`
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436
`
`Before Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN NOISE CANCELLING
`HEADPHONES
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-626
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 12, attached are Complainants Bose Corporation’s (“Bose”)
`
`
`
`Objections to Respondents’ Combined Rebuttal Trial Exhibit List, including objections to
`
`rebuttal witness statements. Bose reserves the right to lodge additional objections to the extent
`
`Respondents’ submit additional supplemental trial exhibit lists.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
` /s/ Autumn J.S. Hwang
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Andrew R. Kopsidas
`Jeffrey R. Whieldon
`Autumn J.S. Hwang
`Steven A. Bowers
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1425 K Street, N.W.
`11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 29, 2008
`
`
`
`
`
`Gregory A. Madera
`Stephen A. Marshall
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`225 Franklin Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 542-5070
`Facsimile: (617) 542-8906
`
`Jordan T. Fowles
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1717 Main Street
`Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 747-5070
`Facsimile: (214) 747-2091
`
`Attorneys for Complainant
`Bose Corporation
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondents’ Combined Rebuttal Trial Exhibit List – October 2, 2008
`Bose’s’ Objections – October 29, 2008
`
`
`
`EX. NO. DESCRIPTION
`RX-900C
`International Standard, ISO 4869-3, Acoustics-
`Hearing Protectors-Part 3: Measurements of
`insertion loss of earmuff type protectors using an
`acoustic test fixture
`RX-901 Marshall Buck’s Rebuttal Wintess
`Statement Marshall
`RX-902C Douglas Winker's Rebuttal Witness
`Statement
`Loudspeaker and Headphone
`Handbook, Third Edition, John
`Borwick, pg. 587-589
`Bose QC-1
`
`RX-903
`
`RX-43
`
`OBJECTION
`A, C, D, F, MIL, R
`
`See Attachment A
`
`See Attachment B
`
`A, D, I, L, R
`
`A, C, D, R, P
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
`A = authenticity, FRE 901
`C = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`D = document not produced during discovery
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`I = incomplete document, FED. R. EVID. 901
`O = improper opinion; FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`L = illegible (original or better copy required)
`MIL = subject to Motion In Limine
`P = all objections preserved
`R = relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`SW = sponsoring witness required
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT A TO COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST—COMPLAINANT
`BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RX-901: DR. MARSHALL BUCK REBUTTAL WITNESS STATEMENT
`
`
`Witness Statement Question/Response No.
`
`Bose’s Objections
`
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; M; MIL; O; R
`C; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R
`
`5
`9
`12
`13
`15
`17
`22
`24
`25
`
`
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
` C
`
` = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`GR6 = expert opinion not previously disclosed per Ground Rule No. 6
`GR10.5.6 = beyond scope of expert report and deposition testimony per Ground Rule 10.5.6
`L = leading
`LC = Legal Conclusion
`M = misleading/mischaracterizes prior testimony
`MIL = subject to motion in limine
`NII = not in Investigation
`NT = new or additional testimony / information not in previous witness statement
`O = improper opinion, FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`R = lacks relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`S = speculation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT B TO COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST—COMPLAINANT
`BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO
`RX-902C: DR. DOUGLAS WINKER REBUTTAL WITNESS STATEMENT
`
`
`Witness Statement Question/Response No.
`
`Bose’s Objections
`
`M; O
`C; F; M; LC; O; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`M; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`M; S
`C; F; GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O; R; S
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`C; MIL; O, R, S
`GR6; GR10.5.6; MIL; O
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`15
`16
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22/23 [sic]
`24
`25
`26
`27
`29
`30
`31
`33
`34
`35
`36
`
`KEY TO OBJECTIONS
`
` C
`
` = confusing, cumulative, waste of time, unduly prejudicial, FED. R. EVID. 403
`F = lacks foundation/lacks personal knowledge/speculative, FED. R. EVID. 602
`GR6 = expert opinion not previously disclosed per Ground Rule No. 6
`GR10.5.6 = beyond scope of expert report and deposition testimony per Ground Rule 10.5.6
`L = leading
`LC = Legal Conclusion
`M = misleading/mischaracterizes prior testimony
`MIL = subject to motion in limine
`NII = not in Investigation
`NT = new or additional testimony / information not in previous witness statement
`O = improper opinion, FED. R. EVID. 701/702
`R = lacks relevance, FED. R. EVID. 401/402
`
`H = hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 802
`S = speculation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on October 29, 2008, a copy of
`
`COMPLAINANT BOSE CORPORATION’S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENTS’
`COMBINED REBUTTAL TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST
`
`_________________
`was served on the following as indicated:
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`Marilyn R. Abbott
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 112-F
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Charles E. Bullock
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`Christopher Paulraj, Esq.
`T. Spence Chubb, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 404-I
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`William B. Nash, Esq.
`Daniel D. Chapman, Esq.
`Mark Fassold, Esq.
`Jackson Walker L.L.P.
`112 E. Pecan Street., Suite 2400
`San Antonio, TX 78209
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`Alan Cope Johnston, Esq.
`G. Brian Busey, Esq.
`Cynthia Lopez Beverage, Esq.
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 5500
`Washington, DC 20006-1888
`
`Counsel for Respondents Phitek Systems
`Limited, GN Netcom, Inc., Creative Labs, Inc.,
`and Logitech Inc.
`
`
`James P. White, Esq.
`J. Aron Carnahan, Esq.
`Welsh & Katz, Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL. 60606
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`Arthur Wineburg, Esq.
`Daniel E. Yonan, Esq.
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
`1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Audio Technica U.S.,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via U.S. Mail
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Docket Filing
` Not Served
`
`/s/ Patrick Edelin, Jr.
`
`Patrick Edelin, Jr.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`Daniel Ebenstein, Esq.
`Abraham Kasdan, Esq.
`Joseph Casino, Esq.
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America
`
`
`Tom M. Schaumberg, Esq.
`Jamie D. Underwood, Esq.
`Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP
`1200 Seventh Street, N.W., Fifth Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Counsel for Respondent Panasonic
`Corporation of North America