throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`RESPONDENTS PHITEK SYSTEMS LIMITED (NZ)’S, CREATIVE LABS, INC.’S AND
`AUDIO TECHNICA, U.S. INC’S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR TWO WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
`BOSE CORPORATION’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY DETERMINATION
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.15(d) and § 210.18, Respondents Phitek Systems Limited
`
`(NZ), Creative Labs, Inc., and Audio Technica, U.S. Inc. respectfully request a two (2) week
`
`extension of time to file responses to the three (3) separate motions for summary determination
`
`filed by Complaint Bose Corporation (“Bose”) on June 30, 2008. Bose does not oppose the
`
`filing of this motion or a two (2) week extension. Bose has agreed to the filing of this motion for
`
`a two (2) week extension of time. The Staff does not oppose a two (2) week extension of time.
`
`Bose filed three (3) motions for summary determination on June 30, 2008: (1) Bose
`
`Corporation’s Motion for Summary Determination on Prosecution History Estoppel, Prosecution
`
`Laches, and Inequitable Conduct Defenses; (2) Bose Corporation’s Motion for Summary
`
`Determination that the QuietComfort 2 Headset Practices at Least One Claim of Each Patent-in-
`
`Suit; and (3) Bose Corporation’s Motion for Summary Determination on Importation of Accused
`
`Products by Respondent Phitek Systems Limited. The court issued Order No. 11 on July 7,
`
`2008, extending the target date to August 6, 2009, and postponing the trial date in this
`
`investigation to December 4-12, 2008. During the parties third settlement conference, on July 9,
`
`2008, Complainant Bose and all Respondents agreed to a two (2) week extension of time to
`
`dc-529292
`
`1
`
`

`
`respond to Bose’s three (3) above-identified motions for summary determination. Thus, the
`
`Respondents respectfully request the court grant a two (2) week extension of time to the
`
`Respondents and Staff to respond to Bose’s three (3) motions for summary determination,
`
`making the Respondents’ responses due on July 24, 2008, and the Staff responses due thereafter.
`
`Dated: July 10, 2008
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Cynthia Lopez Beverage
`____________________________
`William B. Nash
`Dan Chapman
`Mark Fassold
`JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
`112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 2400
`San Antonio, Texas USA 78205
`(210) 978-7700 (phone)
`(210) 242-4620 (fax)
`
`Alan Cope Johnston
`G. Brian Busey
`Cynthia Lopez Beverage
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 887-1500 (phone)
`(202) 887-0168 (fax)
`
`Counsel for Phitek Systems Limited (NZ) and
`Creative Labs, Inc.
`
`dc-529292
`
`2
`
`

`
`Dated: July 10, 2008
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ J. Aron Carnahan
`____________________________
`
`James P. White
`Gerald T. Shekleton
`J. Aron Carnahan
`Welsh & Katz Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`
`Arthur Wineburg
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
`1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica, U.S. Inc
`
`dc-529292
`
`3
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING HEADPHONES
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`I hereby certify that copies of:
`
`RESPONDENTS PHITEK SYSTEMS LIMITED (NZ)’S, CREATIVE LABS, INC.’S AND AUDIO
`TECHNICA, U.S. INC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR TWO WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO
`RESPOND TO BOSE CORPORATION’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY DETERMINATION
`
`have been served on July 10, 2008, as indicated, on the following
`
`Marilyn R. Abbott
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 112A
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`2 copies
`
`Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W. Room 401-F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`T Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`T Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`* Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`T Via Electronic Mail
`
`dc-529292
`
`4
`
`

`
`Jennifer Whang
`Administrative Law Judge Attorney-Advisor
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Andrew R. Kopsidas
`Jeffrey R, Whieldon
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1425 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Attorneys for Complainant Bose Corporation
`
`Charles Hieken
`Gregory A. Madera
`Adam J. Kessel
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`225 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02 1 10
`Attorneys for Complainant Bose Corporation
`
`James P. White
`Gerald T. Shekleton
`J. Aron Carnahan
`Welsh & Katz Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`
`Attorneys for Respondent Audio Technica, U.S. Inc.
`
`Arthur Wineburg
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
`1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Attorneys for Respondent Audio Technica, U.S. Inc.
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`T Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`dc-529292
`
`5
`
`

`
`Tom M. Schaumberg
`Jamie D. Underwood
`Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP
`1200 Seventeenth Floor, NW, Fifth Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation of North
`America
`Daniel Ebenstein
`Abraham Kasdan
`Joseph Casino
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation of North
`America
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`* Via First Class Mail
`* Via Hand Delivery
`* Via Overnight Delivery
`* Via Facsimile
`S Via Electronic Mail
`
`___/s/ Cynthia Lopez Beverage
` Cynthia Lopez Beverage
`
`dc-529292
`
`6
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`PROPOSED ORDER NO. ____ GRANTING RESPONDENTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
`FOR TWO WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO BOSE CORPORATION’S
`MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY DETERMINATION
`
`Having considered Respondents’ Motion for Two Week Extension of Time to Respond to
`
`Bose Corporation’s Motions for Summary Determination,
`
`The Motion is hereby GRANTED, and it is ordered that:
`
`A two (2) week extension of time is granted to all Respondents to file their responses to
`
`(1) Bose Corporation’s Motion for Summary Determination on Prosecution History Estoppel,
`
`Prosecution Laches, and Inequitable Conduct Defenses; (2) Bose Corporation’s Motion for
`
`Summary Determination that the QuietComfort 2 Headset Practices at Least One Claim of Each
`
`Patent-in-Suit; and (3) Bose Corporation’s Motion for Summary Determination on Importation
`
`of Accused Products by Respondent Phitek Systems Limited. Supplemental Letter and Notice of
`
`Investigation;
`
`The Respondents’ and the Staff’s deadline to file responses to Bose Corporation’s three
`
`motions for summary determination will now be July 24, 2008.
`
`dc-529292
`
`7
`
`

`
`So ORDERED this _____ day of July, 2008
`
`_______________________________
`Hon. Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`dc-529292
`
`8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket