throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 12, attached are Complainants Bose Corporation’s (“Bose”)
`
`
`
`Objections to Respondents’ Combined Rebuttal Trial Exhibit List, including objections to
`
`rebuttal witness statements. Bose reserves the right to lodge additional objections to the extent
`
`Respondents’ submit additional supplemental trial exhibit lists.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
` /s/ Autumn J.S. Hwang
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Andrew R. Kopsidas
`Jeffrey R. Whieldon
`Autumn J.S. Hwang
`Steven A. Bowers
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1425 K Street, N.W.
`11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 29, 2008
`
`
`
`

`
`Gregory A. Madera
`Stephen A. Marshall
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`225 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 542-5070
`Facsimile: (617) 542-8906
`
`Jordan T. Fowles
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1717 Main Street
`Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 747-5070
`Facsimile: (214) 747-2091
`
`Attorneys for Complainant
`Bose Corporation
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Respondents’ Combined Rebuttal Trial Exhibit List – October 2, 2008
`Bose’s’ Objections – October 29, 2008
`
`
`
`EX. NO. DESCRIPTION
`RX-900C
`International Standard, ISO 4869-3, Acoustics-
`Hearing Protectors-Part 3: Measurements of
`insertion loss of earmuff type protectors using an
`acoustic test fixture
`RX-901 Marshall Buck’s Rebuttal Wintess
`Statement Marshall
`RX-902C Douglas Winker's Rebuttal Witness
`Statement
`Loudspeaker and Headphone
`Handbook, Third Edition, John
`Borwick, pg. 587-589
`Bose QC-1
`
`RX-903
`
`RX-43
`
`OBJECTION
`A, C, D, F, MIL, R
`
`See Attachment A
`
`See Attachment B
`
`A, D, I, L, R
`
`A, C, D, R, P
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
`A = authenticity, FRE 901
`C = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`D = document not produced during discovery
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`I = incomplete document, FED. R. EVID. 901
`O = improper opinion; FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`L = illegible (original or better copy required)
`MIL = subject to Motion In Limine
`P = all objections preserved
`R = relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`SW = sponsoring witness required
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`

`
`ATTACHMENT A TO COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST—COMPLAINANT
`BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RX-901: DR. MARSHALL BUCK REBUTTAL WITNESS STATEMENT
`
`
`Witness Statement Question/Response No.
`
`Bose’s Objections
`
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R
`
`5
`9
`12
`13
`15
`17
`22
`24
`25
`
`
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
` C
`
` = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`GR6 = expert opinion not previously disclosed per Ground Rule No. 6
`GR10.5.6 = beyond scope of expert report and deposition testimony per Ground Rule 10.5.6
`L = leading
`LC = Legal Conclusion
`M = misleading/mischaracterizes prior testimony
`MIL = subject to motion in limine
`NII = not in Investigation
`NT = new or additional testimony / information not in previous witness statement
`O = improper opinion, FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`R = lacks relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`S = speculation
`
`
`

`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`

`
`ATTACHMENT B TO COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST—COMPLAINANT
`BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RX-902C: DR. DOUGLAS WINKER REBUTTAL WITNESS STATEMENT
`
`
`Witness Statement Question/Response No.
`
`Bose’s Objections
`
`M; O
`C; F; M; LC; O; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`M; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`M; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`15
`16
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22/23 [sic]
`24
`25
`26
`27
`29
`30
`31
`33
`34
`35
`36
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
` C
`
` = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`GR6 = expert opinion not previously disclosed per Ground Rule No. 6
`GR10.5.6 = beyond scope of expert report and deposition testimony per Ground Rule 10.5.6
`L = leading
`LC = Legal Conclusion
`M = misleading/mischaracterizes prior testimony
`MIL = subject to motion in limine
`NII = not in Investigation
`NT = new or additional testimony / information not in previous witness statement
`O = improper opinion, FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`R = lacks relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`S = speculation
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on October 29, 2008, a copy of
`
`COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENTS’
`COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST
`
`_________________
`was served on the following as indicated:
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`Marilyn R. Abbott
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 112-F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`Christopher Paulraj, Esq.
`T. Spence Chubb, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 404-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`
`
`
`
`William B. Nash, Esq.
`Daniel D. Chapman, Esq.
`Mark Fassold, Esq.
`Jackson Walker L.L.P.
`112 E. Pecan Street., Suite 2400
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`Alan Cope Johnston, Esq.
`G. Brian Busey, Esq.
`Cynthia Lopez Beverage, Esq.
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 5500
`Washington, DC 20006-1888
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`James P. White, Esq.
`J. Aron Carnahan, Esq.
`Welsh & Katz, Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`Arthur Wineburg, Esq.
`Daniel E. Yonan, Esq.
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
`1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`/s/ Patrick Edelin, Jr.
`
`Patrick Edelin, Jr.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`Daniel Ebenstein, Esq.
`Abraham Kasdan, Esq.
`Joseph Casino, Esq.
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America
`
`
`Tom M. Schaumberg, Esq.
`Jamie D. Underwood, Esq.
`Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP
`1200 Seventh Street, N.W., Fifth Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket