throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN MOBILE DEVICES, AND
`RELATED SOFTWARE
`
`Inv. N0. 337-TA-750
`(Remand)
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DETERMINATION NOT TO REVIEW AN INITIAL
`DETERMINATION GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE REMAND
`INVESTIGATION BASED ON A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT;
`TERMINATION OF REMAND INVESTIGATION
`
`AGENCY:
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`ACTION:
`
`Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined not to review the initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding Administrative Law
`Judge, granting the joint motion of complainant Apple Inc., f/k/a Apple Computer, lnc., of
`Cupertino, California (“Apple”) and respondent Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) of
`Libertyville, Illinois to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,
`telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this
`investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to
`5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Intemational Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
`S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General infonnation conceming the
`Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet sewer at httg://www.usitc.gov. The
`public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS)
`at httQ.'//edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can
`be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD tenninal on (202) 205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on
`November 30, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Apple. 75 Fed. Reg. 74081-82 (Nov. 30,
`2010). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
`U.S.C. § 1337 (“section 337”), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
`and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile devices and related
`software by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,812,828 (“the ‘828
`Patent”); 7,663,607 (“the ‘607 Patent”); and 5,379,430.
`
`The Commission’s notice of investigation named Motorola, Inc. n/k/a Motorola Solutions of
`Schaumburg, Illinois (“Motorola Solutions”) and Motorola as respondents. The Office of Unfair
`
`1
`
`

`
`Import Investigation was named as a participating party. The Commission subsequently
`terminated Motorola Solutions as a respondent based on withdrawal of allegations pursuant to
`Commission Rule 2l0.21(a)(l)
`(19 C.F.R. § 210.2l(a)(1)). Notice (Aug. 31, 2011).
`
`On January 13, 2012, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding no violation of section 337. On
`March 16, 2012, the Commission issued a notice, determining to review the ID in part, and on
`review, to affinn the ALJ’s determination of no violation and to terminate the investigation. 77
`Fed. Reg. 16860-62 (Mar. 22, 2012). On April 13, 2012, Apple timely appealed the
`Commission’s final determination of no violation of section 337 as to the ’607 and ’828 patents to
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On August 7, 2013, the Federal
`Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, and vacated-in-part the Commission’s decision and
`remanded for f11l'lIl'1€1‘proceedings. Apple, Inc. v. Int’! Trude Comm
`725 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir.
`2013). On September 6, 2013, intervenor Motorola filed a combined petition for panel rehearing
`and rehearing en banc concerning the panel’s holding that the Commission failed to consider
`secondary considerations in finding claim 10 of the ’607 patent invalid for obviousness. On
`November 8, 2013, the Court denied the petition. The mandate issued on November 15, 2013,
`returning jurisdiction to the Commission.
`
`On May 6, 2014, the Commission issued a Notice and Order remanding the investigation
`for an ALJ to make certain findings concerning infringement, validity, and domestic industry with
`respect to the ’607 and ’828 patents. 79 Fed. Reg. 26993-95 (May 12, 2014).
`
`On May 22, 2014, Apple and Motorola filed a joint motion to terminate the remand
`investigation based on a settlement agreement reached between Apple and MotoroIa’s parent
`company, Google Inc. On May 27, 2014, the Commission investigative attomey filed a response
`not opposing the termination.
`
`On May 28, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the joint motion for termination
`pursuant to section 210.2l(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. No petitions
`for review were filed.
`
`The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
`
`The authority for the Commission's detennination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff
`Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in Part 210 ofthe Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. Part 210).
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Issued: June 16, 2014
`
`7@@
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`2
`
`

`
`CERTAIN MOBILE DEVICES AND RELATED SOFTWARE
`
`Inv. N0. 337-TA-750
`(Remand)
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served by hand
`upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Lisa M. Kattan, Esq., and the following parties as
`indicatedon June 16, 2014.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`. ,
`,
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainant Agple Inc.:
`
`Brian E. Ferguson, Esq.
`WEIL, GOTSHALL & MANGES LLP
`1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Motorola Mobility; Inc.:
`
`Charles F. Schill, Esq.
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`Other­)'
`
`) Via Hand Delivery
`) Via Overnight Delivery
`) Via First Class Mail
`
`) Via Hand Delivery
`) Via Overnight Delivery
`) Via First Class Mail
`) Other:

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket