throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2192-5, PageID.39776 Filed 03/17/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2192-5, PageID.39777 Filed 03/17/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`
`IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`No. 12-md-02311
`Hon. Sean F. Cox
`
`______________________________________________________________________________
`IN RE : HEATER CONTROL PANELS
`Case No. 2:12-cv-00403
`IN RE : OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS
`Case No. 2:12-cv-00603
`IN RE : SWITCHES
`Case No. 2:13-cv-01303
`IN RE : IGNITION COILS
`Case No. 2:13-cv-01403
`IN RE : STEERING ANGLE SENSORS
`Case No. 2:13-cv-01603
`IN RE : ELECTRIC POWERED STEERING ASSEMBLIES
`Case No. 2:13-cv-01903
`IN RE : FUEL INJECTION SYSTEMS
`Case No. 2:13-cv-02203
`IN RE : VALVE TIMING CONTROL DEVICES
`Case No. 2:13-cv-02503
`IN RE : AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS
`Case No. 2:13-cv-02703
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE CONSTANT VELOCITY
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02903
` JOINT BOOT PRODUCTS
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE HOSES
`IN RE : SHOCK ABSORBERS
`IN RE : BODY SEALING PRODUCTS
`
`Case No. 2:15-cv-03203
`Case No. 2:15-cv-03303
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03403
` 2:16-cv-10456
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03503
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03603
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03703
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03803
` 2:16-cv-11804
`Case No. 2:16-cv-03903
`Case No. 2:16-cv-04003
` 2:16-cv-12949
`Case No. 2:16-cv-04303
` 2:17-cv-11637
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`IN RE : INTERIOR TRIM PRODUCTS
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE HOSES
`IN RE : EXHAUST SYSTEMS
`IN RE : CERAMIC SUBSTRATES
`
`IN RE : POWER WINDOW SWITCHES
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE STEEL TUBES
`
`IN RE : SIDE-DOOR LATCHES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`End-Payor Actions
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`DECLARATION OF RYAN C. KOENIG IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
`ENFORCE END PAYOR SETTLEMENTS AND STRIKE CONTRADICTORY AND
`IMPROPER STIPULATION
`
`DocuSign Envelope ID: CE2AABBA-79E3-4F9E-BAC0-12701300F40F
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2192-5, PageID.39778 Filed 03/17/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`I, Ryan C. Koenig, declare as follows.
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I, Ryan C. Koenig, am employed as National Service Department Vendor
`
`Operations Manager at Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (“EFM”). In that role, I am fully
`
`familiar with the claim filed on EFM’s behalf in the class action litigation known as In re:
`
`Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2311 (E.D. Mich.) (“Auto Parts Matter”) by
`
`EFM’s authorized representative Crowell & Moring LLP. Unless otherwise indicated, I have
`
`personal knowledge of the matters stated in this declaration and, if called as a witness, could and
`
`would competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I make this declaration in support of EFM’s Motion to Enforce End Payor
`
`Settlements and Strike Contradictory and Improper Stipulation that was reached with Class
`
`Action Capital, Inc. (“CAC”) and certain other fleet management companies (“FMCs”).
`
`3.
`
`EFM is an FMC and filed its initial claim in this matter on November 12, 2019.
`
`The claim was supplemented on March 16, 2020, to include additional vehicles that had become
`
`eligible under subsequent settlements.
`
`4.
`
`EFM’s claimed vehicles were purchased new, not for resale, through dealerships
`
`in the United States.
`
`5.
`
`The vast majority of EFM’s lease agreements are open-ended Terminal Rental
`
`Adjustment Clause (“TRAC”) leases. A true and correct copy of EFM’s standard lease
`
`agreement is attached here at Exhibit 1.
`
`6.
`
`EFM’s standard lease includes terms consistent with EFM’s ownership of its
`
`vehicles and its customers’ rights to possession and use only:
`
` “Lessor is the sole legal owner of each Vehicle.” Ex. 1, ¶ 1.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`DocuSign Envelope ID: CE2AABBA-79E3-4F9E-BAC0-12701300F40F
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2192-5, PageID.39779 Filed 03/17/22 Page 4 of 4
`
` “This Agreement is a lease only and Lessee will have no right, title or interest in or
`to the Vehicles except for the use of the Vehicles as described in this Agreement.”
`Ex. 1, ¶ 1.
`
`
`
` “This Agreement shall be treated as a true lease for federal and applicable state
`income tax purposes with Lessor having all benefits of ownership of the Vehicles.”
`Ex. 1, ¶ 1.
`
` “Each Vehicle will be titled and licensed in the name designated by Lessor.” Ex. 1,
`¶ 6.
`
`7.
`
`EFM held title to each of its claimed vehicles for the entirety of its period of
`
`ownership, including during any lease of those vehicles to EFM customers.
`
` I
`
` certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 16th day of March, 2022, in Missouri.
`
`GDocuSigned by:
`
`~DJA, buu1
`
`25202FBDA628455
`
`By:
`
`
`
`Ryan C. Koenig
`National Service Department Vendor
`Operations Manager
`Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`DocuSign Envelope ID: CE2AABBA-79E3-4F9E-BAC0-12701300F40F
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket