throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`
`
`JACKIE GREEN
`Direct Witness Statement
`
`
`Please state your name.
`
`Question No. 1.
`
`
`Jackie Green.
`
`Are you employed?
`
`Where?
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 2.
`
`
`Yes.
`
`Question No. 3.
`
`
`Audio-Technica US, which is sometimes called ATUS.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 4.
`
`
`What is the nature of ATUS’ business?
`
`-It designs and sells professional audio equipment, including headphones.
`
`Question No. 5.
`
`
`How long have you been employed by ATUS?
`
`Over 21years.
`
`
`
`Question No. 6
`
`
`What is your position with ATUS?
`
`Vice-President of Research and Development/Engineering.
`
`
`
`Question No. 7.
`
`Where is ATUS located?
`
`RX-136
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Stow, Ohio.
`
`How long has ATUS been in business?
`
`Nearly 30 years.
`
`Question No. 8.
`
`
`Question No. 9.
`
`
`How long has ATUS been selling headphones?
`
`Nearly 30 years.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 10.
`United States?
`
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`Question No. 11.
`States?
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 12.
`
`ATH 909, ATH 910, and ATH 911, and others.
`
`Directing your attention to 1988, was ATUS selling headphones in the
`
`What models of headphones was ATUS selling in 1988 in the United
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RPX-9 (ATH 909), RPX-10
`(ATH 910) and RPX-12 (ATH 911). Can you identify these exhibits?
`
`What are they?
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 13.
`
`
`These are the ATH 909, 910, and 911 headphones that were offered for sale and
`sold in 1988.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 14.
`
`Directing your attention to 1990, was ATUS offering for sale and selling
`headphones in the United States?
`
`Yes, we were selling a number of models, including those I just referenced. We
`also introduced the ATH 908 in 1990.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Question No. 15.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RPX-8 and ask you to identify
`it.
`
`RPX-8 is the ATUS 908 headphone.
`
`Question No. 16.
`
`How do you know that Exhibits RPX-9, RPX-10 and RPX-12, were
`offered for sale and sold in 1988?
`
`I was the Product Manager for ATUS in 1988 in charge of the development of
`these headphones. I negotiated the pricing of these units, created the price lists,
`created the sales literature, and supervised the creation of the packaging and the
`point of purchase displays for these headphones. I also supervised the creation of
`the trade show display that held the headphones at trade shows. I attended the
`trade shows where the headphones were offered for sale and sold. As such, I was
`involved in the initial sales of these products. I also went back to the records of
`Audio-Technica and found price lists that I wrote and that were issued at or about
`the time the headphones were sold.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 17.
`How do you know that the ATH-908 headphone (exhibit RPX-8), was
`offered for sale and sold as early as 1990?
`
`
`In 1990, I was still the Product Manager who was responsible for the same
`development tasks with the ATH-908 that I discussed in connection with the
`earlier headphones I just mentioned. I also went back to ATUS records and found
`the 1990 price lists, which were written by me, and these price lists were issued
`about the same time the product was sold.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 18.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RX 198C, and ask you to
`identify this document.
`
`RX-198C is a price list from June of 1988 showing the ATUS headphone models
`ATH 909, ATH 910, and ATH 911 being offered for sale.
`
`Question No. 19.
`
`According to RX198C, what was the Professional net price for the ATH
`909, ATH910, and ATH 911 in 1988?
`
`The ATH 909 professional net price was $79, the ATH910 was $99, and the 911
`was $129.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Question No. 20.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RX-266C, and ask you to
`identify the document.
`
`
`Question No. 21.
`
`This is an ATUS “Professional User” price list from February of 1988 showing
`the ATUS headphone models ATH 909, ATH 910, and ATH 911.
`
`Directing your attention to Exhibit RX-266C, could you point out the
`prices for ATH 909 (exhibit RPX-9), ATH 910 (exhibit RPX-10), and
`ATH 911 (exhibit RPX-12)?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 22.
`
`Page number AT0133712 shows the 900 series stereophones prices for the ATH
`909, ATH 910, and ATH 911. The ATH 909 is listed at $79, the ATH 910 is
`listed at $99, and the ATH911 is listed at $129.
`
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RX-267C, and ask you to
`identify the document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 23.
`
`This is an ATUS “Confidential Dealer” price list from February of 1988 showing
`the ATUS headphone models ATH 909, ATH 910, and ATH 911.
`
`Directing your attention to Exhibit RX-267C, could you point out the
`prices for ATH 909 (exhibit RPX-9C), ATH 910 (exhibit RPX-10C), and
`ATH 911 (exhibit RPX-12C)?
`
`Although the prices vary with how many headphones are purchased at once, the
`dealer cost for one set of headphones is listed as $42.75for the ATH 909, $55.00
`for the ATH 910, and $71.75 for the ATH911, as shown on page number
`AT0133714.
`
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as ATUS Exhibit RPX 206C and
`ask you to identify the same.
`
`Exhibit RX-206C consists of another price list for Audio Technica products, this
`one from January 1, 1990.
`
`
`Question No. 24.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 25.
`
`Yes.
`
`
`Question No. 26.
`
`Does Exhibit RX-206C reference prices for headphones sold by Audio
`Technica?
`
`Directing your attention to Exhibit RX-206C, could you point out the
`prices for any of the headphone models ATH 908 (exhibit RPX-8), ATH
`909 (exhibit RPX-9) and ATH 910 (exhibit RPX-10)?
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`Yes, the Master Pack price for ATH 908 was $37.98, the ATH 909 was $42.98, and
`ATH 910 was $53.98 in 1990.
`
`
`Question No. 27 Now directing your attention to Exhibit RX-232C, could you please identify
`this document?
`
`
`
`Yes. Exhibit RX-232C is the confidential dealer price list effective January 1,
`1995.
`
`
`
`Question No. 28 Again directing your attention to Exhibit RX-232C, could you please point out
`the prices for any of the headphone models ATH 908 (exhibit RPX-8) and ATH 910 (exhibit
`RPX-10) from 1995?
`
`
`The page numbered AT00008994 lists the prices in 1995 for ATH 908 ($57) and
`ATH 910 ($69), with discounts for buying higher volumes of headphones.
`
`
`Question No. 29 Now directing your attention to Exhibit RX-262C, could you please identify
`this document?
`
`
`Yes. Exhibit RX-262C is the confidential dealer professional products price list effective
`April 1, 2001.
`
`Question No. 30 Again directing your attention to Exhibit RX-262C, could you point out the
`prices for any of the headphone models ATH 908 (exhibit RPX-8) and ATH 910 (exhibit RPX-
`10) from 2001?
`
`
`The page numbered AT00009054 lists the prices for the ATH 908 ($52.25) and ATH
`910 ($63.25), again with discounts for volume purchases.
`
`
`
`Question No. 31.
`
`You testified earlier about various ATUS price lists, including RX 198C
`RX 206C, RX-232C, RX262C, RX-264C, RX266C, AND RX267C.
`Where did you locate these price lists?
`
`All of these price lists were kept in the archives of ATUS at Stow, Ohio.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No 32.
`
`Were the price lists you testified about (RX 198C RX 206C, RX-232C,
`RX262C, RX-264C, RX266C, AND RX267C) actually distributed to
`dealers or customers?
`
`Yes, and I know this because we printed large quantities of the price lists to take
`to trade shows. We kept them behind the trade show stand and distributed
`
`5
`
`

`
`them to dealers, customers or end users as appropriate. I attended the
`shows, handed out price sheets and I saw others hand them out.
`
`Where did you locate the headphones that are marked as ATUS Exhibits
`RPX-8, RPX-9, RPX-10 and RPX-12?
`
`
`
`Question No. 33.
`
`
`
`They were located in a storage closet at ATUS in Stow, Ohio.
`
`What was your position at ATUS in 1988?
`
`
`Question No. 34.
`
`
`Product Manager.
`
`
`
`Question No. 35.
`
`
`What was your position at ATUS in 1990?
`
`Product Manager.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RX-194 and ask you to
`identify the contents of this Exhibit.
`
`ATUS RX- 194 are advertisements for the ATH 900 series headphones.
`
`
`
`Question No. 36.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 37.
`
`Directing your attention to RX-194, production page number
`AT00008890, what headphones are the subject of that advertisement?
`
`The ATH 909 and ATH 910 headphones, respectively.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 38.
`
`
`Do you know when this advertisement was first used by ATUS?
`
`I believe it was 1988.
`
`Question No. 39.
`
`
`Why do you believe that?
`
`It has a copyright notice of 1988 at the bottom of page number AT00008890.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 40.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RX-189, and ask you to
`identify the contents of this Exhibit.
`
`More 900 series headphone advertisements.
`
`6
`
`

`
`
`Question No. 41.
`
`Turning to the production page number AT00008896, what headphones
`are the subject of that advertisement in exhibit RX-189?
`
`The ATH 908 (RPX-8) and ATH 910 PRO (RPX 4).
`
`Question No. 42.
`
`
`Do you know when this Exhibit RX-189 was first used by ATUS?
`
`I believe it was first used in 1995 because it has a copyright notice of 1995 at the
`bottom of the production page number AT00008896.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No 43.
`
`Where did you locate the advertisements that have been marked as
`Exhibits RX-189 and RX-194?
`
`In the archives of ATUS at Stow, Ohio.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No 44.
`Were the advertisements designated Exhibits RX-189 and RX-194
`actually used in advertising ATUS the products depicted in those advertisements?
`
`
`Yes, and I know this because we printed large quantities of this
`
`advertising literature to take to trade shows. We displayed them in our
`trade show booth and I saw people taking this literature when I attended
`the shows.
`
`Are you familiar with headphones sold by ATUS other than Exhibit RPX
`4, RPX-8, RPX-9, RPX-10 and RPX-12?
`
`Let me show you what has been marked ATUS Exhibit RX-264C and
`Exhibit RX-265C, and ask you to identify these particular exhibits.
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 45
`
` Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 46.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 47.
`
`
`
`Exhibit RX-265C is the Product Development Request for AP1300 headphone,
`and Exhibit RX-264C is the Product Development Request for AP1400 headphone
`
`What is a Product Development Request form?
`
`This was a form we used to describe a product or product line that we
`
`circulated to get approvals on pricing, schedules, the product configuration and
`performance, etc. It was a stage required in a product development stage gate
`process in order to “launch” a product.
`
`7
`
`

`
`Question No. 48.
`
`Let me show what has been marked as RPX-3 and RPX-2 and ask you to
`identify those Exhibits.
`
`
`
`These are the AP 1300 Headphones (RPX-3) and AP1400 Headphones (RPX-2)
`
`Question No. 49.
`
`Do you know if these particular headphones marked RPX-3 (AP1300) and
`RPX-2 (AP1400) and referenced in Exhibits RX-264C and RX-265C were
`sold by Audio Technica in the United States?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes, these products they were sold by ATUS.
`
`
`How do you know they were sold?
`
`
`Question No. 50.
`
`
`I wrote the Product Development Requests and created the Pricing Structure for
`the AP1300 and AP1400 dated 1987, and I recall products referenced in Exhibits
`RX-264C and RX-265C being in the ATUS product line. I was the Product
`Manager for these headphones when they came out and was responsible for
`coordinating the development of these headphones.
`
`
`
`Question No. 51.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as ATUS Exhibit RX-197C with
`a production page number AT00008894, and ask you to identify that
`exhibit.
`
`Exhibit RX-197C is a confidential dealer price list that references the prices for
`AP1300 and AP1400 headphones effective June 1, 1987.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 52.
`
`
`What was your position with Audio Technica from 1987 through 1995?
`
`I started as a Product Manager, then I was promoted to Vice President of Product
`Development in the early 1990’s, and later I became the Vice President of
`Research and Development/Engineering.
`
`Question No. 53.
`
`You testified earlier that various headphones of ATUS were sold. How do
`you know ATUS headphones identified as Exhibits RPX-2, RPX-3, RPX-
`4, RPX-8, RPX-9, RPX-10, and RPX-12 were offered for sale and sold by
`ATUS in the United States?
`
`As part of my duties, I worked on the development of these headphones and
`created the pricing structure for headphone products sold by the company and
`
`8
`
`

`
`maintained the records that reflect the development, advertising and sale of these
`headphone products.
`
`
`
`Offering Exhibits At this time, your Honor, Respondent ATUS, offers into evidence ATUS
`Exhibits RPX-2, RPX-3, RPX-4, RPX-8, RPX-9, RPX-10, RPX-12, RX-
`189, RX-194, RX-197C, RX-198C, RX 206C, RX-232C, RX-262C, RX-
`264C, RX-265, C RX-266C and RX-267C, which have been marked for
`identification as Respondent’s Exhibit RPX-2, RPX-3, RPX-4, RPX-8,
`RPX-9, RPX-10, RPX-12, RX-189, RX-194, RX-197C, RX-198C, RX
`206C, RX-232C, RX-262C, RX-264C, RX-265C, RX-266C & RX-267C.
`
`
`
`Question No. 54.
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as ATUS Exhibit RX -188C and
`ask you to identify this Exhibit.
`
`This is a series of e-mails concerning Mr. Roman Sapiejewski, an engineer at
`Bose, and Mr. Bill Balmer of Audio Technica, and others during the 1997–1998
`time period relating to Audio Technica drivers and other components that could
`be used in noise cancelling headphones that Bose was designing.
`
`Question No. 55.
`
`
`Who is Mr. Balmer?
`
`Mr. Balmer was an OEM sales engineer at ATUS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Did you know Mr. Balmer?
`
`Why is it that you have this series of e-mails?
`
`Question No. 56
`
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`Question No. 57.
`
`
`I obtained the e-mails from Bill Ballmer’s files at the time Bill retired from
`ATUS. These e-mails were kept in his files, and later my files, as part of Audio
`Technica’s business records.
`
`Your Honor, Audio Technica offers into evidence Exhibit RX-188C which
`has been marked for identification as Respondent’s Exhibit RX-188C.
`
`Ms. Green, were you aware of the relationship between Bose and Audio
`Technica during the years 1997 and 1998?
`
`
`Offering Exhibit
`
`
`
`Question No. 58.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 59.
`
`
`
`Question No. 60.
`
`What was that relationship?
`
`Bose was looking to source component parts from Audio-Technica for a noise
`cancelling headphone, and possibly have ATUS be an OEM supplier for a Bose
`noise cancelling headphone
`
`What component parts were Bose exploring that Audio Technica could
`provide?
`
`Drivers, microphones, and possibly even the whole headphone product
`
`Do the e-mails discuss what type of drivers Bose was interested in
`obtaining?
`
`Yes, Audio-Technica supplied Bose with a number of possible drivers, including
`40mm drivers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 61.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 62.
`
`
`Where is that e-mail?
`
`Did Bose request any other components for headphones?
`
`What are they?
`
`
`Question No. 63.
`
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`Question No. 64.
`
`
`Mr. Sapiejewski requested microphones and headphones from Audio Technica.
`With regard to headphones, Mr. Sapiejewski wanted samples of the ATH-F3,
`ATH-F5 and the ATH-G5.
`
`
`
`Question No. 65.
`
`Directing your attention to ATUS RX-188C, are there references to the
`ATH-F3, ATH-F5 and the ATH-G5 headphones?
`
`
`
`10
`
`At RX-188C, production page number AT00008861, Mr. Balmer states, “There
`are two types of samples, 1) HD52A . . . and 2) HD 52B . . .” At production page
`numbers AT00008847–48, Roman Sapiejewski writes to Bill Balmer on October
`8, 1997 under the heading, 40mm driver. Basically, he states, “We are using
`these drivers for active noise cancellation communication headset” and that,
`“require[s] a high excursion and efficient driver.”
`
`

`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 66.
`
`
`Could you point out those references?
`
`In RX-188C at production page number AT00008864, Bill Balmer writes January
`9, 1998 that, “Bose is interested in possibly buying headphones from us. Bose
`has requested samples . . . [of] the ATH-F3 and ATH-F5. On production page
`number AT00008865, Balmer writes on April 23, 1998 to Ms.. Kurita at AT
`Japan, that Bose has requested samples of the ATH-G5.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 67.
`
` Yes
`
`Question No. 68.
`
`
`Did Audio-Technica send Bose the Audio Technica headphones?
`
`
`
`How do you know that?
`
`Let me show you what has been marked as RPX-15, and ask you to
`identify that Exhibit.
`
`RPX-15 is the ATH-F3 Headphone sent to Mr. Sapiejewski.
`
`Your honor Audio Technica offers into evidence RPX 15, which has
`been marked for identification as RPX 15.
`
`When do the e-mails show that Audio-Technica sent Mr. Sapiejewski
`these headphones?
`
`The e-mail communications show that Mr. Balmer sent the physical Audio
`Technica headphones to Mr. Sapiejewski.
`
`
`
`Question No. 69.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Offering Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 70.
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 71.
`
`The ATH-F3 and F-5 headphones were sent from Audio-Technica to Mr.
`Sapiejewski on 1/22/98, according to RX-188C e-mails dated January 13, 1998
`and January 22, 1998 from Mr. Balmer to Mr. Sapiejewski, production page
`numbers AT00008865–66.
`
`Directing your attention to the ATH-F3, (RPX 15). Could you please look
`at the back of the cushion from the ATH-F3. Are there any holes in the
`leatherette covering of these headphones?
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 72.
`
` Yes
`
`Outside of exchanging e-mails and receiving physical headphones, does
`RX-188C indicate that Mr. Sapiejewski had any additional contacts with
`Audio-Technica regarding this project?
`
`Yes, Mr. Sapiejewski and others from Bose travelled to Naruse, Japan to visit the
`factory where Audio-Technica headphones are made to see if the factory would
`be acceptable to make an OEM product for Bose.
`
`Question No. 73.
`
`
`According to RX-188C, when did this meeting take place?
`
`On production page number AT00008884 of RX-188C, there is an e-mail styled,
`“AT-J/Bose Meeting Notes” of the September 18, 1998 meeting with Bose at the
`Naruse factory.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 74.
`
`According to the meeting notes, who from Bose attended the meeting at
`the Audio-Technica headphone factory”
`
` Wayne Sauer, Joe Auclair, Bob Maresca, and Roman Sapiejewski.
`
`According to the meeting notes, were there Audio-Technica employees at
`the meeting also?
`
` Yes, a number of Audio-Technica employees were there also
`
`Question No.75.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 76
`
`According to the meeting notes, what headphone models did the meeting
`participants review?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 77.
`
` ATH-F3 and others.
`
`According to the meeting notes, what other matters were discussed at the
`September 18, 1998 meeting?
`
`The earpads of headphones, headbands, cable assemblies, drivers, including
`driver models HD30, HD22B, HD45, and HD52.
`
`12
`
`

`
`Question No. 78.
`
`According to the meeting notes, did Bose request any additional
`information from Audio—Technica at the end of the meeting?
`
`Yes, Bose asked for quotation on costs for providing components from the ATI-I—
`F3, including a headband, a cushion, a cup, and drivers.
`
`Please indicate whether or not the foregoing answers in your witness
`Question No. 79.
`statement contains your own answers to the questions posed to you.
`
`This witness statement contains my answers to the questions that were posed.
`
`WW
`
`Iac 1e
`
`reen
`
`$’/zz':/ds/
`
`Dated
`
`13
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 29, 2008 a copy of
`
`JACKIE GREEN’S DIRECT WITNESS STATEMENT SUBIVIITTED BY
`
`RESPONDENT AUDIO-TECHNICA, U.S. INC.
`
`was served on the following as indicated:
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via U. S. Mail
`
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via Electronic Docket Filing
`
`Via Hand Delivery (2 copies)
`Via U. S. Mail
`
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via U. S. Mail
`
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Facsimile
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via U. S. Mail
`
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Facsimile
`
`& D D D C
`
`]
`
`E E E
`
`l
`El
`El
`
`E E E
`
`l
`El
`D
`
`I‘
`
`Marilyn R. Abbott
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 112-F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`I
`
`The Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`U. S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`T. Spence Chubb, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U. S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U. S. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`

`
`D Via Hand Delivery
`Via U. S. Mail
`I:I Via Overnight Mail
`E] Via Electronic Mail
`I:I Via Facsimile
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell, Esq.
`Andrew R. Kopsidas, Esq.
`Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq.
`Charles Hieken, Esq.
`Gregory A. Madera, Esq.
`Adam J. Kessel, Esq.
`FISH &_ RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`1425 K Street, N.W.
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Counselfor Complainant Bose Corporation
`
`Alan Cope Johnston, Esq.
`G. Brian Busey, Esq.
`Cynthia Lopez Beverage, Esq.
`MORRISON FOERSATER LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`El Via Hand Delivery
`XI Via U. S. Mail
`D Via Overnight Mail
`D Via Electronic Mail
`[:1 Via Facsimile
`
`Counselfor Respondent Phitek Systems Limited,
`GN Netcom, Inc., Logitech Inc. and Creative
`Labs, Inc.
`
`.
`
`Dan Chapman, Esq.
`Mark Fassold, Esq.
`JACKSON WALKER LLP
`112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 2400
`San Antonio, TX 78205
`
`Counselfor Respondent Phitek Systems Limited,
`GNNetcom, Inc., Logitech Inc. and Creative
`
`Labs, Inc.
`
`Via Hand Delivery
`Via U. S. Mail
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`Via Facsimile
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Daniel Ebenstein, Esq.
`I:I Via Hand Delivery
`Abraham Kasdan, Esq.
`Via U. S. Mail
`Joseph Casino, Esq.
`CI Via Overnight Mail
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP
`El Via Electronic Mail
`90 Park Avenue
`E] Via Facsimile
`New York, NY 10016
`
`
`
`
`Counselfor Respondent Panasonic Corporation
`ofNorth America
`
` Via Hand Delivery
`
`Tom M. Schaumberg, Esq
`Via U. S. Mail
`Jamie D. Underwood, Esq.
`ADDUCI, MASTRANI & SCHAUMBERG LLP
`
`DEICIEEI
`
`Via Overnight Mail
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Via Facsimile
`
`1200 Seventh Street NW, Fifth Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`
`
`
`
` Counselfor Respondent Panasonic Corporation
`
`ofNorth America
`
`/‘/
`
`David E. Hedgepeth
`Paralegal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket