obtain stability of the system.
`
`Regarding claim 10, although not explicitly shown, the microphone is inherently
`
`positioned between the grille and the speaker by a holder (could be by any means as
`
`long as the microphone is being properly positioned).
`7.‘
`Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Jones in view of Gorike.
`
`Regarding claims 1 and 2, Jones discloses a headset comprising, an earcup
`
`(Fig. 2A) having abfront opening adapted to be adjacent to the ear of the user (Fig. 1),‘ a
`driver (22) inside said earcup, a cushion (3.0) around the periphery of said front opening
`
`formed with an ear opening constructed and arranged to accommodate the ear of a
`user, a microphone (28) inside said earcup adjacent to said driver, and active noise
`
`reducing circuitry (abstract) intercoupling said microphone (28) and said driver (22)
`
`constructed and arranged to provide active noise reduction, whereby said cushion is
`
`further constructed and arranged to furnish additional damping to help smooth the audio
`
`response at the ear of a user and control stability with the headset off the head (col. 5,
`
`lines 10-22).
`
`‘ Jones fails to disclose that the cushion is formed with a plurality of openings
`
`around the opening constructed and arranged to acoustically add the volume of the
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`Page 6
`
`cushion to the volume of the earcup and enhance passive attenuation. Gorike teaches
`
`that the cushion material could be selected depending on how much communication’
`
`between the outside air and the coupling volume is preferred (col. 7, lines 33-38). For
`
`example, foam material with open pores would have a plurality of openings around the
`
`opening of the earcup. Depending on the density of the pores, the passive attenuation
`
`could be enhanced. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art
`
`to modify Jones in view of Gorike by selecting cushion material made with open pores in
`
`order to enhance passive attenuation and communication between the outside air and
`
`the coupling volume.
`
`8.
`
`Claims 3-6 are rejected under.35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Jones in view of Gorike as applied to claims 1 and 2 above, and further in view of
`
`Olsson.
`
`Regarding ‘claims 3-6, Jones fails to explicitly show that the grille is a wire mesh
`
`resistive cover. However, Jones clearly teaches that the resistive cover imparts certain
`
`acoustic properties to the sound system to achieve the desired acoustic response.
`
`Jones further teaches that his/her design would greatly improve the stability of the
`
`system.
`
`It was well known to those in the art that the resonance(s) caused instability.
`
`Olsson teaches that a resistive fine—meshed grille of 'cross—laid thin wires could be used
`
`for reducing resonance (col. 5, lines 20-26). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art to further modify Jones and Gorike in view of Olsson by selecting
`
`the proper grille in order to reduce the resonance and obtain stability of the system.
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`I
`
`'
`
`Page 7
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`9.
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 12/7/07 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive.
`
`Applicant argued that examiner used the rejected claim as a blueprint to
`
`reconstruct the claimed invention from the prior art. This is not persuasive. Every '
`
`patent examination requires to use applicant's claim(s) as a guide to search for all
`
`relevant prior art. The rejection for claim 1 is 102(b) as the claimed invention is being
`
`anticipated by Gorike. The claimed openings read on the open pores in Gorike, the
`
`claimed “acoustically add the volume of said cushion to the volume of said earcup"
`
`reads on the inherent feature provided the cushion with open pores, the claimed
`
`"enhance passive attenuation” reads on the phrase as disclosed in col. 7, lines 38-39.
`
`App|icant’s case law citations are irrelevant because the rejection is not based on
`
`obviousness, it is based on anticipation.
`
`Applicant further argued that the cushion 14 in Gorike is acoustically isolated
`from the volume of the earcup. This is not convincing. As t36rike clearly indicated that
`
`the cushion is made of open pores, so the cushion is not acoustically isolated from the
`
`earcup. The open pores will provide acoustic connection between the earcup and some
`
`,space inside the cushion. Furthermore, Gorike clearly discloses that depending on the
`
`cushion material, “a more or less intense communication between the coupling volume
`
`and the outside air”.
`
`If the cushion 14 in Gorike is acoustically isolated from the volume
`
`of the earcup as alleged by application, the communication between the coupling
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number:
`10/754,094
`Art Unit: 2615
`
`Page 8
`
`volume and the outside air cannot be modified or adjusted as suggested in Gorike.
`
`Therefore, applicant clearly does not understand Gorike as a whole.
`
`App|icant's.arguments with respect to claims 7 and 11 have beenconsidered but
`
`are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`10.
`examiner should be directed to Ping Lee whose telephone number is 571-272-7522.
`The examiner can normally be reached on Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`supervisor, Vivian C. Chin can be reached on 571-272-7848. The fax phone number for
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (to||—free). If you would like assistance from a
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`Ing
`
`
`rimary Examiner
`Art Unit 2615
`
`pwl
`
`

`
`
`Exhibit 4
`
`
`
`In Support of Audio-Technica’s Motion for Summary Determination
`
`
`
`

`
`plurality of openings
`
`ear opening
`
`cushion
`
`driver
`
`earcup
`
`cushion
`
`opening
`ear
`
`front opening
`
`earcup
`
`
`
`Bose® QuietComfort® 2 Acoustic Noise Cancelling® headphones
`
`Representative Photographs:
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 6,597,792
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`Claims 1
`
`
`
`
`
`headset is worn by the user.
`enhance passive attenuation when the
`cushion to the volume of the earcup and
`acoustically add the volume of the
`around its inner periphery. The openings
`cover includes a series of openings
`enclosed by a leatherette cover. The
`a cushion having a ring of foam largely
`The Bose QuietComfort Products include
`a driver located inside the earcup.
`The Bose QuietComfort Products include
`worn.
`to the ear of the user when the headset is
`an earcup with a front opening that is next
`The Bose QuietComfort Products include
`headsets.
`The Bose QuietComfort Products are all
`
`attenuation.
`earcup and enhance passive
`cushion to the volume of said
`acoustically add the volume of said
`constructed and arranged to
`of openings around said opening
`of a user and formed with a plurality
`arranged to accommodate the ear
`ear opening constructed and
`said front opening formed with an
`a cushion around the periphery of
`
`a driver inside said earcup,
`
`the user,
`adapted to be adjacent to the ear of
`an earcup having a front opening
`
`1. A headset comprising,
`
`Noise Cancelling® headphones and
`Bose® QuietComfort® 2 Acoustic
`
`Cancelling headphones (the "Bose
`QuietComfort® 3 Acoustic Noise
`
`QuietComfort Products")
`
`

`
`Exhibit 9 to Bose’s First Supplemental Responses to Phitek’s First Set of Interrogatories—Page 2
`
`
`
`figures for additional detail)
`headset off the head (see claim 1
`a user and control stability with the
`smooth the audio response at the ear of
`furnish additional damping to help
`further constructed and arranged to
`Cushion with a plurality of openings
`
`
`
`Microphone
`
`
`
`Circuitry
`Active Noise Reducing
`
`Driver
`
`
`
`
`
`the headset off the head.
`of the user and control stability with
`smooth the audio response at the ear
`furnish additional damping to help
`further constructed and arranged to
`a cushion with a plurality of openings
`Bose QuietComfort Products include
`provide active noise reduction. The
`driver constructed and arranged to
`intercoupling the microphone and
`include active noise reducing circuitry
`Bose QuietComfort Products further
`earcup adjacent to the driver. The
`include a microphone inside the
`The Bose QuietComfort Products
`
`the headset off the head.
`user and control stability with
`audio response at the ear of a
`damping to help smooth the
`arranged to furnish additional
`further constructed and
`with said plurality of openings is
`reduction, whereby said cushion
`arranged to provide active noise
`and said driver constructed and
`intercoupling said microphone
`active noise reducing circuitry
`adjacent to said driver, and
`a microphone inside said earcup
`claim 1 and further comprising,
`2. A headset in accordance with
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Exhibit 5
`
`
`
`In Support of Audio-Technica’s Motion for Summary Determination
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Headset
`
`The ATH is a headset.
`
`
`
`Audio Technica QuietPoint™ ATH-ANC7 Active Noise Cancelling
`
`Representative Photographs

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket